Marshawn Lynch could be traded by draft day (1 Viewer)

[Matt's Eagles]

ESPN's Adam Schefter recently named Marshawn Lynch the player most likely to be traded, ahead of Brandon Marshall and Jason Campbell.

"They have a new coach, a new GM and any time there are new people in charge, they bring in their own players," said Schefter. "Marshawn Lynch could be traded on or before the draft." The new regime is less than impressed with Lynch's attitude, and it's looking more and more likely that he'll be replaced by a change-of-pace complement to Fred Jackson. Apr. 9 - 8:25 am et

Where do you think he will go?

 

[Honda]

Detroit

 

[dmac37]

Chargers

Pair him up with Sproles

 

[David Yudkin]

I think the issue will be that teams are aware of his off field issues and may shy away realizing that he is one bone head move from seeing a lengthy suspension. IMO, the Bills may think that he has more trade value than he actually does. RBs usually don't bring much in a trade in the first place (at least not in terms of draft pick compensation). Would the Bills be willing to part with him for a late round pick?

 

[Ketamine Dreams]

I honestly wonder what he would be worth in a trade. Not too much IMO.

 

[Tau837]

I think the issue will be that teams are aware of his off field issues and may shy away realizing that he is one bone head move from seeing a lengthy suspension. IMO, the Bills may think that he has more trade value than he actually does. RBs usually don't bring much in a trade in the first place (at least not in terms of draft pick compensation). Would the Bills be willing to part with him for a late round pick?

I was thinking the same thing. The new regime isn't impressed with his attitude, bu... why would any other team be any more impressed with him? And if they are moving him for a draft pick, other teams have to consider how he compares in terms of production, salary, and risks to a RB they could draft with the pick... which would seem to push the likely pick Buffalo could get for him into the 4th round or later...

 

[Comer]

Detroit

Love it if we can get him for a 4th or later pick.

 

[GroveDiesel]

Unless the Bills are 100% certain that Lynch takes more off of the table than he bringsto it, it seems foolish for them to trade him. As others have pointed out, his value isn't all that high so they're unlikely to get much for him. Why trade away a guy that can at least be valuable depth and a guy that can share carries for a pick that could net you someone that would be lucky to be a backup in the league for a few years?

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

Unless the Bills are 100% certain that Lynch takes more off of the table than he bringsto it, it seems foolish for them to trade him. As others have pointed out, his value isn't all that high so they're unlikely to get much for him. Why trade away a guy that can at least be valuable depth and a guy that can share carries for a pick that could net you someone that would be lucky to be a backup in the league for a few years?

agreed. Unless this has to do with "spending" issues. As I imagine is making decent money.

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

Detroit

Love it if we can get him for a 4th or later pick.

agreed. I think the coaching staff seems "tough enough" to deal with these types of personalities. Look what Schwartz did with Albert haynesworth.

 

[SugarNuts]

Unless the Bills are 100% certain that Lynch takes more off of the table than he bringsto it, it seems foolish for them to trade him. As others have pointed out, his value isn't all that high so they're unlikely to get much for him. Why trade away a guy that can at least be valuable depth and a guy that can share carries for a pick that could net you someone that would be lucky to be a backup in the league for a few years?

Because a new regim would rather take a chance on a guy that could be a solid contributor than a guy who is 1 strike away from a long suspoension. I think they keep him, but I wouldnt be the least bit surprised to see him moved. Anything less than a 3rd would be a steal for another team. Even a 3rd is a steal IMO. The dude has tons of talent. He just needs the right coaching IMO.

 

[Hipple Long Ware & Peete]

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/36166034/ns/...ts-player_news/

April 4, 2010 - 7:15 AM ET

The Buffalo News passes along "word within the locker room" that Marshawn Lynch would like to be traded this offseason.

Lynch's off-field trouble has ruined his trade value, as no team wants to deal for him only to lose him to a suspension the next time he runs afoul of the law. The Bills are under no pressure to ship him out, but they could consider a draft-weekend trade if coach Chan Gailey lands his desired scat-back. For now, it's clear that Lynch won't be regaining his starting job even with a new coaching staff in town.

