Well ... I'll need help remembering injury details ... but let's go:How about Fred Taylor?Barring injuries, name the last 5 rookie RBs that displaced the current starting RB.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I believe the point he is making is that rookie RBs are overrated. Yes, there are some that will be given a chance early, but most will not.clinton portis took over during his rookie season
dominick davis took over during his rookie season
anthony thomas took over during his rookie season
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know what his point is, and I was just answering his question. Each one of those running backs did not start the season as a rookie, but took over the starting job during the season.I believe the point he is making is that rookie RBs are overrated. Yes, there are some that will be given a chance early, but most will not.clinton portis took over during his rookie season
dominick davis took over during his rookie season
anthony thomas took over during his rookie season
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know, but that's still not that many in comparison to all the rookie RBs getting hyped as if they will replace the current starter.I know what his point is, and I was just answering his question. Each one of those running backs did not start the season as a rookie, but took over the starting job during the season.I believe the point he is making is that rookie RBs are overrated. Yes, there are some that will be given a chance early, but most will not.clinton portis took over during his rookie season
dominick davis took over during his rookie season
anthony thomas took over during his rookie season
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
you're right it's not many. those are the recent one's off the top of my head i could come up with.I know, but that's still not that many in comparison to all the rookie RBs getting hyped as if they will replace the current starter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
some of these guys like cadillac were drafted to start the season. they didn't start as 2nd string, and then take over the starters job during the season.Caddy of course.
Would Ronnie Brown count?
Kevin Jones
Julius Jones
William Green
Travis Henry
Portis (although that was in large part due to TD)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
In fact ... IIRC, in the 90s, the common knowledge was that first-round backs almost always started right away.I remember some questioning of Fred Taylor in 1998 ... some owners thought that James Stewart would keep the starting gig.
James Stewart suffered a season ending injury early in the year IIRC, opening the door for Fred Taylor.In fact ... IIRC, in the 90s, the common knowledge was that first-round backs almost always started right away.I remember some questioning of Fred Taylor in 1998 ... some owners thought that James Stewart would keep the starting gig.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Stewart was the Starter and had 2 decent games then torn his ACL. That's when Fred took over.In fact ... IIRC, in the 90s, the common knowledge was that first-round backs almost always started right away.I remember some questioning of Fred Taylor in 1998 ... some owners thought that James Stewart would keep the starting gig.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's your criteria then?I took it as "name a rookie who started, while the incumbent was healthy"some of these guys like cadillac were drafted to start the season. they didn't start as 2nd string, and then take over the starters job during the season.Caddy of course.
Would Ronnie Brown count?
Kevin Jones
Julius Jones
William Green
Travis Henry
Portis (although that was in large part due to TD)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not my criteria. I thought JAA was asking what rookies unseated healthy starters during the season. I must have misunderstood.What's your criteria then?
I took it as "name a rookie who started, while the incumbent was healthy"
I agree, few rookies drafted to be 2nd stringers start, barring injury. Doesn't seem to be worth debating.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yes, this is the trend from the past that has changed. Back 5-10 years ago, you could count on 1-2 rookie RB's from the rookie class to be top 10 (sometimes top 5) fantasy/NFL studs in their rookie season. You're not getting those immediate returns on investment anymore. I think its pass blocking technique requirements now-adays...at least that is the only conclusion I've come to on the trend change.It used to be common for one or possibly two rookies to make the fantasy top 10, but Portis was the last rookie to make the list in the 2002 season.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You have to consider the drafts and situations that have happened the past few seasons. In 2003 McGahee and Larry Johnson were the only two first round backs. McGahee wasnt healthy enough to play and Priest Holmes was leading the NFL in rushing. In 2004 both Kevin Jones and Julius Jones made good on their opportunities and either could have easily been in the top ten if they had started the entire year. Last year Caddilac and Arrington were the two guys. Caddy probably would have been top ten if it wasnt for his injury. Neither Arrington nor any other RB had a prayer of being top ten in Arizona. Nothing has changed in the NFL over the past few years that would make it any more diffacult for a rookie to make the top ten. If it wasnt for injuries to McGahee, Julius Jones, and Caddillac we probably wouldnt even be having this discussion. Just because a handful of players dont finish in the top ten with one opportunity doesnt affect future odds. The odds are still just as good as they've always been.It used to be common for one or possibly two rookies to make the fantasy top 10, but Portis was the last rookie to make the list in the 2002 season.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
