What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Larry Johnson to Cincinnati (1 Viewer)

Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
winning has a tendency to cure a lot of ails. Benson seems to have worked out ok and there were the same types of question marks surrounding him before he signed w/ the Bengals. I think LJ fits that offense well and would be a decent replacement should Benson miss a few weeks.
 
Larry Johnson, RB KC

News: ESPN reports that RB Larry Johnson is on his way to Cincinnati to sign with the Bengals. Johnson, who was released by the Chiefs last Monday, was expected to sign with a playoff contender. Johnson's signing might signal that starting RB Cedric Benson's hip injury is worse than the team is letting on.

Analysis: If Johnson's signing in Cincinnati becomes official, he'll have the chance to start taking touches away from Benson almost immediately. Johnson will be running behind a fantastic offensive line, and even though he won't see every carry like he pretty much did in Kansas City, he should be able to pitch in and find the end zone. He's worth claiming off waivers and stashing on benches for the time being.

 
I guess this will prove if he is washed up or not.

Too bad because I was enjoying the production I was getting from my 5th round pick

 
Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
Why allow your season to fade away because your running game is going to fizzle down the stretch (if Benson is out for a significant amount of time)? I could easily see Cinci signing LJ to a 1 year deal as a stop-gap for the remainder of this season. If he doesn't shape up when he's there they cut him like KC did, only much cheaper.LJ's timing seems to be uncanny right now. Several RBs went down to injury this week and his value is no doubt on the way up bug time.
 
Crap, and I cut LJ last week in addition to trading for Benson. I have no chance to pick him back up on the ww...

I hate this game.

 
Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
Why allow your season to fade away because your running game is going to fizzle down the stretch (if Benson is out for a significant amount of time)? I could easily see Cinci signing LJ to a 1 year deal as a stop-gap for the remainder of this season. If he doesn't shape up when he's there they cut him like KC did, only much cheaper.LJ's timing seems to be uncanny right now. Several RBs went down to injury this week and his value is no doubt on the way up bug time.
I'm not sure how to read this. I have to assume that Benson's hip is worse than advertised or possibly they are looking for him to come in and take 8-10 carries a game. It'll be interesting to hear what Benson's status is. What's odd is that he's not really a complementary back in that he's got a pretty similar game as Benson, i.e. workhorse, pounder, not a great receiver, etc.. so there wouldn't be much of a change of pace between the two backs.This has the potential to be absolute gold though if Benson is out because the Bengals have a cake schedule down the stretch with Oak, Clev, Det, Minn, SD and KC. There's only 1 good defense and the rest are pretty bad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
Why allow your season to fade away because your running game is going to fizzle down the stretch (if Benson is out for a significant amount of time)? I could easily see Cinci signing LJ to a 1 year deal as a stop-gap for the remainder of this season. If he doesn't shape up when he's there they cut him like KC did, only much cheaper.LJ's timing seems to be uncanny right now. Several RBs went down to injury this week and his value is no doubt on the way up bug time.
I'm not sure how to read this. I have to assume that Benson's hip is worse than advertised or possibly they are looking for him to come in and take 8-10 carries a game. It'll be interesting to hear what Benson's status is. What's odd is that he's not really a complementary back in that he's got a pretty similar game as Benson, i.e. workhorse, pounder, not a great receiver, etc.. so there wouldn't be much of a change of pace between the two backs.
I kind of agree here, but I think Larry is better at catching the ball than Cedric.
 
Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
Why allow your season to fade away because your running game is going to fizzle down the stretch (if Benson is out for a significant amount of time)? I could easily see Cinci signing LJ to a 1 year deal as a stop-gap for the remainder of this season. If he doesn't shape up when he's there they cut him like KC did, only much cheaper.LJ's timing seems to be uncanny right now. Several RBs went down to injury this week and his value is no doubt on the way up bug time.
I'm not sure how to read this. I have to assume that Benson's hip is worse than advertised or possibly they are looking for him to come in and take 8-10 carries a game. It'll be interesting to hear what Benson's status is. What's odd is that he's not really a complementary back in that he's got a pretty similar game as Benson, i.e. workhorse, pounder, not a great receiver, etc.. so there wouldn't be much of a change of pace between the two backs.
I kind of agree here, but I think Larry is better at catching the ball than Cedric.
probably but they are pretty similar backs which makes it kind of odd unless they aren't looking to modify the offense at all and are just looking to plug in a similar back.
 