Source: Buffalo News

 

[Shutout]

-Chargers

-Eagles (good trading history between the two teams...if the price is right)

-Redskins (if it somehow involves Haynesworth..would rely on the Bills staying more in a 4-3..doubting this one but need is there)

-Seahawks

-Patriots

-Lions

Those would be my most likely. As far as the other stuff, I think people are blowing out of proportion the attitude, etc. We have seen COUNTLESS players make complete asses of themselves, on and off the field, and end up somewhere. Bottom line is if there is talent, there is a market. If the attitude/baggage theory held up, guys like Moss, Owens, A. Bryant, Marshall, and a whole host of others would be gone by now. If you can trade Brandon Marshall, you can sure trade Lynch. I think the price will be a 4th this year or a 3rd next year. Could possibly involve a LB or Defensive lineman if the trading partner is right.

 

[FantasyMan]

I think the issue will be that teams are aware of his off field issues and may shy away realizing that he is one bone head move from seeing a lengthy suspension. IMO, the Bills may think that he has more trade value than he actually does. RBs usually don't bring much in a trade in the first place (at least not in terms of draft pick compensation). Would the Bills be willing to part with him for a late round pick?

Lynch isn't going anywhere except the bench as a backup to Jackson. His trade value is close to worthless and he brings more value to the Bills as a backup than anything another team is going to offer for him.Offseason speculation by the media in order to have something to talk about.

 

[Ron_Mexico]

I think the issue will be that teams are aware of his off field issues and may shy away realizing that he is one bone head move from seeing a lengthy suspension. IMO, the Bills may think that he has more trade value than he actually does. RBs usually don't bring much in a trade in the first place (at least not in terms of draft pick compensation). Would the Bills be willing to part with him for a late round pick?

Lynch isn't going anywhere except the bench as a backup to Jackson. His trade value is close to worthless and he brings more value to the Bills as a backup than anything another team is going to offer for him.Offseason speculation by the media in order to have something to talk about.

I concur with this.

 

[travdogg]

I would the Texans would make a lot of sense. Lynch's biggest strength is being a good runner after contact. He and Slaton could form a pretty solid 1-2 punch and would allow the Texans to address their defensive needs in the 1st two rounds.

 

[On The Rocks]

Lynch isn't going anywhere except the bench as a backup to Jackson. His trade value is close to worthless and he brings more value to the Bills as a backup than anything another team is going to offer for him.

Offseason speculation by the media in order to have something to talk about.

This is exactly right.

Unless they could find a suiter that would provide at a minimum a 3rd rounder with a possible extra pick based on performance...I don't see him going anywhere...and I don't see anyone making that kind of offer.

 

[JamesTheScot]

I'm going to do a little hijack here...why is this news?

Schefter says Lynch "could be traded on or before the draft". Did he also report that it could rain this weekend? Or that Jamarcus Russell could get cut if he screws up bad enough? It's one thing to cite an unnamed source as telling him that team X is inquiring about Lynch. But why cite him for his own opinion on what everybody already knows could (and also might not) happen?

In other words, how does this change in even one iota anything we didn't already know about the Lynch vs. Buffalo situation? It doesn't. It's a just regurgitation of the same old speculation. As far as we know, Lynch is no closer to be traded now than he was the day before this "news" came out.

I give props to A.S. on his skill in ferreting out information, but this is a prime example of the reporter being the news instead of finding the news and exposing it.

<steps down off the soap box>

 

[coolnerd]

I'm going to do a little hijack here...why is this news?Schefter says Lynch "could be traded on or before the draft". Did he also report that it could rain this weekend? Or that Jamarcus Russell could get cut if he screws up bad enough? It's one thing to cite an unnamed source as telling him that team X is inquiring about Lynch. But why cite him for his own opinion on what everybody already knows could (and also might not) happen?In other words, how does this change in even one iota anything we didn't already know about the Lynch vs. Buffalo situation? It doesn't. It's a just regurgitation of the same old speculation. As far as we know, Lynch is no closer to be traded now than he was the day before this "news" came out.I give props to A.S. on his skill in ferreting out information, but this is a prime example of the reporter being the news instead of finding the news and exposing it.<steps down off the soap box>

I always assume that when "information" guys start throwing out this sort of stuff that is based on a mention from a source, not on thier analysis or even assumptions. On my more cynical days, I even think that an agent or team has planted this in order to drum up trade interest that may not have been there to start.

