fantasysharkctb
Footballguy
CJ and it isn't close in my book. He made one of the jets just look silly this weekend on a 30 yard run where he had to slow down and jerk back inside.
no kidding ... all hypeADPCJDeangelo....then a couple of WRs like Desean, SS, etc....I can't believe people are voting Felix Jones.
Wow! That is fun to watch.This guy:
Interesting pick. He's a great return man (the best in the game imo) and is quite dangerous in the open field.I voted Cribbs, watching his highlights I'm not sure anybody can set up blocks any better than him. Also will add a big stiff arm in when needed.
This angle would still lead most to AP given his power=these 2 but he has the added elusivness of some of these smaller backs..Probably Brandon Jacobs or Michael Turner. It's dangerous for anyone trying to tackle them at full speed.
I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?Hipple said:WTF? Chris Johnson? I mean if this was a race maybe, but the question has defenders in front not open space.
I'd say Adrian Peterson and Mo Drew (and then DeSean Jackson in there, too). In 587 career carries + another 86 returns + 161 receptions, Mo Drew has 9 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.In 660 career carries + another 17 returns + 47 receptions, Peterson has 8 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.I voted Mo Drew simply because he seems to take most of the runs where he gets to the open field for a TD. But, if you told me I had to have Peterson instead, I certainly wouldn't be shedding any tears. Peterson's 40 and 50 yards + TD per touch is actually better.It's very close to me.I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?Hipple said:WTF? Chris Johnson? I mean if this was a race maybe, but the question has defenders in front not open space.
Apologies if I'm just splitting hairs here, but based on what you said above:MJD has a 50+ yard TD every 93 touchesAP has a 50+ yard TD every 91 touchesChris Johnson has a 50+ yard TD every 72 touches (5 TD's on 359 touches)Just sayin...I'd say Adrian Peterson and Mo Drew (and then DeSean Jackson in there, too). In 587 career carries + another 86 returns + 161 receptions, Mo Drew has 9 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.In 660 career carries + another 17 returns + 47 receptions, Peterson has 8 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.I voted Mo Drew simply because he seems to take most of the runs where he gets to the open field for a TD. But, if you told me I had to have Peterson instead, I certainly wouldn't be shedding any tears. Peterson's 40 and 50 yards + TD per touch is actually better.It's very close to me.I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?Hipple said:WTF? Chris Johnson? I mean if this was a race maybe, but the question has defenders in front not open space.
What are you just saying?Apologies if I'm just splitting hairs here, but based on what you said above:MJD has a 50+ yard TD every 93 touchesAP has a 50+ yard TD every 91 touchesChris Johnson has a 50+ yard TD every 72 touches (5 TD's on 359 touches)Just sayin...I'd say Adrian Peterson and Mo Drew (and then DeSean Jackson in there, too). In 587 career carries + another 86 returns + 161 receptions, Mo Drew has 9 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.In 660 career carries + another 17 returns + 47 receptions, Peterson has 8 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.I voted Mo Drew simply because he seems to take most of the runs where he gets to the open field for a TD. But, if you told me I had to have Peterson instead, I certainly wouldn't be shedding any tears. Peterson's 40 and 50 yards + TD per touch is actually better.It's very close to me.I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?Hipple said:WTF? Chris Johnson? I mean if this was a race maybe, but the question has defenders in front not open space.
You were picking either MJD or AP for this hypothetical, and based on the information you presented, you were looking at 50+ yard TD's per touch as the basis for your choice. I was only pointing out that Chris Johnson has a better ratio than either of them.What are you just saying?Apologies if I'm just splitting hairs here, but based on what you said above:MJD has a 50+ yard TD every 93 touchesAP has a 50+ yard TD every 91 touchesChris Johnson has a 50+ yard TD every 72 touches (5 TD's on 359 touches)Just sayin...I'd say Adrian Peterson and Mo Drew (and then DeSean Jackson in there, too). In 587 career carries + another 86 returns + 161 receptions, Mo Drew has 9 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.In 660 career carries + another 17 returns + 47 receptions, Peterson has 8 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.I voted Mo Drew simply because he seems to take most of the runs where he gets to the open field for a TD. But, if you told me I had to have Peterson instead, I certainly wouldn't be shedding any tears. Peterson's 40 and 50 yards + TD per touch is actually better.It's very close to me.I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?Hipple said:WTF? Chris Johnson? I mean if this was a race maybe, but the question has defenders in front not open space.
