What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lance Briggs (1 Viewer)

msommer

Footballguy
I understand from previous posts that Lance is negotiating his future contract - are there any leaks yet on how it is going? Looking hard at Jamar Williams but I'd not be interested in him as a long term back up or if he is forced to take over from Hillenmeyer down the road.

 
Briggs contract negotiations broke down in April when he and agent Drew Rosenhaus (gulp) were asking for Urlacher money (more even).

Keep tabs on this situation for the long term picture at WLB.

Hillenmeyer was only re-signed to a one year deal, and im not sure he fits in the long term plans.

 
Williams would be hard pressed to become a quality will linebacker in the cover 2 system. I think that replacing Hillenmeyer at strongside will happen sooner rather than later but that would most likely be his future. Leon Joe is a decent option at will down the line but I see the Bears addressing this position in the draft or free agency next offseason if Briggs is not resigned.

 
There has been no talk of holding out from Briggs or Rosenhaus as of yet. He has one year left before becoming an unrestricted free agent.

 
boubucarow is right...the Jamar Williams talk is WAY overblown. I like a good sleeper as much as the next guy, but a good situation does not make a good player.

 
Williams can play all three positions, and has the skills to possibly stay on the field in passing down packages (long term). While he is not the automatic successor to briggs in the event that he leaves, he's certainly a player that would get a shot at the job, assuming his development goes well. I wouldnt anoint him the next big thing, but I certainly wouldnt dismiss him either.

 
It seems as though Briggs might be skipping Bears mini-camp. He did not take his physcial according to the NFL Network.

 
He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.

 
KFFL

Bears | L. Briggs practices with second unit

Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:19:16 -0700

Larry Mayer, of ChicagoBears.com, reports Chicago Bears LB Lance Briggs practiced with his teammates Friday, June 2 at the team's minicamp. "It was good to have our entire group on the football field," head coach Lovie Smith said following a two-hour practice. Briggs worked with the second team Friday behind LB Leon Joe. "We have a starting rotation," Smith said. "In order to be at the top of the starting rotation, you have to be here. So that's how it is. Leon Joe worked with the ones at the linebacker position and we'll go from there."

 
FBG Bolgger

LB J. Williams Put On IR

Yahoo.com - [Full Article]

The Chicago Bears placed rookie LB Jamar Williams on the IR Tuesday after hurting his shouldler during Sunday's game at Minnesota. LB Rod Wilson was signed from the practice squad to replace him.

 
So with Okwo now in town, it sounds like this what FBG IDPers should be doing:

1) Hold on to Jamar Williams for now in case Briggs does hold out for half the season (or traded).

2) Draft Okwo late to have Chicago's WLB when Briggs leaves at the end of the season if Williams is a dud.

Michael Okwo May 8 09:13a

Brad Biggs, of the Chicago Sun-Times, reports Chicago Bears LB Michael Okwo may compete with LB Jamar Williams for the starting weakside linebacker position, if LB Lance Briggs does not play with the Bears.
May compete. While there is a little bit of FBG love around for Okwo, do any of you guys think he can beat Williams before Williams even gets his shot? He was drafted 25 spots higher than Williams, but the latter obviously has a year in the system. This link has Lovie saying:

“He’s what we’re looking for at that (weakside) linebacker position. He doesn’t have great size, but he has skill, good quickness, good speed, his change of direction is real good and he’s been a playmaker. We’re anxious to put him into the mix.”
At the same time, Lovie comments about their size (Owko 5-11, 232 / Williams 6-0, 234)
“They are (similar),” Smith said, “and that’s the prototype that we’re looking for at that position. Most of them are (close to) 6-feet. They have some defensive back skills as far as their movement and they have a little bit of strength.”
These two seem very simliar but one of them has to win out eventually. OZ and Jene have previously been on record in this forum saying that Williams doesn't have the talent and would simply be a product of the system, likely a one-year filler at that. Conversely, everything on Okwo seems to suggest the kid can play so my money is on him to be this years' Keiaho.......which I'm sure means a lot since I've only ever read about Owko and never seen him play :cry:

 
So with Okwo now in town, it sounds like this what FBG IDPers should be doing:

1) Hold on to Jamar Williams for now in case Briggs does hold out for half the season (or traded).

