
Real or Poweradish?
J
Whare's Capy????For those that don't know what I'm talking about, Rackers has 4 footballs teed up for field goals. Looks to be about for a 35-40 yarder.
He looks into the camera and says he's going to kick the first two off the left upright of the goal post and the second two off the right upright.
Yeah right.
First kick - boink. Second kick - boink. Third kick - boink. Fourth kick - boink.
![]()
I can't believe it's not faked but it sure looked real.
Anyone know?
J
I can parse data, too. Rackers is 86-101 (85.1 %) since the start of the 2002 season.2000- 12-21 (57.1%)
2001- 17-28 (60.7%)
2002- 15-18 (83.3%)
2003- 9-12 (75%)
2004- 22-29 (75.9%)
Career (not incl. 2005): 75-108 (69.4%)
2005- 40-42 (95.2%)
Career (incl. 2005)- 115-150 (76.7%)
You decide.![]()
It doesn't matter how accurate he is if he doesn't get the attempts. Opportunity is by and large more important than accuracy when figuring PK projections.Edit to add: I'm not as convinced that your equation will hold true. The OL isn't exactly littered with Pro Bowlers. What I do know, however, is that Arizona's 1135 team rushing yards were the worst performance by any offense since at least 2001 (128th out of 128 from 2002-2005). Edge figures to increase this number, and other "perfect storm" ingredients may also be lacking this year, reducing Rackers' attempts per game closer to 2 than to the 2.8 he enjoyed in 2005.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
thanks for helping me prove my pointIt doesn't matter how accurate he is if he doesn't get the attempts. Opportunity is by and large more important than accuracy when figuring PK projections.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
From my earlier post...I'm not as convinced that your equation (Edge = moving the ball...) will hold true. The OL isn't exactly littered with Pro Bowlers. What I do know, however, is that Arizona's 1135 team rushing yards were the worst performance by any offense since at least 2001 (128th out of 128 from 2002-2005). Edge figures to increase this number, and other "perfect storm" ingredients may also be lacking this year, reducing Rackers' attempts per game closer to 2 than to the 2.8 he enjoyed in 2005.thanks for helping me prove my pointIt doesn't matter how accurate he is if he doesn't get the attempts. Opportunity is by and large more important than accuracy when figuring PK projections.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
i think the poiint was shorter FGs not necessarily fewer attempts - there is an excellent argument that Edge provides Rackers with MORE opportunities for FGs - but fewer opps for LONG FGs.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzoneExactly. Less opportunities.I saw it and thought the donk sound was added.
Perhaps, but I still think the balance of all trends and regressions point to fewer FGA per game for Rackers. Even last year, things cooled down considerably:Games 1-4: 16 FGM/16 FGA (4 made and attempted per game)i think the poiint was shorter FGs not necessarily fewer attempts - there is an excellent argument that Edge provides Rackers with MORE opportunities for FGs - but fewer opps for LONG FGs.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzoneExactly. Less opportunities.I saw it and thought the donk sound was added.
I don't think this thread has anything to do with Racker's fantasy value. It was more about whether what we are seeing is real. If I was a Racker's fantasy owner I would actually prefer if he didn't hit the uprights four straight times. Than again I will never own Rackers because I am always the last to take a kicker.
You're kidding right? It's a Nike commercial ...I also saw it and it looked pretty real. It was different from the commercial where LeBron James hits 3 straight shots in practice from the other end of the court. In that one the ball leaves the screen at the top of it's arc and re-enters before it goes in. The first 3 Rackers kicks remain in the screen from his foot to the upright.
I think it was real. I'm sure it took dozens of takes but I think it is possible.
I had the same argument with some of my buddies about this video of Ronaldniho.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8925413301368236130
I feel silly for doing some research to discern this same fact, but at least I know it's trueDon't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
golden corral?I feel silly for doing some research to discern this same fact, but at least I know it's trueDon't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone.There are some places where having an OL with an average weight of 360lbs has its advantages
.
golden corral?I feel silly for doing some research to discern this same fact, but at least I know it's trueDon't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone.There are some places where having an OL with an average weight of 360lbs has its advantages
.
