What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Larry Johnson, An Update After Meeting (1 Viewer)

eefflrat

Footballguy
Wasn't he supposed to meet with the Chiefs regarding a settlement? If they agree with him they will release him, yet he is now saying he wants to play for them, and his beef with the tram was the old regime. Anybody think he sticks?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know enough of the details, so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't see why not. He still has a lot left (at least for a season or two of good, if not very good production) and Jamaal Charles needs to show he's ready to take his approach to football to the next level. Unless KC is just tired of his act and doesn't believe he's truly contrite or they don't want the constant PR hassle of what he did, then he's a guy I would want on my team. He may never be the fantasy stud he flashed for a couple of seasons, but he's still a dangerous player at his position.

And if they draft someone, are they comfortable going with Charles-Savage-Battle and draft pick?

 
I don't know enough of the details, so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't see why not. He still has a lot left (at least for a season or two of good, if not very good production) and Jamaal Charles needs to show he's ready to take his approach to football to the next level. Unless KC is just tired of his act and doesn't believe he's truly contrite or they don't want the constant PR hassle of what he did, then he's a guy I would want on my team. He may never be the fantasy stud he flashed for a couple of seasons, but he's still a dangerous player at his position. And if they draft someone, are they comfortable going with Charles-Savage-Battle and draft pick?
Kolby Smith is irrelevant in your opinion? I actually think he stands to benefit the most if LJ goes unless they draft a RB high (which I don't see).
 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.

 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.
I'm sure a lot of teams would like the player but very few if any can take the contract.
 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.
I'm sure a lot of teams would like the player but very few if any can take the contract.
Doesn't really seem all that bad actually. If you trade for him you pay 5.75 in 2009. $250,000 of the 6 million in 2010 is guaranteed. Two years at 11.75, not bad in todays NFL. If he's a turd you can part with him for 6 million total. From rotoworld:

pixel.gif
8/21/2007: Signed a six-year, $45.05 million contract. The deal contains $19 million guaranteed, including $12.5 million signing bonus. The first three years' base salaries are guaranteed, as is $250,000 of L.J.'s 2010 salary. 2009: $4.55 million (+ $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2010: $5 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2011: $5.3 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2012: $5.9 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2013: Free Agent. Cap charge: $7.596 million (2009).

 
I don't know enough of the details, so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't see why not. He still has a lot left (at least for a season or two of good, if not very good production) and Jamaal Charles needs to show he's ready to take his approach to football to the next level. Unless KC is just tired of his act and doesn't believe he's truly contrite or they don't want the constant PR hassle of what he did, then he's a guy I would want on my team. He may never be the fantasy stud he flashed for a couple of seasons, but he's still a dangerous player at his position. And if they draft someone, are they comfortable going with Charles-Savage-Battle and draft pick?
Kolby Smith is irrelevant in your opinion? I actually think he stands to benefit the most if LJ goes unless they draft a RB high (which I don't see).
was thinking the same thing.I think a Charles-Smith-Battle combo could be effective in the right offense. Charles getting most of the passing game work (which I expect there to be a lot), Smith being a 2 down back grinding it out, and Battle in SY/GL...seems like it could work to me. Kind of fits the Pioli MO as well.
 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.
I think Edge is due 5 million this year, so there is a good chunk of what LJ would be due once they release Edge. Boldins renegotiations will surely limit they cap space, but LJ for Edge give or take a million would be a steal. Not sure how you dont leave 8 in the box if LJ is healthy and has his head on straight. If would be fun to watch and Warner commands enough respect in the huddle that LJ would have to do his part, they have shown they wont hesitate to move a RB with a marquee name to the bench if he is not performing. Just seems like a great fit for both LJ and the Cards. The Cards window with Warner is 2 years which is what LJ probably has left at a high level. Just a homer wishing for the best!!
 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.
I think Edge is due 5 million this year, so there is a good chunk of what LJ would be due once they release Edge. Boldins renegotiations will surely limit they cap space, but LJ for Edge give or take a million would be a steal. Not sure how you dont leave 8 in the box if LJ is healthy and has his head on straight. If would be fun to watch and Warner commands enough respect in the huddle that LJ would have to do his part, they have shown they wont hesitate to move a RB with a marquee name to the bench if he is not performing. Just seems like a great fit for both LJ and the Cards. The Cards window with Warner is 2 years which is what LJ probably has left at a high level. Just a homer wishing for the best!!
I agree that Johnson to the Cards would be a very intriguing combination of player+good circumstances. The Chiefs' brass has been really lukewarm about keeping LJ on the team - he just got 2 years of probation for the 2 nightclub incidents last year, which combined with Johnson's one game suspension by the NFL is the basis for the Chiefs trying to wiggle out of the $3.75 million guaranteed money that they owe him (they claim his suspension violated the contract and nullified the guaranteed money). If the Chiefs win the arbitration, Johnson's contract would be extremely cheap for someone else to pick up/renegotiate with him.
 
