Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
SELF-

Last edited by a moderator:
Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Hi Tecumseh,How many teams do you think will have a worse record than Cleveland?JIf you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
There are quite a few teams that could potentially have worse records than Cleveland...I think Atlanta, Miami, and KC are near locks and Tennessee, Minnesota, Oakland and the NY Giants are close behind.Hi Tecumseh,How many teams do you think will have a worse record than Cleveland?JIf you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
No Andre' Woodson?? He is better than Brennan and Booty....Brohm is close call.If the 'Boys end up with the #1 pick they'll take a QB - Brian Brohm, Colt Brennan, or John David Booty.
That's a good name to throw out too.No Andre' Woodson?? He is better than Brennan and Booty....Brohm is close call.If the 'Boys end up with the #1 pick they'll take a QB - Brian Brohm, Colt Brennan, or John David Booty.
KC??There are quite a few teams that could potentially have worse records than Cleveland...I think Atlanta, Miami, and KC are near locks and Tennessee, Minnesota, Oakland and the NY Giants are close behind.Hi Tecumseh,How many teams do you think will have a worse record than Cleveland?If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
J
Why is this no doubt?Not saying you're wrong, just curious.They will no doubt trade down in the first round for more picks in the '08 draft and/or the '09 draft.
Yes. Their o-line is terrible, their corners are old and have definitely lost at least a step and their receiving corps is B-A-D.They still have nothing at DT and Jared Allen is starting the season off with a suspension. (Okay LBs and very good DE's though.)O/U for wins is 5.You really think the Chiefs with LJ, Tony Gonzalez, Huard now at QB (the better option), a good defense and 8 games at Arrowhead are really going to finish worse than Cleveland?
Great point Routilla. NE has been doing this for years...seems they always have 2 1st round picks and they leverage it for the next year because they have few glaring weaknesses. Dallas can keep pushing that card back for the right time to cash it in...also turning it into multiple picks. Dallas has a chance to take over the NFC East as Washingotn can't draft to save their lives, Philly is in sort of a flux as they are not as good as they were a couple years back, and the NY Giants look terrible right now.They will no doubt trade down in the first round for more picks in the '08 draft and/or the '09 draft. I kind of like the idea of having leverage heading into each draft in the form of additional picks. Of course they always have the option of using the pick if they think a real stud exists at their spot or if they have a glaring need to fill.
It's not that Washington picks bad, it's just that they hardly pick at all!Great point Routilla. NE has been doing this for years...seems they always have 2 1st round picks and they leverage it for the next year because they have few glaring weaknesses. Dallas can keep pushing that card back for the right time to cash it in...also turning it into multiple picks. Dallas has a chance to take over the NFC East as Washingotn can't draft to save their lives, Philly is in sort of a flux as they are not as good as they were a couple years back, and the NY Giants look terrible right now.They will no doubt trade down in the first round for more picks in the '08 draft and/or the '09 draft. I kind of like the idea of having leverage heading into each draft in the form of additional picks. Of course they always have the option of using the pick if they think a real stud exists at their spot or if they have a glaring need to fill.
Oh did they trade for the Raiders first pick next year?Darren McFadden or Jake Long?
Then they'll have their own pick somewhere in the mid to late 20s.![]()
Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns. They weren't the worst team in football last year, and have vastly improved this season all around.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Not a fan of them but I know football very well. They will have a top 5 pick, im pretty confident in that prediction.Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Keep in mind they finished 9-7 last year....Similar O-line as last year (yes worse, but it was pretty bad last year, too)Same DB's (yes they are old, but the secondary is one of Herm's few strengths)Receiving corp added Bowe, plus Gonzo & LJ are still big parts of the passing game.Jared Allen is only missing 2 games.LB's added Donnie Edwards.I figure O/U more around 7 wins. Not good....... but not Cleveland, Atlanta, Oakland & Miami bad.Yes. Their o-line is terrible, their corners are old and have definitely lost at least a step and their receiving corps is B-A-D.They still have nothing at DT and Jared Allen is starting the season off with a suspension. (Okay LBs and very good DE's though.)O/U for wins is 5.You really think the Chiefs with LJ, Tony Gonzalez, Huard now at QB (the better option), a good defense and 8 games at Arrowhead are really going to finish worse than Cleveland?
