Chaser1439
Footballguy
What can be offered to go get this guy?
Am an Austin owner, hoping to swap for G Jennings in my league.What can be offered to go get this guy?
The guy in my league who has Austin, lost Dallas Clark and has been rolling with Ben Watson at TE. I offered Jennings and Zach Miller and got rejected.Am an Austin owner, hoping to swap for G Jennings in my league.What can be offered to go get this guy?
Isn;t it a concern that Austin has bad games 3 out of the last 4 weeks? I also didn't like 2-3 balls he should have caught and didn't. Kitna can't be a good thing for him.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.We don't even know what will happen yet - we need to see 1 game with Kitna getting a full week of practice with the 1st team.I think they will develop some sort of Chemistry.
I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
Especially since Finley went down for the year, and Driver is banged up as well.Austin is far too inconsistent this year, and while Jennings hasn't exactly been a guaranteed performer, he seems to be on the rise in both targets and catches.
Yeah, in a dynasty league I would gladly give up Jennings for Austin.lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
Would you consider trading him for any of the following:HarvinSteve JohnsonMike X Williams?I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
No way! NONE of those guys come close to Austin's upside if Kitna can play anywhere near the level he played in the 4th quater Monday night.Would you consider trading him for any of the following:HarvinSteve JohnsonMike X Williams?I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
Gotta love the smart/tough/mall-cop-type guys in the Shark Pool.Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
Harvin maybe. I have a tough time believing Steve Johnson will keep up his pace but if he does he could outperform Austin too. I don't think this is the week to trade Austin. Granted, he's been brutal in three of the past four games but the matchup this week against the Jags is ridiculously easy. There is certainly risk involved in Austin getting ignored by Kitna again but if Austin cashes in this week due to the easy matchup his value will rise and you can likely get more for him by trade next week. So I would actually hold Austin unless I was getting a WR I definitely believed could outperform him the rest of the way like Jennings.Would you consider trading him for any of the following:HarvinSteve JohnsonMike X Williams?I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
If I was in a league that starts 3 WR and I had Miles Austin, Brian Robiskie and Andre Roberts as my starting 3, I would take these three guys for Austin. Otherwise, not a chance. And definitely not straight up for any one of them.Would you consider trading him for any of the following:HarvinSteve JohnsonMike X Williams?I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
That was a sanity check. You passed.Harvin maybe. I have a tough time believing Steve Johnson will keep up his pace but if he does he could outperform Austin too. I don't think this is the week to trade Austin. Granted, he's been brutal in three of the past four games but the matchup this week against the Jags is ridiculously easy. There is certainly risk involved in Austin getting ignored by Kitna again but if Austin cashes in this week due to the easy matchup his value will rise and you can likely get more for him by trade next week. So I would actually hold Austin unless I was getting a WR I definitely believed could outperform him the rest of the way like Jennings.Would you consider trading him for any of the following:HarvinSteve JohnsonMike X Williams?I have Austin and I would make that trade and that's not a homer call. Jennings' production is on the rise with Finley out (12 receptions and two TDs) while Austin has had three poor games in the past four, including being ignored by Kitna Monday night. That could change with Kitna getting more reps in practice with Austin but I still think Jennings is someone to target in trades although his price has surely gone way up after the last two games.I have Austin and I wouldn't trade him for Greg Jennings.
Agreed. I can definitely see the argument for posting this in the ACF, but it can be pointed out nicely...Gotta love the smart/tough/mall-cop-type guys in the Shark Pool.Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
Instead of trying to tear threads down why don't you come up with something original. Everyone else has turned this thread into something valuable so go screw captain hook. The question is simple. Is Austin a buy low candidate, and if so, what are other intelligent fantasy owners offering for him. It is guys like you that give a bad name to the Shark Pool. They should create another section in the Subforums called "Hall Monitors" or "Loser Turds".Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
SolidSWC said:player pretty good but not yet
Don't even give Captain Hook a second thought. I have no idea who he is, but it's quite obvious by his post that he's just a troll.The funny thing is, he tries belittling you, but he seems to be the only one lacking the intelligence to understand your question. He seems like a real tough guy. Probably works out.Instead of trying to tear threads down why don't you come up with something original. Everyone else has turned this thread into something valuable so go screw captain hook. The question is simple. Is Austin a buy low candidate, and if so, what are other intelligent fantasy owners offering for him. It is guys like you that give a bad name to the Shark Pool. They should create another section in the Subforums called "Hall Monitors" or "Loser Turds".Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
Im sorry about that i must have been typing something else and gotten messed up and hit post. That's on me.I think i would definitely go after Austin as Kitna might be playing from behind a lot and looking to toss teh ball around to catch up and austin may get a lot of looks, and notably some looks in garbage time.SolidSWC said:player pretty good but not yet![]()
This is a terrible post. If you didn't understand his post, that's on you. It was a fine post and extremely straight forward. Methinks your feelings are hurt that Austin's stock has dropped and you're just taking it out on him. Austin is in fact a "buy low" guy. The reason is there are owners out there that think it could get worse with Kitna. I'm targeting him but you bet I'm offering less than I would have had to offer 3-4 weeks ago.Would you Please explain your post?1) The title asks about "buying low"........do you really think that anyone who has Austin wants to sell low?2) You ask "what can be offered to get this guy?" Aside from the terrible use of the English language, what exactly do you want people to tell you? What they would accept? What you should offer? Interesting since no one knows (or cares) who is on your roster, so3) Shouldn't you discuss this with more information in the Assistant Coach Forum (see the bold, black bar above the one that says replying to Miles Austin)What can be offered to go get this guy?
i know the owner on the other end of this is happy as ####s if you offer him that.I'm an Austin owner and was thinking about offering him straight-up for Pierre Garcon. Is that selling too low?