If Benson's injury is minor like they are letting on there is no way they are bringing in LJ to replace him as the starter is there? The guy is running lights out, is quite a bit younger and has way less mileage on him. So if he is healthy he may lose some carries to LJ but surely he will remain the feature back. Someone please agree with me on this :thumbup:

 
Any chance that Benson is okay, and they just want to have a capable backup to reduce his carries/be an injury replacement instead of relying on a rookie?
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe they just think LJ is a better backup than Scott.
I mean it is possible but I thought it was kind of odd in their biggest game of the year, he goes out with a hip problem, doesn't come back, and then they say he should be fine for next week? If he was so fine, why not come back in what is essentially the battle for the division and playoff berth.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?

 
If Benson's injury is minor like they are letting on there is no way they are bringing in LJ to replace him as the starter is there? The guy is running lights out, is quite a bit younger and has way less mileage on him. So if he is healthy he may lose some carries to LJ but surely he will remain the feature back. Someone please agree with me on this :thumbup:
Presumably whoever does a better job will be the feature back. Most people think that will be Benson.
 
With all the RBs going down this week....could this be a deal to block another team fron signing him? Maybe Benson is just dinged only......

This is good insurance, and good defence at the same time

jmho

Parm

 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
Agreed expect Benson is no Peterson and we don't know if Benson is simply "dinged but not going to miss any time".Except for that, spot on.
 
If Benson's injury is minor like they are letting on there is no way they are bringing in LJ to replace him as the starter is there? The guy is running lights out, is quite a bit younger and has way less mileage on him. So if he is healthy he may lose some carries to LJ but surely he will remain the feature back. Someone please agree with me on this :hifive:
who knows. Who was Benson before last year? He was a step away from being out of the game after essentially being a bust in Chicago. He was in the same spot as LJ midway through the season after being cut by his team. Now he landed in a very good spot and got ALL the touches but there's no reason for me to think that LJ couldn't be just as effective in that offense (I know I'll get a parade of "he's done"'s). We'll see soon enough...
 
Any chance that Benson is okay, and they just want to have a capable backup to reduce his carries/be an injury replacement instead of relying on a rookie?
A chance of this? Sure, but LJ would probably want a chance to start.
Benson has been one of the top RBs in the league this year.LJ has virtually ZERO chance to start unless Benson is injured.And I do think Benson is injured more than they had originally thought.good signing.
 
Any chance that Benson is okay, and they just want to have a capable backup to reduce his carries/be an injury replacement instead of relying on a rookie?
A chance of this? Sure, but LJ would probably want a chance to start.
That's a good point, I really doubt LJ signed to be a backup. I'd be willing to bet that at least he thinks that he's going to get quite a few carries, or else why sign?
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
well insurance or their new starting RB.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
That's the view from the perspective of the Bengals, but it takes two to sign a contract. Why does LJ sign with a team that is using him as nothing more than insurance?
 
If Benson's injury is minor like they are letting on there is no way they are bringing in LJ to replace him as the starter is there? The guy is running lights out, is quite a bit younger and has way less mileage on him. So if he is healthy he may lose some carries to LJ but surely he will remain the feature back. Someone please agree with me on this :hifive:
Facts:-LJ is 30 yrs olds-Bernard Scott seems to be locked in the special teams role-Benson is no spring chicken-Benson was averaging 25 carries per game in the first 8 games-Benson has been running with a stout OL all seasonI think if anything, barring a season ending injury from Benson (which I doubt), LJ will split with Benson or take some of his carries away. Which honestly doesn't make either choice look great IMO
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
well insurance or their new starting RB.
Which takes me back to my original post that Benson's injury is more serious than they thought yesterday.With a healthy Benson and a healthy LJ, Benson is the unquestioned starter.
 