I don't know enough of the details, so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't see why not. He still has a lot left (at least for a season or two of good, if not very good production) and Jamaal Charles needs to show he's ready to take his approach to football to the next level. Unless KC is just tired of his act and doesn't believe he's truly contrite or they don't want the constant PR hassle of what he did, then he's a guy I would want on my team. He may never be the fantasy stud he flashed for a couple of seasons, but he's still a dangerous player at his position. And if they draft someone, are they comfortable going with Charles-Savage-Battle and draft pick?
Kolby Smith is irrelevant in your opinion? I actually think he stands to benefit the most if LJ goes unless they draft a RB high (which I don't see).
Gianmarco, I'm not a big fan of Kolby Smith, but in all honest I just forgot about him. He could certainly be the guy instead of Battle, but to me Savage and Smith are guys that you root for, but lack that one skill that can keep them on the field for longer than it takes for either the big-time prospect to stand out or the starter to get healthy. Mark makes a good point about LJ going to the Cards. Fresh start. A bruiser for the coach with the Henning-Falcons/Redskins background as a player and Cowher-Steelers as a coach. Personnel-wise, it would give the Cards what they really need. You just never know what Bidwell will do...
 
Wouldn't Zona be a little timid about going after LJ? LJ is 29 now, turns 30 this year, and will bring a big contract along with him.

They just did that exact thing recently and that guy (Edge) is now the guy that they're already trying to get rid of.

 
May be old news, but I didn't see it here-

Source

It’s All Over in Kansas City for Larry Johnson

Posted by Digital Sports Daily on Apr 2nd, 2009 and filed under NFL. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry from your site

Sometimes news travels a bit slowly out of Kansas City, so it may come to non-Kansans as a surprise to learn that one time great Larry Johnson of the Cheifs will be released. Logic seems that some team will take a chance that he could be a viable 3rd down back somewhere, somebody will bring him into camp. The Indianapolis Colts would be interesting with Joseph Addai coming have a dissappointed injury filled year. But it is not Bill Polians style to bring in a Veteran at that position. From the Kansas City Star

The case between the Chiefs and running back Larry Johnson was heard Wednesday by a special master, but he made no ruling. Neither side was certain when a ruling would be given.

At issue is $3.75 million of guaranteed money Johnson is due from the Chiefs in the contract extension he signed in August 2007. The contract calls for $3.5 million of Johnson’s 2009 salary and $250,000 of his 2010 salary to be guaranteed regardless of whether he plays for them or not.

The Chiefs claim the one-game suspension he received from the NFL last year for violating the league’s personal-conduct policy is a breach of his contract and frees them from having to pay the guaranteed money.

A source familiar with the situation has said the Chiefs would probably release Johnson if they prevail, suggesting the team wouldn’t be going through the trouble if it didn’t intend to free him from his contract.

p.s. I wrote this article in less than 60 seconds, take that Buzz Bissinger

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm tired of LJ's antics and am certainly not one of his biggest fans, but he's got a lot more left than being a third-down back (which he wouldn't even be any good at anyway because he can't pass-block and is just a so-so receiver). His biggest problem is attitude, not mileage or ability. I wouldn't be surprised if he signed for a competitor and actually played hard and, consequently, quite well.

