What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Bush (1 Viewer)

I think he is. He's burly and they like to use him in short yardage situations, so it seems he gets pigeon-holed as a one-dimensional "power back." But he can do lots of things. He's got good burst, can catch the ball out of the backfield, and, as we're seeing tonight, can carry a heavy workload. I don't see what he wouldn't be a great RB1 for some team willing to give him that chance.

 
He without a doubt gets a big payday next year to carry the load with another team. He'd be a great complement to a speedy/elusive RB. Someone else hit the nail in the head when they noted that he's not great at any one thing, but is fairly competent and productive in each part of the game

 
Yes, he really is that good when given the opportunity. He's one of the most valuable handcuffs in the league along with Tate imo.

 
He without a doubt gets a big payday next year to carry the load with another team. He'd be a great complement to a speedy/elusive RB. Someone else hit the nail in the head when they noted that he's not great at any one thing, but is fairly competent and productive in each part of the game
As a Lions fan, I'm hoping Mayhew will see him as a fit. Pair him with Best (assuming he comes back) and that's a pretty scary 1-2 punch. With Leshoure coming off an achilles, I'm not expecting him to regain his college form...although I hope I'm wrong. Just not a ton of track record with RB's rebounding after achilles injuries.
 
IMHO, Atlanta (having less picks after the Julio Jones trade) or Detroit would be wise to make a play for Bush. Turner is not getting any younger and Detroit has a need for an every down back. :football:

 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.

 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.
 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
the screens were just wide open and the first long run they were talking about involved running straight where the play was directed through a gaping hole. I think McFadden can pull that off
 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.
Healthy McFadden? ;)
 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.
Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).
 
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.

Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.

But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.

Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."

 
People seem to forget that at the beginning of the year last year there were many predicting Bush, not McFadden, to have the breakout year as the Raiders primary back. He got hurt and McFadden took full advantage of the opportunity as he started to flash the ability that most thought he had coming out of college. Bush has a 4.4 career ypc average and if you look at his game logs over the years he has been pretty damn good when given the opportunity to be the primary back.

In the 11 games where he carried the ball 15+ times he has 236 carries for 1187 yards (5.02 ypc) and 9 TDs. You can argue that the Raiders run blocking is very good and he benefits from that, but he has certainly taken advantage of the opportunities he's been given.

 
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."
:goodposting:
 
I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.

I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".

 
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."
:goodposting: amen bro. So many haters that see things through any colored lens but reality colored!
 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.
Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).
Nice. I'm guessing you "watch a lot of tape". :hophead: What part of "Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night" has anything to do with what you said? Oakland was running a lot of 2 minute style offense. Tell me with your superior football IQ how SD was going to get their McFadden Defense in to keep Oakland from getting him in the open field?SD knew the run was coming last night and was helpless against it. Oakland would have surely gotten McFadden the ball in space and he would have had a big night against SD's pitiful D.
 
We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.

For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.

 
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."
:goodposting: amen bro. So many haters that see things through any colored lens but reality colored!
Bush was great last night, I wouldn't take anything away from him. He was absolutely awesome. But if he had another gear he would have broken records. A lot of that had to do with SD's defense last night. It was that bad.
 
I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".
:goodposting: Loved watching him run in college, he was a beast. Yes, he lacks the elite speed of a McFadden, but he is a VERY good runner. Despite lacking that elite speed he still had a monster night last night.Hope you own him in dynasty leagues, enjoy him this year if you own him in redraft. Remember him next year.
 
He without a doubt gets a big payday next year to carry the load with another team. He'd be a great complement to a speedy/elusive RB. Someone else hit the nail in the head when they noted that he's not great at any one thing, but is fairly competent and productive in each part of the game
As a Lions fan, I'm hoping Mayhew will see him as a fit. Pair him with Best (assuming he comes back) and that's a pretty scary 1-2 punch. With Leshoure coming off an achilles, I'm not expecting him to regain his college form...although I hope I'm wrong. Just not a ton of track record with RB's rebounding after achilles injuries.
Between Best & Leshoure's injuries they really do need someone who can take the brunt of the tough carries.
 
I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.

