What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Male Teen Has Consensual Sex with Female Teen. He Gets 25 Years as Sex (1 Viewer)

I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.

 
No younger male likes strict liability in these circumstances. Society has deemed it acceptable to place strict liability on younger males in these circumstances. There seems to be a power disparity here.

This is a hybrid legal entanglement of the evangelicals and progressives of the 1900-1930 period of our country, and it's going to take a long time to undo. Mandatory minimum sentencing going the way of the dodo and sex offender registries with flexibility are places to start, statutorily.

This sucks. Nobody likes this anymore except for blowhard politicians and PACs and conservative parents of all political stripes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone thinking treating him this way is necessary to keep kids safe? Anderson and his family certainly don’t.

Neither does his supposed underage victim. The girl readily admitted that she lied about her age, and in this WSBT-TV interview her mother admitted that Anderson “didn't do anything my daughter didn’t do.” Everyone agrees the encounter was completely consensual. The only reason the police became involved at all is because the girl suffers from epilepsy, and when she didn't come home as quickly as expected her mom worried and called the cops for help.

In this excellent South Bend Tribune article, the mom told a reporter that she didn’t just ask the judge for leniency, "we asked him to drop the case."
Yeah, I'm placing this squarely on the judge then.

What say the FBG Lawyers?

More awfulness from the judge:

But court records show that Berrien County District Court Judge Dennis Wiley (who once jailed a woman for 10 days over Christmas because she cursed while paying a traffic ticket in the county clerk’s office) paid none of the participants any mind. At sentencing he told Anderson, "You went online, to use a fisherman's expression, trolling for women to meet and have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior. There is no excuse for this whatsoever."

Now, in addition to registering as a sex offender, Anderson will spend five years on probation, during which time he will not be allowed to live in a home where there is internet access or a smart phone. He will obviously have to change his major. And he is forbidden to talk to anyone under age 17, except his brothers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone thinking treating him this way is necessary to keep kids safe? Anderson and his family certainly don’t.

Neither does his supposed underage victim. The girl readily admitted that she lied about her age, and in this WSBT-TV interview her mother admitted that Anderson “didn't do anything my daughter didn’t do.” Everyone agrees the encounter was completely consensual. The only reason the police became involved at all is because the girl suffers from epilepsy, and when she didn't come home as quickly as expected her mom worried and called the cops for help.

In this excellent South Bend Tribune article, the mom told a reporter that she didn’t just ask the judge for leniency, "we asked him to drop the case."
Yeah, I'm placing this squarely on the judge then.

What say the FBG Lawyers?
FBG lawyers probably say the age of consent is 16. She wasnt 16, therefore, can not consent.

 
Does anyone thinking treating him this way is necessary to keep kids safe? Anderson and his family certainly don’t.

Neither does his supposed underage victim. The girl readily admitted that she lied about her age, and in this WSBT-TV interview her mother admitted that Anderson “didn't do anything my daughter didn’t do.” Everyone agrees the encounter was completely consensual. The only reason the police became involved at all is because the girl suffers from epilepsy, and when she didn't come home as quickly as expected her mom worried and called the cops for help.

In this excellent South Bend Tribune article, the mom told a reporter that she didn’t just ask the judge for leniency, "we asked him to drop the case."
Yeah, I'm placing this squarely on the judge then.

What say the FBG Lawyers?
The judge is a ####. Prosecutor too.

 
this happened to a friend/acquaintance of mine. kid's life got proper ####ed for dating a white girl a few years younger than him. don't remember how long he was in for- definitely not 25 years.

 
this happened to a friend/acquaintance of mine. kid's life got proper ####ed for dating a white girl a few years younger than him. don't remember how long he was in for- definitely not 25 years.
The 25 years is registering as a sex offender. He'll only spent 90 days in jail.

 
Judge likes his power. Jailing a lady for cursing

#### this guy

ETA: no way am I condoning having sex with a 14 year old, but the girls mom asked for the case to be dropped as her daughter played a role

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this happened to a friend/acquaintance of mine. kid's life got proper ####ed for dating a white girl a few years younger than him. don't remember how long he was in for- definitely not 2
This might make it better, if imperfect. The kid got ninety days, 25 years on the sex offender registry. Still sucks, and is still a perversion of justice, but not as bad as jail for twenty-five years.

cheat's headline cut out.

The auto-correct keeps changing chet to cheat. Which is awesome, considering how the Blackhawks cheated again to win it all. :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At sentencing he told Anderson, "You went online, to use a fisherman's expression, trolling for women to meet and have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior."
Not only is it appropriate, but it's awesome.

 
this happened to a friend/acquaintance of mine. kid's life got proper ####ed for dating a white girl a few years younger than him. don't remember how long he was in for- definitely not 2
This might make it better, if imperfect. The kid got ninety days, 25 years on the sex offender registry. Still sucks, and is still a perversion of justice, but not as bad as jail for twenty-five years.

cheat's headline cut out.

