http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2007/09...ostgame-wrap-5/LaMont Jordan is 10 yards shy of the 434 yards he gained in nine games last season, but his back injury could be serious enough to take him out of action for awhile.
Following the game, Jordan needed crutches to walk because his lower back would not support his weight. He lowered himself into a chair next to Justin Fargas in the locker room and winced all the way down. He declined comment.
Well that sucks. His back is hurt so bad that he can't walk? Well the Raiders have a bye so two weeks rest will make him all better.![]()
After the way Fargas played yesterday?Well that sucks. His back is hurt so bad that he can't walk? Well the Raiders have a bye so two weeks rest will make him all better.![]()
Insert Dominic Rhodes.
Good point. But I think Miami may have given up shortly after he came in, if not before.Did you see those poor excuses for tackle attempts? Wow...just wow. And these guys get paid millions of dollars.After the way Fargas played yesterday?Well that sucks. His back is hurt so bad that he can't walk? Well the Raiders have a bye so two weeks rest will make him all better.![]()
Insert Dominic Rhodes.
If Jordan plays/is healthy, there's no RBBC.Hello RBBC. Jordan, Rhodes, Fargas.
:X Post #2 of this very thread.btw, does anyone know exactly what kind of back injuy Jordan has or had been struggling with?
Is it a muscular thing or a vertebrae thing or what? Lower back? upper back? All I've ever heard about this injury is that it's his back, but I've never seen it specified anywhere what kind of injury it is.
Couch Potato (lives near Oakland) stated Jordan hurt his back originally in a pick up softball game during training camp swinging a bat, but had seemed to not have any real problems with it since training camp.ok, lower back. That's a start.If this is the same injury he struggled with last year, I'm starting to worry that it could be some kind of slow healing chronic thing...but I'm no doctor so that's pure speculation.
Exactly. It's either the Lamont Jordan show or he's in street clothes. If he can suit up he's the primary ball carrier. If not, Rhodes and Fargas are going to spit somehow. With the versatility that Culp brings to the offense, I could see the running game thriving even without Jordan.If Jordan plays/is healthy, there's no RBBC.Hello RBBC. Jordan, Rhodes, Fargas.
I agree that Jordan is unlikely to be an RBBC member; he's healthy and the workhorse, or injured and out.I think the RBBC would likely be three backs; in the Jordan-out scenario the team would probably activate Echemandu, unless Fargas proves that this week wasn't a fluke (which it was).Exactly. It's either the Lamont Jordan show or he's in street clothes. If he can suit up he's the primary ball carrier. If not, Rhodes and Fargas are going to spit somehow.If Jordan plays/is healthy, there's no RBBC.Hello RBBC. Jordan, Rhodes, Fargas.
22 Carries for 179 yards says different.Fargas isn't nearly durable enough to carry the load himself.
As noted earlier, Miami's D was completely ineffective. Also note that I am not saying Fargas doesn't have talent, simply that he has shown that he can't take the punishment a feature back receives.22 Carries for 179 yards says different.Fargas isn't nearly durable enough to carry the load himself.
When has he shown that?As noted earlier, Miami's D was completely ineffective. Also note that I am not saying Fargas doesn't have talent, simply that he has shown that he can't take the punishment a feature back receives.22 Carries for 179 yards says different.Fargas isn't nearly durable enough to carry the load himself.
Judging by the way Jordan left the field, and everything we've heard since the injury, I don't think you can count on him being the same all year. How does a lower back injury NOT get aggravated - RBs take so many hits, it seems like he'll just be a ticking time bomb - not to mention that when your back is out of whack, nothing seems to work right. I would be trying to work the trade angle hard right now before worse news comes out.
Based on what? This is what I didn't want this thread to turn into--a bunch of speculation. This site used to be a great source for injury updates, etc. It is still great for info, but on issues like this it becomes nearly impossible to get and factual info. Unless you're a doctor then people aren't asking for opinions. What happens with opinions on this board is that they get turned into facts in other threads. As a doctor, I can tell you that what I have read from the team(which is in post #2 of this thread) this does not sound just muscular. I'd like to know of any studies he has had done--xrays, MRI, etc.Sorry for the rant. Any updates?Upside is they hopefully wont rush Jordan back. I agree this injury isnt something you can play through or shake off- he needs some rest and trainer work.
Except that Rhodes sucks, so he'll be equalled or outperformed by the other backs on the roster.Dominic Rhodes was brought in for a reason. Management didn't like what they saw last year so they brought in Rhodes as insurance and now he will have an opportunity to showcase his skills and the reason they brought him in. I think Rhodes will get the majority of the carries if Jordan is out.
