this says he'll be in campIt seems as though Briggs might be skipping Bears mini-camp. He did not take his physcial according to the NFL Network.
May compete. While there is a little bit of FBG love around for Okwo, do any of you guys think he can beat Williams before Williams even gets his shot? He was drafted 25 spots higher than Williams, but the latter obviously has a year in the system. This link has Lovie saying:Michael Okwo May 8 09:13a
Brad Biggs, of the Chicago Sun-Times, reports Chicago Bears LB Michael Okwo may compete with LB Jamar Williams for the starting weakside linebacker position, if LB Lance Briggs does not play with the Bears.
At the same time, Lovie comments about their size (Owko 5-11, 232 / Williams 6-0, 234)“He’s what we’re looking for at that (weakside) linebacker position. He doesn’t have great size, but he has skill, good quickness, good speed, his change of direction is real good and he’s been a playmaker. We’re anxious to put him into the mix.”
These two seem very simliar but one of them has to win out eventually. OZ and Jene have previously been on record in this forum saying that Williams doesn't have the talent and would simply be a product of the system, likely a one-year filler at that. Conversely, everything on Okwo seems to suggest the kid can play so my money is on him to be this years' Keiaho.......which I'm sure means a lot since I've only ever read about Owko and never seen him play“They are (similar),” Smith said, “and that’s the prototype that we’re looking for at that position. Most of them are (close to) 6-feet. They have some defensive back skills as far as their movement and they have a little bit of strength.”
I'm on the lookout for places where you have to waste two roster spots on a position where nobody knows who'll win. In Zealots where it's possible to hold extra players between the rookie draft and the regular season, it makes sense to go for these situations. This one fits the bill - both players are cheap right now and the winner could be really valuable.So with Okwo now in town, it sounds like this what FBG IDPers should be doing:
1) Hold on to Jamar Williams for now in case Briggs does hold out for half the season (or traded).
2) Draft Okwo late to have Chicago's WLB when Briggs leaves at the end of the season if Williams is a dud.
May compete. While there is a little bit of FBG love around for Okwo, do any of you guys think he can beat Williams before Williams even gets his shot? He was drafted 25 spots higher than Williams, but the latter obviously has a year in the system. This link has Lovie saying:Michael Okwo May 8 09:13a
Brad Biggs, of the Chicago Sun-Times, reports Chicago Bears LB Michael Okwo may compete with LB Jamar Williams for the starting weakside linebacker position, if LB Lance Briggs does not play with the Bears.
At the same time, Lovie comments about their size (Owko 5-11, 232 / Williams 6-0, 234)“He’s what we’re looking for at that (weakside) linebacker position. He doesn’t have great size, but he has skill, good quickness, good speed, his change of direction is real good and he’s been a playmaker. We’re anxious to put him into the mix.”These two seem very simliar but one of them has to win out eventually. OZ and Jene have previously been on record in this forum saying that Williams doesn't have the talent and would simply be a product of the system, likely a one-year filler at that. Conversely, everything on Okwo seems to suggest the kid can play so my money is on him to be this years' Keiaho.......which I'm sure means a lot since I've only ever read about Owko and never seen him play“They are (similar),” Smith said, “and that’s the prototype that we’re looking for at that position. Most of them are (close to) 6-feet. They have some defensive back skills as far as their movement and they have a little bit of strength.”![]()
This just shows some people who post here have no clue as to what is going on in the football world..someone want to help him out.He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.
Thought I'd help you out chief. His post was from 2006. Your WelcomeThis just shows some people who post here have no clue as to what is going on in the football world..someone want to help him out.He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.
This just shows some people who post here have no clue as to what is going on in the football world.. someone want to help him out.He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.
No. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.KellysHeroes said:AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one
Meanwhile, Bears linebacker Lance Briggs, whom Chicago slapped with its franchise tag, will not be at his team's minicamp this week.
More disappointing to Chicago is this: Briggs continues to insist that he will not show up to the team without a long-term contract extension until the 10th week of the regular season. The 10th week is the latest possible date that Briggs could report this season and still become a free agent in 2008.
Briggs' absence will draw more attention that the Bears would rather not have. They were hoping he would be there. About two weeks ago, Bears head coach Lovie Smith said he assumed that Briggs would be at the mandatory minicamp, but if not, his team would make the adjustments it needed and go on from there.
