Marawho?
Good info, thanks...Marinelli spent the past 10 seasons in Tampa Bay as defensive line coach. His unit helped establish an NFL record with 69 straight games with at least one sack from 1999 to 2003. He had the title of assistant head coach added in 2002.
AMEN,,, that's pretty much why I WANT to know....Anything's better than Haslett.
EXACTLY what I was going to post. Collective sigh of relief by KJ owners.Anything's better than Haslett.
I don't report false info.i'm not asking for a link..BUT
did we hear "HE IS THE MAN"??
or that he APPEARS to be the man??
sorry didn't want insult, just want to see what "=" meant PS, thanks for the news!!I don't report false info.i'm not asking for a link..BUT
did we hear "HE IS THE MAN"??
or that he APPEARS to be the man??
Well that's one way to look at it. The other way is that some new blood is getting a shot at a head coaching job, instead of all of these useless old retreads. I'm just glad they didn't hire Haslett. Or **** Jauron. At least somebody new is getting a chance.Maybe I should throw my name into the coach applicant pool... I mean I'm going to be 18 soon so I can be hired!
Are they serious with all this? McCarthy, Marinelli? Come on!
Because the results with Duece were so terrible?EXACTLY what I was going to post. Collective sigh of relief by KJ owners.Anything's better than Haslett.
Cappy,The Bucs are used to losing position coaches [Herm, Lovie, etc...] but have had Monte Kiffin as the key underpinning and constant. With Kiffin remaining, how would you rate the significance of losing Marinelli and your DB coach [to Minnesota] in the same year? Any idea of who they'll replace them with?God, this is such a great hire I can hardly believe the Lions are the ones behind it.
Marinelli has been due for a job for years now. The Bucs are really going to miss him. Really going to miss him.
For those of you who don't know his name -- you will.
My thought exactly. Haslett hurt Deuce?JBecause the results with Duece were so terrible?EXACTLY what I was going to post. Collective sigh of relief by KJ owners.Anything's better than Haslett.![]()
sorry didn't want insult, just want to see what "=" meant PS, thanks for the news!!I don't report false info.i'm not asking for a link..BUT
did we hear "HE IS THE MAN"??
or that he APPEARS to be the man??
Hi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
Tomlin isn't as significant as Marinelli -- out of all the recent departures, I'd rate him the least important after Lovie, Herm and Rod (not in that order). He's been on the job for a few years, but it's an experienced defensive backfield. Always has been.From everything I've seen/read over the years, Marinelli is going to be incredibly hard to replace. Look at that D-line every year -- no matter who they stick in there, they get production. Chris Hovan has said Marinelli was the reason he came here, and was the reason why he had such a great year. Many players have expressed the same sentiment.Cappy,The Bucs are used to losing position coaches [Herm, Lovie, etc...] but have had Monte Kiffin as the key underpinning and constant. With Kiffin remaining, how would you rate the significance of losing Marinelli and your DB coach [to Minnesota] in the same year? Any idea of who they'll replace them with?God, this is such a great hire I can hardly believe the Lions are the ones behind it.
Marinelli has been due for a job for years now. The Bucs are really going to miss him. Really going to miss him.
For those of you who don't know his name -- you will.
Woodrow
Yes...actually he did.My thought exactly. Haslett hurt Deuce?JBecause the results with Duece were so terrible?EXACTLY what I was going to post. Collective sigh of relief by KJ owners.Anything's better than Haslett.![]()
Hi Shonuf,Can you expound on that please? Thanks.Yes...actually he did.My thought exactly. Haslett hurt Deuce?JBecause the results with Duece were so terrible?EXACTLY what I was going to post. Collective sigh of relief by KJ owners.Anything's better than Haslett.![]()
The newly fired coaches aren't very appealing. Jimmy Johnson and Marv Levy said no. No one looks good in the college ranks. I think there aren't many options left. Time to find the next Jim Mora, Jr., Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith, etc.Hi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J
Not saying this - or any HC job - is easy, but I think following a SB champ, or even a consistent winner (Hi Packers) would be a much more difficult task.I just hope he is up for the most difficult coaching task in his life.
Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J
Thanks Jason. You write for the site?.... Good thoughts and I agree wholeheartedly with the risk factor. And for sure I don't disagree if a guy is incredible in the interview. I just see lots of the thing with Greenberg with people wanting anyone but the guy they've got. Change for change's sake.Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J] and I've long felt that GMs too often take the "safe" route rather than hiring the guy that most impresses them. Obviously my own experience as an Eagles fan colors my viewpoint here. Andy Reid had never been an NFL coordinator or head coach, but the Eagles chose him as head coach over a list of much more mature coaches. Lurie said Reid just blew him away with his level of professionalism, preparedness and organization. Lurie got SHREDDED for the hire, but obviously five division titles, five 11 win seasons and a SB trip later, people recognize it was the right move.