2) Draft Okwo late to have Chicago's WLB when Briggs leaves at the end of the season if Williams is a dud.

Michael Okwo May 8 09:13a

Brad Biggs, of the Chicago Sun-Times, reports Chicago Bears LB Michael Okwo may compete with LB Jamar Williams for the starting weakside linebacker position, if LB Lance Briggs does not play with the Bears.
May compete. While there is a little bit of FBG love around for Okwo, do any of you guys think he can beat Williams before Williams even gets his shot? He was drafted 25 spots higher than Williams, but the latter obviously has a year in the system. This link has Lovie saying:

“He’s what we’re looking for at that (weakside) linebacker position. He doesn’t have great size, but he has skill, good quickness, good speed, his change of direction is real good and he’s been a playmaker. We’re anxious to put him into the mix.”
At the same time, Lovie comments about their size (Owko 5-11, 232 / Williams 6-0, 234)
“They are (similar),” Smith said, “and that’s the prototype that we’re looking for at that position. Most of them are (close to) 6-feet. They have some defensive back skills as far as their movement and they have a little bit of strength.”
These two seem very simliar but one of them has to win out eventually. OZ and Jene have previously been on record in this forum saying that Williams doesn't have the talent and would simply be a product of the system, likely a one-year filler at that. Conversely, everything on Okwo seems to suggest the kid can play so my money is on him to be this years' Keiaho.......which I'm sure means a lot since I've only ever read about Owko and never seen him play :D
I'm on the lookout for places where you have to waste two roster spots on a position where nobody knows who'll win. In Zealots where it's possible to hold extra players between the rookie draft and the regular season, it makes sense to go for these situations. This one fits the bill - both players are cheap right now and the winner could be really valuable.

Any others out there? Last year I lucked out with SJones/BPool and flopped with Kiel/Hart. I still like the idea since you can often get these guys off the scrap heap or late in the rookie draft.

 
He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.
This just shows some people who post here have no clue as to what is going on in the football world..someone want to help him out.

 
He did end up reporting to mini-camp but Thomas Jones and Briggs are in sketchy situations with the team right now. I don't think there will be a problem come Week 1 but it is worth keeping an eye on.
This just shows some people who post here have no clue as to what is going on in the football world..someone want to help him out.
Thought I'd help you out chief. His post was from 2006. Your Welcome

 
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...

why bring this back then..

Just start a new one

 
KellysHeroes said:
AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one
No. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.
 
FWIW, from Schefter today. Nothing overly new.

Meanwhile, Bears linebacker Lance Briggs, whom Chicago slapped with its franchise tag, will not be at his team's minicamp this week.

More disappointing to Chicago is this: Briggs continues to insist that he will not show up to the team without a long-term contract extension until the 10th week of the regular season. The 10th week is the latest possible date that Briggs could report this season and still become a free agent in 2008.

Briggs' absence will draw more attention that the Bears would rather not have. They were hoping he would be there. About two weeks ago, Bears head coach Lovie Smith said he assumed that Briggs would be at the mandatory minicamp, but if not, his team would make the adjustments it needed and go on from there.

It now looks like they could be without Briggs indefinitely. Briggs still wants a trade, and he believes Washington and Tampa Bay remain interested. Each team is more amenable to meeting his contract demands than Chicago, and though there are no active trade talks now, the linebacker hopes and believes they will heat up once training camp opens.

Briggs' absence no doubt will draw more attention to a situation that the Bears would rather have gone away. But there will be other headline makers at Chicago's camp.
 