The auto-correct keeps changing chet to cheat. Which is awesome, considering how the Blackhawks cheated again to win it all. :)
He also can't live in a house with internet or a smart phone for 5-years. That means he basically has to live by himself. If this were my kid, I'd get him out of the country and use my UK or Canada passport.

Judge is a complete ##########.

 
If the girl admits to lying, how did the kid break the law? Do you have to ask for ID before you bang some random now? I assume the responsibility is on the banger to verify the age of the bangee?

This has to be the bible belt, yes?

 
this happened to a friend/acquaintance of mine. kid's life got proper ####ed for dating a white girl a few years younger than him. don't remember how long he was in for- definitely not 2
This might make it better, if imperfect. The kid got ninety days, 25 years on the sex offender registry. Still sucks, and is still a perversion of justice, but not as bad as jail for twenty-five years.

cheat's headline cut out.

The auto-correct keeps changing chet to cheat. Which is awesome, considering how the Blackhawks cheated again to win it all. :)
He also can't live in a house with internet or a smart phone for 5-years. That means he basically has to live by himself. If this were my kid, I'd get him out of the country and use my UK or Canada passport.

Judge is a complete ##########.
That part is messed up. You cant function as a college student without the internet.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.

 
Um, yeah. I've met one or two judges that had some sense. The rest were a bunch of dopes obviously posted as some kind of political reward or something.

 
If the girl admits to lying, how did the kid break the law? Do you have to ask for ID before you bang some random now? I assume the responsibility is on the banger to verify the age of the bangee?

This has to be the bible belt, yes?
Michigan.

Addressed in the article re ID.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?

 
Seems ripe for appeal no?
From the article:

Tfamily is about to try to withdraw the original plea deal Zach agreed to, because, he says, "The prosecutor violated the plea."

You see, in Michigan there is a leniency provision for first-time offenders under age 21. It keeps them off the registry. As part of the plea deal, the prosecutor had agreed not to take a position pro or con on whether to apply the provision to Zach. But when it came time for sentencing, the prosecutor reminded the judge that he had denied leniency in similar cases twice before.

That struck defense lawyer Scott Grabel as not exactly neutral. "He did us a favor," says Grabel, "because now we have a basis to withdraw the plea."

I chatted with Grabel yesterday, too. He says that if the case is tried anew, he would like to hold off for another six-to-nine months, because by then it's possible that the Michigan Supreme Court will have decided to allow defendants to use she lied about her age as a component of their defense.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
Ive already said I dont know what the answer is. What if she was 12? 11? 10? At what point is it Ok to believe her?

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
Ive already said I dont know what the answer is. What if she was 12? 11? 10? At what point is it Ok to believe her?
I'd assume most 10yo girls aren't going to look 17 but it's not a stretch for a 14/15yo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:

 
feel bad for the guy but 14 year olds are still in junior high...he couldn't tell the difference? come on
Lots of 17 year-olds don't have much upstairs and those that have been around very well may mow the grass down below. :shrug:
feel bad for the guy but 14 year olds are still in junior high...he couldn't tell the difference? come on
My 13yo daughter has been served alcohol before. No way can you tell in some cases.
looks alone, yeah a lot of 14 year olds can pass for 17+, but I feel like I could spot a 14-year-old just by having one conversation with her.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
Ive already said I dont know what the answer is. What if she was 12? 11? 10? At what point is it Ok to believe her?
I'd assume most 10yo girls aren't going to look 17 but it's not a stretch for a 14/15yo.
To be honest, I dont want statutory rape to have a grey area. The laws can change as indicated in the article, but for now, its pretty cut and dry.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?

 
feel bad for the guy but 14 year olds are still in junior high...he couldn't tell the difference? come on
Lots of 17 year-olds don't have much upstairs and those that have been around very well may mow the grass down below. :shrug:
feel bad for the guy but 14 year olds are still in junior high...he couldn't tell the difference? come on
My 13yo daughter has been served alcohol before. No way can you tell in some cases.
looks alone, yeah a lot of 14 year olds can pass for 17+, but I feel like I could spot a 14-year-old just by having one conversation with her.
OK

 
I mean how long ago was it ok for a 14-year-old girl to marry in the U.S.? It's still allowed in most of the second and third world. As soon as females are sexually mature there are gonna be bees flying to the honey, same as it ever was.

 
Though it's hard to compare things like this, here's another link to a story that's similar IMO. 'Rape' culture seems to be trending to the point where if you have a penis, you are at fault regardless.

http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu

I don't recall which talking head, but remember it was put forth that individuals (~99% men) accused of rape should be considered guilty until proven innocent. Under the 'logic' that no victim would ever make an accusation unless it had actually happened, as the crime is so horrible.

