This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
because I don't know enough about it to do so. And you're wrong anyhow: despite the large number of my posts, they have been almost entirely focused on 2-3 very specific issues. The ones that are more scientific in nature (whether he was shot in the front, how many bullets, the trajectory of the bullets; etc.) I have sometimes asked questions but never offered any opinions.
i have never reported you. During my 7 years here I think I have only reported two people, Clinton and LHUCKS, and I regretted doing so afterward. I'll never do it again. It's not my place to police this forum.
As an extreme example, if an officer says a suspect charged him and the suspect only has shots in their back...that would be pretty damn relevant, no?
BS. The one and only time I was suspended on this forum a MOD told me it was due to a report by you. And I've seen you post that you've reported others, most recently last week. I know you lie regularly on here, but please....On things I know for a fact don't lie.
What? I don't know what that MOD told you but I don't recall ever reporting you. It's possible that it slipped my memory but I doubt it because it's so rare that I ever report anyone. And I certainly did not report anybody 2 weeks ago . You must be thinking of someone else.
And I assume you'd be willing to donate it to charity, or are you going to pocket it?
Yep. No aliases, no visits. I'll wish a few people goodbye and I'll be gone.
oh no. If you're insane enough to send me the cash, it's completely my decision what to do with it.
The one within the last couple of weeks is based upon a post of yours. You posted that you were reporting someone. Only you can verify whether it is true. As far as whether you reported me all I can say is that if you even question that you might have, given that a MOD said you did, maybe you should just concede the point. You never do and that's one of your biggest flaws. The fact that YOU don't remember doing it doesn't mean you didn't do it. And I was suspended for a couple of months based upon you reporting me. Unless you want to call a MOD a liar.
its not that I cling to it; it's that it bothers me more than any other issue. To answer your question I don't know if the order of shots is relevant or not. I've asked you repeatedly now to make an argument as to why it is, because I want to understand you better. Instead you keep challenging me to defend positions I've never made in the first place. Why don't you tell me what YOU think about the order of shots and it's relevancy to whether or not Brown's death was justified? Then I'll let you know if I agree with you or not, and why.
i didn't report anyone two weeks ago. I don't recall saying I was going to either. I don't ever recall reporting you . I've been here a long time though so any things possible. If you were suspended for 2 whole months then you must have written something really horrendous so don't blame me for that. In any event I give you my word that I will NEVER report anyone again. Period.
Whatever the #### I want I guess.
This is a load of crap. This is based upon bias. In fact the person who suspended me said I had a very valid point but the way I posted it was offensive. It was a PC reaction. Unfortunately that's what our society has come to. You see it in Ferguson as well as everywhere else. But you don't even know what the comment was so, as I feel about most of your responses in threads, how the F can you know whether it was truly offensive?????
i have no idea what you're talking about. I'm sad that you think I'm a troll. I've always liked your posts, especially about punk rock. Lately I've been purchasing music from several artists that I've never heard before which you recommended. Greatly appreciated.
you're right I don't know. I was speculating.
Gee, what's new? Tim, can you post a thread where people post how long they were suspended for and what the infraction was? Because I guaranf-ingtee you that most people are suspended for relatively minor infractions, and a couple of months isn't very long around here. Especially a few years ago. Things are much more lax now. Do you disagree with anything I've just asserted?
i neither agree nor disagree. I've never been suspended except once and that was only for a couple hours . I haven't really followed why people get suspended. I have no opinion to offer.
in your opinion , do the order of the bullets demonstrate that Brown was charging Wilson? Of so, please explain- I don't mean that as a challenge but I'm afraid I don't understand you . If you have another point to make I don't understand that either. Perhaps I am obtuse; more likely in just dumb. Either way I don't get it.
