What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NFL Draft (1 Viewer)

SHIZNITTTT

Footballguy
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.

 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
There is the answer to your question. /thread
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
There is the answer to your question. /thread
So put you down for the "crap shoot"
 
Every position has a high likelihood of being a bust so why pick any player in a draft? If you hit on a QB it could be a franchise changing happening affecting the next 10 years and no other position can claim that effect, so many believe it's worth the risk based on the possible reward.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're franchise is any good at scouting, its not a crap shoot at all.

 
Every position has a high likelihood of being a bust so why pick any player in a draft? If you hit on a QB it could be a franchise changing happening affecting the next 10 years and no other position can claim that effect, so many believe it's worth the risk based on the possible reward.
I believe that the money that is being offered to QB's in the first round is too much of a gamble. Defensive/Offensive lineman seem to pan out better. But, my original point was that it seems with such a high risk/return that most NFL clubs would just try and pick up a FA QB that has proven they can play. Sure it would cost a little more money, but you have a proven QB.
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
 
The real key to this questionn is how many non-first rounders become even legitimate starters versus true elite players. Essentially finding a QB is a numbers game. One set of numbers say to invest a lot of money and hope. the other set says invest a ton of bodies and hope. There is not perfect formula or we would have more than 12-15 decent QBs at any given time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
None of those guys fit the criteria you stated. None of them were seasons guys signed as a free agent.
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
None of those guys fit the criteria you stated. None of them were seasons guys signed as a free agent.
Sorry misread your question, off the top of my head Kurt Warner is seasoned, and is leading the Cardinals to the SB.
 
quick google search and I found this in another forum:

22 out of 42 SuperBowl's have been won by a QB taken in the 1st round

13 out of 42 SuperBowl's have been won by a QB taken with 1st pick in the 1st round (Terry Bradshaw-4,Jim Plunkett-2,Troy Aikman-3,John Elway-2, Peyton and Eli Manning - 1)

5 of the 1st round picks who have won the SuperBowl won it with a team other than the team who drafted them (Len Dawson, Jim Plunkett, Doug Williams, Trent Dilfer, John Elway)

2 Superbowl winning QB's did not enter the NFL through the regular NFL draft (Steve Young, Kurt Warner)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe that the money that is being offered to QB's in the first round is too much of a gamble. Defensive/Offensive lineman seem to pan out better. But, my original point was that it seems with such a high risk/return that most NFL clubs would just try and pick up a FA QB that has proven they can play. Sure it would cost a little more money, but you have a proven QB.
I agree the money offered to unproven players (not just QB) is beyond my feeble comprehension.What franchise level QB's are available in FA? Do you settle for someone who has proven they can merely play or try to lock up that special player that will make a difference? I think your way may save you some coin short term but not the way to build for a championship.
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
None of those guys fit the criteria you stated. None of them were seasons guys signed as a free agent.
Sorry misread your question, off the top of my head Kurt Warner is seasoned, and is leading the Cardinals to the SB.
Saying SB limits the question a lot, but taking deep into the playoffs there have been a bunch. Kerry Collins went to the SB with the Giants, Brad Johnson, Warner, Doug Williams to name a few off the top of my head. I am sure there are a few others
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
None of those guys fit the criteria you stated. None of them were seasons guys signed as a free agent.
Sorry misread your question, off the top of my head Kurt Warner is seasoned, and is leading the Cardinals to the SB.
Yes. If he wins, that makes #1. And Brad Johnson. And that's it for the last 20 years, unless you count Dilfer, but he wasn't even signed to be the team's starter.The majority of Super Bowls have been won by first round picks drafted by their team (or drafted and traded on draft day :o ).
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve YoungBrett FavreKurt Warnerall started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
None of those guys fit the criteria you stated. None of them were seasons guys signed as a free agent.
Warner was, so were Kerry Collins, Trent Dilfer and Chris Chandler.
 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve Young

Brett Favre

Kurt Warner

all started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
"seasoned vet or journeyman Super Bowl appearances" QBs not drafted as franchise QB by team they led to Super Bowl

Kurt Warner X3

Matt Hasselbeck

Jake Delhomme

Rich Gannon

Brad Johnson

Kerry Collins

Trent Dilfer

Tom Brady X4

First round QBs who led team that drafted him to Super Bowl

Eli Manning

Peyton Manning

Rex Grossman :tinfoilhat:

