Negative Pts for Int that results in TD (1 Viewer)

[NCPanthersFan]

We are voting on a negative point deduction in the next couple of weeks. I tried the data dominator but did not see a field for it. I am trying to determine how many interceptions went for TD's for the past few years. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Additional - any general consensus on the stat and its incorporation? The league is fairly old so it is being sold as something to spice up the scoring as we are a QB heavy league. To me it is just a random stat that does not reflect anything but luck.

 

[RUSF18]

We are voting on a negative point deduction in the next couple of weeks. I tried the data dominator but did not see a field for it. I am trying to determine how many interceptions went for TD's for the past few years. Can someone point me in the right direction?Additional - any general consensus on the stat and its incorporation? The league is fairly old so it is being sold as something to spice up the scoring as we are a QB heavy league. To me it is just a random stat that does not reflect anything but luck.

By player:http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/defense/sort/interceptionTouchdownsBy team (defense achieving the INT TD):http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/defense/sort/interceptionTouchdownsI wouldn't use it in my league. As you said, too random. Penalize for the INT, but to further impact a QBs scores because his linemen couldn't chase down a CB or because a WR couldn't make a tackle is overkill IMO. In an ideal world you would be able to punish a QB for the quick slant that gets jumped and taken the other way, but too many factors at play for it to be a position-wide penalty.