 

[Boston]

The Bills would probably be better off going the conditional trade route here...the guy has not lived up to expectations in Buffalo but he has legit talent and if the lightbulb went on with a change of scenery he could be very productive.

 

[coolnerd]

I would the Texans would make a lot of sense. Lynch's biggest strength is being a good runner after contact. He and Slaton could form a pretty solid 1-2 punch and would allow the Texans to address their defensive needs in the 1st two rounds.

On the field he seems like a fit. The Texans have yet to sign, draft or trade an obvious character risk, don't expect them to make their first with a guy that close to missing significant games.

 

[Tackling Dummies]

Unless the Bills are 100% certain that Lynch takes more off of the table than he brings to it, it seems foolish for them to trade him. As others have pointed out, his value isn't all that high so they're unlikely to get much for him. Why trade away a guy that can at least be valuable depth and a guy that can share carries for a pick that could net you someone that would be lucky to be a backup in the league for a few years?

The Bills know going in that they will be selling low, but the value of getting rid of a troubled player/loud mouth/headcase is most likely worth it.

 

[Chicago Hooligan]

Who would trade for this diarrhea milkshake of a contract? You can try him out for one year at a reasonable price but if he doesn't pan out he will be released. MJD makes far less on his 2009 deal.

Lynch, from rotoworld - 2010: $3.6 million

2011: $6 million

2012: $6.5 million

2013: $7.2 million

2014: Free Agent.

Cap charges: $8.75 million (2011)

 

[Shutout]

His trade value is close to worthless and he brings more value to the Bills as a backup than anything another team is going to offer for him.

Interesting statement, especially from a person with a Chargers icon.I am starting to get the feeling that everyone talking about this only has the memory of Lynch of exactly one year, which was bad. But this a guy with more than just last year. He is a 24 year old who had two very serviceable years on a poor offensive team. Then last year, the Bills completely disintegrated and he missed time and the result was a poor year. We in the FF world may damn him to eternity and says he's worthless because we remember him being worthless to us 5 months ago, but real world NFL people consider the complete picture. If a guy has talent, he will get redemption chances. That's part of the reason why guys like Garcia and Moss and Delhomme have gotten other chances elsewhere...because NFL people know they could do it. Its part of the reason why guys like T.O. and Pacman Jones won't go away. His trade value in a fantasy circle may be next to nothing but in the NFL, there is still a lot of value there. If a team like the Chargers (or anyone else) looks at this and weighs in a first round player that has played well, and the team was poor and there were other circumstances with Lynch, and then talks to the Bills and finds out they can get him for a 4th or a pick next year, or a player that they have on their roster that they won't be keeping, then it instantly creates value because now, all of a sudden, a team like the Chargers can say "we can give that for Lynch AND STILL keep our 1st rounder to use on that lineman we need so bad, or whatever. If thats the case, a small price for a player that has proven they can play in the league is certainly valuable. After all, you don't know if a rookie will pan out. You know that if you're trading away a player you won't otherwise keep that you're going to part ways with the player anyways. Sure, there's value.The more I read about this situation with Lynch, the more it reminds me of Jamal Lewis when he had been exiled and declared done. But then he came back around and had one really good year and a few others. And Lynch is much younger and without the injury history that Lewis was. I wouldn't start shoveling dirt on him just yet.

 

[domvin]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

 

[FantasyMan]

His trade value is close to worthless and he brings more value to the Bills as a backup than anything another team is going to offer for him.