Big Ben X2

Donovan McNabb

Steve McNair

This is just since 2000

ETA: Eli Manning

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve Young

Brett Favre

Kurt Warner

all started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
"seasoned vet or journeyman Super Bowl appearances"Kurt Warner X3

Matt Hasselbeck

Jake Delhomme

Rich Gannon

Brad Johnson

Kerry Collins

Trent Dilfer

First round QBs who led team that drafted him to Super Bowl

Peyton Manning

Rex Grossman :tinfoilhat:

Big Ben X2

Donovan McNabb

Steve McNair

This is just since 2000

I was going to include Tom Brady since he was a 6th rounder but I don't know if his 1st Super Bowl appearance really fits the category of "seasoned vet" and he is definitely not a journeyman. He wasn't drafted as a franchise qb either.
I assume this to be correct, so we basically have a better shot of making the SB with a journeyman. So it seems that it would be better for teams to pick up the FA QB, since the amount of drafted QB's to take you to the "promised land" is pretty slim. Also, out of the drafted category there could possibly be 4 HOF players.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're franchise is any good at scouting, its not a crap shoot at all.
Tell me the franchise that hasn't had a bust when drafting a QB. TIA
Are you talking about the entire draft? Tell me the franchise that hasn't had a bust when drafting a (insert position here). TIA
thanks this helps
:thumbdown:Clearly you are heavily stubborn and aren't objective about this theory whatsoever. Players at all positions bust. QBs really don't bust at a higher rate than any other position, unless you have statistics that can prove otherwise.
 
Try as they might, NFL teams cannot predict which draft prospects will turn into productive players. Teams do their homework and still draft players who fail miserably. It happens every year. But with their owners' money and co-workers' careers at stake, smart personnel people can avoid falling into the same traps.

An evaluation of all 254 first-round picks since 2000 revealed the potential risks and rewards teams face heading into the draft this weekend.

The No. 1 Issue

A Scouts Inc. evaluation of all 254 first-round picks since 2000 reveals the potential risks and rewards teams face. Column

SCOUTS INC.: We rate 254 first-round draft picks since 2000.

AFC | NFC

CLEVELAND DRAFT: Browns are prime example of how success or failure in first round can determine a team's fate. Column

HASHMARKS: More on what Scouts Inc.'s evaluation of first round since 2000 reveals. Blog

PODCAST: Jeremy Green and Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc. discuss No. 1 picks since 2000. Listen

FIRST-ROUND HISTORY

• 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003

• 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007

Scouts Inc. marked each first-round player as having exceeded, met or failed to meet expectations. The categories were broad enough to head off debate in most cases, yet powerful enough to produce useful information when harnessed collectively.

Overall, 169 of the 254 first-round selections (66.5 percent) have met or exceeded expectations. Twenty-four percent exceeded expectations. One-third failed to measure up.

Receivers failed to meet expectations 52.4 percent of the time, surpassing quarterbacks (47.6 percent) for the highest rate of failure.

Based on the findings, teams holding the seventh through 10th overall choices should exercise extreme caution before drafting a receiver in those slots. Teams hoping to find quality defensive backs with the 21st through 32nd choices should also beware. And any team looking for a defensive end with the 16th through 20th choices might want to say a prayer first.

For while making wise use of first-round draft selections does not ensure success, repeatedly botching those choices essentially guarantees failure.

That's where you can really get hammered," Carolina Panthers coach John Fox said. "Especially if it's a real early pick, because you're paying that guy like a future Hall of Famer and he hasn't played a down yet."

A look at what the past eight drafts can tell teams as they balance needs with value heading into the 2008 draft:

The safest positions

1. Interior offensive line

2. Linebacker

3. Tight end

4. Defensive tackle, offensive tackle and running back.

The high-risk positions

1. Receiver.

2. Quarterback

2. Defensive backs taken 26th to 32nd overall

Five of the 10 failed to meet expectations. Only Oakland's Nnamdi Asomugha, drafted 31st overall in 2003, has exceeded expectations within that range since 2000. Disappointments included Jamar Fletcher, Mike Rumph, Andre Woolfolk, Derrick Gibson and Sammy Davis.