It's not the magnitude of posts (though that doesn't help). It's the sheer arrogance in which he expresses an opinion and vaguely or blatantly insults the opposition. He'll often change his stance and immediately start questioning the intelligence/thinking of how anyone could dare to believe what he himself was just taking the side of. It's the fact he regularly asks for information, claims he'll read it later, but never actually gets around to reading it, but goes ahead and asks questions that the ignored post would have answered. Hell, it's the fact he clearly posts articles/links and argues points that he doesn't remotely understand. Among many other issues.I don't get the whole pile on Tim thing. He may not always be correct, but at least he has *some* sense of intellect about him, unlike many others here....
I dunno. Is it because he posts a lot?
Fair enough.It's not the magnitude of posts (though that doesn't help). It's the sheer arrogance in which he expresses an opinion and vaguely or blatantly insults the opposition. He'll often change his stance and immediately start questioning the intelligence/thinking of how anyone could dare to believe what he himself was just taking the side of. It's the fact he regularly asks for information, claims he'll read it later, but never actually gets around to reading it, but goes ahead and asks questions that the ignored post would have answered. Hell, it's the fact he clearly posts articles/links and argues points that he doesn't remotely understand. Among many other issues.He seems plenty nice and clearly tries hard to fit in. Perhaps I've given him entirely too much credit and he's actually sporting a rather low IQ, but it seems he has some intelligence. He lacks a lot of common sense and seemingly has a low EQ. At times he's a real asset to the board. On a lot of other occasions he's an insufferable pseudo intellectual who inadvertently hijacks quality threads by saying or doing mind numbingly moronic things.I don't get the whole pile on Tim thing. He may not always be correct, but at least he has *some* sense of intellect about him, unlike many others here....
I dunno. Is it because he posts a lot?
Probably because in one post he acts like a pompous know it all, then the next post admits he really doesn't know much about it.I don't get the whole pile on Tim thing. He may not always be correct, but at least he has *some* sense of intellect about him, unlike many others here....
I dunno. Is it because he posts a lot?
Thought this was fairly obviousIt's not the magnitude of posts (though that doesn't help). It's the sheer arrogance in which he expresses an opinion and vaguely or blatantly insults the opposition. He'll often change his stance and immediately start questioning the intelligence/thinking of how anyone could dare to believe what he himself was just taking the side of. It's the fact he regularly asks for information, claims he'll read it later, but never actually gets around to reading it, but goes ahead and asks questions that the ignored post would have answered. Hell, it's the fact he clearly posts articles/links and argues points that he doesn't remotely understand. Among many other issues.I don't get the whole pile on Tim thing. He may not always be correct, but at least he has *some* sense of intellect about him, unlike many others here....
I dunno. Is it because he posts a lot?
He seems plenty nice and clearly tries hard to fit in. Perhaps I've given him entirely too much credit and he's actually sporting a rather low IQ, but it seems he has some intelligence. He lacks a lot of common sense and seemingly has a low EQ. At times he's a real asset to the board. On a lot of other occasions he's an insufferable pseudo intellectual who inadvertently hijacks quality threads by saying or doing mind numbingly moronic things.
For sure it did. But remember this wasnt a show trial or anything. Especially when the prosecutor doesnt even know the law. They can indict a ham sandwich, but cant indict a cop who killed an unarmed man. Birds of a feather.
Why do you think only 6% of black people vote in St. Louis county? Because that's the way to change laws and culture, not by stealing 6 packs of Budweiser and burning cars. I'm betting that exactly 0% of the looters voted in November. You know why? Not because they are oppressed or were suppressed. No, they don't vote because they are lazy ####### morons, and that would actually take some effort.
Wow, if this isnt the most racist thing I have seen on this site.
I am an opinionated person, you think I dont vote? I vote for things that dont even matter, but what does me voting have to do with anything?
What's racist in my post? Am I not allowed to talk about race? Being an idiot is universal. I think the Wall Street protesters were idiots too. I doubt many of them voted either. Has nothing to do with race.
Kind of like justifying millions of dollars in property damage because a cop shot a suspect.
