What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

muffed punt catch=fumble ? (1 Viewer)

Beau Tocks

Footballguy
This might be a stupid question but critical for my scoring tonight. Was the muffed catch by Desean Jax tonite considered a fumble though he did not have possession? What is the official ruling on this?

 
it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.

 
it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?
The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.
 
We attribute negative points for screw ups like INTs, fumbles, muffed kicks. D Jackson screwed up. He deserves negative points.

 
it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?
The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.
If DeSean Jackson was the first person to touch the ball for the receiving team and he loses the ball it's a fumble and the D/ST gets credited with a fumble recovery, which Chicago did. How can a D/ST get credit for a fumble recovery and no player on the receiving team get charged with a lost fumble?DeSean Jackson did not need to have "possession" for it to be a fumble. If he were to let it land on the ground, touch it but not pick it up, and a Bears player picks it up, it's still a fumble.
 
it's my understanding that a Defense - Special Teams play, positive OR negative, does not count vs a player's total in most standard scoring systems.
IF Return TD's count for WR's, how do Return Fumbles NOT?
The main problem is trying to identify when the fumble occured. That is something that is only determinable for team stats by looking through the play by play. And something that complicated has been beyond most FF software for the most part. Nowadays, it's possible, but it's an added complication that just isn't worth the effort, IMO.
If DeSean Jackson was the first person to touch the ball for the receiving team and he loses the ball it's a fumble and the D/ST gets credited with a fumble recovery, which Chicago did. How can a D/ST get credit for a fumble recovery and no player on the receiving team get charged with a lost fumble?DeSean Jackson did not need to have "possession" for it to be a fumble. If he were to let it land on the ground, touch it but not pick it up, and a Bears player picks it up, it's still a fumble.
Most scoring systems have charged DeSean Jackson with a Fumble. It's officially a fumble in the Gamebook. The only scoring systems that won't is those that differentiate between ST fumbles and regular fumbles. And, as I've mentioned the difficulty in separating the two, those scoring systems are few and far between.
 
I dind't see the play so I don't know if he had possession or not, but a muffed punt without possession is not a fumble in NFL stats.

Edited to add a note directly from NFL rulebook: The distinction between a fumble and a muff should be kept in mind in considering rules about fumbles. A fumble is the loss of player possession of the ball. A muff is the touching of a loose ball by a player in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain possession.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dind't see the play so I don't know if he had possession or not, but a muffed punt without possession is not a fumble in NFL stats.Edited to add a note directly from NFL rulebook: The distinction between a fumble and a muff should be kept in mind in considering rules about fumbles. A fumble is the loss of player possession of the ball. A muff is the touching of a loose ball by a player in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain possession.
I agree with the above. I don't believe it was a fumble. You have to have the ball to fumble it. He never had possession.
 
not sure if NFL rules are different....but this was a muff and not a fumble....in order to fumble you have to have the ball first....he never had the ball

it also makes a difference as far as who can advance the ball when recovered, etc....defense can't advance a muff, they can recover but not advance.....same on an onside kick....

 
My league (sportsline) gave him a fumble lost. I didn't see the whole game, so if that was the only instance and he did not fumble after an offensive catch, then I'd say he's guilty as charged

 
I don't know about all websites, but MFL's "fumble" categories included muffed punts (as it says in the scoring system setup page).

Further, on MFL you would have set it up exactly how you want. There are Fumbles, Fumbles on Offense, Fumbles on Defense, and Fumbles on Special Teams scoring categories. There are also "Fumbles Lost" for each of the above if you only penalize for Fumbles that result in a turnover.

 
A muff is a fumble, it just can not be advanced by the opposing team. He should receive negative points in any league that penalizes fumbles.

 
In our Sportsline league it is listed as a fumble currently as well but if your rules differentiate between special teams scoring and regular scoring then it should not be counted against you... at least according to our rules. Usually Sportsline has to manually assign certain scoring and most of the time this is done overnight but I expect we'll automatically see Sportsline make the correction on this one.

In our league this would count against the Eagles DST and not Jackson. If Jackson had scored a touchdown then it would have benefited the Eagles DST and not Jackson so it should be the same for a fumble.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top