It's amazing that we are talking about not overpaying for a kicker.Don't overpay for him. Edge = moving the ball in the redzone
These low percentages only confirm that he has tendencies toward uprights... thus, it must be real2000- 12-21 (57.1%)
2001- 17-28 (60.7%)
2002- 15-18 (83.3%)
2003- 9-12 (75%)
2004- 22-29 (75.9%)
Career (not incl. 2005): 75-108 (69.4%)
2005- 40-42 (95.2%)
Career (incl. 2005)- 115-150 (76.7%)
You decide.![]()
Tiger Woods down...You're kidding right? It's a Nike commercial ...I also saw it and it looked pretty real. It was different from the commercial where LeBron James hits 3 straight shots in practice from the other end of the court. In that one the ball leaves the screen at the top of it's arc and re-enters before it goes in. The first 3 Rackers kicks remain in the screen from his foot to the upright.
I think it was real. I'm sure it took dozens of takes but I think it is possible.
I had the same argument with some of my buddies about this video of Ronaldniho.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8925413301368236130
You're rubbing off on me capy...JThanks for the post Joe... although don't you think you may be getting a little carried away with this kicker fixation? Two kicker articles in the other day's e-mail update, and now this.
I know, but look! His best season was 2000, and even then he missed the uprights at least 57.1% of the time!These low percentages only confirm that he has tendencies toward uprights... thus, it must be real2000- 12-21 (57.1%)
2001- 17-28 (60.7%)
2002- 15-18 (83.3%)
2003- 9-12 (75%)
2004- 22-29 (75.9%)
Career (not incl. 2005): 75-108 (69.4%)
2005- 40-42 (95.2%)
Career (incl. 2005)- 115-150 (76.7%)
You decide.![]()
![]()
Yeah, everyone knows that THIS is how they made that Ronaldhino commercial. I'm betting they hired the same guys to do the Rackers video as well.You're kidding right? It's a Nike commercial ...I also saw it and it looked pretty real. It was different from the commercial where LeBron James hits 3 straight shots in practice from the other end of the court. In that one the ball leaves the screen at the top of it's arc and re-enters before it goes in. The first 3 Rackers kicks remain in the screen from his foot to the upright.
I think it was real. I'm sure it took dozens of takes but I think it is possible.
I had the same argument with some of my buddies about this video of Ronaldniho.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8925413301368236130
Gotta be steroids. Don't we say that any time a player's numbers take a big jump up?2000- 12-21 (57.1%)
2001- 17-28 (60.7%)
2002- 15-18 (83.3%)
2003- 9-12 (75%)
2004- 22-29 (75.9%)
Career (not incl. 2005): 75-108 (69.4%)
2005- 40-42 (95.2%)
Career (incl. 2005)- 115-150 (76.7%)
You decide.![]()
Hi Penn.Oh yes. He "called his shots" before kicking. Said he'd take the first two off the left upright and the 2nd two off the right upright.I wasn't paying too much attention, but my take was that he said something like, "Nice. I hit the left upright twice and then the right upright twice" as if he were joking that they were filming him and he wasn't down the middle.
Did he actually come out before the segment and say he would do this? Or was his comment making fun of himself for not doing it when the film was rolling?
Hi cs,Why do you guarantee it's fake? What did you see that made it look fake?no way its real. he doesn't even take 1 whole second to line up and aim before he kicks them. i guarantee you that was fake.
Could well be, S. I seriously doubt he did it on the first try. There isn't anything in the video that makes you think that's the case.He could have been out there trying for 2 weeks. Still pretty incredible.Is this one of those videos where the guy calls his shot and then unsuccessfully tries it 2 dozen times, but we only see the 1 time where it actually happened?