BTW, since the rumor came out that he'd be released if the Chiefs won the grievance (a while ago now), LJ's agent has come out with a statement that he'd be open to playing in KC. He's also at the voluntary workouts FWIW.

 
BTW, since the rumor came out that he'd be released if the Chiefs won the grievance (a while ago now), LJ's agent has come out with a statement that he'd be open to playing in KC. He's also at the voluntary workouts FWIW.
Stand-up guy..
 
So whats the major issue with Jamal Charles?

Im looking at his stats from last year and average about 5 ypc and 10 yd per catch.

Didnt he just get hurt ?

 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
JaYz0618 said:
So whats the major issue with Jamal Charles? Im looking at his stats from last year and average about 5 ypc and 10 yd per catch.Didnt he just get hurt ?
very green one-dimensional back.
:rant: He's the opposite of one-dimensional. His "issue" is his size and that he's unlikely to be able to carry it 20 times per game.
 
His "issue" is his size and that he's unlikely to be able to carry it 20 times per game.
Why do people believe this? Is there any evidence that supports it? Tiki did ok. Westbrook does ok. Slaton looked great last year. There may not be as many talented small backs, but I haven't seen anything to suggest the talented ones aren't just fine carrying the load.
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
JaYz0618 said:
So whats the major issue with Jamal Charles? Im looking at his stats from last year and average about 5 ypc and 10 yd per catch.Didnt he just get hurt ?
very green one-dimensional back.
:popcorn: He's the opposite of one-dimensional. His "issue" is his size and that he's unlikely to be able to carry it 20 times per game.
looks like a speedy PPR 3rd down back to me. thats the dimension I was referring to
 
His "issue" is his size and that he's unlikely to be able to carry it 20 times per game.
Why do people believe this? Is there any evidence that supports it? Tiki did ok. Westbrook does ok. Slaton looked great last year. There may not be as many talented small backs, but I haven't seen anything to suggest the talented ones aren't just fine carrying the load.
People on this message board are eat up with the "he's not a workhorse back mentality". It's their own undoing IMO.
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
JaYz0618 said:
So whats the major issue with Jamal Charles? Im looking at his stats from last year and average about 5 ypc and 10 yd per catch.Didnt he just get hurt ?
very green one-dimensional back.
:bag: He's the opposite of one-dimensional. His "issue" is his size and that he's unlikely to be able to carry it 20 times per game.
looks like a speedy PPR 3rd down back to me. thats the dimension I was referring to
Nah, he's better than that. Look how he did against the Bucs last year carrying a full load. Up to that point they didn't give up 100 yards to any back, he tore them apart.wdcrob: I'm not saying he can't do it -- I'd love it if he could -- but that's the tag he carries. Again, I'd be happy if he proved it wrong and was the lead guy in, say, a 70-30 "RBBC."
 
I can't believe they cant get a 3rd, 4th or 5th rounder for the guy if they don't want him anymore. i would think the Cards would jump at the chance of giving their late 3rd or 4th to add LJ to that offense.
I'm sure a lot of teams would like the player but very few if any can take the contract.
Doesn't really seem all that bad actually. If you trade for him you pay 5.75 in 2009. $250,000 of the 6 million in 2010 is guaranteed. Two years at 11.75, not bad in todays NFL. If he's a turd you can part with him for 6 million total. From rotoworld:

pixel.gif
8/21/2007: Signed a six-year, $45.05 million contract. The deal contains $19 million guaranteed, including $12.5 million signing bonus. The first three years' base salaries are guaranteed, as is $250,000 of L.J.'s 2010 salary. 2009: $4.55 million (+ $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2010: $5 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2011: $5.3 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2012: $5.9 million (+ $1 million roster bonus due 3/1 + $100,000 workout bonus + $62,500 per-game roster bonuses), 2013: Free Agent. Cap charge: $7.596 million (2009).
I don't think the signing bonus owed goes with him to the potential team, the rest does.
 