Interesting statement, especially from a person with a Chargers icon.I am starting to get the feeling that everyone talking about this only has the memory of Lynch of exactly one year, which was bad. But this a guy with more than just last year. He is a 24 year old who had two very serviceable years on a poor offensive team. Then last year, the Bills completely disintegrated and he missed time and the result was a poor year. We in the FF world may damn him to eternity and says he's worthless because we remember him being worthless to us 5 months ago, but real world NFL people consider the complete picture. If a guy has talent, he will get redemption chances. That's part of the reason why guys like Garcia and Moss and Delhomme have gotten other chances elsewhere...because NFL people know they could do it. Its part of the reason why guys like T.O. and Pacman Jones won't go away. His trade value in a fantasy circle may be next to nothing but in the NFL, there is still a lot of value there. If a team like the Chargers (or anyone else) looks at this and weighs in a first round player that has played well, and the team was poor and there were other circumstances with Lynch, and then talks to the Bills and finds out they can get him for a 4th or a pick next year, or a player that they have on their roster that they won't be keeping, then it instantly creates value because now, all of a sudden, a team like the Chargers can say "we can give that for Lynch AND STILL keep our 1st rounder to use on that lineman we need so bad, or whatever. If thats the case, a small price for a player that has proven they can play in the league is certainly valuable. After all, you don't know if a rookie will pan out. You know that if you're trading away a player you won't otherwise keep that you're going to part ways with the player anyways. Sure, there's value.The more I read about this situation with Lynch, the more it reminds me of Jamal Lewis when he had been exiled and declared done. But then he came back around and had one really good year and a few others. And Lynch is much younger and without the injury history that Lewis was. I wouldn't start shoveling dirt on him just yet.

While many people on this board seem to suffer from "5 months ago syndrome", I'm not one of them. My statement actually had nothing to do with last season, I thought he played pretty well given his circumstances even though he was outplayed by his backup. My statement was directed toward the fact that this guy just doesn't get it. He's half a strike away from not playing in the NFL for quite awhile and still finds ways to find his name connected to doing stupid things.Given the choice of a rookie in the 3rd/4th round or Lynch, I'll take the rookie. At least I know he'll be able to suit up on Sundays.

 

[Tommy Collins]

Trade Lynch. Then who is with Jackson in the backfield? Because Jackson is, what, 29 or 30 years old now? That and he isn't built to be an every down back in the NFL. So we're creating yet another hole by doing this. Doesn't make much sense.

 

[djmich]

Trade Lynch. Then who is with Jackson in the backfield? Because Jackson is, what, 29 or 30 years old now? That and he isn't built to be an every down back in the NFL. So we're creating yet another hole by doing this. Doesn't make much sense.

The guy they draft with the pick they get?

 

[bluesclues]

Fred Jackson is not youthful.

They could land Dwyer after the first round or find a back like McCluster to be the change of pace.

 

[az_prof]

I think the issue will be that teams are aware of his off field issues and may shy away realizing that he is one bone head move from seeing a lengthy suspension. IMO, the Bills may think that he has more trade value than he actually does. RBs usually don't bring much in a trade in the first place (at least not in terms of draft pick compensation). Would the Bills be willing to part with him for a late round pick?

I can't imagine any team giving up more than a fourth round pick, and at that point, new regime or not, you have to consider if keeping him as a backup to Jackson is better value than trading him.How many teams are still in the market for back at this time? How many of them would rather draft their 'own guy' rather than buy someone else's trash?

 

[IvanKaramazov]

Trade Lynch. Then who is with Jackson in the backfield? Because Jackson is, what, 29 or 30 years old now? That and he isn't built to be an every down back in the NFL. So we're creating yet another hole by doing this. Doesn't make much sense.

So? We do this every couple of years, so why stop now? We had Travis Henry in the backfield, but then we decided oh what the hell let's spend a 1st on McGahee. Then we traded McGahee, which created a hole that forced us to draft Lynch. So now the obvious shark move is to trade Lynch for penuts so we'll have to spend another draft pick on this position.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

Gailey only had the four Ga Tech juniors for one year so I doubt there is the tie you would think there is. And Gailey wants a change of pace back to pair with Jackson which sounds to me like a Spiller, Best, McKnight, or McCluster type of player.

 

[Ghost of Bill Walsh]

If they can't get anything better than a 4th this year or a 3rd next year they'll keep him. If he's still on the roster in TC and some team loses rb/rb's in camp his trade value for at least a 3rd in '11 goes up if they draft a rb in this year's draft.

 

[Carter_Can_Fly]

Sometimes players can benefit greatly from an actual NFL playing stand point with a new team and or new sitauation... Look at guys like Thomas Jones, Cedric Benson, Priest Holmes, Ryan Grant, Cory Dillion etc etc for guys that needed a change of scenery to have a shot at rejuivinating their careers or kick starting them. People were quick to dismiss Benson saying he did not have the work ethic to make it in the NFL but he moves to Cincy and had a very good year.