I believe wholeheartedly that when a GM hires a first-time coach the onus becomes squarely on him, especially when it's not their first hire. So for guys like Bradway [replacing Herm] and Millen [replacing Marty Morhinweg and Mooch], they HAD to get these hires right. IT would've been a LOT easier to hire an established veteran [like a Jim Fassel or Wade Phillips] who were available and were former head coaches and justify that move. With the young guys, it could be a DISASTER. You're probably not going to get a disaster by hiring Martz or Fassel or Phillips.
But the upshot is you could also be hiring a truly great mind. There's no formula, but I've no doubt the success of Reid, John Fox, Jack Del Rio, Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith and Jon Gruden has GMs willing to take chances on young minds now more than ever.
also I feel, it gives Millen another 2 to 3 years, for his coach to get "seasoned"Thanks Jason. You write for the site?.... Good thoughts and I agree wholeheartedly with the risk factor. And for sure I don't disagree if a guy is incredible in the interview. I just see lots of the thing with Greenberg with people wanting anyone but the guy they've got. Change for change's sake.Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J] and I've long felt that GMs too often take the "safe" route rather than hiring the guy that most impresses them. Obviously my own experience as an Eagles fan colors my viewpoint here. Andy Reid had never been an NFL coordinator or head coach, but the Eagles chose him as head coach over a list of much more mature coaches. Lurie said Reid just blew him away with his level of professionalism, preparedness and organization. Lurie got SHREDDED for the hire, but obviously five division titles, five 11 win seasons and a SB trip later, people recognize it was the right move.
I believe wholeheartedly that when a GM hires a first-time coach the onus becomes squarely on him, especially when it's not their first hire. So for guys like Bradway [replacing Herm] and Millen [replacing Marty Morhinweg and Mooch], they HAD to get these hires right. IT would've been a LOT easier to hire an established veteran [like a Jim Fassel or Wade Phillips] who were available and were former head coaches and justify that move. With the young guys, it could be a DISASTER. You're probably not going to get a disaster by hiring Martz or Fassel or Phillips.
But the upshot is you could also be hiring a truly great mind. There's no formula, but I've no doubt the success of Reid, John Fox, Jack Del Rio, Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith and Jon Gruden has GMs willing to take chances on young minds now more than ever.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes. I wonder a little about a guy as old as Marinelli that's never been a HC before at any level. One thing for Reid, that was due. Another for a guy that's been around that long. I hope he does well.
J
Greeny is intolerable so I'll agree with you there. Greeny is simply projecting man-love for Mangini because he's a Belichick disciple.But as history has shown us, a handful of Belichick coaches are going to end up fair to middling as head coaches. The Bill Walsh tree had its Morhinweg's. So if you presume Nick Saban is a proven stud, Charlie Weis is the real deal, Kirk Ferentz is well regarded, Pat Hill has done a nice job at Fresno...chances are someone [or two] from the tree will be an outright failure. Personally, of all the hires thus far, I'm most circumspect on Mangini and Payton. With Payton, I just haven't seen enough from him to project his being good...that's not to say he won't be, but I just get nervous about a guy who's known primarily as an offensive mind who got play-calling duties taken from him in New York and Dallas [bill took back final play calling say in 2005].Thanks Jason. You write for the site?.... Good thoughts and I agree wholeheartedly with the risk factor. And for sure I don't disagree if a guy is incredible in the interview. I just see lots of the thing with Greenberg with people wanting anyone but the guy they've got. Change for change's sake.Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J] and I've long felt that GMs too often take the "safe" route rather than hiring the guy that most impresses them. Obviously my own experience as an Eagles fan colors my viewpoint here. Andy Reid had never been an NFL coordinator or head coach, but the Eagles chose him as head coach over a list of much more mature coaches. Lurie said Reid just blew him away with his level of professionalism, preparedness and organization. Lurie got SHREDDED for the hire, but obviously five division titles, five 11 win seasons and a SB trip later, people recognize it was the right move.
I believe wholeheartedly that when a GM hires a first-time coach the onus becomes squarely on him, especially when it's not their first hire. So for guys like Bradway [replacing Herm] and Millen [replacing Marty Morhinweg and Mooch], they HAD to get these hires right. IT would've been a LOT easier to hire an established veteran [like a Jim Fassel or Wade Phillips] who were available and were former head coaches and justify that move. With the young guys, it could be a DISASTER. You're probably not going to get a disaster by hiring Martz or Fassel or Phillips.
But the upshot is you could also be hiring a truly great mind. There's no formula, but I've no doubt the success of Reid, John Fox, Jack Del Rio, Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith and Jon Gruden has GMs willing to take chances on young minds now more than ever.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes. I wonder a little about a guy as old as Marinelli that's never been a HC before at any level. One thing for Reid, that was due. Another for a guy that's been around that long. I hope he does well.