If Larry Johnson is cut I think you guys are reaching if you believe that Pioli is just going to run with what is currently on the roster.

 
Chiefs win the grievance.

Larry Johnson Loses Grievance On Future Guaranteed Salaries

Posted by Mike Florio on April 6, 2009, 1:11 p.m. EDT

The good news for NFL players coming out of last week’s combined Plaxico Burress/Larry Johnson grievance is that the forfeiture of signing bonus money has been significantly limited.

The bad news for NFL players is that Special Master Richard Burbank upheld player contract language invalidating future guaranteed base salaries.

Per a league source, Johnson’s grievance failed as to the question of whether the Chiefs are permitted to erase $3.5 million in guaranteed base salary due in 2009 and $250,000 in guaranteed base salary due in 2010 based on Johnson’s one-game suspension in 2008 for violation of the personal conduct policy.

With the future guaranteed payments now off the books, the Chiefs are expected to cut or trade Johnson.

Meanwhile, we’re told that Johnson’s grievance prevailed as to the partial forfeiture of his signing bonus allocation applicable to 2008, for the same reasons that the Burress grievance prevailed on that point — according to Burbank, suspensions don’t trigger a forfeiture of signing bonus money.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/04/06/...nteed-salaries/Don't expect anything to happen for a while (assuming something happens at all). Pioli is EXTREMELY thorough and whoever thinks they're just gonna cut his ### is sorely mistaken.

 
Chiefs win the grievance.

Larry Johnson Loses Grievance On Future Guaranteed Salaries

Posted by Mike Florio on April 6, 2009, 1:11 p.m. EDT

The good news for NFL players coming out of last week’s combined Plaxico Burress/Larry Johnson grievance is that the forfeiture of signing bonus money has been significantly limited.

The bad news for NFL players is that Special Master Richard Burbank upheld player contract language invalidating future guaranteed base salaries.

Per a league source, Johnson’s grievance failed as to the question of whether the Chiefs are permitted to erase $3.5 million in guaranteed base salary due in 2009 and $250,000 in guaranteed base salary due in 2010 based on Johnson’s one-game suspension in 2008 for violation of the personal conduct policy.

With the future guaranteed payments now off the books, the Chiefs are expected to cut or trade Johnson.

Meanwhile, we’re told that Johnson’s grievance prevailed as to the partial forfeiture of his signing bonus allocation applicable to 2008, for the same reasons that the Burress grievance prevailed on that point — according to Burbank, suspensions don’t trigger a forfeiture of signing bonus money.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/04/06/...nteed-salaries/Don't expect anything to happen for a while (assuming something happens at all). Pioli is EXTREMELY thorough and whoever thinks they're just gonna cut his ### is sorely mistaken.
meaning what? that they'll go the trade route? If so, who realistically is going to pick up that deal? If they weren't looking to cut him they wouldn't have went through this exercise. That's my take at least...

As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chiefs win the grievance.

Larry Johnson Loses Grievance On Future Guaranteed Salaries

Posted by Mike Florio on April 6, 2009, 1:11 p.m. EDT

The good news for NFL players coming out of last week’s combined Plaxico Burress/Larry Johnson grievance is that the forfeiture of signing bonus money has been significantly limited.

The bad news for NFL players is that Special Master Richard Burbank upheld player contract language invalidating future guaranteed base salaries.

Per a league source, Johnson’s grievance failed as to the question of whether the Chiefs are permitted to erase $3.5 million in guaranteed base salary due in 2009 and $250,000 in guaranteed base salary due in 2010 based on Johnson’s one-game suspension in 2008 for violation of the personal conduct policy.

With the future guaranteed payments now off the books, the Chiefs are expected to cut or trade Johnson.