Ok, I didn't actually see you say that other than just adding Chris Johnson's stats without saying anything. I used it as only part of the basis. Heck, I admitted that I was picking the guy who had a slightly lower ratio (Drew over Peterson).That being said, I think I'd need to see Chris Johnson do this a little more. As of two weeks ago, Johnson's ratio of 50+ yard TD's per touch was one every 155 touches. He got three in one game a little more than a week ago that really ramped up his ratio. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that he's not excellent in the open field, but I'm going with the more proven and powerful commodities of Mo Drew (who is one of a very few that I have seen listed to have 50+ yard TDs through all three of rushes, receptions and returns) and Peterson.You were picking either MJD or AP for this hypothetical, and based on the information you presented, you were looking at 50+ yard TD's per touch as the basis for your choice. I was only pointing out that Chris Johnson has a better ratio than either of them.What are you just saying?Apologies if I'm just splitting hairs here, but based on what you said above:MJD has a 50+ yard TD every 93 touchesAP has a 50+ yard TD every 91 touchesChris Johnson has a 50+ yard TD every 72 touches (5 TD's on 359 touches)Just sayin...I'd say Adrian Peterson and Mo Drew (and then DeSean Jackson in there, too). In 587 career carries + another 86 returns + 161 receptions, Mo Drew has 9 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.In 660 career carries + another 17 returns + 47 receptions, Peterson has 8 TDs that have gone for 40 yards or more, including 7 of 50 or more yards.I voted Mo Drew simply because he seems to take most of the runs where he gets to the open field for a TD. But, if you told me I had to have Peterson instead, I certainly wouldn't be shedding any tears. Peterson's 40 and 50 yards + TD per touch is actually better.It's very close to me.
No, it isn't. The question is, "Most dangerous open-field runner in the NFL?" And, that's a copy and paste.The 50+ yard TD runs have to do with providing at least some evidence for who are the guys that are the most dangerous (scoring a TD is dangerous to the defense, right?) in the open field (long runs where you get by the first wave and it's the RB vs. a couple guys in the secondary).WTF does all these stats of runs over 50+ yards have to do with anything?The question is who is the most elusive runner. Not the fastest, not the most powerful, the most elusive. That means, who can break a mf'ers ankle.
Well, so. You're 100% correct.Carry on then!No, it isn't. The question is, "Most dangerous open-field runner in the NFL?" And, that's a copy and paste.The 50+ yard TD runs have to do with providing at least some evidence for who are the guys that are the most dangerous (scoring a TD is dangerous to the defense, right?) in the open field (long runs where you get by the first wave and it's the RB vs. a couple guys in the secondary).WTF does all these stats of runs over 50+ yards have to do with anything?The question is who is the most elusive runner. Not the fastest, not the most powerful, the most elusive. That means, who can break a mf'ers ankle.
And at least one of those three wasn't because he was a dangerous open-field runner -- he was completely uncovered and didn't have anyone near him to evade. A defensive breakdown that anyone on the list would have scored on.That being said, I think I'd need to see Chris Johnson do this a little more. As of two weeks ago, Johnson's ratio of 50+ yard TD's per touch was one every 155 touches. He got three in one game a little more than a week ago that really ramped up his ratio. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that he's not excellent in the open field, but I'm going with the more proven and powerful commodities of Mo Drew (who is one of a very few that I have seen listed to have 50+ yard TDs through all three of rushes, receptions and returns) and Peterson.
My mancrush on Westy is well documented in the FBGs archives, but at this stage of his career? No.You think Westbrook should have no votes? I voted for him.
2 hand touch? That's not real football. What you're asking there is simply who's the shiftiest player in the league. There's a lot more to open-field running than pure shiftiness (although it certainly helps). That's taking several moves completely out of Peterson's repertoire.Here's how you settle this in your mind.Rules:1) 10' wide alleyway.2) One defender.3) The defender is playing 2-hand touch to win.4) The offensive player can only make one cut.Which one of these guys gets past the defender the most in 100 tries?
Again, my mancrush on MJD is well documented around here (I could probably find several posts where I go on record calling him a more complete and more talented RB than Peterson)... but he doesn't have the open field moves to merit serious consideration in this exercise. A lot of his long scores were simply plays where the defense lost him behind his linemen, and by the time they found him again he was already gone. He's more than capable of running over people and running away from people, but he's not going to make a lot of people miss.I agree he should be on this list but have seen him thrown down buy defenders just grabbing some jersey enough that I couldnt see him at the top of this list*surprised at the lack of votes for MJD..Maybe we need to get some Youtube highlights in here.. also ALOT of love for the rooks..?
how quickly has this guy become forgotten and underrated as hell?first 3 who came to my mind were him, westbrook, APThat would be my pick in open field.DeAngelo should be on this list.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree.I can't believe that I haven't seen Michael Vick mentioned yet.