Why mess with the chemistry the Bengals seem to have right now?
Why allow your season to fade away because your running game is going to fizzle down the stretch (if Benson is out for a significant amount of time)? I could easily see Cinci signing LJ to a 1 year deal as a stop-gap for the remainder of this season. If he doesn't shape up when he's there they cut him like KC did, only much cheaper.LJ's timing seems to be uncanny right now. Several RBs went down to injury this week and his value is no doubt on the way up bug time.
I'm not sure how to read this. I have to assume that Benson's hip is worse than advertised or possibly they are looking for him to come in and take 8-10 carries a game. It'll be interesting to hear what Benson's status is. What's odd is that he's not really a complementary back in that he's got a pretty similar game as Benson, i.e. workhorse, pounder, not a great receiver, etc.. so there wouldn't be much of a change of pace between the two backs.This has the potential to be absolute gold though if Benson is out because the Bengals have a cake schedule down the stretch with Oak, Clev, Det, Minn, SD and KC. There's only 1 good defense and the rest are pretty bad.
thats why i avoid Benson every year. We know he's a bust, soft and will get hurt at some point.
 
this legitimizes LJ's behavior in Kansas City. If he can verbally discriminate against a group in order to get out of a bad team and sign with a better team, then other players would want to follow his example.

the Bengals, with their history of malcontents, almost seem like the perfect fit for him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Bengal fan, I'm totally into this. If Benson is down for any stretch of time, LJ and Scott share the load. Like someone else said, we get to see if LJ was washed up or just in a horrific situation. If Benson is fine, hes a good insurance policy as well. As much as I like Scott, I don't want him to carry the full load, regardless of the "seemingly easy" schedule going forward.

I'm also of the opinion that "team chemistry" is overrated.

 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
That's the view from the perspective of the Bengals, but it takes two to sign a contract. Why does LJ sign with a team that is using him as nothing more than insurance?
it's possible that he doesn't/didn't have the options that we assumed he had or that Benson is hurt worse than they are letting on and he is the starter.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
well insurance or their new starting RB.
Which takes me back to my original post that Benson's injury is more serious than they thought yesterday.With a healthy Benson and a healthy LJ, Benson is the unquestioned starter.
I don't know that.
 
NOt expecting LJ reborn, but this has potential for a solid late season pick up. Stash him and if Benson really is hurting badly, then you might get very lucky.

 
this legitimizes LJ's behavior in Kansas City. If he can verbally discriminate against a group in order to get out of a bad team and sign with a better team, then other players would want to follow his example.the Bengals, with their history of malcontents, almost seem like the perfect fit for him.
this is the NFL...You have guys that shoot people, dui's, beat their girlfriends, hit and runs, run dog killing operations, use/sell drugs, and on and on and if people seriously thought what he did was going to keep him from another job they are naive. The only thing that was going to keep him from getting another job is if he had no skills left.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
That's the view from the perspective of the Bengals, but it takes two to sign a contract. Why does LJ sign with a team that is using him as nothing more than insurance?
Has anyone else made an offer? I doubt there's a starting RB job waiting for LJ out there or they woulda made the call already
 
this legitimizes LJ's behavior in Kansas City. If he can verbally discriminate against a group in order to get out of a bad team and sign with a better team, then other players would want to follow his example.the Bengals, with their history of malcontents, almost seem like the perfect fit for him.
this is the NFL...You have guys that shoot people, dui's, beat their girlfriends, hit and runs, run dog killing operations, use/sell drugs, and on and on and if people seriously thought what he did was going to keep him from another job they are naive. The only thing that was going to keep him from getting another job is if he had no skills left.
:thumbup: Not that I agree with LJ's behavior. But there is MUCH worse behavior in the NFL year in and year out.
 
Hypothetical: Let's say the Vikings didn't have Chester Taylor and are standing at 8-1. AP is dinged but not going to miss any time and has been getting a heavy workload recently. Their backup is an unproven rookie w/ less than 25 career carries. Would it not make sense to sign Larry Johnson? Seems like that is the situation here. Agreed?
if that's the case, why not sign him last week? They had the same need right? The difference between last week and this week was their starting RB left the game with an injury.
precisely.LJ is nothing more than insurance for a playoff bound team.
That's the view from the perspective of the Bengals, but it takes two to sign a contract. Why does LJ sign with a team that is using him as nothing more than insurance?
Cinci is poised to make a run, who knows how deep into the playoffs? Maybe LJ was sold on the idea of a possibility of a ring before his career is done. HC Lewis has built this team much like the Ravens ala 2000-2001 but with a much better QB & rec. core. Lewis was also in Bmore when RayLewis was on trial and if memory serves me correctly, when Jamal Lewis was on trial for cocaine trafficking. Both had record breaking seasons coming out of those incidents. Not saying those things are direct correlations but doesn't hurt when trying to get LJ on board, even in a back-up role. Great risk for the Bengals depending on the contract with huge upside. Its also a relatively easy sell to Benson. He knows that LJ aint a spring chicken that will challenge his role in future years but does have the potential to help this team succeed this year if he's injured.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nothing to see here beyond pushing Bernard Scott out until next year as the primary backup to Benson. This ends no differently than the Shaun Alexander stint in Washington. Age, declining YPC...many similarities between the two. If Ced is truly injured now or in the future LJ being the bellcow will not end well for the Bengals.

