Yes. Absolutely. The guy plays on a high octane offense where he will get plenty of snaps this season and *only* posted what, 900+ yards and 10 TDs last season? Yes. Absolutely drop him after one game.Then watch him kill you when you play the guy that adds him without blinking an eye.R-E-L-A-X.I watched most of the game. Moore was definitely out there less than all of the other WRs.
what dont u guys understand. moore was barely in the game. i watched most of the game and he was mostly on the sidelines.puckalicious said:Would you be complaining if he'd caught those 2 targets that would have ended up as TDs? Shockey won't get 2 TDs every week.
Based on some of your fantasy football posts from the past, I'd probably suggest doing the opposite of whatever you think is the best idea.what dont u guys understand. moore was barely in the game. i watched most of the game and he was mostly on the sidelines.puckalicious said:Would you be complaining if he'd caught those 2 targets that would have ended up as TDs? Shockey won't get 2 TDs every week.
Do you honestly think Peterson will surpass LT in the next few years? I dont, and I wouldnt be able to look past a few years IMO.How many years of top 5 performance does LT have left in the tank though?If you believe in Peterson's talent, its a legitimate question. I understand the appeal of a proven commodity like LT, but you have to like the talent youth combo that Peterson has.I have Peterson in a couple of leagues. I'd move him for LT in the redrafts, but in my keep1 league, I think I'm going to roll with him for the next 5 or so years.at people who would take Peterson over LT in a dynasty format.
How is that even remotely possible in a 14 teamerJust scooped him off waivers in a 14 team ppr. Had not done any research on the situation at all as I had no inkling he would be dropped. I would rather have a solid piece of a great big, yummy pie (Moore) than an unknown piece of a crappy pie (Hixon)![]()

Dunno. Like I said, I pulled the trigger real fast without thinking about it. I really had no idea what Moore's situation was so I am trying to catch up now and figure out what his value is the rest of the year. I guess the other owner bought into the idea that he has dropped down to 3rd or 4th on the WR depth chart. The WR situation seems a bit murky for the Saints but he was still a 6th round pick in our draft. Could be a good scoop or he could end up being just another in a long line of mediocre WRs on my roster. Who knows. I definitely did not hesitate.How is that even remotely possible in a 14 teamerJust scooped him off waivers in a 14 team ppr. Had not done any research on the situation at all as I had no inkling he would be dropped. I would rather have a solid piece of a great big, yummy pie (Moore) than an unknown piece of a crappy pie (Hixon)![]()
![]()
Wow, only giving Colston a two week window to get hurt or Moore gets cut? I've heard of a short leash before, but geez.I know you didn't mean it that way, but it struck me as funny.I'm giving him one more week. If his targets don't rise considerably and Colston doesn't get hurt, he's waiver wire material next week.

Bingo.Thinking of cutting him after one or two outings is pretty much a confession that you over-valued him in your draft.I think the bottom line is that you have to hold onto him for what he is capable of in that offense. last year, he excelled when Bush and Colston were dinged. Plus, he's coming off labrum surgery......no need to rush him when you have colston, schockey, meacham, henderson, etc....Bring him out when some injuries strike their position players.....
So, one should wait to cut him before it is readily apparent he was overvalued? I'd rather cut a player (a/k/a confess that he was overvalued) than have him rot on my bench waiting to break out. Sometimes it is better to cut bait earlier while there are still decent options on the ww. The trick is knowing when to cut bait.Bingo.Thinking of cutting him after one or two outings is pretty much a confession that you over-valued him in your draft.I think the bottom line is that you have to hold onto him for what he is capable of in that offense. last year, he excelled when Bush and Colston were dinged. Plus, he's coming off labrum surgery......no need to rush him when you have colston, schockey, meacham, henderson, etc....Bring him out when some injuries strike their position players.....
You forgot the most important one. He played the leadt out of any of the WRsMoores problems in week one are due to a couple of reasons.1) he is a possession receiver. he runs the checkdown routes and finds the soft spot in the zone and gets the balls if the deep threat is covered.2) detroit wasnt able to cover the deep threat, so why would Brees look to the checkdown play? The deep threat was open all day, and he took what the defense gave him.3) Moore is also recovering from injury. While I dont think this played a huge part in the decision, I'm sure he was downgraded from the 2nd read to the third read on some plays to ease the wear & tear on him.against a better defense that can keep the deep guy covered, Moore will get more love. Just hold tight a week or two. You'll be fine.
Would you be complaining if he'd caught those 2 targets that would have ended up as TDs? Shockey won't get 2 TDs every week.
He catches everything thrown his way, Brees trusts him, they are working him back in...i wish you were in my league, drop him and clock how fast he gets scooped up!

You're right.But if you were that wrong about him a week ago, it's an admission that you may not know what you are doing, which means you may not know when to cut bait on him any better than you knew when to draft him. You may be swinging back to undervalueing him after overvalueing him at the draft.So, one should wait to cut him before it is readily apparent he was overvalued? I'd rather cut a player (a/k/a confess that he was overvalued) than have him rot on my bench waiting to break out. Sometimes it is better to cut bait earlier while there are still decent options on the ww. The trick is knowing when to cut bait.Bingo.Thinking of cutting him after one or two outings is pretty much a confession that you over-valued him in your draft.I think the bottom line is that you have to hold onto him for what he is capable of in that offense. last year, he excelled when Bush and Colston were dinged. Plus, he's coming off labrum surgery......no need to rush him when you have colston, schockey, meacham, henderson, etc....
Bring him out when some injuries strike their position players.....
Depends on the league and roster sizes. IMO he's dropable in leagues who only start two WR and/or with short rosters. He still has a great chance to be productive when he gets healthy compared to some of the waiver wire darlings of the last few weeks--he's a dependable target in a prolific offense. Plus, Bush, Shockey and Colston don't exactly have great histories when it comes to injury, and if one or more of those guys get hurt, his value shoots way up.With Moore's hamstring injury, is he dropable now?
I have dropped him. but the leagues I play in do not have much in the way of extra roster spots. There are starters and bye week players/backups and nothing more.I may look to pick him up again in 2 or 3 weeks. I think he will be out of the lineup at least that long and may take some time to find his way back into the lineup due to the depth the saints have at WR.With Moore's hamstring injury, is he dropable now?
I'm always hesitant to drop a player with his upside, but there are just too many red flags in his situation at the moment so I pulled the trigger. Perhaps more importantly, no one in my 12-team PPR league has even bothered to pick him up.I have dropped him. but the leagues I play in do not have much in the way of extra roster spots. There are starters and bye week players/backups and nothing more.I may look to pick him up again in 2 or 3 weeks. I think he will be out of the lineup at least that long and may take some time to find his way back into the lineup due to the depth the saints have at WR.With Moore's hamstring injury, is he dropable now?