By getting dinged up his entire career.And one game of 22 carries doesn't say different. It is just one game. Carrying the load is 20 carries for multiple games. By the way, he pulled himself from the game after getting bashed by Darius in yesterday's game.Nothing I'd love more than for Fargas to turn into Terrell Davis. But this is a fantasy football discussion, and people are wondering if he can be the lead dog. Observers of Fargas' career in Oakland (heck, in college), would mostly agree that he can't carry the ball 250+ times in a season.When has he shown that?As noted earlier, Miami's D was completely ineffective. Also note that I am not saying Fargas doesn't have talent, simply that he has shown that he can't take the punishment a feature back receives.22 Carries for 179 yards says different.Fargas isn't nearly durable enough to carry the load himself.
There is an intelligent response, based upon what? Going into the last preseason game he and Jordan were neck and neck for the starter job. He did not start in indy? He was behind Edge and split time with Addai, who happen to be well above average backs. When he has had a chance he taken advatage and while he is not a great back he has not exactly"sucked". Here are his #'sCAREER STATS RUSHING RECEIVING FUMBLES Stats Team G GS ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG TD FUM LOST 2001 Colts 15 10 233 1104 4.7 77 9 34 224 6.6 0 6 6 2003 Colts 11 0 37 157 4.2 25 0 6 62 10.3 1 0 0 2004 Colts 16 0 53 254 4.8 55 1 2 24 12.0 0 2 1 2005 Colts 13 1 40 118 3.0 24 4 12 88 7.3 0 2 2 2006 Colts 16 16 187 641 3.4 17 5 36 251 7.0 0 3 3 Career 71 27 550 2274 4.1 77 19 90 649 7.2 1 13 12 He probably will not be a stud but he has had similar #'s to JordanTeam G GS ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG TD FUM LOST 2001 Jets 16 0 39 292 7.5 46 1 7 44 6.3 1 0 0 2002 Jets 14 0 84 316 3.8 61 3 17 160 9.4 0 4 2 2003 Jets 16 0 46 190 4.1 39 4 11 101 9.2 0 0 0 2004 Jets 16 0 93 479 5.2 33 2 15 112 7.5 0 1 0 2005 Raiders 14 14 272 1025 3.8 26 9 70 563 8.0 2 2 1 2006 Raiders 9 8 114 434 3.8 59 2 10 74 7.4 0 1 1 2007 Raiders 4 4 84 424 5.0 33 2 12 128 10.7 0 0 0 Career 89 26 732 3160 4.3 61 23 142 1182 8.3 3 8 4 If Jordan was doing well I see no reason that Rhodes can not also given the opportunity.Except that Rhodes sucks, so he'll be equalled or outperformed by the other backs on the roster.Dominic Rhodes was brought in for a reason. Management didn't like what they saw last year so they brought in Rhodes as insurance and now he will have an opportunity to showcase his skills and the reason they brought him in. I think Rhodes will get the majority of the carries if Jordan is out.
unable to put weight on the lower back = not muscular.http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2007/09...ostgame-wrap-5/LaMont Jordan is 10 yards shy of the 434 yards he gained in nine games last season, but his back injury could be serious enough to take him out of action for awhile.
Following the game, Jordan needed crutches to walk because his lower back would not support his weight. He lowered himself into a chair next to Justin Fargas in the locker room and winced all the way down. He declined comment.
What exactly was the nature of his injury last year - I keep hearing that he had back issues last year, but never anything more specific than that.Ni?If this is the same injury he struggled with last year, I'm starting to worry that it could be some kind of slow healing chronic thing...but I'm no doctor so that's pure speculation.
Based upon the fact that in the past two years, playing in one of the best offenses in the league, he averaged 3.0 and 3.4 ypc, while the feature backs averaged 4.2 and 4.8. And based on the fact that, during pre-season, he consistently looked to initiate contact and go down, which led to him averaging 2.4 ypc against defensive scrubs.My guess based on info available today:Jordan sits in week 6. Rhodes gets 15 carries for 35 yards, Fargas gets 10 carries for 38 yards, Echemandu gets 5 carries for 25 yards, and the coaching staff has some tough questions on their hands.There is an intelligent response, based upon what? Going into the last preseason game he and Jordan were neck and neck for the starter job.Except that Rhodes sucks, so he'll be equalled or outperformed by the other backs on the roster.Dominic Rhodes was brought in for a reason. Management didn't like what they saw last year so they brought in Rhodes as insurance and now he will have an opportunity to showcase his skills and the reason they brought him in. I think Rhodes will get the majority of the carries if Jordan is out.
