footballguy#1
Footballguy
Reminds me a bit of Bettis tonight, looking good enough to be an everydown back next year, he is a free agent next year.
Exactly what I said to my wife and buddy!Reminds me a bit of Bettis tonight, looking good enough to be an everydown back next year, he is a free agent next year.
As a Lions fan, I'm hoping Mayhew will see him as a fit. Pair him with Best (assuming he comes back) and that's a pretty scary 1-2 punch. With Leshoure coming off an achilles, I'm not expecting him to regain his college form...although I hope I'm wrong. Just not a ton of track record with RB's rebounding after achilles injuries.He without a doubt gets a big payday next year to carry the load with another team. He'd be a great complement to a speedy/elusive RB. Someone else hit the nail in the head when they noted that he's not great at any one thing, but is fairly competent and productive in each part of the game
I'd personally trade the speed for a guy who almost never gets negative yards.anyone with some speed might have had 4 TDs last night..big powerful, but slowww
McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
the screens were just wide open and the first long run they were talking about involved running straight where the play was directed through a gaping hole. I think McFadden can pull that offI loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
Healthy McFadden?McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
If he didn't break his leg badly during his senior year at Lousiville, he was projected to be a high first round pick.Reminds me a bit of Bettis tonight, looking good enough to be an everydown back next year, he is a free agent next year.
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."
All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."
Nice. I'm guessing you "watch a lot of tape".Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.
Bush was great last night, I wouldn't take anything away from him. He was absolutely awesome. But if he had another gear he would have broken records. A lot of that had to do with SD's defense last night. It was that bad.All this McFadden woulda, coulda shoulda stuff just needs to stop. We heard it enough from Mike Mayock last night and it is appearing in numerous other threads already.Of course, McFadden has better speed and is generally the better back. And the O-line played great.But Michael Bush just broke the single-game total yards from scrimmage record for the Raiders (242 yds). McFadden never did that.Give Bush his due for what he did IN HIS OWN WAY and please leave it at that. It has nothing to do with what McFadden "might have done."amen bro. So many haters that see things through any colored lens but reality colored!
I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".
Between Best & Leshoure's injuries they really do need someone who can take the brunt of the tough carries.As a Lions fan, I'm hoping Mayhew will see him as a fit. Pair him with Best (assuming he comes back) and that's a pretty scary 1-2 punch. With Leshoure coming off an achilles, I'm not expecting him to regain his college form...although I hope I'm wrong. Just not a ton of track record with RB's rebounding after achilles injuries.He without a doubt gets a big payday next year to carry the load with another team. He'd be a great complement to a speedy/elusive RB. Someone else hit the nail in the head when they noted that he's not great at any one thing, but is fairly competent and productive in each part of the game
People forget that before he was injured he was being talked about as the 2nd best RB going into the draft after Peterson.Football's Future had him at #3 after the injury and here's the scouting profile.I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.
I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".
He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
I know another RB that lacks elite speed but is lighting the league on fire: Freddie Jackson!I don't know how many people really remember/followed but Bush was a monster in college until he broke his leg against kentucky. At the time, I thought Michael and not Reggie would be a much better FF pick in a rookie draft.I think he just is a great complete back and I can definitely see a team like Atlanta looking at him in FA and saying "there is our turner replacement".Loved watching him run in college, he was a beast. Yes, he lacks the elite speed of a McFadden, but he is a VERY good runner. Despite lacking that elite speed he still had a monster night last night.Hope you own him in dynasty leagues, enjoy him this year if you own him in redraft. Remember him next year.
'RavenLunatic said:Great hands. On at least one of the long receptions he had to snag a low throw.
Not that it means anything, but I am a Falcons season ticketholder and an avid Turner fan. I've been proudly wearing his jersey # since they signed him in 2008! I'm a huge fan, but I realize Turner's shortcomings at this point. He does not break a lot of tackles and he does not have great moves at this point. His stats often look like 1 yard, 2 yards, -1 yard, 4 yards, 1 yard, 18 yards. He usually breaks 1-3 runs a game over 10 yards that inflate his per carry average. Atlanta loves to dictate the tempo, so they feed him the ball even if he is only getting 2 yards a pop. Matt Ryan to Roddy White usually extends the drive on 3rd down.He only has one or two productive years left in my opinion. Bush would be an excellent replacement, but ATL has the 3rd worst salary cap situation in the NFL right now, so they might not be able to afford a guy like Bush anyway. Too bad!'az_prof said:They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?'RhymesMcJuice said:He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.'Sir Chadwick said:We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
If they cut Turner it would free up 2.5M in cap space this year and 5.5M next year.Not that it means anything, but I am a Falcons season ticketholder and an avid Turner fan. I've been proudly wearing his jersey # since they signed him in 2008! I'm a huge fan, but I realize Turner's shortcomings at this point. He does not break a lot of tackles and he does not have great moves at this point. His stats often look like 1 yard, 2 yards, -1 yard, 4 yards, 1 yard, 18 yards. He usually breaks 1-3 runs a game over 10 yards that inflate his per carry average. Atlanta loves to dictate the tempo, so they feed him the ball even if he is only getting 2 yards a pop. Matt Ryan to Roddy White usually extends the drive on 3rd down.He only has one or two productive years left in my opinion. Bush would be an excellent replacement, but ATL has the 3rd worst salary cap situation in the NFL right now, so they might not be able to afford a guy like Bush anyway. Too bad!'az_prof said:They may give Turner the option to stay if he restructures and if he doesn't cut him. That seems to be a common strategy with older HBs.Curious what Turner and ATL fans think of Bush compared to Turner? They seem very similar to me. Does Turner have better top end speed or is it comparable?'RhymesMcJuice said:He'd be a perfect Turner replacement but unless the Falcons cut him they aren't going to sign Bush. Cap-wise they could cut Turner easily (his 2012 cap hit is $7.5M but they only have $5M of his bonus left on the books) but I think it would be terrible for morale.'Sir Chadwick said:We'd welcome him with open arms in Atlanta. Love Turner, but he's bound to break down a bit next year.For a 245 lb'er, I think his speed isn't really an issue considering he is so well-rounded.
