I think we can all acknowledge that the NBA is scripted tighter than a WWE show, so why don't we just cut to the chase and Put Dallas v. Miami in the finals, with Dallas winning this time after a disputed call?

Last edited by a moderator:
I think we can all acknowledge that the NBA is scripted tighter than a WWE show, so why don't we just cut to the chase and Put Dallas v. Miami in the finals, with Dallas winning this time after a disputed call?

Angry/focused Lebron is kind of scary late in games here in the playoffs. I prefer this to the goofy/dancing/aloof Lebron in Cleveland. Kid is really growing up..That said...Dallas in 5
Good luck with that.Heat in 6. Dallas has not seen this kind of defense.pm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .

sure. what terms are you looking for here?heat in 5Heat in 5.Anyone looking for action?
1:150 bones?sure. what terms are you looking for here?heat in 5Heat in 5.Anyone looking for action?
I think Chandler will do a pretty good job of shutting down Bosh, if that is the matchup. He has the quickness and length to give him fits. If I'm Dallas, I'm not sure what I do. Dirk could do a mediocre job Bosh leaving Chandler to roam and help on Wade/James drives.Also looking forward to the renewed Deshawn / LeBron feud.Haslem and Bosh will be a much different look for Dirk than Pau and Collison. I don't think he's "shutdown" but he isn't averaging 32 this series. I assume Lebron is on Dirk in crunchtime. Kidd's 3s will be the X-factor this series.
Post of the year with a few tweaks.Angry/focused Lebron is kind of scary late in games here in the playoffs. I prefer this to the goofy/dancing/aloof Lebron in Cleveland. Kid is really growing up..
That said...Dallas in 57
Mavs baby!!!How bout this you give me the Mavs at around 4.75/4 and make it evenpm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .![]()
allas wins, you give me $100Miami wins, I give you $100Who going defend Wade then?? What's Marion going to do??I think Chandler will do a pretty good job of shutting down Bosh, if that is the matchup. He has the quickness and length to give him fits. If I'm Dallas, I'm not sure what I do. Dirk could do a mediocre job Bosh leaving Chandler to roam and help on Wade/James drives.Also looking forward to the renewed Deshawn / LeBron feud.Haslem and Bosh will be a much different look for Dirk than Pau and Collison. I don't think he's "shutdown" but he isn't averaging 32 this series. I assume Lebron is on Dirk in crunchtime. Kidd's 3s will be the X-factor this series.
wouldn't it be heat win I get 100, mavs win you don't owe me 60?Mavs baby!!!How bout this you give me the Mavs at around 4.75/4 and make it evenpm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .![]()
allas wins, you give me $100Miami wins, I give you $100
As it stands now:Heat win, I owe you 60Mavs win, you ove me 50You give me a little odds on this matchup and make it and even 100 either way. We can keep it the same if you want, just saw you wanted more action.wouldn't it be heat win I get 100, mavs win you don't owe me 60?Mavs baby!!!How bout this you give me the Mavs at around 4.75/4 and make it evenpm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .![]()
allas wins, you give me $100Miami wins, I give you $100
I'm a dummy. I forgot this was for the title not heat v. bulls. My bad 100%. I'm in on w/ the new odds. 100 straight away for the winner.As it stands now:Heat win, I owe you 60Mavs win, you ove me 50You give me a little odds on this matchup and make it and even 100 either way. We can keep it the same if you want, just saw you wanted more action.wouldn't it be heat win I get 100, mavs win you don't owe me 60?Mavs baby!!!How bout this you give me the Mavs at around 4.75/4 and make it evenpm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .![]()
allas wins, you give me $100Miami wins, I give you $100
Marion will probably be on LeBron. Kidd or Deshawn on Wade.Who going defend Wade then?? What's Marion going to do??I think Chandler will do a pretty good job of shutting down Bosh, if that is the matchup. He has the quickness and length to give him fits. If I'm Dallas, I'm not sure what I do. Dirk could do a mediocre job Bosh leaving Chandler to roam and help on Wade/James drives.Also looking forward to the renewed Deshawn / LeBron feud.Haslem and Bosh will be a much different look for Dirk than Pau and Collison. I don't think he's "shutdown" but he isn't averaging 32 this series. I assume Lebron is on Dirk in crunchtime. Kidd's 3s will be the X-factor this series.