Meanwhile, we’re told that Johnson’s grievance prevailed as to the partial forfeiture of his signing bonus allocation applicable to 2008, for the same reasons that the Burress grievance prevailed on that point — according to Burbank, suspensions don’t trigger a forfeiture of signing bonus money.
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/04/06/...nteed-salaries/Don't expect anything to happen for a while (assuming something happens at all). Pioli is EXTREMELY thorough and whoever thinks they're just gonna cut his ### is sorely mistaken.
meaning what? that they'll go the trade route?
Maybe, but mostly I was referring to the time frmae. I didn't word it particularly clearly in my final sentence, but what I'm getting at, mainly in response to the idea that "a release is imminent," is that Pioli is too thorough to do anything for a few days.
 
I certainly do not understand why a release would be "imminent".

I would think that the Chiefs, if they want to let him go, will hold onto him till the draft while at the same time putting out feelers to teams that LJ could be had in trade. During the draft you try to trade him. If that is unsuccessful, then cut him before the next OTA's. Surely someone like the Saints, Cardinals or otherws would be willing to part with a 4th or 5th for LJ.

With no bonus money attached, he should be easier to trade. And there would be no downside to keeping him until the next OTAs. If no trade, and the Chiefs really do not want him, then release him at that juncture.

 
As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.
Not sure either - I'm thinking I like his situation in KC. New GM, head coach not named Herm Edwards, competent QB throwing to a rising star wideout/veteran TE, improving O line, couple of fellow RBs with game experience to lighten his load. Where else could he go that would be more intriguing than KC?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.
Not sure either - I'm thinking I like his situation in KC. New GM, head coach not named Herm Edwards, competent QB throwing to a rising star wideout/veteran TE, improving O line, couple of fellow RBs with game experience to lighten his load. Where else could he go that would be more intriguing than KC?
Seattle may be a push/improvement, AZ would be better,
 
I certainly do not understand why a release would be "imminent". I would think that the Chiefs, if they want to let him go, will hold onto him till the draft while at the same time putting out feelers to teams that LJ could be had in trade. During the draft you try to trade him. If that is unsuccessful, then cut him before the next OTA's. Surely someone like the Saints, Cardinals or otherws would be willing to part with a 4th or 5th for LJ.With no bonus money attached, he should be easier to trade. And there would be no downside to keeping him until the next OTAs. If no trade, and the Chiefs really do not want him, then release him at that juncture.
:thumbup: Pioli is a smart guy. Zero benefit to cutting LJ at this point.
 
As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.
Not sure either - I'm thinking I like his situation in KC. New GM, head coach not named Herm Edwards, competent QB throwing to a rising star wideout/veteran TE, improving O line, couple of fellow RBs with game experience to lighten his load. Where else could he go that would be more intriguing than KC?
Seattle may be a push/improvement, AZ would be better,
Agree on those two, but would those teams be interested in another aging RB (Shaun Alexander/Edge)?I would think a team would have to be in "win now" mode to take a chance on LJ. Maybe Cleveland? Houston?
 
They will cut him whenever it is best for their cap situation.
I'm not a cap expert, so I won't try to pass this off as fact, and welcome all corrections, but my understanding is his cap hit will be right around 8m whether they play him, cut him, or trade him.of course, if they trade him for a player, you'd have the additional player's salary.anyway, I'm pretty sure the chiefs are well below the cap, so cap space probably isn't as much an issue as simply player value or attitude.I really can't say I'm on top of rb salaries around the league --- anybody have an opinion on teams in position to take a $6m rb?what did jacobs sign for, as comparison?edit: the franchise tag fig is apparently only about 1m more than another team would have to pay johnson this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Something was just reported on NFLTA by DHorton but I was in the kitchen getting a beer. It sounded like if the Chiefs were going to cut Johnson citing certain violations to his probation or something along those lines they would not have to pay him bonuses. I could be way off but something was definately reported on LJ.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I certainly do not understand why a release would be "imminent". I would think that the Chiefs, if they want to let him go, will hold onto him till the draft while at the same time putting out feelers to teams that LJ could be had in trade. During the draft you try to trade him. If that is unsuccessful, then cut him before the next OTA's. Surely someone like the Saints, Cardinals or otherws would be willing to part with a 4th or 5th for LJ.With no bonus money attached, he should be easier to trade. And there would be no downside to keeping him until the next OTAs. If no trade, and the Chiefs really do not want him, then release him at that juncture.
:goodposting: Pioli is a smart guy. Zero benefit to cutting LJ at this point.
Unless he considers getting rid of a cancer a benefit.
 
