I think it's naive to think contracts don't matter. They matter to the GM that tendered them and what matters to the GM matters to the rookie head coach. Also, Ward has averaged a yard more a carry than Graham for their careers and is also better as a receiver. These are not equal talents we are talking about. I don't expect Ward to get the same workload as a Michael Turner, but he is clearly the #1 back in TB.

It's not just the difference in the value of the contracts, it's the structure. There is a lot said in that. Graham has a deal with no guaranteed money, and back-loaded heavily... a recipe for a forced re-negotiation or him being cut. Ward's deal is front-loaded, indicating they plan on getting something out of him early. Ignore that if you want, but barring Graham going above and beyond what he has been thus far in the NFL, it sounds like someone in Tampa views Ward as the #1 back.As far as Ward's history, there are multiple factors here. He has been injury prone, which has limited his overall numbers. He also has been jammed up in NY, where they have had Barber, then Jacobs... both pretty uniquely talented guys. I wonder how many people said the same things about Ryan Grant in 2007, considering he came from the same NYG situation. He was un-drafted, stuck behind a bunch of talented backs, and seemed injury prone... but once he got his shot, he has produced. Obviously, not the same situation as Ward, as Ward is a bit more established than Grant was in 2007... but still, the negatives I'm hearing pointed out about Ward are the same ones that could have been made about Grant.It's all speculation at this point, but to ignore the obvious indicators that Ward is in a good situation to become a solid producer, is kinda foolish. If the Buc's thought Graham was the answer, I doubt they would have made Ward such an immediate priority, and paid him the way they did.