it's not a stretch to say that performance can suffer in pressure situations, or that some people handle pressure better than others.
I didn't think this was a revelation until I came here this morning.
Never underestimate the ability of the data-trumps-reason crowd to find examples of Mike Bibby making a layup with 1:56 left in a close game and use it to suggest role players don't feel pressure on game deciding shots.
I don't think anyone is suggesting that. Most here are objecting to the notion that role players feel so much
more pressure than a super star player that a role player would blow a wide open shot while the super star should be able to hit a tough shot against double or triple coverage.
In fairness, making jump shots in the context of an NBA game is difficult as it is, so I wouldn't characterize role players missing wide open shots as "blowing" them. Simply looking at FG's made vs. FG's missed in the final seconds is a distortion of all of the possible outcomes in play. It ignores a player's individual ability to get his own shot off under distressed circumstances when defensive intensity peaks.
When all we're looking at is makes vs. misses, we're oversimplifying a very complex game. The "I'd rather give it to a wide open guy" crowd seems unable to comprehend the fact that defenses don't leave anyone wide open at the end of games, unless attention is diverted elsewhere. And what constitutes "wide open"? It's virtually impossible to quantify such a thing, because "wide open" to one guy means "slightly contested" to another. And "contested" may mean that a defender is crowding a player, but if the shooter pump fakes the defender and is able to get off a clean shot with marginal chances of a blocked shot, is that "wide open" even though a defender was on top of him?