June 26, 2007, per Len Pasquarelli, ESPN

Bears Holding Firm With LB Briggs

FBG News Blogger Summary:

Even though the Chicago Bears have recently signed cornerback Nathan Vasher to a 5-year, $28 million contract extension and it is believed they have offered a similar deal to CB Charles Tillman, there has been no change in the teams negotiating stance with disgruntled linebacker Lance Briggs. Chicago has not budged from a one-year qualifying offer for their franchise linebacker, a tender that carries a price tag of $7.206 million. A much more pressing priority for the Bears is a long-term extension for defensive tackle Tommie Harris, who has 2 years remaining on his rookie deal signed in 2004.

 
It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
I'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.
:link: ?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
This isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlines

:lol:

 
It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
I'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.
:link: ?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
This isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlines

:mellow:
Yeah there was a few articles around with this particular story a month ago. I thought something new may have come about since. Cheers though :thumbup:
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.

 
chook said:
Warpig said:
It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
I'm hoping so. But I'm not too optimistic. There have been several articles stating how well Williams has looked in the WLB spot while running with the first unit.
:bag: ?That link guy has too much of an angry face.
This isn't the link I read when I posted my message, but this is from the Chicago Tribune and it is actually a little more informative than the one I read.Link - http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...bears-headlines

:hey:
Yeah there was a few articles around with this particular story a month ago. I thought something new may have come about since. Cheers though :lmao:
Haven't really seen anything but them saying Okwo is much like Jamar Williams.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longterm
Rosenhaus doesn't always make the best moves - but realistically, Briggs can hold out. When it comes down to the carrot or the stick, I don't see Rosenhaus as a carrot user, so he'll use the stick. He's got a stick, and is using it.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
I can't understand how they feel this will help Briggs longterm
Rosenhaus doesn't always make the best moves - but realistically, Briggs can hold out. When it comes down to the carrot or the stick, I don't see Rosenhaus as a carrot user, so he'll use the stick. He's got a stick, and is using it.
Briggs doesn't have any leverage. The Bears are not going to extend his contract and they know it. They aren't going to trade him. The Bears will easily win the division with or without Briggs. If he sat out, he would be playing when it mattered...the playoffs. I don't see the Bears being overly concerned about this situation. The only thing that will happen if he sits out is he will lose about 4-5 million dollars.
 
It's all about Okwo at the WLB in Chicago!
Wishful thinking. They like Williams in Chicago and he has been in the system.
reread post 13 and check the references there.May be wishful thinking from a Williams owner :)
Well of course. A few of my 37 LB'ers have to be in the top 40.I agree with Lovie. They are close and both in the mix.

He has a lot of talent,” Smith said. “He’s what we’re looking for at that (weakside) linebacker position. He doesn’t have great size, but he has skill, good quickness, good speed, his change of direction is real good and he’s been a playmaker. We’re anxious to put him into the mix.”

Starting nine games last season as a senior, Okwo registered 95 tackles, five tackles for loss and two sacks.

The 5-11, 232-pounder compares favorably with 2006 fourth-round pick Jamar Williams, a 6-foot, 234-pounder who missed the final 13 games of his rookie season with a ruptured pectoral muscle.

“They are (similar),” Smith said, “and that’s the prototype that we’re looking for at that position. Most of them are (close to) 6-feet. They have some defensive back skills as far as their movement and they have a little bit of strength.”

 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
Of course Rosenhaus is going to tell him to sit out. Rosenhaus doesn't lose any money if Briggs sits out. Briggs has nothing to gain by sitting out because the Bears are not going to give him a long term deal and he knows it. This is just talk now because it isn't costing him anything to talk now. It will cost a lot to sit out during the season, with no real benefit to it. It would be different if there was a possibility of the Bears offering him a long term deal, or if the money long term was an obstacle. But they don't want to sign him long term, so Briggs has no leverage at all.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
Trade him straight up for McIntosh.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
Trade him straight up for McIntosh.
Bite your tongue! If the reports about McIntosh are true the 'Skins have a good young player who costs a hell of a lot less than Briggs does.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
Trade him straight up for McIntosh.
Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.
 
