Pushing your own player = unsportsmanlike conductFollowing online and haven't seen the play?Wow. Serious lack of discipline here.
If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
...by enforcing the rulebookAbsolutely disgusting call. Refs taking the game into their own hands and completely affecting the outcome of the game.
Explain how that was a lack of discipline jackass.I'm watching. Are you talking about you?Following online and haven't seen the play?Wow. Serious lack of discipline here.![]()
I also can't stand the Pats, but that was a bull#### call.I hate the pats, but hate to see them lose like that.
called a Patriots defensive lineman for pushing his own teammate forward through the pile of players.Little help for us non-viewers here. What was the call?
Jets kicking a field goal, missed.Little help for us non-viewers here. What was the call?
It wasn't that blatant. So if you get stuck behind your own player on a stunt, you can't do anything?If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
I'm sure they enjoy your tears.All you anti-NE posters....I'm sure you're fine with that call if made against your team, right? Sure...that's what I thought.
No. We'll revisit this when defenders are allowed to tackle the NE qb without drawing a flag.Can we finally put to rest that stupid "Refs always favor the Patriots" meme?
pretty muchI also can't stand the Pats, but that was a bull#### call.I hate the pats, but hate to see them lose like that.
+8,234,567Ouch. That stings.
I feel ZERO pity for the Pats, Belichick, and their fans. They have gotten so many breaks from the officials through the years that the karma on the way back around is going to hurt.
Well Patriots fan, That's what being a BIlls fan the past 15 years has felt like...![]()
Whoa there. This message board doesn't need that kind of language. Now if you'll be civil, I can answer your question.Explain how that was a lack of discipline jackass.I'm watching. Are you talking about you?Following online and haven't seen the play?Wow. Serious lack of discipline here.![]()
I can't watch as much this year, but I thought I saw one earlier. I think there are few things you can do to get that Unsportsmanlike Conduct penalty. I haven't checked the updated rulebook this year, though.First time ever called you mean, since it was added this year.Except this is an actual rule. Not called often, but a rule. Just sayin...This is on level with them blowing that call 3 weeks ago and then handing them back the challenge because their equipment wasn't working...
The Jets wouldn't have even been within a possible comeback if it weren't for the drops (mostly Dobson).2 ugly overthrows by Brady on that last regulation possession contributed to this loss. Ouch.
Edit to add: Interesting that from the quote in the last paragraph, it was the NFLPA that instigated the change.New NFL rules: Overloading line restriction will protect linemen
By Bill Bradley, contributing editor
Editor's note: This is a closer look at one of four player health and safety-related rules that are new to this NFL season, which begins Thursday.
NEW RULE: A ban on teams overloading one side of the defensive line on point-after and field-goal attempts.
What the rule changes: During a field-goal attempt or a try kick: (1) No more than six Team B players may be on the line of scrimmage on either side of the snapper at the snap; Penalty: For illegal formation by the defense, loss of 5 yards from the previous spot. (2) Team B players not on the line of scrimmage at the snap cannot push players on the line of scrimmage into the offensive formation. Penalty: For unnecessary roughness, loss of 15 yards from the previous spot.
Why the change was made: PAT defensive teams were rushing through the gaps created by the overload. After looking at a lot of tape, NFL Competition Committee members found too many injuries were caused by this formation.
How it would impact player health and safety: "They will no longer permit defense rush players, Team B players, to push their teammates through the gaps and overload. This proposal also creates a situation where the snapper now becomes a defenseless player and he gets helmet-to-helmet protection." -- St. Louis Rams coach Jeff Fisher.
What players are saying about it: "I had a game, we played the Bengals ... and I had two guys over me and two guys behind them pushing, so it was basically four-on-one. My foot slipped, and I actually went down and did a split and pulled a hamstring. I'm like, 'Man, this is ridiculous.' Like, it's literally impossible to hold up that much force. I emailed (NFLPA executive director) DeMaurice Smith and got the ball rolling with that." -- Washington Redskins center Will Montgomery.
Jets missed a FG but the officials called the Patriots a penalty for one of their players pushing another into the offensive line. You're not allowed to do that this season on kicks.Little help for us non-viewers here. What was the call?
Absolutely disgustingcallrookie move.RefsRookies taking the game into their own hands and completely affecting the outcome of the game.
Some ticky-ticky rule against pushing your own player during a FG attempt. It was designed to prevent two defenders from lining up and running over one of the blockers, which was not what was happening. Honestly it looked like one of the two defenders picked the wrong gap to try and penetrate, which just clogged up the lane for the other guy -- no real advantage at all.Little help for us non-viewers here. What was the call?
Really no difference between this and the Tuck Rule except it was a smaller stage today. Rules are rules whether or not they happen much.If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
Some of us just enjoy seeing NE on the receiving end of one of these calls for a change.All you anti-NE posters....I'm sure you're fine with that call if made against your team, right? Sure...that's what I thought.
Totally agree. I cannot stand when they put their whistles/flags away on decisive drives. If it was a penalty in the 1st quarter, you better call it on the last drive. This is a huge problem in hockey as well towards the end of the game... can pretty much get away with anythingPats fan here - thought the call was good. I don't believe in not calling something just because its near the end of the game. Not like we haven't been the beneficiaries of many of those in the past.