 
according to Ocho Cinco Network:

@OGOchoCinco OCNN BREAKING NEWS: LJ hasn't signed with Bengals, when and if he does ill tweet the ROC is n bldg

 
As someone who follows the team closely & is a season tix holder here's my take.

1. There is zero..ZERO chance that LJ takes Benson's job. The coaches love his work ethic & he has done everything right both on AND off the field.

2. Benson's legs aren't giving out on him. Despite his heavy work load he 25 and we are only 9 games into the season. Not an issue. The thought that LJ's signing has anything to due with this idea is wild speculation.

3. The Bengals aren't going to promise LJ a shot at starting.

The only scenario that makes sense is that Benson is hurt more than they are letting on & they don't trust a rookie as the full time starter. If this offense was built for a RB load of 15 carries...maybe. However Cincy has turned into a smash mouth team that is built on the run to set up the pass. That means either trusting Scott to carry the ball 20-25 times a game or shifting offensive philosophy in min-season to pass more. I don't think they are interested in changing their offensive identity. Scott has proven to be a nice back to spell Benson and they trust him in that role but no more than that at this point.

I also don't agree with comments that LJ wouldn't come into a situation where he was promised a chance to start. He was just cut mid-season from a crappy team. I'm sure he's tired of losinig and he has a chance to hitch himself to a team that's playoff bound. How many other opportunites (i.e. teams) are there who appear to be playoff bound, who need a RB and who would be willing to pick up a trouble makers like LJ. Not many...maybe exactly one. LJ may be a jerk but he's in no position to demand squat right now unless he'd rather sit the rest of the season. He signs a contract for the rest of the year. plays a role to whatever degree the Bengals need, goes to the playoffs and then looks for employment for next year when the year is over.

 
As someone who follows the team closely & is a season tix holder here's my take.

1. There is zero..ZERO chance that LJ takes Benson's job. The coaches love his work ethic & he has done everything right both on AND off the field.

2. Benson's legs aren't giving out on him. Despite his heavy work load he 25 and we are only 9 games into the season. Not an issue. The thought that LJ's signing has anything to due with this idea is wild speculation.

3. The Bengals aren't going to promise LJ a shot at starting.

The only scenario that makes sense is that Benson is hurt more than they are letting on & they don't trust a rookie as the full time starter. If this offense was built for a RB load of 15 carries...maybe. However Cincy has turned into a smash mouth team that is built on the run to set up the pass. That means either trusting Scott to carry the ball 20-25 times a game or shifting offensive philosophy in min-season to pass more. I don't think they are interested in changing their offensive identity. Scott has proven to be a nice back to spell Benson and they trust him in that role but no more than that at this point.

I also don't agree with comments that LJ wouldn't come into a situation where he was promised a chance to start. He was just cut mid-season from a crappy team. I'm sure he's tired of losinig and he has a chance to hitch himself to a team that's playoff bound. How many other opportunites (i.e. teams) are there who appear to be playoff bound, who need a RB and who would be willing to pick up a trouble makers like LJ. Not many...maybe exactly one. LJ may be a jerk but he's in no position to demand squat right now unless he'd rather sit the rest of the season. He signs a contract for the rest of the year. plays a role to whatever degree the Bengals need, goes to the playoffs and then looks for employment for next year when the year is over.
Nothing personal, I don't think because you happen to be a fan and season ticket holder gives you any special knowledge if Benson is wearing down or not.The dude has a boatload of carries through nine games (leading the league with 205 even after missing most of last week's game) and a hip injury, that reportedly has been a nagging issues for a few weeks, may well be a sign that he is in fact wearing down a bit.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top