Who going defend Wade then?? What's Marion going to do??I think Chandler will do a pretty good job of shutting down Bosh, if that is the matchup. He has the quickness and length to give him fits. If I'm Dallas, I'm not sure what I do. Dirk could do a mediocre job Bosh leaving Chandler to roam and help on Wade/James drives.Also looking forward to the renewed Deshawn / LeBron feud.Haslem and Bosh will be a much different look for Dirk than Pau and Collison. I don't think he's "shutdown" but he isn't averaging 32 this series. I assume Lebron is on Dirk in crunchtime. Kidd's 3s will be the X-factor this series.
ok deal.I'm a dummy. I forgot this was for the title not heat v. bulls. My bad 100%. I'm in on w/ the new odds. 100 straight away for the winner.As it stands now:Heat win, I owe you 60Mavs win, you ove me 50You give me a little odds on this matchup and make it and even 100 either way. We can keep it the same if you want, just saw you wanted more action.wouldn't it be heat win I get 100, mavs win you don't owe me 60?Mavs baby!!!How bout this you give me the Mavs at around 4.75/4 and make it evenpm for paypalDeal.You get the field and a win earns you 50?I get the Heat and a win earns me 60?In, if this is the case.I'll throw in the Hawks too and make it 4.75/4.My $60 to your $50hahaha no way brochacho. I am a heat fan but not a sound play. I'll take the action at 2/1 .![]()
allas wins, you give me $100Miami wins, I give you $100
The 'feud' and trash talk can happen without them covering each other.Who going defend Wade then?? What's Marion going to do??I think Chandler will do a pretty good job of shutting down Bosh, if that is the matchup. He has the quickness and length to give him fits. If I'm Dallas, I'm not sure what I do. Dirk could do a mediocre job Bosh leaving Chandler to roam and help on Wade/James drives.Also looking forward to the renewed Deshawn / LeBron feud.Haslem and Bosh will be a much different look for Dirk than Pau and Collison. I don't think he's "shutdown" but he isn't averaging 32 this series. I assume Lebron is on Dirk in crunchtime. Kidd's 3s will be the X-factor this series.
Whoa.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
LeBron has that kind of potential perhaps, but he certainly hasn't attained that status yet, and it will be years before he earns that type of discussion even IMO. LeBron's combination of size, speed, vision, scoring, rebounding, and now defensive intensity has him poised as the best candidate we've had though, that's for sure. But not yet.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
I agree he hasn't reached that point yet. He does, however, have the most talent and ability of any player I've ever seen play (I've watched the nba since the 80's). Basically, if you combined Magic and Jordan, and then added a heavy dose of strength and physicality, you have LeBron James. Dude is an uberfreak. If the Heat start winning championships over the next 5 or 6 years, I think it will be pretty clear that he's a top candidate, if not the obvious candidate, for GOAT.LeBron has that kind of potential perhaps, but he certainly hasn't attained that status yet, and it will be years before he earns that type of discussion even IMO. LeBron's combination of size, speed, vision, scoring, rebounding, and now defensive intensity has him poised as the best candidate we've had though, that's for sure. But not yet.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
Heat -180Dallas +170ETA: NBA finals is 2-3-2, not 2-2-1-1-1, heat in 5 assumes heat win at least 2 games on the roadWhat are the real series odds?I think Heat in 5 seems likely.
I'll wait until the line moves further out for the Mavericks. I think they have a decent shot at this.Heat -180Dallas +170ETA: NBA finals is 2-3-2, not 2-2-1-1-1, heat in 5 assumes heat win at least 2 games on the roadWhat are the real series odds?I think Heat in 5 seems likely.
Magic Johnson + MJ + Karl Malone = LBJI agree he hasn't reached that point yet. He does, however, have the most talent and ability of any player I've ever seen play (I've watched the nba since the 80's). Basically, if you combined Magic and Jordan, and then added a heavy dose of strength and physicality, you have LeBron James. Dude is an uberfreak. If the Heat start winning championships over the next 5 or 6 years, I think it will be pretty clear that he's a top candidate, if not the obvious candidate, for GOAT.LeBron has that kind of potential perhaps, but he certainly hasn't attained that status yet, and it will be years before he earns that type of discussion even IMO. LeBron's combination of size, speed, vision, scoring, rebounding, and now defensive intensity has him poised as the best candidate we've had though, that's for sure. But not yet.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
Slow down there, Lebron hater. When did you jump on the bandwagon?Magic Johnson + MJ + Karl Malone = LBJI agree he hasn't reached that point yet. He does, however, have the most talent and ability of any player I've ever seen play (I've watched the nba since the 80's). Basically, if you combined Magic and Jordan, and then added a heavy dose of strength and physicality, you have LeBron James. Dude is an uberfreak. If the Heat start winning championships over the next 5 or 6 years, I think it will be pretty clear that he's a top candidate, if not the obvious candidate, for GOAT.LeBron has that kind of potential perhaps, but he certainly hasn't attained that status yet, and it will be years before he earns that type of discussion even IMO. LeBron's combination of size, speed, vision, scoring, rebounding, and now defensive intensity has him poised as the best candidate we've had though, that's for sure. But not yet.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
updated clutchness rating?Magic Johnson + MJ + Karl Malone = LBJ
That's ridiculous. Put another way: if the Heat were playing any of Jordan's title teams, who would be favored? /argumentWhoa.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
If you decide to give more money away Ill sign up.Let's not go overboard. They haven't even won this year yet, and personally I don't think they will. But we'll see.The Heat are going to challenge Boston for consecutive titles if they stay healthy. I may quit watching the NBA.