So the o-line is worse than the bad line they had last year and the receiving corps added a rookie? And the defense added an oooold Donnie Edwards?I stand by my prediction.Plus, I think Huard's production last year was a fluke and I think the QB situation in KC is going to be a wreck all season long.Keep in mind they finished 9-7 last year....Similar O-line as last year (yes worse, but it was pretty bad last year, too)Same DB's (yes they are old, but the secondary is one of Herm's few strengths)Receiving corp added Bowe, plus Gonzo & LJ are still big parts of the passing game.Jared Allen is only missing 2 games.LB's added Donnie Edwards.I figure O/U more around 7 wins. Not good....... but not Cleveland, Atlanta, Oakland & Miami bad.Yes. Their o-line is terrible, their corners are old and have definitely lost at least a step and their receiving corps is B-A-D.They still have nothing at DT and Jared Allen is starting the season off with a suspension. (Okay LBs and very good DE's though.)O/U for wins is 5.You really think the Chiefs with LJ, Tony Gonzalez, Huard now at QB (the better option), a good defense and 8 games at Arrowhead are really going to finish worse than Cleveland?
They finished tied for fifth from the bottom last year, and this year:- Why they would be worse - I can't think of 1 reason.- Why they would be better - Healthy Bodden and the drafting of Wright gives them one of the better CB duo's in the league, if Bodden would stay healthy, he would be a pro-bowler. - Their LB's are deep and more experienced. - Their OLine is the most improved unit on the team. Ryan Tucker will be healthy after week 4, they drafted Joe Thomas, and signed McKinney and Steinbach. Not to mention Bentley is almost back to health after missing all of last year.Not a fan of them but I know football very well. They will have a top 5 pick, im pretty confident in that prediction.Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Not a fan of them but I know football very well. They will have a top 5 pick, im pretty confident in that prediction.Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
:( I'm gonna let that slide. It will hurt BAD when fat Berman introduces the commish, and Dallas is on the clock.Oh did they trade for the Raiders first pick next year?Darren McFadden or Jake Long?
Then they'll have their own pick somewhere in the mid to late 20s.![]()
For serious?They finished tied for fifth from the bottom last year, and this year:- Why they would be worseNot a fan of them but I know football very well. They will have a top 5 pick, im pretty confident in that prediction.Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
- I can't think of 1 reason.
- Why they would be better
- Healthy Bodden and the drafting of Wright gives them one of the better CB duo's in the league, if Bodden would stay healthy, he would be a pro-bowler.
- Their LB's are deep and more experienced.
- Their OLine is the most improved unit on the team. Ryan Tucker will be healthy after week 4, they drafted Joe Thomas, and signed McKinney and Steinbach. Not to mention Bentley is almost back to health after missing all of last year.
Trader Jerry learned it from Trader Jimmy - trade, trade, trade on draft day. Move down to second and get extra picks, move back up into 1st a few picks after the original pick when there is a player they really want. Worked in the early 90s when they had a ton of picks. Hasn't really worked well since Trader Jimmy left the fold.Why is this no doubt?Not saying you're wrong, just curious.They will no doubt trade down in the first round for more picks in the '08 draft and/or the '09 draft.
I wouldn't count on Baxter butLet's look at where the Browns have improved this year:Offense- They spent good money getting Steinbach and drafted well getting Thomas. Their o-line should be much improved.- Whether they start Frye for his second year or just go to Quinn, the QB spot is better than last year.- As much as I don't like Lewis, he's an improvement over Droughns.- Braylon Edwards should be fully healed and if he can keep his mouth shut, could be a big producer. They better hope Winslow stays healthy, though.Defense- They started two rookies for their 3-4 alignment last year - Wimbley & Jackson - and both played well, which hopefully carries over to improvement this year.- Sean Jones is probably the most underrated safety in the league.- Leigh Bodden is healthy and with Baxter returning and the rookie Eric Wright is playing well.The d-line is still a big concern, though.
It will hurt worse when Oakland is on the clock and they take Jamarcus Russell for a second time.Oh did they trade for the Raiders first pick next year?Darren McFadden or Jake Long?
Then they'll have their own pick somewhere in the mid to late 20s.![]()
I'm gonna let that slide. It will hurt BAD when fat Berman introduces the commish, and Dallas is on the clock.
They will finish with a top 5 pick because they will be lucky to win 1 game in their division. They will probably be starting a rookie QB (good luck with that) and I cant see Jamal Lewis as an upgrade over anyone. They wont be able to score enough point to win their games and that puts a big "L" in the weekly column. I understand your probably a Browns fan and thats sweet, but you really should take off those rose colored glasses. HTHThey finished tied for fifth from the bottom last year, and this year:- Why they would be worse - I can't think of 1 reason.- Why they would be better - Healthy Bodden and the drafting of Wright gives them one of the better CB duo's in the league, if Bodden would stay healthy, he would be a pro-bowler. - Their LB's are deep and more experienced. - Their OLine is the most improved unit on the team. Ryan Tucker will be healthy after week 4, they drafted Joe Thomas, and signed McKinney and Steinbach. Not to mention Bentley is almost back to health after missing all of last year.Not a fan of them but I know football very well. They will have a top 5 pick, im pretty confident in that prediction.Obviously you don't know a thing about the Browns.Right now its a crap shoot but the Browns are still one of the safest bets.If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Oh, snap!It will hurt worse when Oakland is on the clock and they take Jamarcus Russell for a second time.I'm gonna let that slide. It will hurt BAD when fat Berman introduces the commish, and Dallas is on the clock.
