She didn't start that. And her message- "Just Say No" wasn't about laws; it was a personal urging because she had lost too many close friends to drug and alcohol addiction. It was a good message and still is.Thanks for the war on drugs, NOT
It was not a good message.She didn't start that. And her message- "Just Say No" wasn't about laws; it was a personal urging because she had lost too many close friends to drug and alcohol addiction. It was a good message and still is.
No one was baiting you and it is beyond pale that you feel the need to bring up one of the most notorious gossip writers of our time at the time of someone's death.It feels like some bait in here goading someone to get into the Kitty Kelley stuff. I'll abstain out of respect - RIP Nancy.
Hey kiddies say yes to drugs!It was not a good message.
This "Just Say No to Drugs" message was brought to you today by: RJ Reynolds, Anheuser Busch, the makers of Prozac and the letter "H" for "hypocrisy".Hey kiddies say yes to drugs!
Yeah, urging kids to feel empowered to not use drugs is a bad message. What ####### planet are you on?It was not a good message.
That wasn't the message and you know it.Yeah, urging kids to feel empowered to not use drugs is a bad message. What ####### planet are you on?
Earth. Where misleading simplistic slogans are often ineffective and counterproductive.Yeah, urging kids to feel empowered to not use drugs is a bad message. What ####### planet are you on?
Oh please, you are better than that.This "Just Say No to Drugs" message was brought to you today by: RJ Reynolds, Anheuser Busch, the makers of Prozac and the letter "H" for "hypocrisy".
what do you think the message was?That wasn't the message and you know it.
what do you think the message was?
This is false as well. I just listened to Andrea Mitchell discuss this. Nancy had close friends who died of AIDS. It was Nancy who pushed her husband to do something about it, against the wishes of some of the homophobic members of his administration.She also "just said no" to helping people dying of AIDS.
Probably not the time or place to debate this."All drugs are horrible and will destroy your life".
The hell I am. You don't find it the least bit ironic that she was telling people not to use drugs when her husband and party has historically been in the back pockets of tobacco, alcohol and Big Pharma? Come on....her husband endorsed Chesterfield cigarettes for Christ's sake. So...destroy yourself with nicotine but don't you dare smoke a joint? "Just Say No" was responsible for massive government waste on a drug war that has not just failed but imprisoned countless non-violent offenders. I also note it didn't stop you from smoking weed, so I'd call the message not only dangerous but ineffectual.Oh please, you are better than that.
Yeah, because "Just say no" was only referring to weed.The hell I am. You don't find it the least bit ironic that she was telling people not to use drugs when her husband and party has historically been in the back pockets of tobacco, alcohol and Big Pharma? Come on....her husband endorsed Chesterfield cigarettes for Christ's sake. So...destroy yourself with nicotine but don't you dare smoke a joint? "Just Say No" was responsible for massive government waste on a drug war that has not just failed but imprisoned countless non-violent offenders. I also note it didn't stop you from smoking weed, so I'd call the message not only dangerous but ineffectual.
Oh, you mean like "hope and change"?Earth. Where misleading simplistic slogans are often ineffective and counterproductive.
Nope, especially when people are trying to rewrite history on what she meant.Probably not the time or place to debate this.
This is not anything new. He is pretty much is the Negative Nancy (pun intended) in every thread he posts in. Try going into a movie review/discussion thread - if it wasn't made before 1940 it's crap.Why don't we talk about what a classless **** you are?
So your absurd position is if anyone you associate with is involved in something that might indirectly be hypocritical if you wish to make such a huge stretch, that you can not make any positive statements on such topic? That is going to be your position in the day of that person's death. Damn, talk about being extremely judgmental. If this is the best point people can make against Nancy, she is a saint.The hell I am. You don't find it the least bit ironic that she was telling people not to use drugs when her husband and party has historically been in the back pockets of tobacco, alcohol and Big Pharma? Come on....her husband endorsed Chesterfield cigarettes for Christ's sake. So...destroy yourself with nicotine but don't you dare smoke a joint? "Just Say No" was responsible for massive government waste on a drug war that has not just failed but imprisoned countless non-violent offenders. I also note it didn't stop you from smoking weed, so I'd call the message not only dangerous but ineffectual.
Is it or is it not a good thing to advise young people to just say no to addictive drugs? I think it's a good thing.The hell I am. You don't find it the least bit ironic that she was telling people not to use drugs when her husband and party has historically been in the back pockets of tobacco, alcohol and Big Pharma? Come on....her husband endorsed Chesterfield cigarettes for Christ's sake. So...destroy yourself with nicotine but don't you dare smoke a joint? "Just Say No" was responsible for massive government waste on a drug war that has not just failed but imprisoned countless non-violent offenders. I also note it didn't stop you from smoking weed, so I'd call the message not only dangerous but ineffectual.
Sometimes it is worth it to take a fall inspite of how stupidly this forum gets moderated.Sure, you want to go first?
Ah, right. Forgot that one was removed from Schedule One of the DEA classification for most dangerous Street drugs.Yeah, because "Just say no" was only referring to weed.