Mike Mayock's Only Mock draft (1 Viewer)

[coolnerd]

http://www.nfl.com/draft/2012/mock-drafts/mike-mayock/150251

Too much graphic for me to attempt post.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

Mark Barron + Eric Berry.

 

[eaglezzz]

Blackmon at #4 then Martin at #22. That would be a better scenario for Cleveland then Richardson/Weeden

 

[beef]

Blackmon at #4 then Martin at #22. That would be a better scenario for Cleveland then Richardson/Weeden

Way better.

 

[Multiple Scores]

Blackmon at #4 then Martin at #22. That would be a better scenario for Cleveland then Richardson/Weeden

Sure would. The 22 isn't for Weeden though, 37 is. Trent, Wright, Weeden sounds better than Blackmon, Martin, Weeden.

 

[pantherclub]

Is he basing this draft on anything. Inside information or whatnot? Or is he just going with his gut?

 

[No Way Jose]

Hill to the Titans would be an awful pick for them.

 

[wadegarrett]

This is the same guy that wanted the Panthers to take Gabbert over Newton last year?

 

[Ridgelake]

Mark Barron + Eric Berry.

I saw that too. It would be sick. And a waste. It would be difficult to maximize the talents of two guys like that.

 

[GroveDiesel]

I would scoff at Kuechly to the Bills if Mayock hadn't nailed their last 4 1st round picks including Spiller. So I guess Sheppard is out and Kuechly is in.

 

[BallparkFrank]

There's something very fishy about Mayock picking Blackmon to the Browns at #4 - almost like he knows something the rest of us don't. On his top 100, Mayock has Richardson 3rd and Blackmon 10th, fwiw.

 

[Blackjacks]

So Philly gets rid of Samuels today cause they already have too many cb's and now they draft a cb with their first round pick tommorrow?

I dont think so.

Also totally disagree with the Tennesse pick

 

[imagroid]

So Philly gets rid of Samuels today cause they already have too many cb's and now they draft a cb with their first round pick tommorrow?I dont think so.

He was going to be cut. A 7th > nothing. Not to say they go CB, but I don't think it has anything to do with dumping Samuels.

 

[Deamon]

So Philly gets rid of Samuels today cause they already have too many cb's and now they draft a cb with their first round pick tommorrow?I dont think so.

He was going to be cut. A 7th > nothing. Not to say they go CB, but I don't think it has anything to do with dumping Samuels.

Gilmore would be a huge gift for philly at 15. But I don't think he lasts that long. CB will prob be addressed in round2 by philly.

 

[RBM]

Jones to Bears....love to see it.

 

[cobalt_27]

This is the same guy that wanted the Panthers to take Gabbert over Newton last year?

I mean, everyone knew Cam was going to be a fantasy god, and Mayock was the ONLY one in the building who got this wrong.Mayock forgot more than 99% of these guys have ever known about player evaluations. I think you can safely assume he knows what he's talking about, despite the fact that he can't predict the future completely.

 

[wadegarrett]

This is the same guy that wanted the Panthers to take Gabbert over Newton last year?

I mean, everyone knew Cam was going to be a fantasy god, and Mayock was the ONLY one in the building who got this wrong.Mayock forgot more than 99% of these guys have ever known about player evaluations. I think you can safely assume he knows what he's talking about, despite the fact that he can't predict the future completely.

Yeah, ok.

 

[N Zone]

For the love of God, if you're talking about a player not yet in the NFL, type out his first AND last name, not just his first (and not just his last name). Trent Richardson is not on a first name basis "Trent" with us yet. Dam, I have to look up a list of top ranked college prospects after reading each post. :kicksball:

 

[Abraham]

Hill to the Titans would be an awful pick for them.

Which would be fitting of their first round picks of late

 

[by_the_sea_wannabe]

For the love of God, if you're talking about a player not yet in the NFL, type out his first AND last name, not just his first (and not just his last name). Trent Richardson is not on a first name basis "Trent" with us yet. Dam, I have to look up a list of top ranked college prospects after reading each post. :kicksball:

you are in a draft thread, if you don't know who Trent or Richardson is, perhaps you shouldn't be here. just sayin

 

[Kenny Powers]

His explanation on why Blackmon/Martin would be better than Richardson/WR available at 22 kind of went in circles. Dont see how they can pass on Trent.