I cut the stats out from the above quoted post as they were just too confusing (hint to all posters - use the "CODE" tag for large stat quotes - it helps clean it up)In particular I wanted to highlight the "he has had similar #'s to Jordan" argument for Rhodes as I've seen quite a few posters use it.There is an intelligent response, based upon what? Going into the last preseason game he and Jordan were neck and neck for the starter job. He did not start in indy? He was behind Edge and split time with Addai, who happen to be well above average backs. When he has had a chance he taken advatage and while he is not a great back he has not exactly"sucked". He probably will not be a stud but he has had similar #'s to JordanExcept that Rhodes sucks, so he'll be equalled or outperformed by the other backs on the roster.Dominic Rhodes was brought in for a reason. Management didn't like what they saw last year so they brought in Rhodes as insurance and now he will have an opportunity to showcase his skills and the reason they brought him in. I think Rhodes will get the majority of the carries if Jordan is out.
If Jordan was doing well I see no reason that Rhodes can not also given the opportunity.
Uh, Rhodes did it with the Colts while Jordan did it on the Jets and Raiders. Judging by their preseason performances with the first team, Jordan grossly outperformed Rhodes. My guess is RBBC until Jordan is healthy.BTW, the sleeper here is not Rhodes or Fargas. It's Adim Echimandu. He's the closest thing to Jordan's skill set on this roster and if he gets the opportunity, I think he will put up similar numbers.There is an intelligent response, based upon what? Going into the last preseason game he and Jordan were neck and neck for the starter job. He did not start in indy? He was behind Edge and split time with Addai, who happen to be well above average backs. When he has had a chance he taken advatage and while he is not a great back he has not exactly"sucked". Here are his #'sCAREER STATS RUSHING RECEIVING FUMBLES Stats Team G GS ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG TD FUM LOST 2001 Colts 15 10 233 1104 4.7 77 9 34 224 6.6 0 6 6 2003 Colts 11 0 37 157 4.2 25 0 6 62 10.3 1 0 0 2004 Colts 16 0 53 254 4.8 55 1 2 24 12.0 0 2 1 2005 Colts 13 1 40 118 3.0 24 4 12 88 7.3 0 2 2 2006 Colts 16 16 187 641 3.4 17 5 36 251 7.0 0 3 3 Career 71 27 550 2274 4.1 77 19 90 649 7.2 1 13 12 He probably will not be a stud but he has had similar #'s to JordanTeam G GS ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG TD FUM LOST 2001 Jets 16 0 39 292 7.5 46 1 7 44 6.3 1 0 0 2002 Jets 14 0 84 316 3.8 61 3 17 160 9.4 0 4 2 2003 Jets 16 0 46 190 4.1 39 4 11 101 9.2 0 0 0 2004 Jets 16 0 93 479 5.2 33 2 15 112 7.5 0 1 0 2005 Raiders 14 14 272 1025 3.8 26 9 70 563 8.0 2 2 1 2006 Raiders 9 8 114 434 3.8 59 2 10 74 7.4 0 1 1 2007 Raiders 4 4 84 424 5.0 33 2 12 128 10.7 0 0 0 Career 89 26 732 3160 4.3 61 23 142 1182 8.3 3 8 4 If Jordan was doing well I see no reason that Rhodes can not also given the opportunity.Except that Rhodes sucks, so he'll be equalled or outperformed by the other backs on the roster.Dominic Rhodes was brought in for a reason. Management didn't like what they saw last year so they brought in Rhodes as insurance and now he will have an opportunity to showcase his skills and the reason they brought him in. I think Rhodes will get the majority of the carries if Jordan is out.
I've never understood statments like "Hello RBBC", just because a guy gets hurt. More times than not, once the starter is healthy he gets same load he had before the injury. Now it may be RBBC between Rhodes and Fargas while Jordan is out, and that makes more sense.Exactly. It's either the Lamont Jordan show or he's in street clothes. If he can suit up he's the primary ball carrier. If not, Rhodes and Fargas are going to spit somehow. With the versatility that Culp brings to the offense, I could see the running game thriving even without Jordan.If Jordan plays/is healthy, there's no RBBC.Hello RBBC. Jordan, Rhodes, Fargas.
On the PUP list, can't do a thing until after 6 games. Beyond that, there's no info out there. Before the season, Bush was making noise about being ready to go, but I think the Raiders were planning to PUP him the day they drafted him.RE: Echemandu. Love to see it happen, he looked great in the preseason, but I dunno.Where's Michael Bush in all this? When he is ready to come back or does he realistically have no shot at doing so?
BUTIF Joe E got a shot man, I know this guy could be a consistent workhorse, I hope he gets a shot down the road.