M Bulger (1 Viewer)

[pk2448]

Bulger is saying that the new offense is WR firendly, and that the O Line will have a more difficult job. Without Pace that does not make the future look al that bright.

The sexy and needed pick would be Crabtree from Texas Tech. but the sensible and more value to the entire team is the best O tackle (Smith or Monroe) on the board.

Bulger is available in our 12 team keeper league, and with Garrard, Cambell and Shaun Hill as my QB I am thinking of dropping Hill as SF is going to look at Smith again.

at 3 points per TD toss, 1 point per 20 yards and 2 pt 300 yard bonus is Bulger a value play?

Had Cartwright in there thats what happens when the wife interupts and the dog has to go also.

 

[rock753]

Bulger is saying that the new offense is WR firendly, and that the O Line will have a more difficult job. Without Pace that does not make the future look al that bright.

The sexy and needed pick would be Cartright from Texas Tech. but the sensible and more value to the entire team is the best O tackle on the board.

Bulger is available in our 12 team keeper league, and with Garrard, Cambell and Shaun Hill as my QB I am thinking of dropping Hill as SF is going to look at Smith again.

at 3 points per TD toss, 1 point per 20 yards and 2 pt 300 yard bonus is Bulger a value play?

Hoss?

 

[Jerry Lawler]

Some will disagree, but I would take Bulger over Shaun Hill. Even though Bulger hasn't had a big year in a while, he's only a few months older than Tom Brady and certainly has shown the ability to be an elite performer when his offense is running competently.

The obvious problem is that St. Louis has a crappy O-Line and very little experience at WR, but a new coaching staff and creative schemes can go a long way. If the team can turn it around, my bet is that Bulger surprises a lot of people over the next couple of years.