Skanker said:
Skanker, After seeing you do this time and time again tonight I think you should know that you don't get "points" for your one word/1 icon posts. Please come up with a thought of your own.:whattheheckthatotherguysaid::quitwastingourtime:I don't see LJ getting released for "nothing" at this point. He has to be at least a little more open to continuing on in KC with a regime change and an actual NFL QB (or so it seems).
 
I certainly do not understand why a release would be "imminent". I would think that the Chiefs, if they want to let him go, will hold onto him till the draft while at the same time putting out feelers to teams that LJ could be had in trade. During the draft you try to trade him. If that is unsuccessful, then cut him before the next OTA's. Surely someone like the Saints, Cardinals or otherws would be willing to part with a 4th or 5th for LJ.With no bonus money attached, he should be easier to trade. And there would be no downside to keeping him until the next OTAs. If no trade, and the Chiefs really do not want him, then release him at that juncture.
The Saints are only 4.1 million under the salary cap so forget them.
 
Skanker said:
Skanker, After seeing you do this time and time again tonight I think you should know that you don't get "points" for your one word/1 icon posts. Please come up with a thought of your own.:whattheheckthatotherguysaid:

:quitwastingourtime:

I don't see LJ getting released for "nothing" at this point. He has to be at least a little more open to continuing on in KC with a regime change and an actual NFL QB (or so it seems).
LJ has already said he would like to return, and that his beef was with the old management.....
 
As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.
Not sure either - I'm thinking I like his situation in KC. New GM, head coach not named Herm Edwards, competent QB throwing to a rising star wideout/veteran TE, improving O line, couple of fellow RBs with game experience to lighten his load. Where else could he go that would be more intriguing than KC?
Seattle may be a push/improvement, AZ would be better,
Agree on those two, but would those teams be interested in another aging RB (Shaun Alexander/Edge)?I would think a team would have to be in "win now" mode to take a chance on LJ. Maybe Cleveland? Houston?
AZ with Warner at QB I would say is in a "win now" mode...they don't have many years with him. Seattle may be in a rebuilding mode but if the choice is rolling with J. Jones/Duckett or LJ for a year while rebuilding other parts of the team they could do worse. Outside chances that he could also head to Houston to be a goal line short yardage back to pair with Slaton or to NO to pair with Bush. He's also a lot better than anyone on Denver's, Baltimore and Indy's rosters. Pittsburgh could also be a possibility (although remote) depending on how Mendenhall is progressing...they need a short yardage/goal line guy. It will all depend on how he interviews with the teams and if "he's turned a new leaf" and is willing to take a different role and be a team guy. That's a huge question and the thing that will keep him off a lot of rosters because talent wise he's in the top 1/2 of the league.
 
As an LJ owner I think this makes me happy but I'm not sure.
Not sure either - I'm thinking I like his situation in KC. New GM, head coach not named Herm Edwards, competent QB throwing to a rising star wideout/veteran TE, improving O line, couple of fellow RBs with game experience to lighten his load. Where else could he go that would be more intriguing than KC?
Seattle may be a push/improvement, AZ would be better,
Agree on those two, but would those teams be interested in another aging RB (Shaun Alexander/Edge)?I would think a team would have to be in "win now" mode to take a chance on LJ. Maybe Cleveland? Houston?
AZ with Warner at QB I would say is in a "win now" mode...they don't have many years with him.
:goodposting: this, IMO. I think ARI makes another run at SB win, then cuts a lot of high-priced talent and goes back to being a mediocre franchise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top