Well, right, the emphasis is still on elusiveness and explosiveness, but I think the ability to break tackles is still very relevant when it comes to open field running. There are inevitably going to be times when, even though a running back's in the open field, a defender still has a great angle and a shot at tackling the ball carrier. You might say, well, the best open field runners would avoid this situation in the first place, but there are still situations that even a person with perfect elusiveness wouldn't be able to get out of. That's where ADP's ability to break tackles becomes so valuable. If you unleash him on the second level where he's just going up against the secondary, then he's going to be better than probably anybody on the planet at getting to the end zone. His elusiveness and explosiveness will guarantee that the secondary doesn't get good shots at him, so that when he's faced with mediocre tackle attempts, he'll be able to break out of them. In the case of DeSean and CJ3, they might go down on these tackle attempts. This video of Adrian's run vs. the Browns on week 1 perfectly encapsulates my argument:the key is its open-field. therefore, they probably won't have to break tackles, they can just make people miss.My thoughts exactly, I would put Peterson at 1 and Hester at 2. While Peterson might not be the fastest, the extremely slight drop in speed you get from Peterson compared to CJ3, Percy and DeSean is more than made up by his far superior ability to break tackles. Hester's at number 2 because he's one of the best return men of all time, which is just open field running.Great question. I was worried that everyone was out-thinking themselves, but the poll looks like I think it should. While Chris Johnson and Percy Harvin and DeSean Jackson probably have the best "football speed" in the league right now, Peterson's capable of making plays that no other human being on the planet could even imagine. Witness his run in week 1 where he did a behind-the-back stiff arm, came to a full stop, and then restarted and managed to accelerate away from everyone again.
My second choice would have to be Hester, who again isn't quite as fast as Harvin/Jackson/CJ, but who is really only good at one thing, and that one thing is making people look ridiculous in the open field. How many NFL coaches have ever said "man, this guy is SO GOOD at making people look ridiculous in the open field that we're going to actually change his position"? And more importantly, how many times has it actually worked?
If this were 2004 I'd agree. Both games I've seen him play this year he's looked about as fast as Jamal Lewis.Jewell said:I can't believe that I haven't seen Michael Vick mentioned yet. Granted, he's been out of the game for two years, we have yet to see what he has left in the tank this season, and he may be a questionable quarterback, but he's always been a deadly open field runner. The highest yards per rushing attempt in NFL history and moves like this in the open field.
It's nice of you to provide a highlight reel that includes several instances of him getting caught from behind, as well as no evidence of him making it more than 5 yards past the first serious contact.Norwood's very good, but he's probably the weakest name on the list in the open field.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...s-Redskins-2006You want a yards after contact vid I can show you Michael Turners 2008 highlight reelIt's nice of you to provide a highlight reel that includes several instances of him getting caught from behind, as well as no evidence of him making it more than 5 yards past the first serious contact.Norwood's very good, but he's probably the weakest name on the list in the open field.
Edit: Nevermind, I'd take him over Bush, Westbrook, and Bradshaw.
I don't just want yards after contact. For the title of *MOST* dangerous, I want a back with multiple tools in his belt. Norwood's not the fastest back in the league, and he's not the shiftiest back in the league (you'll notice his lack of stop-and-start moves in his highlight reel), and he has little in the way of after-contact skills. Everyone on the list handily beats him in at least one of those three departments. Many of the names on the list beat him in all three. Sproles, for instance, will break more ankles. CJ will never get caught from behind. Peterson could do all the shifty stuff that Norwood just did, then finish it all with a punishing stiff arm while running through a tackle.I have no problem with the statement that Norwood is ONE OF THE most dangerous open field runners in the league... I just can't buy him as *THE* most dangerous open field runner in the league.http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...s-Redskins-2006You want a yards after contact vid I can show you Michael Turners 2008 highlight reelIt's nice of you to provide a highlight reel that includes several instances of him getting caught from behind, as well as no evidence of him making it more than 5 yards past the first serious contact.Norwood's very good, but he's probably the weakest name on the list in the open field.
Edit: Nevermind, I'd take him over Bush, Westbrook, and Bradshaw.
All time, I'd take Barry if he was on the field by himself with the other 21 players on the field all trying to tackle him. And I'm a Bears fan. Although Sweetness would be a close second, as he could also stiff-arm guys into next week.I voted CJ.How about ever?I'd go Barry.
From the games I've watched this season, which is as many as I possibly can........Chris Johnson, Percy Harvin, and DeSean Jackson seem to possess a gear that no other NFL player has.
Same here.Those are nice college highlights but my vote goes for CJ 1A and Sproles 1B.ADP is a step slower but a beast nontheless.This guy:
Agreed - when is the last time you saw an RB put a move on someone like Jones did in MNF? Crazy for him not to be on this list.Ridiculous to not include Felix Jones. I clicked on this thread just to vote for him.