What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Las Vegas Chargers? (1 Viewer)

Bri

Footballguy
SAN DIEGO (AP) -- Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman continues to roll the dice trying to lure the San Diego Chargers to his gambling and entertainment mecca.

Although the Chargers haven't responded - yet - to overtures from cities outside San Diego County, the team's top negotiator said Goodman called earlier this week to say he's still interested in having the team move to his city.

It was the second time in less than nine months that Goodman contacted Southern California's only NFL team, which says it needs a new stadium to remain financially competitive within the league.

Goodman's renewed interest comes at a time when the Chargers are a good bet in any Las Vegas sports book to win their first Super Bowl title.

Mark Fabiani, who's heading the Chargers' stadium effort, said he returned Goodman's call on Friday, telling the mayor that the team will continue to look for a site within San Diego County, "for the time being."

"He said that he appreciated the update and that he'd be following our progress," Fabiani said. "It was a very cordial conversation."

Goodman was too busy to answer questions Friday, said his assistant, Elena Owens.

But he issued a statement, saying he and Fabiani spoke and length, "and I'll do my due diligence. Bringing a professional sports team to Las Vegas is just another part of my goal to make this the world-class city. We have world-class entertainment, the greatest hotels and the finest restaurants. We need a professional team here to create a sense of community for my constituents"

Goodman first contacted the Chargers in April, saying, "I'm thirsting for a major league team."

At the time, the Chargers were barred from talking with cities other than San Diego.

Shortly after that, the San Diego City Council unanimously agreed to allow the Chargers to look for a new stadium site within the county.

The Chargers effectively became eligible for free agency on Jan. 1, when cities outside the county could begin contacting them.

However, Fabiani said last month that the Chargers will decline to negotiate with outside suitors, at least for the time being, while it explores options in the San Diego-area suburbs of Chula Vista, National City and Oceanside.

Goodman said in his statement that he called Fabiani on Tuesday. Fabiani was out of town and didn't get a chance to return the call until Friday.

Fabiani won't say how long the Chargers will explore local options before responding to invitations from further afield.

The Chargers have ruled out a new facility at the site of its current home, Qualcomm Stadium, because of San Diego's financial crisis and friction with City Attorney Mike Aguirre.

Chargers owner Alex Spanos, who lives in Stockton, Calif., runs a construction company that has an office in Las Vegas. His son, Dean, the team's president, owns a condo in Las Vegas.

The team declined to make Dean Spanos available for comment.

Professional sports leagues have avoided locating teams in Las Vegas because they fear the influence of gambling. But Goodman last year called that a "red herring," noting that Nevada regulates sports betting.

Asked about that topic, NFL spokesman Greg Aiello issued this statement: "We appreciate Mayor Goodman's interest, but at this time we support the team's commitment to working toward a stadium solution in San Diego County."

The Chargers can leave San Diego after the 2008 season if they pay off the approximately $60 million in bonds the city issued in 1997 to expand Qualcomm Stadium.

Led by league MVP LaDainian Tomlinson, the Chargers (14-2) have the NFL's best record and own home-field advantage throughout the AFC playoffs. They have a bye this weekend before hosting a divisional-round game next weekend.

 
The city of San Diego is so terarded. The NFL won't give them any more super bowls without a new stadium. Bowls bring in huge dollars. San Diego will be guaranteed to get them on a rotating basis as it is a prime location for a late winter game. They are going to lose this franchise and it is to bad for them.

 
The City of SD cannot afford the Chargers because government corruption bankrupted the city, but no NFL team will ever be in Las Vegas.

 
The City of SD cannot afford the Chargers because government corruption bankrupted the city, but no NFL team will ever be in Las Vegas.
Which is moronic, because it's one of the fastest-growing cities (if not THE fastest) in the country. And everyone there has tons of money and is itching to spend it. Anyone who thinks it'd be a bad image to have them there is kidding themselves. What, it's not possible to bet on games from the privacy of your own home out in Tampa or Kansas City or Seattle? Online bookies don't work anymore? :rolleyes: Whatever team finally gets on board and is allowed to set up shop in Vegas (in any sport) will reap the rewards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Either way, the NFL needs to change their stance on Vegas hosting Superbowl parties! About 3 years ago, the NFL cracked down on Vegas and said the casinos couldn't host parties using any TV larger than the largest commercially produced TV on the market. And at that, they could only have 1 of those TV's in a room?!

What used to be a great time to go to Vegas has been all but ruined! The NFL uses the same logic for these games as they do towards moving any professional sports franchise. They are concerned that someone will influence the outcome of the game. For some reason, it seems to me that they think that only the bad guys live in Vegas. Like it's not possible for someone to influence an outcome of a game in some other city outside of Vegas.

All that Vegas would have to do is take the local team off the board and restrict wagering on that game. They do this currently for UNLV games.

We are still headed to Vegas during the Superbowl, but this is our last year. Next year we are moving our annual visit to either New Year's Eve or March Madness.

Rant over...

 
The decision to move or not is not entirely in the hands of the Chargers. They need league approval to move more than 50 miles from their current stadium, and I don't think that the NFL is ready to abandon all of Southern California just yet. A move to Vegas seems pretty far-fetched, but I've certainly been wrong before.

 
The City of SD cannot afford the Chargers because government corruption bankrupted the city, but no NFL team will ever be in Las Vegas.
Which is moronic, because it's one of the fastest-growing cities (if not THE fastest) in the country. And everyone there has tons of money and is itching to spend it. Anyone who thinks it'd be a bad image to have them there is kidding themselves. What, it's not possible to bet on games from the privacy of your own home out in Tampa or Kansas City or Seattle? Online bookies don't work anymore? :confused: Whatever team finally gets on board and is allowed to set up shop in Vegas (in any sport) will reap the rewards.
It is a example of technology advancing faster than rules and people's perceptions. The internet has made it possible to do all your gambling from everywhere, not just Vegas.No reason to not give Vegas a team IMHO
 
However, Fabiani said last month that the Chargers will decline to negotiate with outside suitors, at least for the time being, while it explores options in the San Diego-area suburbs of Chula Vista, National City and Oceanside

This seems most likely to me. Chula or National

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top