M.Bennett for M. Jones and Pryor in PPR? (1 Viewer)

[ultraviolet]

I have Pitta/Henry at TE and have been offered M. Bennett/T. Sharpe for M. Jones/T. Pryor.  This would leave me with Hilton and Landry as starting WR and C. Meredith and M. Thomas on the bench (I will cut Sharpe).

Is Bennett enough of an upgrade over Pitta? Will be get consistently more targets? 

For instance, Pitta projects higher in PPR scoring this week.

I see M. Jones as a much better WR2 for me than Landry, but have coveted Bennett.

 

[TheKillerBrees]

I dunno if I would do this. Bennett is banged up and Gronk coming back to form. I am not sure Bennett is enough of a jump for you on TE to be worth losing out at WR...

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/749636-thursday-night-te-play/

 

[Gally]

Which M. Jones?  I first assumed Matt because there is no way I would be giving up Marvin in that deal but then you reference "M. Jones as a WR2".  Marvin is putting up WR1 numbers and shouldn't really slow down much.  There is no way I make this deal if it is Marvin but would probably do so if it is Matt.

 

[TheKillerBrees]

I assumed Marvin in my response....

 

[JoeSteeler]

Looks to be Marvin...easy decline for me. You would be "buying high" on Bennett.

 

[DoseOfDopeness]

Absolutely not

 

[pjhathaway77]

No way, Gronk is just getting started, Bennett will retain value but not at a level that much higher than Henry or Pitta, I wouldn't do Jones for Bennett straight up let alone adding in pryor for a wr you're not even gonna keep...

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/749653-start-charles-this-week/

 

[ultraviolet]

Thanks for the quick responses, guys.  Yes, I meant Marvin Jones and after reading this, I will turn down the trade.