What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Matt Cassel will throw 3 TD's Sunday (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Random

Footballguy
I just don't see how the Pats can't come out and at least attempt to shut up the nay-sayers. Awesome oline, great receivers, great system. Put me back there and I could get a few to Moss.

*Yes, I am an overly optimistic MC owner

 
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:

Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:

PASSING

T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)

RUSHING

A.Smith 22-94-2

K.Faulk 9-48-1

M.Edwards 4-11

T.Brown 2-11

D.Patten 1-11

T.Brady 1-2

 
If Cassell throws three touchdowns on Sunday, Brady is officially a fraud.

I think that, in some ways, Brady's legacy will be formed this Sunday.

 
Rhodes and Revis are licking their chops right now. At least 2 picks for Cassel. Jets win by 7-10 points.

 
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:PASSING T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)RUSHINGA.Smith 22-94-2K.Faulk 9-48-1M.Edwards 4-11T.Brown 2-11D.Patten 1-11T.Brady 1-2
:popcorn: plus, I certainly don think the Pats want to get into a shoot out. Pennington isn´t chucking the ball for us anymore.
 
If Cassell throws three touchdowns on Sunday, Brady is officially a fraud.I think that, in some ways, Brady's legacy will be formed this Sunday.
Bring back Reche Caldwell and Doug Gabriel to replace Randy Moss and Wes Welker and then it would be a fair fight.I have seen several people post that Brady somehow is a fraud or is a system quarterback. People need to remember who he's had to throw the ball to.Here a full list of guys that had at least 10 catches in a season with Brady:Troy Brown David Patten Kevin Faulk Marc Edwards Antowain Smith Jermaine Wiggins Charles Johnson Terry Glenn J.R. RedmondDeion BranchChristian FauriaCam CleelandDaniel Graham Donald HayesDavid GivensLarry Centers Bethel Johnson Patrick PassCorey DillonBen WatsonTim DwightHeath EvansReche CaldwellDoug GabrielLaurence MaroneyChad JacksonDavid Thomas Jabar Gaffney Wes WelkerRandy MossDonte StallworthUp until last year, I would go so far to say he had very few years with top tier receiving talent. That list of players is not exactly the 27 Yankees of receiving options.
 
David Yudkin said:
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:PASSING T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)RUSHINGA.Smith 22-94-2K.Faulk 9-48-1M.Edwards 4-11T.Brown 2-11D.Patten 1-11T.Brady 1-2
Is this what you would predict for Cassel this week, being the New England insider that you are? It seems to me that the situations are so drastically different in terms of the offense, that this would shock me if Cassel had this sort of day. I think that Brady would have been given a little more leaway in this particular game if he had Welker and Moss to throw the ball to and they were running the sort of offense that they have been over the last season or so.
 
Guy hasn't started a game since high school, but I just don't see how the Pats can't come out and at least attempt to shut up the nay-sayers. Awesome oline, great receivers, great system. Put me back there and I could get a few to Moss. Of course, then again, this is the NFL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Yudkin said:
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:PASSING T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)RUSHINGA.Smith 22-94-2K.Faulk 9-48-1M.Edwards 4-11T.Brown 2-11D.Patten 1-11T.Brady 1-2
Is this what you would predict for Cassel this week, being the New England insider that you are? It seems to me that the situations are so drastically different in terms of the offense, that this would shock me if Cassel had this sort of day. I think that Brady would have been given a little more leaway in this particular game if he had Welker and Moss to throw the ball to and they were running the sort of offense that they have been over the last season or so.
After Brady went down, the Pats had 22 rushes to go with 20 passing plays (plus two kneel downs which I didn't count).I'd would guess something pretty even in terms of pass/run distribution. 200/1 for Cassel. 50/50% on an interception.I think they will go conservative against the Jets. They can let Cassel open up the offense more against some of the other defensively challenged teams on their schedule.
 
Mark it! (I got him riding the pine this weekend --- but I got him).

