Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
31 pointsalso on ESPNHe has on MFL.
Okereke still hasn't been credited with the FR. Hmmm
31 pointsalso on ESPNHe has on MFL.
Okereke still hasn't been credited with the FR. Hmmm
A lot of other teams don't have a franchise QB either. See Cowboys.Giants have stud pieces in the making on offense with Tracy and Nabers. They need a real QB and some help on the line to become a formidable offense.
Me too. I’ve been jinxed all yearI went in down 18.2 points with Nabers/Pickens going tonight. THREE (!!!) TDs reversed/called back between the two and I lost by 2.2 points. I feel like I've been kicked in the d!ck.
HahahhaSo, see my post. Would that be a TD?2 feet down is the rule. Always has been.So if a guy catches the ball in the middle of the end zone and hops 35 times on one foot to the sidelines, it's not a TD?
Narrator: He was in fact kicked in the d!ck.I went in down 18.2 points with Nabers/Pickens going tonight. THREE (!!!) TDs reversed/called back between the two and I lost by 2.2 points. I feel like I've been kicked in the d!ck.
Trying to understand the logic on this. Down 14 and you score a TD. Go for 2:Why would they go for 2?
I didn’t understand it either.Trying to understand the logic on this. Down 14 and you score a TD. Go for 2:Why would they go for 2?
* get it and you are down 6 with a chance to win if you score another TD
* don't get it and you are down 8 and must get it to force OT if you score another TD
Trying to understand the analytics/logic of this vs just kicking the extra point twice to play for OT.
Why? Schoen maybe gets another year. Not every move a GM makes will be right, although I'd argue the DJones contract was an overtly obvious mistake when it happened. Though one they will get out of fairly unscatched eating $23M. So maybe GM gets another shot at it. But I can't imagine getting a new QB and putting him in Daboll's hands.Giants kept it interesting
But once again quarterback position held them back
I think Mara will give Schoen and Daboll another year
It was a very nice draft for The G-Men this year
Get a quarterback next year and give Daboll another shot
I think you just summarized the logic. By going for 2, you have a chance to win the game and regulation with 2 TDs. By kicking the extra point, you are guaranteeing a tie with 2 TDs and then the additional need to win the game in OT.Trying to understand the logic on this. Down 14 and you score a TD. Go for 2:Why would they go for 2?
* get it and you are down 6 with a chance to win if you score another TD
* don't get it and you are down 8 and must get it to force OT if you score another TD
Trying to understand the analytics/logic of this vs just kicking the extra point twice to play for OT.
So the thought being, if going for 2 is roughly 50/50. If you don't get the 2 the first time, you would the 2nd time. Then you are the same as you would have been with 2 EPs. But if you happen to get it on the first 2pt try, then you are in a better position to win the game. Is that the logic?I think you just summarized the logic. By going for 2, you have a chance to win the game and regulation with 2 TDs. By kicking the extra point, you are guaranteeing a tie with 2 TDs and then the additional need to win the game in OT.Trying to understand the logic on this. Down 14 and you score a TD. Go for 2:Why would they go for 2?
* get it and you are down 6 with a chance to win if you score another TD
* don't get it and you are down 8 and must get it to force OT if you score another TD
Trying to understand the analytics/logic of this vs just kicking the extra point twice to play for OT.
Don't know if it is true or not, but in the press conf after he said he did not realize that it had been reviewed. This feels like a cya cop out, because the call on the field was TD and he should know that all TDs are auto reviewed.I know it was mentioned earlier in the thread. But Mike Tomlin is on the rules committee. He should know better that you can't challenge an already reviewed play. Also does he confer with anyone who has the potential to tell him Mike don't do it. lol
Yup I think that’s it. I think most coaches go for 2 in that scenario now.So the thought being, if going for 2 is roughly 50/50. If you don't get the 2 the first time, you would the 2nd time. Then you are the same as you would have been with 2 EPs. But if you happen to get it on the first 2pt try, then you are in a better position to win the game. Is that the logic?I think you just summarized the logic. By going for 2, you have a chance to win the game and regulation with 2 TDs. By kicking the extra point, you are guaranteeing a tie with 2 TDs and then the additional need to win the game in OT.Trying to understand the logic on this. Down 14 and you score a TD. Go for 2:Why would they go for 2?
* get it and you are down 6 with a chance to win if you score another TD
* don't get it and you are down 8 and must get it to force OT if you score another TD
Trying to understand the analytics/logic of this vs just kicking the extra point twice to play for OT.
John Mara has stated that Schoen and Daboll will be back next year. I think the problem lies with John. However, he won't lose his job. But if John did lose his job. Then you better believe the next guy coming in would fire Schoen and have the new GM pick his head coach.
Schoen and Daboll screwed the pooch when they resigned Daniel Jones. Then this pre-season they tried to distance themselves from their terrible decision. By inquiring on the Commander's 2nd round pick.
Letting Barkley Walk a John Mara favorite player should cost Joe his job.