IRS 1040UE(unearned income)
1. List total amount of all
unearned income on line 1...................$100,000
2. Multiply line 1 by .20
and enter on line 2...................................$20,000
3. Line 2 is amount OWED
So if I buy a house in 1973 for $100,000 and sell it in 2015 for $550,000, I should pay $90,000 in income taxes when I sell it even though my inflation-adjusted income from the transaction was a bit less than zero?
What would you pay in taxes under the current laws?
Under the current tax code, people in that situation usually do a 1031 like-kind exchange and don't pay taxes if they reinvest the $550,000 in another residence. (They don't pay taxes until they stop doing 1031 exchanges and use the money for something else, that is.)
This workaround is needed because without it, it would be grossly unfair to make people pay taxes on only nominal income (without any real income).
I'd suggest that it's no less unfair if we substitute stock in ABC Co. for a house. Either way, it's kind of lame to make people pay taxes on only nominal income. That's a very good reason for making the tax rate for capital gains less than the tax rate for ordinary income, which is how we've always done things. About half of the capital gains, on average, from selling stock in ABC Co. are only nominal, not real, because of inflation.
I therefore suggest that Rubi's idea of taxing capital gains at a higher rate than ordinary income is unfair. The example with the house shows why it's unfair. The same principle extends to situations that don't involve houses.