2000====bal 12- 4-0 Jamal Lewis (309-1364- 6, 27-296-0)buf 8- 8-0 Shawn Bryson (161- 591- 0, 32-271-2)cle 3-13-0 Travis Prentice (173- 512- 7, 37-191-1)den 11- 5-0 Mike Anderson (297-1487-15, 23-169-0)nyg 12- 4-0 Ron Dayne (228- 770- 5, 3- 11-0)2001====buf 3-13-0 Travis Henry (213- 729- 4, 22-179-0)chi 13- 3-0 Anthony Thomas (278-1183- 7, 22-178-0)cle 7- 9-0 James Jackson (195- 554- 2, 7- 56-0)ind 6-10-0 Dominic Rhodes (233-1104- 9, 34-224-0)min 5-11-0 Michael Bennett (172- 682- 2, 29-226-1)sdg 5-11-0 LaDainian Tomlinson (339-1236-10, 59-367-0)2002====ari 5-11-0 Marcel Shipp (188- 834- 6, 38-413-3)cle 9- 7-0 William Green (243- 887- 6, 16-113-0)den 9- 7-0 Clinton Portis (273-1508-15, 33-364-2)hou 4-12-0 Jonathan Wells (197- 529- 3, 9- 48-0)2003====hou 5-11-0 Domanick Davis (238-1031- 8, 47-351-0)2004====dal 6-10-0 Julius Jones (197- 819- 7, 17-109-0)det 6-10-0 Kevin Jones (241-1133- 5, 28-180-1)2005====gnb 4-12-0 Samkon Gado (143- 582- 6, 10- 77-1)mia 9- 7-0 Ronnie Brown (207- 907- 4, 32-232-1)tam 11- 5-0 Cadillac Williams (290-1178- 6, 20- 81-0)
Year 2.Should McGahee count for this topic? His rookie year was clearly a mulligan, and he took the job from Henry early into his soph compaign.IIRC, Didn't Shaun Alexander take over for Ricky Waters in Seatle his rookie year? Injury may have given him his shot, but when Waters was healthy again, he couldnt take the job back from Alexander?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And there it is! 3 straight years of recent without a rookie producing either greater than 10 TDs or greater than 1200 rushing yds. Not very studly trends for our rookie RB's as of late.Drinen covered this issue in his blog:
2000====bal 12- 4-0 Jamal Lewis (309-1364- 6, 27-296-0)buf 8- 8-0 Shawn Bryson (161- 591- 0, 32-271-2)cle 3-13-0 Travis Prentice (173- 512- 7, 37-191-1)den 11- 5-0 Mike Anderson (297-1487-15, 23-169-0)nyg 12- 4-0 Ron Dayne (228- 770- 5, 3- 11-0)2001====buf 3-13-0 Travis Henry (213- 729- 4, 22-179-0)chi 13- 3-0 Anthony Thomas (278-1183- 7, 22-178-0)cle 7- 9-0 James Jackson (195- 554- 2, 7- 56-0)ind 6-10-0 Dominic Rhodes (233-1104- 9, 34-224-0)min 5-11-0 Michael Bennett (172- 682- 2, 29-226-1)sdg 5-11-0 LaDainian Tomlinson (339-1236-10, 59-367-0)2002====ari 5-11-0 Marcel Shipp (188- 834- 6, 38-413-3)cle 9- 7-0 William Green (243- 887- 6, 16-113-0)den 9- 7-0 Clinton Portis (273-1508-15, 33-364-2)hou 4-12-0 Jonathan Wells (197- 529- 3, 9- 48-0)2003====hou 5-11-0 Domanick Davis (238-1031- 8, 47-351-0)2004====dal 6-10-0 Julius Jones (197- 819- 7, 17-109-0)det 6-10-0 Kevin Jones (241-1133- 5, 28-180-1)2005====gnb 4-12-0 Samkon Gado (143- 582- 6, 10- 77-1)mia 9- 7-0 Ronnie Brown (207- 907- 4, 32-232-1)tam 11- 5-0 Cadillac Williams (290-1178- 6, 20- 81-0)Link
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Exactly. Most of these examples are rookies going to a team with a has-been or never-was RB as the incumbent starter. Unless the rookie RB is supremely talented and going to a team without an established or productive starter, the chances of the rookie overtaking the veteran are pretty slim in year one. People think that Benson would've had the job last year if he hadn't held out, but the chances are that Thomas Jones would've kept the job based on his play on the field and Benson still would've spent the year learning. He'd have gotten more time, but not enough to eat into Jones' numbers.Great thread
LT2
Replaced Terrell Fletcher who never ran for more than 550/5 (back in 1998) in his career. Year before LT, Fletcher and Jermaine Fazande ran for about 360 yards each.
Caddy
Michael Pittman, 30 years old and history of problems (suspensions). Was also sutied as more of a 3rd back becuse of receiving abilities.
Ronnie Brown
Started by deafult because of Ricky's suspension and afterward was pretty much RBBC the rest of the season
Kevin Jones
Displaced Shawn Bryson who had never rused for more then 610 and and 3 TDs in his career.
Julius Jones
Displaced Eddie George who was in the twilight of his career
William Green
Replaced Jamel White who never even rushed for 500 yards and 5 TDs in a single season
Travis Henry
As a rookie rushed for 729/4. Eventually replaced Bryson....
Jamal
Last time Terry Allen ran for over 900 yards was 1997. Jamal started in 2002, Allen was 32.
Based on this Maroney has the best situation IMO (Dillon starting to look like Eddie George circa 2004). Williams , Addai and White, while good fits for the teams drafting them, still have proven but often injured starters in front of them.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>