At this stage maybe I am hoping more than anything as I just aquired Lynch in a dynasty league thinking that he has a chance with his age and talent to right this ship. It only takes one team to believe in him and give him a shot and next thing ya know Lynch could be labelled as a guy that "turned his career around" and is "back on track."

Lynch's off field issues is more concerning to his ablity to be effective down the road than his talent. If he stay out of trouble his talent and opportunity may have him back as a worthy fantasy player sooner than many think.

 

[domvin]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

Gailey only had the four Ga Tech juniors for one year so I doubt there is the tie you would think there is. And Gailey wants a change of pace back to pair with Jackson which sounds to me like a Spiller, Best, McKnight, or McCluster type of player.

Help me out Rambling.......I thought Gailey recruited him to GT? Not the case?

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

Gailey only had the four Ga Tech juniors for one year so I doubt there is the tie you would think there is. And Gailey wants a change of pace back to pair with Jackson which sounds to me like a Spiller, Best, McKnight, or McCluster type of player.

Help me out Rambling.......I thought Gailey recruited him to GT? Not the case?

Yes Gailey recruited all four to Tech but only coached them on the field one season.

 

[kaa]

The Browns should focus on being strictly a running football team for now until they find a franchise QB. They don't have anyone on their roster who has a proven track record in the NFL. The Browns have a surplus of selections in this draft. Maybe bringing in a veteran RB to add depth would be a good idea.

 

[Blackjacks]

The Browns should focus on being strictly a running football team for now until they find a franchise QB. They don't have anyone on their roster who has a proven track record in the NFL. The Browns have a surplus of selections in this draft. Maybe bringing in a veteran RB to add depth would be a good idea.

I was thinking this as well.A Harrison/Lynch duo would be very nice and take some heat off the passing game. When Lynch is on the field he is a very good rb

 

[Tommy Collins]

Trade Lynch. Then who is with Jackson in the backfield? Because Jackson is, what, 29 or 30 years old now? That and he isn't built to be an every down back in the NFL. So we're creating yet another hole by doing this. Doesn't make much sense.

So? We do this every couple of years, so why stop now? We had Travis Henry in the backfield, but then we decided oh what the hell let's spend a 1st on McGahee. Then we traded McGahee, which created a hole that forced us to draft Lynch. So now the obvious shark move is to trade Lynch for penuts so we'll have to spend another draft pick on this position.

Yeah, I know. It's just not logical and I hope the new regime changes that. To waste another high pick on a running back is just a waste.

 

[thecardiackid]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

Gailey only had the four Ga Tech juniors for one year so I doubt there is the tie you would think there is. And Gailey wants a change of pace back to pair with Jackson which sounds to me like a Spiller, Best, McKnight, or McCluster type of player.

Help me out Rambling.......I thought Gailey recruited him to GT? Not the case?

Yes Gailey recruited all four to Tech but only coached them on the field one season.

That's fine, so help me out too. How do you 'know' the bolded part?I'd tend to agree in the short term, but Jackson is going to be 30 yrs old when this season is over.

 

[Donnybrook]

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/4/10/...ating?ref=yahoo

Marshawn Lynch trade talks heating up

by Brian Galliford on Apr 10, 2010 8:47 PM EDT in News



We've known for roughly a week now that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch wants out of town. According to a couple of reports - one that names names, and one that doesn't - the third-year running back may be getting his wish sooner rather than later.



Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports reports via Twitter that a Pro Bowl running back is on the trade block, but will not yet disclose the name of the player nor the two teams involved in trade talks. He does, however, mention that the two teams are not in the same division.



A BuffaloSportsDaily.com report takes things a step further. Citing a "reliable source," the report indicates that a trade involving Lynch is now "inevitable," and that there is more than one team in contention for the former Cal star's services. This report also indicates that the Bills are seeking player compensation, as opposed to draft pick compensation.



Lynch is coming off his worst season as a professional - one in which he served a three-game suspension and rushed for just 450 yards while losing his starting job to Fred Jackson. He did not report to the team's voluntary workouts in late March.