 

[sho nuff]

Hill to the Titans would be an awful pick for them.

Which would be fitting of their first round picks of late

2007 - Michael Giffin2008 - Chris Johnson2009 - Kenny Britt2010 - Derrick Morgan2011 - Jake LockerMorgan so far is the only bust of the bunch.Seems like a pretty solid record given where they have been picking those last 5 years.

 

[Saint]

His explanation on why Blackmon/Martin would be better than Richardson/WR available at 22 kind of went in circles. Dont see how they can pass on Trent.

Have to agree with this. I think CLE would be crazy to pass on Richardson.

 

[coolnerd]

His explanation on why Blackmon/Martin would be better than Richardson/WR available at 22 kind of went in circles. Dont see how they can pass on Trent.

Mayock's explanation seemed to suggest that the logic wasn't his, but what he was told.

 

[cobalt_27]

For the love of God, if you're talking about a player not yet in the NFL, type out his first AND last name, not just his first (and not just his last name). Trent Richardson is not on a first name basis "Trent" with us yet. Dam, I have to look up a list of top ranked college prospects after reading each post. :kicksball:

you are in a draft thread, if you don't know who Trent or Richardson is, perhaps you shouldn't be here. just sayin

Agreed.But, is it ok if I can't remember whether it's Marcellus Mercilus or Whitney Wiley?

 

[Kenny Powers]

His explanation on why Blackmon/Martin would be better than Richardson/WR available at 22 kind of went in circles. Dont see how they can pass on Trent.

Mayock's explanation seemed to suggest that the logic wasn't his, but what he was told.

Yeah, he clarified it later and thats what it sounds like. CLE is ####ing dumb if they think thats the right play though. Then again, its the Browns.It would be oh so much better for fantasy purposes if Trent lands in TB than CLE though as well.

 

[Drunken Cowboy]

Would be thrilled if either Glenn or Poe is there when the Steelers draft. If they both are, I would hope it is Poe.

 

[identikit]

Seeing a lot of Fleener to the Texans.

Seems odd to me.

Then again, he's WR-ish.

 

[radiohead417]

Mentions jags new coach Mel tucker.... Been d coordinator for 2 years already.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

Then again, he's WR-ish.

Very much so. Same height/weight as Calvin Johnson.

 

[krsone21]

Blackmon at #4 then Martin at #22. That would be a better scenario for Cleveland then Richardson/Weeden

Sure would. The 22 isn't for Weeden though, 37 is. Trent, Wright, Weeden sounds better than Blackmon, Martin, Weeden.

I was just going to post the same thing. I would rather have Trent, Wright, and Weeden.

 

[coolnerd]

Then again, he's WR-ish.

Very much so. Same height/weight as Calvin Johnson.

Fleener is much closer to a standard sized TE than Calvin Johson is to standard sized WR.

 

[Tackling Dummies]

Mark Barron + Eric Berry.

I saw that too. It would be sick. And a waste. It would be difficult to maximize the talents of two guys like that.

Not a waste at all. Berry never comes off the field and I'd assume that Barron would be similar. The back end would never be "caught off" in any formation.

 

[dcarrbaby]

For the love of God, if you're talking about a player not yet in the NFL, type out his first AND last name, not just his first (and not just his last name). Trent Richardson is not on a first name basis "Trent" with us yet. Dam, I have to look up a list of top ranked college prospects after reading each post. :kicksball:

For the love of God, how can you have made 220 posts on this site, and in a mock draft thread the day before the draft not know who Richardson, Trent, or TRich is. This is embarrassing for you, you should have kept this to yourself not posted it pointing fingers.This site is for fantasy football fans who know there stuff, not guys who hold their grandmothers tea on Sunday's while she watches football and you sit on Facebook checking your buddies status update. C'Mon Man !!

 

[gandalas]

If the Browns take Blackmon at #4 tonight, I don't even know what I will do. We already tried the top-5 WR experiment. It didn't work out so well, remember? We got basically one fantastic year out of Braylon Edwards, and a bunch of crap after that. And Braylon was arguably the better WR prospect coming out (4.38 speed, 6'3", only the 3rd WR ever to have 3x1000 yard seasons in NCAA).

Please, go Richardson or Claiborne (or maybe Kalil if he is there...)