J
That's probably a good point, none. As long as Millen has "those" pictures of whoever it is they're of, he'll be ok though.Jalso I feel, it gives Millen another 2 to 3 years, for his coach to get "seasoned"Thanks Jason. You write for the site?.... Good thoughts and I agree wholeheartedly with the risk factor. And for sure I don't disagree if a guy is incredible in the interview. I just see lots of the thing with Greenberg with people wanting anyone but the guy they've got. Change for change's sake.Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J] and I've long felt that GMs too often take the "safe" route rather than hiring the guy that most impresses them. Obviously my own experience as an Eagles fan colors my viewpoint here. Andy Reid had never been an NFL coordinator or head coach, but the Eagles chose him as head coach over a list of much more mature coaches. Lurie said Reid just blew him away with his level of professionalism, preparedness and organization. Lurie got SHREDDED for the hire, but obviously five division titles, five 11 win seasons and a SB trip later, people recognize it was the right move.
I believe wholeheartedly that when a GM hires a first-time coach the onus becomes squarely on him, especially when it's not their first hire. So for guys like Bradway [replacing Herm] and Millen [replacing Marty Morhinweg and Mooch], they HAD to get these hires right. IT would've been a LOT easier to hire an established veteran [like a Jim Fassel or Wade Phillips] who were available and were former head coaches and justify that move. With the young guys, it could be a DISASTER. You're probably not going to get a disaster by hiring Martz or Fassel or Phillips.
But the upshot is you could also be hiring a truly great mind. There's no formula, but I've no doubt the success of Reid, John Fox, Jack Del Rio, Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith and Jon Gruden has GMs willing to take chances on young minds now more than ever.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes. I wonder a little about a guy as old as Marinelli that's never been a HC before at any level. One thing for Reid, that was due. Another for a guy that's been around that long. I hope he does well.
J
i remember hearing about those...those are the pictures Wayne Fontes left in the desk....That's probably a good point, none. As long as Millen has "those" pictures of whoever it is they're of, he'll be ok though.Jalso I feel, it gives Millen another 2 to 3 years, for his coach to get "seasoned"Thanks Jason. You write for the site?.... Good thoughts and I agree wholeheartedly with the risk factor. And for sure I don't disagree if a guy is incredible in the interview. I just see lots of the thing with Greenberg with people wanting anyone but the guy they've got. Change for change's sake.Hey Joe,As you know, I follow the coaching carousel fairly intently [and write the stuff up for the siteHi Jason,Can you expound on that?I must admit I'm really impressed with the hirings thus far. While some of these guys will inevitably fail [some on their own failings, others due to circumstance], the GMs have all [to date] universally gone with young new faces in the hopes of finding greatness versus settling for someone they know is "safe."
That seems to me to be the conventional wisdom with everyone. Greenberg loving Mangini this morning saying he'd rather have the devil he doesn't know than the devil he does.
It's like the love hot rookies get every year to me. I fell for it with Spurrier.
I'm sure some of these guys will do fine. I don't think any of the former head coaches out there are the next Belichick but I don't know that a Bill Belichick type story isn't out there as well with a guy that has experience already.
Why do you applaud the new face so strong?
J] and I've long felt that GMs too often take the "safe" route rather than hiring the guy that most impresses them. Obviously my own experience as an Eagles fan colors my viewpoint here. Andy Reid had never been an NFL coordinator or head coach, but the Eagles chose him as head coach over a list of much more mature coaches. Lurie said Reid just blew him away with his level of professionalism, preparedness and organization. Lurie got SHREDDED for the hire, but obviously five division titles, five 11 win seasons and a SB trip later, people recognize it was the right move.
I believe wholeheartedly that when a GM hires a first-time coach the onus becomes squarely on him, especially when it's not their first hire. So for guys like Bradway [replacing Herm] and Millen [replacing Marty Morhinweg and Mooch], they HAD to get these hires right. IT would've been a LOT easier to hire an established veteran [like a Jim Fassel or Wade Phillips] who were available and were former head coaches and justify that move. With the young guys, it could be a DISASTER. You're probably not going to get a disaster by hiring Martz or Fassel or Phillips.
But the upshot is you could also be hiring a truly great mind. There's no formula, but I've no doubt the success of Reid, John Fox, Jack Del Rio, Marvin Lewis, Lovie Smith and Jon Gruden has GMs willing to take chances on young minds now more than ever.
It'll be interesting to see how it goes. I wonder a little about a guy as old as Marinelli that's never been a HC before at any level. One thing for Reid, that was due. Another for a guy that's been around that long. I hope he does well.
J
Anything's better than Haslett.
One other thing -- people talk about the Belichek/Parcells 'family tree' and with good reason -- but the Dungy/Kiffin "Tampa 2" branch is starting to extend out pretty far.
Kiffin-Tampa D guru
Dungy-Indy HC
Marinelli-Detroit HC
Herm-KC HC
Lovie-Chi HC
Tomlin-Minny DC
That's four head coaches and two DC's. Pretty solid.
I can give you a description straight from an employee of the Bucs who went to practices:Rod is a complete HARD ###! His coaching style is an in-your-face combo of screaming at you and teaching you at the same time. He is completely relentless with his yelling/teaching, and could be heard over everyone else on the field.Can anyone speak as to what kind of disciplinarian this guy is? The one aspect the Lions need. I know he's sort of linked to Mooch in that they were on Bruce Snyder's staff together at Cal in the early 90s, but why hasn't he been a head coach before this?