Pittsburgh is the cream of the crop in the division, but the other two teams have their issues:Baltimore's o-line is struggling (and subsiquently therefore so is McGahee - who I don't like anyway) and how much does McNair have left in the tank?Cincinnati has MAJOR issues on defense. They could be one of the worst units in the league.They will finish with a top 5 pick because they will be lucky to win 1 game in their division. They will probably be starting a rookie QB (good luck with that) and I cant see Jamal Lewis as an upgrade over anyone. They wont be able to score enough point to win their games and that puts a big "L" in the weekly column. I understand your probably a Browns fan and thats sweet, but you really should take off those rose colored glasses. HTH
I know nobody is going to believe me, and I don't blame you. But I swear to the man upstairs... no fingers crossed, no toes crossed -- that the following statement is not just due to me being a shameless homer. I think Oakland will be nowhere near in contention for the # 1 pick next year. Their defense is really, really good, and I am super encouraged by their offensive prospects. Being in that beastly division with Denver and San Diego is a killer, of course, but what can you do?As for the other teams you listed. I think Atlanta will surprise some folks. I don't think they'll be nearly as bad as everyone expects, and I think Harrington will perform fairly well. He really has no pressure, if you think about it. He wasn't expected to be a savior for the Falcons. Anything positive he does is gravy, and an actual "pocket QB" might yet yield some results with those young receivers.There are quite a few teams that could potentially have worse records than Cleveland...I think Atlanta, Miami, and KC are near locks and Tennessee, Minnesota, Oakland and the NY Giants are close behind.Hi Tecumseh,How many teams do you think will have a worse record than Cleveland?If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Cincy has issues but they will be able to score more points when they play the Browns. I would be shocked if the Browns inept offense manages 3 points against the Ravens. I see the Browns as a 5 win team max.Pittsburgh is the cream of the crop in the division, but the other two teams have their issues:Baltimore's o-line is struggling (and subsiquently therefore so is McGahee - who I don't like anyway) and how much does McNair have left in the tank?Cincinnati has MAJOR issues on defense. They could be one of the worst units in the league.They will finish with a top 5 pick because they will be lucky to win 1 game in their division. They will probably be starting a rookie QB (good luck with that) and I cant see Jamal Lewis as an upgrade over anyone. They wont be able to score enough point to win their games and that puts a big "L" in the weekly column. I understand your probably a Browns fan and thats sweet, but you really should take off those rose colored glasses. HTH
Oh, snap!It will hurt worse when Oakland is on the clock and they take Jamarcus Russell for a second time.I'm gonna let that slide. It will hurt BAD when fat Berman introduces the commish, and Dallas is on the clock.![]()
And hook up with Laurent Robinson for years to come. They better really suck this year because KC, Miami, Washington, Minnesota, the Bucs and the Browns are top 6 locks. Each one has posted up in the cellar of their division. Whoever said the Giants is clueless. The Redskins have staked out the claim for the cellar in the NFC East. They suck. Who catchs footballs over there not named Cooley? Moss? He's always hurt. The Raiders will beat KC twice if they can avoid doing something really stupid. KC has nothing. They have the better D and now a better O.Miami is a total joke. GinnAtlanta will have the #1 pick and take Brohm.
All those teams you mentioned are a possibility to finish with a higher draft pick than the Browns but I think Cleveland is the safer bet. IMOI know nobody is going to believe me, and I don't blame you. But I swear to the man upstairs... no fingers crossed, no toes crossed -- that the following statement is not just due to me being a shameless homer. I think Oakland will be nowhere near in contention for the # 1 pick next year. Their defense is really, really good, and I am super encouraged by their offensive prospects. Being in that beastly division with Denver and San Diego is a killer, of course, but what can you do?As for the other teams you listed. I think Atlanta will surprise some folks. I don't think they'll be nearly as bad as everyone expects, and I think Harrington will perform fairly well. He really has no pressure, if you think about it. He wasn't expected to be a savior for the Falcons. Anything positive he does is gravy, and an actual "pocket QB" might yet yield some results with those young receivers.There are quite a few teams that could potentially have worse records than Cleveland...I think Atlanta, Miami, and KC are near locks and Tennessee, Minnesota, Oakland and the NY Giants are close behind.Hi Tecumseh,How many teams do you think will have a worse record than Cleveland?If you think CLE will have the worst record in the league, you're delusional.