I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".
People forget that before he was injured he was being talked about as the 2nd best RB going into the draft after Peterson.Football's Future had him at #3 after the injury and here's the scouting profile.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.
 
We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.
They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".
:goodposting: Loved watching him run in college, he was a beast. Yes, he lacks the elite speed of a McFadden, but he is a VERY good runner. Despite lacking that elite speed he still had a monster night last night.Hope you own him in dynasty leagues, enjoy him this year if you own him in redraft. Remember him next year.
I know another RB that lacks elite speed but is lighting the league on fire: Freddie Jackson!
 
'az_prof said:
'RhymesMcJuice said:
'Sir Chadwick said:
We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.
They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?
Not that it means anything, but I am a Falcons season ticketholder and an avid Turner fan. I've been proudly wearing his jersey # since they signed him in 2008! I'm a huge fan, but I realize Turner's shortcomings at this point. He does not break a lot of tackles and he does not have great moves at this point. His stats often look like 1 yard, 2 yards, -1 yard, 4 yards, 1 yard, 18 yards. He usually breaks 1-3 runs a game over 10 yards that inflate his per carry average. Atlanta loves to dictate the tempo, so they feed him the ball even if he is only getting 2 yards a pop. Matt Ryan to Roddy White usually extends the drive on 3rd down.He only has one or two productive years left in my opinion. Bush would be an excellent replacement, but ATL has the 3rd worst salary cap situation in the NFL right now, so they might not be able to afford a guy like Bush anyway. Too bad!
 
'az_prof said:
'RhymesMcJuice said:
'Sir Chadwick said:
We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.
They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?
Not that it means anything, but I am a Falcons season ticketholder and an avid Turner fan. I've been proudly wearing his jersey # since they signed him in 2008! I'm a huge fan, but I realize Turner's shortcomings at this point. He does not break a lot of tackles and he does not have great moves at this point. His stats often look like 1 yard, 2 yards, -1 yard, 4 yards, 1 yard, 18 yards. He usually breaks 1-3 runs a game over 10 yards that inflate his per carry average. Atlanta loves to dictate the tempo, so they feed him the ball even if he is only getting 2 yards a pop. Matt Ryan to Roddy White usually extends the drive on 3rd down.He only has one or two productive years left in my opinion. Bush would be an excellent replacement, but ATL has the 3rd worst salary cap situation in the NFL right now, so they might not be able to afford a guy like Bush anyway. Too bad!
If they cut Turner it would free up 2.5M in cap space this year and 5.5M next year.
 
I have McFadden in a money league where we can only carry 4 RB's on our roster until the bye weeks are over. The week DMC got hurt I was able to get Bush off the FA list. It's a 10 team league. Sure glad I was able to handcuff Bush with DMC. Now I don't have to put McFadden on IR because if I do he has to stay there 3 weeks regardless of his injury listing.

Bush certainly can and more than likely will be the lead back for another team next year. I just hope he goes to a team with grass instead of turf. He's a big guy and I think the turf would be bad for him.Oh he'd produce but eventually the turf may get him. Yeah I'm sure he'll play on turf on the road but 8 home games on grass will help.He's young enough still and has fresh legs so he has the chance to be a pretty productive back on another team. I think his size could also help him in terms of longevity at his position because he'll be able to sustain all the pounding he'll get. He's a rare talent at his size and I hope he has a great career form here on out.

 
Darren McFadden and a Mid-Foot Sprain

By Deborah Braconnier | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Fri, Nov 11, 2011

The Oakland Raiders are missing one of their key players after RB Darren McFadden injured his right foot during the October 23, 2011 game against the Kansas City Chiefs. While many reports have said it is an ankle injury, what he actually suffered was what is called a mid-foot sprain and unfortunately the Raiders could find themselves without their start RB for some time.

Raiders coach Hue Jackson was quoted as saying, "That mid-foot sprain is really something. You have to get back to walking first before you can do anything, so my main thing is to get him out of that walking boot first."

So, what exactly is a mid-foot sprain and how long could the Raiders be without McFadden?