 

[Comer]

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/4/10/...ating?ref=yahoo

Marshawn Lynch trade talks heating up

by Brian Galliford on Apr 10, 2010 8:47 PM EDT in News



We've known for roughly a week now that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch wants out of town. According to a couple of reports - one that names names, and one that doesn't - the third-year running back may be getting his wish sooner rather than later.



Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports reports via Twitter that a Pro Bowl running back is on the trade block, but will not yet disclose the name of the player nor the two teams involved in trade talks. He does, however, mention that the two teams are not in the same division.



A BuffaloSportsDaily.com report takes things a step further. Citing a "reliable source," the report indicates that a trade involving Lynch is now "inevitable," and that there is more than one team in contention for the former Cal star's services. This report also indicates that the Bills are seeking player compensation, as opposed to draft pick compensation.



Lynch is coming off his worst season as a professional - one in which he served a three-game suspension and rushed for just 450 yards while losing his starting job to Fred Jackson. He did not report to the team's voluntary workouts in late March.

To the Lions for Ernie Sims would be great

 

[Blackjacks]

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/4/10/...ating?ref=yahoo

Marshawn Lynch trade talks heating up

by Brian Galliford on Apr 10, 2010 8:47 PM EDT in News



We've known for roughly a week now that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch wants out of town. According to a couple of reports - one that names names, and one that doesn't - the third-year running back may be getting his wish sooner rather than later.



Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports reports via Twitter that a Pro Bowl running back is on the trade block, but will not yet disclose the name of the player nor the two teams involved in trade talks. He does, however, mention that the two teams are not in the same division.



A BuffaloSportsDaily.com report takes things a step further. Citing a "reliable source," the report indicates that a trade involving Lynch is now "inevitable," and that there is more than one team in contention for the former Cal star's services. This report also indicates that the Bills are seeking player compensation, as opposed to draft pick compensation.



Lynch is coming off his worst season as a professional - one in which he served a three-game suspension and rushed for just 450 yards while losing his starting job to Fred Jackson. He did not report to the team's voluntary workouts in late March.

To the Lions for Ernie Sims would be great

What would you think about to the Lions for Backus and then take Okung with the #2 overall

 

[Black&Gold]

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/4/10/...ating?ref=yahoo

Marshawn Lynch trade talks heating up

by Brian Galliford on Apr 10, 2010 8:47 PM EDT in News



We've known for roughly a week now that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch wants out of town. According to a couple of reports - one that names names, and one that doesn't - the third-year running back may be getting his wish sooner rather than later.



Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports reports via Twitter that a Pro Bowl running back is on the trade block, but will not yet disclose the name of the player nor the two teams involved in trade talks. He does, however, mention that the two teams are not in the same division.



A BuffaloSportsDaily.com report takes things a step further. Citing a "reliable source," the report indicates that a trade involving Lynch is now "inevitable," and that there is more than one team in contention for the former Cal star's services. This report also indicates that the Bills are seeking player compensation, as opposed to draft pick compensation.



Lynch is coming off his worst season as a professional - one in which he served a three-game suspension and rushed for just 450 yards while losing his starting job to Fred Jackson. He did not report to the team's voluntary workouts in late March.

I think wherever he goes.....he will be a stud....again. The guy is 24! Yes, 24. He seems like he's been around forever and already has 2 1000 yd seasons. Players have off years. He started out with the suspension and then was hurt some. If this guy gets some motivation by being traded, look out. I think that there will be plenty of teams willing to give up a 3rd round pick for a RB with 2 1000 yd seasons and is only 24 years old.

 

[David Yudkin]

OK, I'll play the heavy here. Is Lynch really that great of a running back . . . or is he really more average than many people think? Of the 35 RB with at least 500 rushing attempts in the past three seasons, Lynch ranked 24th with a 4.00 ypc. And some of the guys that ranked behind him are for all intents and purposes gone (Warrick Dunn, Edgerrin James, Rudi Johnson, and DeShaun Foster). Fred Jackson had a 4.54 ypc in that time.