Rosenhaus talking about Briggs on SportsCenter right now. Sounds pretty legit on the holdout if the Bears don't come up with the money.
That was just "agent speak". Personally, I believe Briggs will be there in week 1.
If Briggs doesn't hold out into the regular season, he and Rosenhaus lose a lot of credibility and future leverage. Briggs may not care as this may be his last huge contract extension, but I would guess that unless the Bears budge, Rosenhaus will strongly discourage Briggs from ending his holdout earlier than the first few weeks into the season.
Trade him straight up for McIntosh.
Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.
...Ah, maybe McIntosh >> Okwo or Williams @WLB?? Chicago would just love a Briggs for McIntosh type deal. However, I seriously doubt that WAS would ever go for it if McIntosh is progressing as they say.
 
Haven't the Bears drafted a potential Briggs replacement the last two years (Williams and Okwo)? I wouldn't understand if they were to bring in ANOTHER LB...unless McIntosh were to be Hillenmeyer's replacement. But I think Hillenmeyer plays his role sufficiently.
During the trade debacle at the owners meetings it was rumored they were also interested in McIntosh."Chicago would love the Redskins' young linebacker Rocky McIntosh in the deal to play Briggs' weakside linebacker position. Trading Briggs would leave Chicago without a starting weakside LB. However, the Redskins sources contend they do not want to part with McIntosh, even though he'll either have to move positions or wait for an injury to Briggs if he is to get on the field over the next couple of years.

One Redskins official said that, despite the logjam, they view McIntosh as a good young player who has too much upside to part with. Perhaps one option would be for the Redskins to include McIntosh but then ask Chicago for more as well to even it out a bit.

At this point, however, the two sides have hit a stalemate, putting them right back where they started before the NFL Owners Meeting last week in Phoenix.

Link

 
(KFFL) John Mullin, of the Chicago Tribune, reports the agent for Chicago Bears LB Lance Briggs, Drew Rosenhaus, has approached the team with some ideas regarding a new deal that he hopes will interest the team. "We presented some concepts that we think will work for the Bears and for Lance," Rosenhaus said. Rosenhaus declined to elaborate on specifics.
 
(KFFL) John Mullin, of the Chicago Tribune, reports the agent for Chicago Bears LB Lance Briggs, Drew Rosenhaus, has approached the team with some ideas regarding a new deal that he hopes will interest the team. "We presented some concepts that we think will work for the Bears and for Lance," Rosenhaus said. Rosenhaus declined to elaborate on specifics.
A flickering glimmer of hope returns.
 
AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one
No. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.
So you want me to bring up old post from a yr ago before I post news about a player :goodposting:
 
AhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhI knew there was a reason no one jumped on him...why bring this back then..Just start a new one
No. Too many people start threads without bothering to look up what has been said before on the topic, especially in this IDP forum.The thread on Arizona planning to move to a 3-4 was honda'd with Jene's original post only 4 or 5 threads below.
So you want me to bring up old post from a yr ago before I post news about a player :unsure:
No, coming back two months later with your follow up comment should be fine.
 
No link, but I saw on NFL total access in the news they said "The bears have initiated talks with Lance Briggs on a multiyear contract". Yesterday it was about Drew bringing it up and now it looks like the Bears are onboard. :thumbup:

 
Two Bears players told the Chicago Tribune they believe Lance Briggs, not agent Drew Rosenhaus, is leading the way in the linebacker's holdout.

The Trib believes Rosenhaus blinked first in the stalemate by offering a "new approach" in contract dealings. But if Briggs is indeed leading the holdout cause and serious about sitting out, Rosenhaus' blinking may not matter.

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...l=cs-columnists

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top