Of course, then again, the Raiders play in the NFL....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
After Brady went down, the Pats had 22 rushes to go with 20 passing plays (plus two kneel downs which I didn't count).I'd would guess something pretty even in terms of pass/run distribution. 200/1 for Cassel. 50/50% on an interception.I think they will go conservative against the Jets. They can let Cassel open up the offense more against some of the other defensively challenged teams on their schedule.
That is excellent information. Thanks for the response.
 
My thought is that the Jets are going to be expecting a run-heavy day from the Pats. Wouldn't be surprised if Belichick comes out with more of a passing attack.

 
Im thinking he'll go for a modest 200 yds and 1TD, no INTs, as Belichick keeps the reigns on him. The ground game however might get 2 more TDs.

 
David Yudkin said:
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:PASSING T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)RUSHINGA.Smith 22-94-2K.Faulk 9-48-1M.Edwards 4-11T.Brown 2-11D.Patten 1-11T.Brady 1-2
Is this what you would predict for Cassel this week, being the New England insider that you are? It seems to me that the situations are so drastically different in terms of the offense, that this would shock me if Cassel had this sort of day. I think that Brady would have been given a little more leaway in this particular game if he had Welker and Moss to throw the ball to and they were running the sort of offense that they have been over the last season or so.
After Brady went down, the Pats had 22 rushes to go with 20 passing plays (plus two kneel downs which I didn't count).I'd would guess something pretty even in terms of pass/run distribution. 200/1 for Cassel. 50/50% on an interception.I think they will go conservative against the Jets. They can let Cassel open up the offense more against some of the other defensively challenged teams on their schedule.
Ah, but knowing this is the general expectation of the Jets as well, I wouldn't put it past Belichick to start out throwing bombs early and often.eta - TheDemon beat me to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Yudkin said:
Bottom line, nobody knows what to expect. But I would look at Brady's first full start as a possible indication:Against the Colts in 2001, here were the key offensive stats:PASSING T.Brady 13-23-168 (0 TD, 0 INT)RUSHINGA.Smith 22-94-2K.Faulk 9-48-1M.Edwards 4-11T.Brown 2-11D.Patten 1-11T.Brady 1-2
Is this what you would predict for Cassel this week, being the New England insider that you are? It seems to me that the situations are so drastically different in terms of the offense, that this would shock me if Cassel had this sort of day. I think that Brady would have been given a little more leaway in this particular game if he had Welker and Moss to throw the ball to and they were running the sort of offense that they have been over the last season or so.
After Brady went down, the Pats had 22 rushes to go with 20 passing plays (plus two kneel downs which I didn't count).I'd would guess something pretty even in terms of pass/run distribution. 200/1 for Cassel. 50/50% on an interception.I think they will go conservative against the Jets. They can let Cassel open up the offense more against some of the other defensively challenged teams on their schedule.
Ah, but knowing this is the general expectation of the Jets as well, I wouldn't put it past Belichick to start out throwing bombs early and often.eta - TheDemon beat me to it.
Belichick appears prepared to roll with Cassel. If he either 1) puts Cassel in harm's way for an injury, 2) gets him off to a bad start, or 3) gets him off to a turnover early then Cassel could have some confidence issues. Like the rest of us, BB realizes Cassel hasn't started in almost 10 years. I'm guessing he will start him off slowly with safe plays with max protection for him to get his feet wet and then sneak in a deep bomb to Moss.There is some precident, though, for postering for a big passing attack. In Brady's first start, the team did start out on his first play with 5 wide receivers and an empty backfield. Given that I think the Jets will try to harass and blitz much of the day, I doubt the Pats will risk injuring another QB based on ego alone.
 
I just don't see how the Pats can't come out and at least attempt to shut up the nay-sayers. Awesome oline, great receivers, great system. Put me back there and I could get a few to Moss.

*Yes, I am an overly optimistic MC owner
Awesome O line? Not one of them should have cashed their All Star check last year after the way they got beat up by NYG.They did not look good against KC either.

 
The smart money is taking the points against a sub par Jets team.

With all the weapons and that OL...Cassel should be fine and toss a couple of TD's.

Pats 23

Jets 21

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top