Ah, yes. This is a fishy number. They are begging you to take Dallas.Heat -180Dallas +170ETA: NBA finals is 2-3-2, not 2-2-1-1-1, heat in 5 assumes heat win at least 2 games on the roadWhat are the real series odds?I think Heat in 5 seems likely.
what?That's ridiculous. Put another way: if the Heat were playing any of Jordan's title teams, who would be favored? /argumentWhoa.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
What a good question. I will play that series on NBA2K11. I have all the Bulls teams (all 6 championship teams that is).That is a truly good question and one to ponder. It would be an insane series. The question is which Bulls team? The trio of MJ, Pip and Grant? Or Dennis or Kukoc. Plenty to ponder.That's ridiculous. Put another way: if the Heat were playing any of Jordan's title teams, who would be favored? /argumentWhoa.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
I'm not one to try and quantify "heart" because that's something utilized by fans and media people and probably not as much by the athletes themselves. But MJ's will to win will always separate him from the Kobe's and Lebrons, etc.What a good question. I will play that series on NBA2K11. I have all the Bulls teams (all 6 championship teams that is).That is a truly good question and one to ponder. It would be an insane series. The question is which Bulls team? The trio of MJ, Pip and Grant? Or Dennis or Kukoc. Plenty to ponder.
I can see questioning lots of things w/re to Kobe, but will to win isn't one of them.I'm not one to try and quantify "heart" because that's something utilized by fans and media people and probably not as much by the athletes themselves. But MJ's will to win will always separate him from the Kobe's and Lebrons, etc.What a good question. I will play that series on NBA2K11. I have all the Bulls teams (all 6 championship teams that is).That is a truly good question and one to ponder. It would be an insane series. The question is which Bulls team? The trio of MJ, Pip and Grant? Or Dennis or Kukoc. Plenty to ponder.
He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.
Agreed. Even Phil Jackson concedes that point about Kobe.I can see questioning lots of things w/re to Kobe, but will to win isn't one of them.I'm not one to try and quantify "heart" because that's something utilized by fans and media people and probably not as much by the athletes themselves. But MJ's will to win will always separate him from the Kobe's and Lebrons, etc.What a good question. I will play that series on NBA2K11. I have all the Bulls teams (all 6 championship teams that is).That is a truly good question and one to ponder. It would be an insane series. The question is which Bulls team? The trio of MJ, Pip and Grant? Or Dennis or Kukoc. Plenty to ponder.
He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.
the son of owner Jerry Buss again shows he doesn't know what he's doing by picking Brown over several other better candidates
If they were going to pay $4.5 million a year for a defense-minded, non-Lakers-style coach, the easy choice was Van Gundy, who soothed the press beast as New York Knicks coach, the only job harder than the Lakers.
I'm sure Heisler doesn't know what he's talking about either.Do you really think that's some great analysis of Mike Brown? There are two points about him in your quotes: 1) He's defense-minded; and, 2) he's a non-Lakers-style coach. Amazing stuff, right?Jeff Van Gundy wasn't a candidate. Wasn't your point that Brian Shaw should have been hired instead of Mike Brown? Point me to the quotes from Heisler about why Shaw was the better candidate. Oh right, there were none. On Shaw: "That left Adelman, Dunleavy with non-starters Brian Shaw and Chuck Person."He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.the son of owner Jerry Buss again shows he doesn't know what he's doing by picking Brown over several other better candidatesIf they were going to pay $4.5 million a year for a defense-minded, non-Lakers-style coach, the easy choice was Van Gundy, who soothed the press beast as New York Knicks coach, the only job harder than the Lakers.I'm sure Heisler doesn't know what he's talking about either.
Do you really think that's some great analysis of Mike Brown? There are two points about him in your quotes: 1) He's defense-minded; and, 2) he's a non-Lakers-style coach. Amazing stuff, right?Jeff Van Gundy wasn't a candidate. Wasn't your point that Brian Shaw should have been hired instead of Mike Brown? Point me to the quotes from Heisler about why Shaw was the better candidate. Oh right, there were none. On Shaw: "That left Adelman, Dunleavy with non-starters Brian Shaw and Chuck Person."He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.the son of owner Jerry Buss again shows he doesn't know what he's doing by picking Brown over several other better candidatesIf they were going to pay $4.5 million a year for a defense-minded, non-Lakers-style coach, the easy choice was Van Gundy, who soothed the press beast as New York Knicks coach, the only job harder than the Lakers.I'm sure Heisler doesn't know what he's talking about either.
