Jack McCoy
Footballguy
Our league has been doing 1 PPR for years, but I would love to change things up this season.
When you switched to .5/.5 (or even 0 PPR + 1 PPFD), did you notice any significant differences in the scoring? I set up a dummy MFL league so I could compare my league's 2017 year-end scoring to what that scoring would have looked like had we been using .5/.5. I found the differences to be negligible in terms of a player's average fantasy points per game. Nor was there a significant reordering of the top 100 RBs/WRs/TEs.
I then did another comparison, this one between my 2017 scoring and 0 PPR + 1 PPFD. Again, no significant shifts.
Am I approaching this the wrong way? Is the movement toward PPFD scoring more a philosophical one than a scoring one?
Bonus question (to avoid starting another thread) for those of you who have moved to superflex leagues: did you devalue QBs in such a way that starting two QBs every week wouldn't be a given?
Thanks, everyone — I'm really excited to hear your thoughts.
When you switched to .5/.5 (or even 0 PPR + 1 PPFD), did you notice any significant differences in the scoring? I set up a dummy MFL league so I could compare my league's 2017 year-end scoring to what that scoring would have looked like had we been using .5/.5. I found the differences to be negligible in terms of a player's average fantasy points per game. Nor was there a significant reordering of the top 100 RBs/WRs/TEs.
I then did another comparison, this one between my 2017 scoring and 0 PPR + 1 PPFD. Again, no significant shifts.
Am I approaching this the wrong way? Is the movement toward PPFD scoring more a philosophical one than a scoring one?
Bonus question (to avoid starting another thread) for those of you who have moved to superflex leagues: did you devalue QBs in such a way that starting two QBs every week wouldn't be a given?
Thanks, everyone — I'm really excited to hear your thoughts.