 
You want to argue how old is too old, fine, I get it. We dont want 40 year olds raping little girls

But there has to be some common sense in sentencing by judges. The kid made a mistake. Ruining his whole life for it seems like a stretch when the girl lied and the mother asked for the case to be dropped. I get that you dont drop cases when every victims parents ask you to, but cmon

And yes, my attitude would probably change if the male was older

 
Though it's hard to compare things like this, here's another link to a story that's similar IMO. 'Rape' culture seems to be trending to the point where if you have a penis, you are at fault regardless.

http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu

I don't recall which talking head, but remember it was put forth that individuals (~99% men) accused of rape should be considered guilty until proven innocent. Under the 'logic' that no victim would ever make an accusation unless it had actually happened, as the crime is so horrible.
Most rape victims are male.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
Actually, the way things are going, I can actually SEE this being taught in today's classrooms in school...

"Guys... once you're over 18, things get more complicated as you may be meeting girls who are very close to the legal age. There have been a number of cases, now where some kid's life has been ruined because some judge with #### for brains makes an 18 or 19 year-old for having sex with his under-age girlfriend. So make sure you know the laws in your state...

"Girls... guys can get into big trouble if they don't check your credentials before they so much as touch your genital areas and it turns out you aren't legal. So you girls should expect to get carded. Bear with the guys on this.

"People... if you are going steady with someone now and one of you are getting close to age 18, be especially careful..."


 
Though it's hard to compare things like this, here's another link to a story that's similar IMO. 'Rape' culture seems to be trending to the point where if you have a penis, you are at fault regardless.

http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu

I don't recall which talking head, but remember it was put forth that individuals (~99% men) accused of rape should be considered guilty until proven innocent. Under the 'logic' that no victim would ever make an accusation unless it had actually happened, as the crime is so horrible.
Most rape victims are male.
I thought that was only rape victims in high school. :confused:

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
I'm able to put myself back to my 18/19yo partying self and can't imagine meeting a girl at a party and asking her for ID before we go somewhere to ####.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
I'm able to put myself back to my 18/19yo partying self and can't imagine meeting a girl at a party and asking her for ID before we go somewhere to ####.
I wouldn't have either, but it's a different world. I know I'll be talking to my son about being extra careful.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
I'm able to put myself back to my 18/19yo partying self and can't imagine meeting a girl at a party and asking her for ID before we go somewhere to ####.
Between this and the Amherst college story, it will soon be a very good idea to have a portable copy machine to get a copy of the id and a signed affadavit indicating her consent.

 
The judge and prosecution should all be tarred and feathered and made examples off. Or at the least, strung up in the public square

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
I'm able to put myself back to my 18/19yo partying self and can't imagine meeting a girl at a party and asking her for ID before we go somewhere to ####.
I wouldn't have either, but it's a different world. I know I'll be talking to my son about being extra careful.
Certainly, but I know I still wouldn't stop in the heat of the moment to ask for ID. Even now, knowing what I know.

 
I dont know where you draw the line? The guy was 19, the girl, 14. Yep, she lied, but what if the guy was 25? Would you feel bad for him then? I dont know what the answer is, but a 19 year old being with a 14 year old isnt right IMO.
He didn't know she was 14. I was over 18 and my wife under when we first "hooked up." Not unusual for 18+yo males to have sex with 17yo girls. No way should they have their life ruined because of it.
Most states have 16 as the age, not 18. Like I said, I dont know what the answer is, but I know ignorance doesnt excuse one from the law.
And she said she was 17. What's he supposed to do, card her?
If he doesn't know her then yes. I know this case is stupid, but not every one is. As stupid as the thought of "carding" some girl that wants to sleep with you as far as the law is concerned ignorance is not an excuse.
:lmao:
You can laugh, but who makes the choice on whether it was plausible for the kid to believe she was the age she said she was? Do you want individual judges making the call?
I'm able to put myself back to my 18/19yo partying self and can't imagine meeting a girl at a party and asking her for ID before we go somewhere to ####.
But there is no way you talk to her as she's bragging about her new bike with the basket with a flower on it that she got for Christmas and telling you who her favorite NKOTB/Back Street Boy/One Direction guy is and not at least think that talking a little further might be a good idea. I think anyone that starts sticking it anywhere that will have them at parties without even getting a feel for the age involved, is certainly rolling the dice on jail time.

To whoever said he can't be a college student without internet/smart phone: Maybe thinning the college applicants by weeding out those that make bad decisions works in this case. There were enough idiots like that in college. Many shouldn't have been there as their primary focus was clearly not on studying.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top