TheGreatest
Footballguy
Dynasty Thoughts? Does he start at WLB next year? How good can he be?
shush....not too loud.Dynasty Thoughts? Does he start at WLB next year? How good can he be?
He's a congressman from Minnesota.shush....not too loud.Dynasty Thoughts? Does he start at WLB next year? How good can he be?![]()
He is really small but may have a shot at WLB b/c he is quick and instinctive. However, he has a huge physical hurdle to overcome and may not stay healthy for long. He is a possible starter but I imagine he'll get competition in camp, although there certainly aren't an abundance of able bodies in Buffalo. Check for news on his participation in the offseason program b/c he could use some good weight but the telling sign will be his competition come preseason.
Crowell will be either a will or a mike ... right?Bills LBs are completely in flux this offseason.If they lose Fletcher, they may move Crowell to MLB or they may try to find a replacement in free agency or the draft. They could also consider cutting Spikes. Really tough to figure out what Ellison's role will be until some of this stuff gets sorted out. Right now, however, I'd probably project the Bills to line up like this:WLB - Ellison; MLB - Crowell; SLB - Spikeswith Crowell/Spikes in the nickel as long as Spikes regains most of his quickness.
I think that's a pretty safe assumption, yes.Crowell will be either a will or a mike ... right?
I think that's a pretty safe assumption, yes.Crowell will be either a will or a mike ... right?
I'm still holding out hope that they bring back Fletcher, but I haven't really heard anything about players they might target to replace him.I think that's a pretty safe assumption, yes.Crowell will be either a will or a mike ... right?I'm hoping Buffalo doesn't pursue Kawika Mitchell (have he and Crowell on my dynasty). Has there been any talk of that Aaron?
Patrick Willis? But with McGahee gone they may pick Lynch.Here's a new article on the Bills defensive situation. Bills run defense needs help
I don't think I'd feel too safe with Ellison until after the draft. A solid WLB or MLB in the first two rounds, which is likely, will cut Ellison's value back down. And Walker is more of a penetrating tackle and not as good as he was two or three years ago. He'll help some given the slop that was playing in rotation there last season but not a huge amount.So, Spikes move on and the Ellison band wagon is picking up some speed here?![]()
Ellison's potential just picked up another upward spike, pending draft day of course. The addition of DT Walker is a real plus here....keeping the backers free to run to the ball.
Ellison is in the Bills plans for sure. Off-season reports were good, although I'm not convinced he's a better player than Cato June was. Bills didn't want to pay Clements and/or Fletcher and the deal they took for Spikes probably is just as much fear of his staying healthy/productive as hope for Ellison who would've started even with Spikes around.The LB group this year isn't rich in traditional prospects but there are all kinds of interesting undersized guys that would fit a Cover-2 scheme to be had in the early/middle rounds both inside and outside. A Jon Beason at the top of the second round or Rufus Alexander, etal a little later could kill Ellison's IDP value.Jene, I would agree, but maybe not so much this year. I'm not impressed with this LB class after Willis. I also have to think the Bills think more of Ellison than most of us seem to, or why let both LFB and Spikes go? There isn't much of anything left at LB in FA..... is Ellison better suited to be a SLB? I can see Ellison having decent value for at least this year, unless the Bills go for Willis. My gut tells me the Bills will address the RB situation early... trade up for AP, or down for Lynch, but one never knows with Marv. Trading down makes a ton of sense to me... take Lynch and then the next best LB with their next pick. In the meantime, I took a flyer on Ellison in one league for 4 league bucks... and a wing and a prayer.
Jene do you think Rufus Alexander will be a Lance Briggs in a couple of years?Ellison is in the Bills plans for sure. Off-season reports were good, although I'm not convinced he's a better player than Cato June was. Bills didn't want to pay Clements and/or Fletcher and the deal they took for Spikes probably is just as much fear of his staying healthy/productive as hope for Ellison who would've started even with Spikes around.The LB group this year isn't rich in traditional prospects but there are all kinds of interesting undersized guys that would fit a Cover-2 scheme to be had in the early/middle rounds both inside and outside. A Jon Beason at the top of the second round or Rufus Alexander, etal a little later could kill Ellison's IDP value.Jene, I would agree, but maybe not so much this year. I'm not impressed with this LB class after Willis. I also have to think the Bills think more of Ellison than most of us seem to, or why let both LFB and Spikes go? There isn't much of anything left at LB in FA..... is Ellison better suited to be a SLB? I can see Ellison having decent value for at least this year, unless the Bills go for Willis. My gut tells me the Bills will address the RB situation early... trade up for AP, or down for Lynch, but one never knows with Marv. Trading down makes a ton of sense to me... take Lynch and then the next best LB with their next pick. In the meantime, I took a flyer on Ellison in one league for 4 league bucks... and a wing and a prayer.
I'm no draftnik and I don't trust myself to make those kinds of determinations until I watch a player against NFL competition and hear what their coaches/teammates say about them.Lance Briggs is a very nice player and would probably succeed in any role in the NFL. He may be undersized but he hits hard, has good range and can cover. He's much more Will Witherspoon than Cato June. Alexander's scouting reports suggest he's probably somewhere in between the two and may end up as more of a system guy than one that can fit in every scheme as a WLB. But in a Tampa-2 scheme, he has the same IDP potential as any other WLB in that system.As we saw last year though, sometimes those guys don't translate well to the pros. Chad Greenway had a better scouting report but couldn't work his way ahead of EJ Henderson and Napoleon Harris before his injury.Jene do you think Rufus Alexander will be a Lance Briggs in a couple of years?
Interesting note here as Greenway is beginning to show up as an under rated player based on the likely hood that he starts for this outfit. Too much investment in him for him to be ridding the pine?Jene Bramel said:As we saw last year though, sometimes those guys don't translate well to the pros. Chad Greenway had a better scouting report but couldn't work his way ahead of EJ Henderson and Napoleon Harris before his injury.Jene do you think Rufus Alexander will be a Lance Briggs in a couple of years?
I really liked Greenway's situation in May. You don't draft a defensive player in the middle of the first round and not expect him to make an impact his first season. Especially last season, when the OLB depth was silly good. So it really raised flags for me when Greenway hadn't earned first team snaps after multiple mini-camps and a couple of weeks of training camp. He's on a short list of guys I really want to hear about in camp.Interesting note here as Greenway is beginning to show up as an under rated player based on the likely hood that he starts for this outfit. Too much investment in him for him to be ridding the pine?Jene Bramel said:As we saw last year though, sometimes those guys don't translate well to the pros. Chad Greenway had a better scouting report but couldn't work his way ahead of EJ Henderson and Napoleon Harris before his injury.Jene do you think Rufus Alexander will be a Lance Briggs in a couple of years?![]()