Mid-Foot Sprain

The mid foot is made up of ligaments that attach the five long metatarsal bones to four smaller bones known as the cuneiform bones and the cuboid. These joints make up your mid-foot. The most common ligament that is injured in a mid-foot sprain is the Lisfranc's ligament that runs along the inside of your foot. When this ligament gets torn or sprained, it increases the risk of fractures or dislocations of the bones. This type of injury usually occurs when a large amount of force is placed on the center of your foot or a person twists their lower body while their foot remains planted in place.

Treatment

Treatment for a mid-foot sprain includes the use of a walking boot or cast to immobilize the foot just like the one that McFadden is currently wearing. You will be instructed to keep weight off of your foot and should use crutches for moving. This walking boot and weight bearing restrictions can take as long as six to eight weeks.

Once your physician has determined that the foot is healing correctly, you may be allowed to remove the walking book and begin walking on the foot as pain allows. However, full weight bearing and normal walking can take as long as 12 weeks. According to the Insall Scott Kelly Institute, it can take as long as a full year before a person can return to competitive sports after receiving this injury.

Depending on the severity of McFadden's sprain, he could be out for most of the season. For Raider's fans, I hope his injury is only minimal and he can be back in the game soon.

Deborah Braconnier is a former athlete and 20 year medical professional. Working now as a freelance writer, she brings her love for both sports and the medical field together in her writing.
I am trying desperately to get Bush because the guy that picked him up thinks he is only good for 1 or 2 weeks. He would rather keep Sproles and trade me Bush for Stafford. So be it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get why people hate on this guy so hard. Yeah he's doesn't have breakaway speed, you don't have to be a CJ200 to be a good running back. He was falling down before the line of scrimmage and still coming away with +3 yardage each time, there's nothing to be mad about that. DMC may have a better skillset but all I know is that guy is injured let's look at what's going on now on the field. When the year is over he's gonna get a contract some where else and will make a difference...

 
I'm honestly starting to think Bush could be Michael Turner 2.0. Not necessarily that they have the same style , but in the fact that hes unfairly underused for the first few years of his career. I think that if a team gives him a shot to be a feature back, he could produce borderline RB1 numbers. The most underrated atribute of Bush is his receiving ability. Coming out of Louisville, before he was lost for his entire senior year, people were talking late first round for him. Not Much flash, but hes a load with a quick burst through the line. He seems solidly above average at everything and could be a true workhorse back that carry's the load 20 times a game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only bad thing about Bush is that he will turn 28 before next season starts. He doesn't have much wear and tear though since he's not a starter most of the time. Perhaps he could be another Ricky Williams as far as being able to perform in his later years.

 
I have McFadden in a money league where we can only carry 4 RB's on our roster until the bye weeks are over. The week DMC got hurt I was able to get Bush off the FA list. It's a 10 team league. Sure glad I was able to handcuff Bush with DMC. Now I don't have to put McFadden on IR because if I do he has to stay there 3 weeks regardless of his injury listing.Bush certainly can and more than likely will be the lead back for another team next year. I just hope he goes to a team with grass instead of turf. He's a big guy and I think the turf would be bad for him.Oh he'd produce but eventually the turf may get him. Yeah I'm sure he'll play on turf on the road but 8 home games on grass will help.He's young enough still and has fresh legs so he has the chance to be a pretty productive back on another team. I think his size could also help him in terms of longevity at his position because he'll be able to sustain all the pounding he'll get. He's a rare talent at his size and I hope he has a great career form here on out.
Denver makes sense, would work well with what they're doing over there (from a running standpoint).
 
I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.
Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).
I don't think people literally mean DMC would have scored on that exact play, because defenses do line up differently. People are saying DMC would have scored if he were in the open field with as much space as Bush had. The D can "catch up" to Bush in the open field, but good luck doing that with someone who is much faster and more agile like DMC.
 
I've always liked him. There's a tendency by his coaches (and people in this thread even) to think he needs a complimentary RB to roll with. I don't really understand why. It's never a 3rd down back to give him a breather that is suggested, but someone to take a good chunk of the action away.

One post in this thread was almost comical because it could have been a Raiders coach. It was praise and how he can do it well and needs a complimentary back.

Somehow he's still got people to win over and that will continue to hurt his FF value

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top