Beau Tocks
Footballguy
This might be a stupid question but critical for my scoring tonight. Was the muffed catch by Desean Jax tonite considered a fumble though he did not have possession? What is the official ruling on this?
IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
If DeSean Jackson was the first person to touch the ball for the receiving team and he loses the ball it's a fumble and the D/ST gets credited with a fumble recovery, which Chicago did. How can a D/ST get credit for a fumble recovery and no player on the receiving team get charged with a lost fumble?DeSean Jackson did not need to have "possession" for it to be a fumble. If he were to let it land on the ground, touch it but not pick it up, and a Bears player picks it up, it's still a fumble.The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
Most scoring systems have charged DeSean Jackson with a Fumble. It's officially a fumble in the Gamebook. The only scoring systems that won't is those that differentiate between ST fumbles and regular fumbles. And, as I've mentioned the difficulty in separating the two, those scoring systems are few and far between.If DeSean Jackson was the first person to touch the ball for the receiving team and he loses the ball it's a fumble and the D/ST gets credited with a fumble recovery, which Chicago did. How can a D/ST get credit for a fumble recovery and no player on the receiving team get charged with a lost fumble?DeSean Jackson did not need to have "possession" for it to be a fumble. If he were to let it land on the ground, touch it but not pick it up, and a Bears player picks it up, it's still a fumble.The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
I agree with the above. I don't believe it was a fumble. You have to have the ball to fumble it. He never had possession.I dind't see the play so I don't know if he had possession or not, but a muffed punt without possession is not a fumble in NFL stats.Edited to add a note directly from NFL rulebook: The distinction between a fumble and a muff should be kept in mind in considering rules about fumbles. A fumble is the loss of player possession of the ball. A muff is the touching of a loose ball by a player in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain possession.