Yeah, I'm sure there's no analysis behind Heisler's conclusions, he's just letting stuff fly. He's saying VanGundy, Shaw, etc. weren't candidates because Jim Buss became fixated on Brown - he didn't even interview anyone else.http://twitter.com/#!/MHeislerLATimesJust so you know who you are talking about.Do you really think that's some great analysis of Mike Brown? There are two points about him in your quotes: 1) He's defense-minded; and, 2) he's a non-Lakers-style coach. Amazing stuff, right?Jeff Van Gundy wasn't a candidate. Wasn't your point that Brian Shaw should have been hired instead of Mike Brown? Point me to the quotes from Heisler about why Shaw was the better candidate. Oh right, there were none. On Shaw: "That left Adelman, Dunleavy with non-starters Brian Shaw and Chuck Person."He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.the son of owner Jerry Buss again shows he doesn't know what he's doing by picking Brown over several other better candidatesIf they were going to pay $4.5 million a year for a defense-minded, non-Lakers-style coach, the easy choice was Van Gundy, who soothed the press beast as New York Knicks coach, the only job harder than the Lakers.I'm sure Heisler doesn't know what he's talking about either.
Yeah, I'm sure there's no analysis behind Heisler's conclusions, he's just letting stuff fly. He's saying VanGundy, Shaw, etc. weren't candidates because Jim Buss became fixated on Brown - he didn't even interview anyone else.
LAKER UPDATE: JERRY, JIM BUSS, KUPCHAK MEET Smoke is black, meaning no new coach. Usual suspects/leading candidates still Adelman, Dunleavy
LAKER COACHING ODDS Adelman 3-1. Dunleavy 3-1. BShaw 10-1 and dropping the more they let him interview. Byron 100-1. Byron w/o contract 1-2.
He's been pretty clutch these playoffs. I guess it will take finals heroics to convice you. Which i understand.Never doubted the talent, just his ability to win it all.Clutchness rating is around a 5/10. Still average nothing special.
Never doubted the talent, just his ability to win it all.Clutchness rating is around a 5/10. Still average nothing special.
Care to flesh out what an 8-10 would be? How can he be anymore clutch? How many times does he need to do an as of yet undefined "clutch act" before he is a 10? Splain lucy.Pippen is a knobhead.In case anyone missed M&M this morning, they had Scottie Pippen on and asked him if he thought Jordan was the GOAT. He said that while Jordan is probably the greatest scorer of all time, LeBron is a better player.
This is very stinky bait.Never doubted the talent, just his ability to win it all.Clutchness rating is around a 5/10. Still average nothing special.
Are you familiar with Heisler? He does tend to just let stuff fly. And, if he does have analysis behind his conclusions, it would have made for a much better story if he provided them to the reader.Do you really think that's some great analysis of Mike Brown? There are two points about him in your quotes: 1) He's defense-minded; and, 2) he's a non-Lakers-style coach. Amazing stuff, right?Jeff Van Gundy wasn't a candidate. Wasn't your point that Brian Shaw should have been hired instead of Mike Brown? Point me to the quotes from Heisler about why Shaw was the better candidate. Oh right, there were none. On Shaw: "That left Adelman, Dunleavy with non-starters Brian Shaw and Chuck Person."He ripped the process. He didn't really make any points about Mike Brown.This all he wrote about Mike Brown as a coach:Heat in 5 or 6.
Meanwhile Mark Heisler rips the Mike Brown hiring (making some points I recall seeing someone around here make) and J.J. Adande points out that the Lakers have entered a period of disarray.
Did you know Jimmy, sorry I mean the Lakers, only interviewed one person for the HC job?
That's not exactly great analysis.Brown is a decent coach but all he has over Rick Adelman and Mike Dunleavy is his record ... in the regular season ... courtesy of LeBron James.
Brown kept James in the half-court from ages 20-25 and, at least at the end, they had no Kobe-Phil-type working bond.
The Cavaliers fired Brown last spring to find a coach who had played in the NBA and would drive James — which was what James said he wanted.the son of owner Jerry Buss again shows he doesn't know what he's doing by picking Brown over several other better candidatesIf they were going to pay $4.5 million a year for a defense-minded, non-Lakers-style coach, the easy choice was Van Gundy, who soothed the press beast as New York Knicks coach, the only job harder than the Lakers.I'm sure Heisler doesn't know what he's talking about either.
Yeah, I'm sure there's no analysis behind Heisler's conclusions, he's just letting stuff fly. He's saying VanGundy, Shaw, etc. weren't candidates because Jim Buss became fixated on Brown - he didn't even interview anyone else.