Go.
Whatever, Jackass.Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
You mean the one that didn't actually affect anything?Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
You mean they penalty they DIDN'T call?its like that every week. bull#### penalties taking away a bad GB play.
Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
Is the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it? Seemed to be what the announcers thought.Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Hmmm...not sure. Could be.Is the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it? Seemed to be what the announcers thought.Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Yeah, but not if he fumbles the thing. They were wrong.Is the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it? Seemed to be what the announcers thought.Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
I did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Off the charts. And it was corrected.yeah, ironyFunny when Pats' fan complain about the refs.
Okay, now i re-state what I said earlier. Hyde - you jackass!Yeah, but not if he fumbles the thing. They were wrong.Is the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it? Seemed to be what the announcers thought.Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
it's a free play for the return team up until the returner establishes possession. once possession is established it is a fumble if he fumbles itI did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
If NE touches it first, the returner has a free play. If he fumbles, the ball would go back to where NE first touched it and it would remain Green Bay ballYeah, but not if he fumbles the thing. They were wrong.Is the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it? Seemed to be what the announcers thought.Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
then what's free about it?it's a free play for the return team up until the returner establishes possession. once possession is established it is a fumble if he fumbles itI did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Even if he fumbles after gaining possession, it would remain Green Bay's ball where NEw England first touched itit's a free play for the return team up until the returner establishes possession. once possession is established it is a fumble if he fumbles itI did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Free that had th3 ball stayed in bounds on that instance...Packers retain the bal where NE touched it. If he established possession, then its at his own risk.then what's free about it?it's a free play for the return team up until the returner establishes possession. once possession is established it is a fumble if he fumbles itI did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
Refs trying to throw more phantom penalties. No wonder GB is so good at home.
he can muff it, bat it, touch it without establishing possession. if he did any of that without NE touching it, it's a fumble.then what's free about it?it's a free play for the return team up until the returner establishes possession. once possession is established it is a fumble if he fumbles itI did not know that. Then I take back what I said.yesIs the rule that if NE touched it first Hyde has a free shot at it?Hyde - you jackass. Almost a fookin disaster.
The beginning of the "N" word?Did Simms say what I thought he said???
When ayers isn't being held he's getting hands in his facemask. Zero calls.Those calls against Browner are tone-setters. It's basically telling both defenses that you aren't gonna get away with holding and grabbing today.