I am trying desperately to get Bush because the guy that picked him up thinks he is only good for 1 or 2 weeks. He would rather keep Sproles and trade me Bush for Stafford. So be it.Darren McFadden and a Mid-Foot Sprain
By Deborah Braconnier | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Fri, Nov 11, 2011
The Oakland Raiders are missing one of their key players after RB Darren McFadden injured his right foot during the October 23, 2011 game against the Kansas City Chiefs. While many reports have said it is an ankle injury, what he actually suffered was what is called a mid-foot sprain and unfortunately the Raiders could find themselves without their start RB for some time.
Raiders coach Hue Jackson was quoted as saying, "That mid-foot sprain is really something. You have to get back to walking first before you can do anything, so my main thing is to get him out of that walking boot first."
So, what exactly is a mid-foot sprain and how long could the Raiders be without McFadden?
Mid-Foot Sprain
The mid foot is made up of ligaments that attach the five long metatarsal bones to four smaller bones known as the cuneiform bones and the cuboid. These joints make up your mid-foot. The most common ligament that is injured in a mid-foot sprain is the Lisfranc's ligament that runs along the inside of your foot. When this ligament gets torn or sprained, it increases the risk of fractures or dislocations of the bones. This type of injury usually occurs when a large amount of force is placed on the center of your foot or a person twists their lower body while their foot remains planted in place.
Treatment
Treatment for a mid-foot sprain includes the use of a walking boot or cast to immobilize the foot just like the one that McFadden is currently wearing. You will be instructed to keep weight off of your foot and should use crutches for moving. This walking boot and weight bearing restrictions can take as long as six to eight weeks.
Once your physician has determined that the foot is healing correctly, you may be allowed to remove the walking book and begin walking on the foot as pain allows. However, full weight bearing and normal walking can take as long as 12 weeks. According to the Insall Scott Kelly Institute, it can take as long as a full year before a person can return to competitive sports after receiving this injury.
Depending on the severity of McFadden's sprain, he could be out for most of the season. For Raider's fans, I hope his injury is only minimal and he can be back in the game soon.
Deborah Braconnier is a former athlete and 20 year medical professional. Working now as a freelance writer, she brings her love for both sports and the medical field together in her writing.
Denver makes sense, would work well with what they're doing over there (from a running standpoint).I have McFadden in a money league where we can only carry 4 RB's on our roster until the bye weeks are over. The week DMC got hurt I was able to get Bush off the FA list. It's a 10 team league. Sure glad I was able to handcuff Bush with DMC. Now I don't have to put McFadden on IR because if I do he has to stay there 3 weeks regardless of his injury listing.Bush certainly can and more than likely will be the lead back for another team next year. I just hope he goes to a team with grass instead of turf. He's a big guy and I think the turf would be bad for him.Oh he'd produce but eventually the turf may get him. Yeah I'm sure he'll play on turf on the road but 8 home games on grass will help.He's young enough still and has fresh legs so he has the chance to be a pretty productive back on another team. I think his size could also help him in terms of longevity at his position because he'll be able to sustain all the pounding he'll get. He's a rare talent at his size and I hope he has a great career form here on out.
I don't think people literally mean DMC would have scored on that exact play, because defenses do line up differently. People are saying DMC would have scored if he were in the open field with as much space as Bush had. The D can "catch up" to Bush in the open field, but good luck doing that with someone who is much faster and more agile like DMC.Post like this really make me question someones football I.Q. You do realize that different defenses are used against different players right? If McFadden is in in those situations, different plays likely would of been called to account for McFaddens speed. Do you think people played the same defense when Tiki Barber or Ron Dayne were in the backfield (or any other thunder/lightening combo).McFadden would have scored 2 to 3 long TD's last night. SD was horrible and the Oakland screens worked to perfection. Bush was great but he couldn't do the things a healthy McFadden would have done in the open field last night. It's not meant to be a slight against Bush, who was fantastic, it's just stating the facts.I loved when the announcer kept saying, "McFadden would have scored there.." Really? How often does Mcfadden break 3 long touchdowns in a game? I think they were taking for granted how Bush plowed through the line/had vision to get to the right hole. They were giving him no credit.