Tell that to Larry Fitzgeraldthehornet said:lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
dallas is a totally different team. And Kitna is better than both Anderson and Hall combined.Tell that to Larry Fitzgeraldthehornet said:lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
I agree Kitna is better but in my opinion Fitzgerald is much better than Austin. I love Miles but Fitzgerald in my opinion is a Hall of Fame talent and unlike Austin he really doesn't have anyone decent to compete with for targets.dallas is a totally different team. And Kitna is better than both Anderson and Hall combined.Tell that to Larry Fitzgeraldthehornet said:lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
I agree but how has that worked out for him? HOF talent or not, balls thrown to him have been so bad, they've landed in another zipcode.I'll gamble on Austin have a better season going forward than Larry. Yeah I know I'm praying because I just traded Larry for Austin!I agree Kitna is better but in my opinion Fitzgerald is much better than Austin. I love Miles but Fitzgerald in my opinion is a Hall of Fame talent and unlike Austin he really doesn't have anyone decent to compete with for targets.dallas is a totally different team. And Kitna is better than both Anderson and Hall combined.Tell that to Larry Fitzgeraldthehornet said:lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
That's part of my point. If a potential HOF talent can be rendered useless by a downgrade at QB, it's not difficult to imagine a lesser talent (and I don't mean that as a criticism, just in terms of comparing Austin to Fitz) also losing value - and perhaps extreme value - due to a downgrade at QB. I think we all should agree that Kitna isn't as good as Romo and therefore Austin will likely lose value. The question is how much? That's what we don't know although the early signs (Week 7) were extremely negative. But we'll find out more on Sunday and hopefully for Austin owners his value will rise.I agree but how has that worked out for him? HOF talent or not, balls thrown to him have been so bad, they've landed in another zipcode.I agree Kitna is better but in my opinion Fitzgerald is much better than Austin. I love Miles but Fitzgerald in my opinion is a Hall of Fame talent and unlike Austin he really doesn't have anyone decent to compete with for targets.dallas is a totally different team. And Kitna is better than both Anderson and Hall combined.Tell that to Larry Fitzgeraldthehornet said:lol at all the people saying they'd rather have jenings than austin. last week most of you were calling austin the #1 wr. a couple bad games doesnt change a guys outlook even if he is playing with kitna.
Kitna is FAR better than any QB that is playing in Arizona now. I think some are overestimating the dropoff at QB in Dallas.That's part of my point. If a potential HOF talent can be rendered useless by a downgrade at QB, it's not difficult to imagine a lesser talent (and I don't mean that as a criticism, just in terms of comparing Austin to Fitz) also losing value - and perhaps extreme value - due to a downgrade at QB. I think we all should agree that Kitna isn't as good as Romo and therefore Austin will likely lose value. The question is how much? That's what we don't know although the early signs (Week 7) were extremely negative. But we'll find out more on Sunday and hopefully for Austin owners his value will rise.I agree but how has that worked out for him? HOF talent or not, balls thrown to him have been so bad, they've landed in another zipcode.I agree Kitna is better but in my opinion Fitzgerald is much better than Austin. I love Miles but Fitzgerald in my opinion is a Hall of Fame talent and unlike Austin he really doesn't have anyone decent to compete with for targets.dallas is a totally different team. And Kitna is better than both Anderson and Hall combined.Tell that to Larry Fitzgerald
No question he's much better than what Arizona has but I think Romo is far and away a better QB than Kitna. Even with better offensive lines, Kitna was prone to sacks and poor decisions. The Cowboys' line has had issues all season. That doesn't bode well in my opinion for a 38-year-old QB who previously struggled to avoid sacks in his salad days.Kitna is FAR better than any QB that is playing in Arizona now. I think some are overestimating the dropoff at QB in Dallas.
Are you sitting Austin this week? And if so, for who?No question he's much better than what Arizona has but I think Romo is far and away a better QB than Kitna. Even with better offensive lines, Kitna was prone to sacks and poor decisions. The Cowboys' line has had issues all season. That doesn't bode well in my opinion for a 38-year-old QB who previously struggled to avoid sacks in his salad days.Kitna is FAR better than any QB that is playing in Arizona now. I think some are overestimating the dropoff at QB in Dallas.
I'm starting him because of the matchup. However, I have lowered my expectations considerably. I no longer view Austin as a stud WR1. I now view him as a WR2/3 (and honestly he hasn't been that good the last two games) so that is where my projections for this week will reside. I hope like hell I'm wrong because essentially losing Miles Austin in Week 7 is not what my team needed this season.Are you sitting Austin this week? And if so, for who?No question he's much better than what Arizona has but I think Romo is far and away a better QB than Kitna. Even with better offensive lines, Kitna was prone to sacks and poor decisions. The Cowboys' line has had issues all season. That doesn't bode well in my opinion for a 38-year-old QB who previously struggled to avoid sacks in his salad days.Kitna is FAR better than any QB that is playing in Arizona now. I think some are overestimating the dropoff at QB in Dallas.
Re: the bold.I've gone through the gamebook and this is how the targets broke down for the Cowboys once Romo went out.I think we all should agree that Kitna isn't as good as Romo and therefore Austin will likely lose value. The question is how much? That's what we don't know although the early signs (Week 7) were extremely negative. But we'll find out more on Sunday and hopefully for Austin owners his value will rise.
You're crazy.call me crazy, i dont think fitz is that much better than austin.