Good win by the Jets.
So awesome. suck it Billy
I'm surprised they made the call, but it was the right call. Also, I don't think Hill pushed off on what should have been his TD reception.It was completely blatant. The ref that threw the flag was standing directly behind him. I don't know the specifics of the rule, so I don't know the answer other to that question other than I now know that you can't push the guy in front of you.It wasn't that blatant. So if you get stuck behind your own player on a stunt, you can't do anything?If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
Integrity here. Good on ya.Pats fan here - thought the call was good. I don't believe in not calling something just because its near the end of the game. Not like we haven't been the beneficiaries of many of those in the past.
Good win by the Jets.
OK, I need to look at the replay again, but I thought both players were on the line of scrimmage. One of them just ran a stunt or something.Edit to add: Interesting that from the quote in the last paragraph, it was the NFLPA that instigated the change.New NFL rules: Overloading line restriction will protect linemen
By Bill Bradley, contributing editor
Editor's note: This is a closer look at one of four player health and safety-related rules that are new to this NFL season, which begins Thursday.
NEW RULE: A ban on teams overloading one side of the defensive line on point-after and field-goal attempts.
What the rule changes: During a field-goal attempt or a try kick: (1) No more than six Team B players may be on the line of scrimmage on either side of the snapper at the snap; Penalty: For illegal formation by the defense, loss of 5 yards from the previous spot. (2) Team B players not on the line of scrimmage at the snap cannot push players on the line of scrimmage into the offensive formation. Penalty: For unnecessary roughness, loss of 15 yards from the previous spot.
Nah, the tuck rule made sense because it's impossible to know the QB's intent between trying to pump or throw the ball. This is just some ticky tack rule for safetyReally no difference between this and the Tuck Rule except it was a smaller stage today. Rules are rules whether or not they happen much.If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
I don't cry over games I don't have an impact on...this game is meaningless come playoffs. The jets will be watching from the outside yet again.I'm sure they enjoy your tears.All you anti-NE posters....I'm sure you're fine with that call if made against your team, right? Sure...that's what I thought.
So you don't know the rules but you know it was a penalty?It was completely blatant. The ref that threw the flag was standing directly behind him. I don't know the specifics of the rule, so I don't know the answer other to that question other than I now know that you can't push the guy in front of you.It wasn't that blatant. So if you get stuck behind your own player on a stunt, you can't do anything?If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
Sure. Lots of contributing factors of course. Brady and Dobson clearly have to improve their play.The Jets wouldn't have even been within a possible comeback if it weren't for the drops (mostly Dobson).2 ugly overthrows by Brady on that last regulation possession contributed to this loss. Ouch.
Could you link to this website or article? Looks interesting. I'd like to give it a look. TIA.Edit to add: Interesting that from the quote in the last paragraph, it was the NFLPA that instigated the change.New NFL rules: Overloading line restriction will protect linemen
By Bill Bradley, contributing editor
Editor's note: This is a closer look at one of four player health and safety-related rules that are new to this NFL season, which begins Thursday.
NEW RULE: A ban on teams overloading one side of the defensive line on point-after and field-goal attempts.
What the rule changes: During a field-goal attempt or a try kick: (1) No more than six Team B players may be on the line of scrimmage on either side of the snapper at the snap; Penalty: For illegal formation by the defense, loss of 5 yards from the previous spot. (2) Team B players not on the line of scrimmage at the snap cannot push players on the line of scrimmage into the offensive formation. Penalty: For unnecessary roughness, loss of 15 yards from the previous spot.
Why the change was made: PAT defensive teams were rushing through the gaps created by the overload. After looking at a lot of tape, NFL Competition Committee members found too many injuries were caused by this formation.
How it would impact player health and safety: "They will no longer permit defense rush players, Team B players, to push their teammates through the gaps and overload. This proposal also creates a situation where the snapper now becomes a defenseless player and he gets helmet-to-helmet protection." -- St. Louis Rams coach Jeff Fisher.
What players are saying about it: "I had a game, we played the Bengals ... and I had two guys over me and two guys behind them pushing, so it was basically four-on-one. My foot slipped, and I actually went down and did a split and pulled a hamstring. I'm like, 'Man, this is ridiculous.' Like, it's literally impossible to hold up that much force. I emailed (NFLPA executive director) DeMaurice Smith and got the ball rolling with that." -- Washington Redskins center Will Montgomery.
They called it a personal foul, IIRC.Why is it a 15 yard penalty though? The rule seems pretty stupid, but making it 15 yards takes it to a new level.
It's a rule, tricky-tack or not.Nah, the tuck rule made sense because it's impossible to know the QB's intent between trying to pump or throw the ball. This is just some ticky tack rule for safetyReally no difference between this and the Tuck Rule except it was a smaller stage today. Rules are rules whether or not they happen much.If not when the game is on the line, then when? It's a new penalty, gotta call something that is that blatant, especially when the game is on the line.Why not? Sounds like it's in the rulebook.You can't call that. Period
Ridiculous...should be a 5 yard penalty at best. Automatic first down...yeah, OK.Why is it a 15 yard penalty though? The rule seems pretty stupid, but making it 15 yards takes it to a new level.