If we look at total rushing yards over those three seasons, Lynch ranks 28th. Total yards from scrimmage he ranked 29th. Fantasy points 26th. I realize he's young, missed a few games, his role changed last year, and he played on a less than stellar offense. Maybe he'd benefit from a change of scenery, but up until now his production had been going the wrong way since entering the league. He was very good as a rookie, decent his second year (even as a Pro Bowl selection), and last year was a mess.

 

[Couch Potato]

OK, I'll play the heavy here. Is Lynch really that great of a running back . . . or is he really more average than many people think? Of the 35 RB with at least 500 rushing attempts in the past three seasons, Lynch ranked 24th with a 4.00 ypc. And some of the guys that ranked behind him are for all intents and purposes gone (Warrick Dunn, Edgerrin James, Rudi Johnson, and DeShaun Foster). Fred Jackson had a 4.54 ypc in that time.If we look at total rushing yards over those three seasons, Lynch ranks 28th. Total yards from scrimmage he ranked 29th. Fantasy points 26th. I realize he's young, missed a few games, his role changed last year, and he played on a less than stellar offense. Maybe he'd benefit from a change of scenery, but up until now his production had been going the wrong way since entering the league. He was very good as a rookie, decent his second year (even as a Pro Bowl selection), and last year was a mess.

Call me the heavy #2. His YPC in each of the 1,000 seasons was very pedestrian (4.0 and 4.1). He was fed enough carries to make the yardage, but that doesn't make him a stud as the poster above called him. And last year he was bad enough on the field to lose his starting job to an undrafted free agent. Before someone screams "the low YPC is the OL's fault!" keep in mind that Jackson carried for a 4.5 YPC in 238 carries last year behind that OL, substantially higher than Lynch last year (3.8) as well as Lynch's first 2 years. Factor in that Lynch is a complete tool off the field, didn't bother to show for offseason workouts this year, and is one strike away from a long suspension, and I just don't see why he'd be traded to a situation where he's more than a complementary back. Any team who gives a whole lot for him would be foolish, and any fantasy owner who has very high expectations for him is overly optimistic. Sure, he could turn it around. But he could also continue on his current path toward oblivion. So what if he's only 24. Lots of 24 year olds have flamed out in this league.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

I can see Gailey reuniting himself with Jonathan Dwyer in this draft. I would not be surprised if Lynch is dealt, it's simply, as others stated, a new regime

Gailey only had the four Ga Tech juniors for one year so I doubt there is the tie you would think there is. And Gailey wants a change of pace back to pair with Jackson which sounds to me like a Spiller, Best, McKnight, or McCluster type of player.

Help me out Rambling.......I thought Gailey recruited him to GT? Not the case?

Yes Gailey recruited all four to Tech but only coached them on the field one season.

That's fine, so help me out too. How do you 'know' the bolded part?I'd tend to agree in the short term, but Jackson is going to be 30 yrs old when this season is over.

Thought I read it somewhere last week but I don't remember where.

 

[Sinrman]

Detroit

Love it if we can get him for a 4th or later pick.

:IBTL:

 

[Sinrman]

http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2010/4/10/...ating?ref=yahoo

Marshawn Lynch trade talks heating up

by Brian Galliford on Apr 10, 2010 8:47 PM EDT in News



We've known for roughly a week now that Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch wants out of town. According to a couple of reports - one that names names, and one that doesn't - the third-year running back may be getting his wish sooner rather than later.



Charles Robinson of Yahoo Sports reports via Twitter that a Pro Bowl running back is on the trade block, but will not yet disclose the name of the player nor the two teams involved in trade talks. He does, however, mention that the two teams are not in the same division.



A BuffaloSportsDaily.com report takes things a step further. Citing a "reliable source," the report indicates that a trade involving Lynch is now "inevitable," and that there is more than one team in contention for the former Cal star's services. This report also indicates that the Bills are seeking player compensation, as opposed to draft pick compensation.



Lynch is coming off his worst season as a professional - one in which he served a three-game suspension and rushed for just 450 yards while losing his starting job to Fred Jackson. He did not report to the team's voluntary workouts in late March.

To the Lions for Ernie Sims would be great

Good GOD no... that would be one of the worst possible trades we could make...

 

[Couch Potato]

I dunno... something just tells me Marshawn belongs on a short bus. LOL.

http://stateoftheline.files.wordpress.com/...rshawnlynch.jpg