It now looks like they could be without Briggs indefinitely. Briggs still wants a trade, and he believes Washington and Tampa Bay remain interested. Each team is more amenable to meeting his contract demands than Chicago, and though there are no active trade talks now, the linebacker hopes and believes they will heat up once training camp opens.
Briggs' absence no doubt will draw more attention to a situation that the Bears would rather have gone away. But there will be other headline makers at Chicago's camp.
I'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
I'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
This isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlinesI'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
Wishful thinking. They like Williams in Chicago and he has been in the system.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
Yeah there was a few articles around with this particular story a month ago. I thought something new may have come about since. Cheers thoughThis isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlinesI'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
![]()
Haven't really seen anything but them saying Okwo is much like Jamar Williams.chook said:Yeah there was a few articles around with this particular story a month ago. I thought something new may have come about since. Cheers thoughWarpig said:This isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlinesI'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
![]()
![]()
I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longtermRosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Rosenhaus doesn't always make the best moves - but realistically, Briggs can hold out. When it comes down to the carrot or the stick, I don't see Rosenhaus as a carrot user, so he'll use the stick. He's got a stick, and is using it.I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longtermRosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Briggs doesn't have any leverage. The Bears are not going to extend his contract and they know it. They aren't going to trade him. The Bears will easily win the division with or without Briggs. If he sat out, he would be playing when it mattered...the playoffs. I don't see the Bears being overly concerned about this situation. The only thing that will happen if he sits out is he will lose about 4-5 million dollars.Rosenhaus doesn't always make the best moves - but realistically, Briggs can hold out. When it comes down to the carrot or the stick, I don't see Rosenhaus as a carrot user, so he'll use the stick. He's got a stick, and is using it.I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longtermRosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Substitute TO for Briggs and you will see Roesenhaus' hardball tactics often hurt the players instead of helping them.I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longtermRosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
reread post 13 and check the references there.May be wishful thinking from a Williams ownerbcr8f said:Wishful thinking. They like Williams in Chicago and he has been in the system.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
Well of course. A few of my 37 LB'ers have to be in the top 40.I agree with Lovie. They are close and both in the mix.reread post 13 and check the references there.May be wishful thinking from a Williams ownerWishful thinking. They like Williams in Chicago and he has been in the system.It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!![]()
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Of course Rosenhaus is going to tell him to sit out. Rosenhaus doesn't lose any money if Briggs sits out. Briggs has nothing to gain by sitting out because the Bears are not going to give him a long term deal and he knows it. This is just talk now because it isn't costing him anything to talk now. It will cost a lot to sit out during the season, with no real benefit to it. It would be different if there was a possibility of the Bears offering him a long term deal, or if the money long term was an obstacle. But they don't want to sign him long term, so Briggs has no leverage at all.If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Trade him straight up for McIntosh.If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Bite your tongue! If the reports about McIntosh are true the 'Skins have a good young player who costs a hell of a lot less than Briggs does.Trade him straight up for McIntosh.If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.Trade him straight up for McIntosh.If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
...Ah, maybe McIntosh >> Okwo or Williams @WLB?? Chicago would just love a Briggs for McIntosh type deal. However, I seriously doubt that WAS would ever go for it if McIntosh is progressing as they say.Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.Trade him straight up for McIntosh.If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
During the trade debacle at the owners meetings it was rumored they were also interested in McIntosh."Chicago would love the Redskins' young linebacker Rocky McIntosh in the deal to play Briggs' weakside linebacker position. Trading Briggs would leave Chicago without a starting weakside LB. However, the Redskins sources contend they do not want to part with McIntosh, even though he'll either have to move positions or wait for an injury to Briggs if he is to get on the field over the next couple of years.Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.
A flickering glimmer of hope returns.(KFFL) John Mullin, of the Chicago Tribune, reports the agent for Chicago Bears LB Lance Briggs, Drew Rosenhaus, has approached the team with some ideas regarding a new deal that he hopes will interest the team. "We presented some concepts that we think will work for the Bears and for Lance," Rosenhaus said. Rosenhaus declined to elaborate on specifics.
So you want me to bring up old post from a yr ago before I post news about a playerNo. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one
No, coming back two months later with your follow up comment should be fine.So you want me to bring up old post from a yr ago before I post news about a playerNo. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one![]()