 

[Stinkin Ref]

Mark Barron + Eric Berry.

I saw that too. It would be sick. And a waste. It would be difficult to maximize the talents of two guys like that.

Not a waste at all. Berry never comes off the field and I'd assume that Barron would be similar. The back end would never be "caught off" in any formation.

I wouldn't mind this either....passing league....when others teams did run they would be money in run support

 

[EBF]

If the Browns take Blackmon at #4 tonight, I don't even know what I will do. We already tried the top-5 WR experiment. It didn't work out so well, remember? We got basically one fantastic year out of Braylon Edwards, and a bunch of crap after that. And Braylon was arguably the better WR prospect coming out (4.38 speed, 6'3", only the 3rd WR ever to have 3x1000 yard seasons in NCAA).Please, go Richardson or Claiborne (or maybe Kalil if he is there...)

As much as I like Richardson, the reality of the NFL is that you don't need an elite RB to compete. If I were running a pro team I would have a really hard time spending a top 20 pick on that position knowing that I could always find a serviceable alternative in the 3rd-4th round. As for Blackmon vs. Braylon, I like Blackmon more and I think it's worth pointing out that one of the reasons Braylon had three 1,000+ yard seasons at Michigan is because he wasn't highly-regarded enough to leave for the draft after his junior year. Everyone had Larry Fitzgerald and Roy Williams rated higher (not to mention Lee Evans, Michael Clayton, etc). Braylon was considered a late first rounder at the time. He jumped up in a weak draft after a strong senior season.

 

[Warrior]

Exactly what the Eagles need to win the division...another stud CB

Oh, and the Ravens really need another linebacker...and the 49ers really need a passing target in the first round.

Pathetic attempt, other than the top 10 or so picks, which are pretty obvious anyway.

 

[Warrior]

This is the same guy that wanted the Panthers to take Gabbert over Newton last year?

I mean, everyone knew Cam was going to be a fantasy god, and Mayock was the ONLY one in the building who got this wrong.Mayock forgot more than 99% of these guys have ever known about player evaluations. I think you can safely assume he knows what he's talking about, despite the fact that he can't predict the future completely.

He forgot more than 99% of us about the NFL draft. Unfortunately, he's still too dumb to use that information. His draft predictions are just terrible.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

Oh, and the Ravens really need another linebacker...

The just lost 1 starter in Jarret Johnson, and Ray Lewis is 37. At which point the other guy, McClain, is an UDFA of middling talent.

 

[N Zone]

For the love of God, if you're talking about a player not yet in the NFL, type out his first AND last name, not just his first (and not just his last name). Trent Richardson is not on a first name basis "Trent" with us yet. Dam, I have to look up a list of top ranked college prospects after reading each post. :kicksball:

For the love of God, how can you have made 220 posts on this site, and in a mock draft thread the day before the draft not know who Richardson, Trent, or TRich is. This is embarrassing for you, you should have kept this to yourself not posted it pointing fingers.This site is for fantasy football fans who know there stuff, not guys who hold their grandmothers tea on Sunday's while she watches football and you sit on Facebook checking your buddies status update. C'Mon Man !!

Is this supposed to offend me? LOL

 

[wadegarrett]

This is the same guy that wanted the Panthers to take Gabbert over Newton last year?

I mean, everyone knew Cam was going to be a fantasy god, and Mayock was the ONLY one in the building who got this wrong.Mayock forgot more than 99% of these guys have ever known about player evaluations. I think you can safely assume he knows what he's talking about, despite the fact that he can't predict the future completely.

79th place this year

 

[identikit]

Mayock's top 100 looked pretty good:

http://www.thehuddlereport.com/Free/Top.100.Scores/2012.shtml

 

[Phil4]

IMO,

Best top 100 > Best mock draft by a lot. Too much surprise in a round 1 or 2 to be really succesful with a mock. But a top 100 is much more accurate when you talk about player evaluation

 

[Deamon]

Exactly what the Eagles need to win the division...another stud CB Oh, and the Ravens really need another linebacker...and the 49ers really need a passing target in the first round.Pathetic attempt, other than the top 10 or so picks, which are pretty obvious anyway.

Eagles CB is a slot guy, I wouldn't call him a 'stud' by any means.. yet at least. And Seems like the Ravens did need that LB.