Any team with L.J. and the Arrowhead home crowd will not get the # 1 pick. Herm is just good enough to have K.C. only slightly suck.
Tennesee? Highly unlikely. They were 8-8 last year, and Young will win several games by himself with his legs.
Giants? Possibly, but a longshot.
Minnesota? Could be brutal on offense, but that run D is nice. Who knows.
Miami? Would not completely shock me.
What about Houston?
I love the Oakland defense. Their d-line needs to improve the run defense, but their linebackers rock and if Asomugha doesn't make the Pro-Bowl this year, either he severely regressed of someone isn't paying attention.Their QB situation is still a mess, though. As is the o-line and the RB position. Actually having an offensive game plan should help this year, though.I know nobody is going to believe me, and I don't blame you. But I swear to the man upstairs... no fingers crossed, no toes crossed -- that the following statement is not just due to me being a shameless homer. I think Oakland will be nowhere near in contention for the # 1 pick next year. Their defense is really, really good, and I am super encouraged by their offensive prospects. Being in that beastly division with Denver and San Diego is a killer, of course, but what can you do?
He didn't have any pressure in Miami last year and he still sucked. He's terrible and there's no nice way to put it. I'm not impressed by their defense, especially the safties.As for the other teams you listed. I think Atlanta will surprise some folks. I don't think they'll be nearly as bad as everyone expects, and I think Harrington will perform fairly well. He really has no pressure, if you think about it. He wasn't expected to be a savior for the Falcons. Anything positive he does is gravy, and an actual "pocket QB" might yet yield some results with those young receivers.
Any team with L.J. and the Arrowhead home crowd will not get the # 1 pick. Herm is just good enough to have K.C. only slightly suck.
The running game will be the suck and their defense is worse than last year.Tennesee? Highly unlikely. They were 8-8 last year, and Young will win several games by himself with his legs.
Longshot? Even though Tiki was a punk, they'll not be able to replace him. And that defense is going to be HORRIBLE.Giants? Possibly, but a longshot.
Their defense will keep them out of the #1 spot. If history is any indication, they'll pick 7th.Minnesota? Could be brutal on offense, but that run D is nice. Who knows.
What about Houston?
I think 5 wins is about right but the first pick in the draft is usually a team 2 or 3 wins.Cincy has issues but they will be able to score more points when they play the Browns. I would be shocked if the Browns inept offense manages 3 points against the Ravens. I see the Browns as a 5 win team max.Pittsburgh is the cream of the crop in the division, but the other two teams have their issues:Baltimore's o-line is struggling (and subsiquently therefore so is McGahee - who I don't like anyway) and how much does McNair have left in the tank?Cincinnati has MAJOR issues on defense. They could be one of the worst units in the league.They will finish with a top 5 pick because they will be lucky to win 1 game in their division. They will probably be starting a rookie QB (good luck with that) and I cant see Jamal Lewis as an upgrade over anyone. They wont be able to score enough point to win their games and that puts a big "L" in the weekly column. I understand your probably a Browns fan and thats sweet, but you really should take off those rose colored glasses. HTH
No chance.As bad as Joey Harrington is I still think he is a better QB (right now) over anyone that the Browns have.
The Bills are better than most think.Plus, the get to play the Bills twice which is more than the Browns can say.
Who gets to play the Bills twice?As bad as Joey Harrington is I still think he is a better QB (right now) over anyone that the Browns have. Plus, the get to play the Bills twice which is more than the Browns can say.
For Oakland fans, hopefully so!Oh, snap!It will hurt worse when Oakland is on the clock and they take Jamarcus Russell for a second time.I'm gonna let that slide. It will hurt BAD when fat Berman introduces the commish, and Dallas is on the clock.![]()
Never let it be said that I can't take a joke.(That was a joke, right?)
![]()
Miami does...2 losses for Miami.Who gets to play the Bills twice?As bad as Joey Harrington is I still think he is a better QB (right now) over anyone that the Browns have. Plus, the get to play the Bills twice which is more than the Browns can say.![]()
Miami does, we were talking about Harrington so obviously the Phins were included in the conversation.Who gets to play the Bills twice?As bad as Joey Harrington is I still think he is a better QB (right now) over anyone that the Browns have. Plus, the get to play the Bills twice which is more than the Browns can say.![]()