The 21st through 25th overall spots also produced five disappointments in NFL secondaries. Eleven defensive backs have been drafted in this range, with two becoming Pro Bowl players: cornerback Nate Clements and safety Ed Reed.

3. Defensive ends taken 16th to 20th overall

Four of the eight have failed to meet expectations. None has exceeded expectations. Bad luck might be to blame. Jarvis Moss, David Pollack and Kenechi Udeze experienced injuries or health issues early in their careers.

4. Quarterbacks taken among the top 10 overall

Ten of the 40 players drafted among the top five since 2000 have exceeded expectations. None was a quarterback. Four of the nine quarterbacks drafted that early have yet to meet expectations.

Byron Leftwich and Matt Leinart are the only quarterbacks drafted sixth through 10th overall since 2000. Both have fallen below expectations set by Scouts Inc.

5. Receivers drafted 26th to 32nd

Four of the eight receivers drafted in this range have failed to meet expectations. Only one -- the Colts' Wayne -- exceeded them.

Five safe havens

1. Defensive backs drafted fifth overall and 11th through 15th

[+] EnlargeJosh Umphrey/Getty Images

Chargers cornerback Quentin Jammer has justified his No. 5 overall selection with solid play for San Diego.NFL teams drafted three defensive backs among the top five -- Sean Taylor, Terence Newman and Quentin Jammer -- and all three justified the investment. Each was the fifth player chosen in his draft class. Taylor was named to the most recent Pro Bowl posthumously.

Expectations were met or exceeded by all five defensive backs drafted 11th to 15th: Marcus Trufant, Darrelle Revis, Thomas Davis, Tye Hill and Deltha O'Neal. Trufant picked off seven passes last season. O'Neal disappointed in Denver, but he has two seasons with at least nine picks.

2. Linebackers drafted ninth to 12th overall

NFL teams found six linebackers in this range without making a bad choice. Brian Urlacher, Patrick Willis and Shawne Merriman exceeded expectations. Ernie Sims, Dan Morgan and Jonathan Vilma have played well enough to justify their draft status, Scouts Inc. determined.

3. Running backs drafted 19th to 25th overall

NFL teams found five running backs in this range, and all met or exceeded expectations: Steven Jackson, Deuce McAllister, Willis McGahee, Laurence Maroney and Shaun Alexander.

4. Offensive tackles drafted third to 18th overall

Six of 12 drafted in this range exceeded expectations. Only two -- Mike Williams and Kenyatta Walker -- failed to measure up.

Joe Thomas, Chris Samuels, Bryant McKinnie, Jammal Brown, Shawn Andrews and Jeff Backus exceeded expectations.

5. Guards and centers drafted in the second half of the round

NFL teams have drafted nine of them in the first round, all after the 16th pick, and none has disappointed.

Steve Hutchinson, Nick Mangold and Logan Mankins have exceeded expectations. Hutchinson is a perennial Pro Bowl choice. The others have become solid or promising starters.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
How many seasoned free agents have guided their teams to Super Bowls?
Off the top of my head I can think of:Steve Young

Brett Favre

Kurt Warner

all started their careers for other teams to become HOF players.
"seasoned vet or journeyman Super Bowl appearances"Kurt Warner X3

Matt Hasselbeck

Jake Delhomme

Rich Gannon

Brad Johnson

Kerry Collins

Trent Dilfer

First round QBs who led team that drafted him to Super Bowl

Peyton Manning

Rex Grossman :thumbdown:

Big Ben X2

Donovan McNabb

Steve McNair

This is just since 2000

I was going to include Tom Brady since he was a 6th rounder but I don't know if his 1st Super Bowl appearance really fits the category of "seasoned vet" and he is definitely not a journeyman. He wasn't drafted as a franchise qb either.
I assume this to be correct, so we basically have a better shot of making the SB with a journeyman. So it seems that it would be better for teams to pick up the FA QB, since the amount of drafted QB's to take you to the "promised land" is pretty slim. Also, out of the drafted category there could possibly be 4 HOF players.
I edited my post as I forgot to include Eli Manning and put Brady in the non-franchise QB list since I doubt NE figured they were getting their franchise QB that late. I know NYG didn't technically draft Eli Manning but he went to them on draft day with the assumption he would be their franchise QB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Best reason not to take a QB high: you can only really play 1. If you get a good but not great player at another spot, he can help you if he's your second best. Not true at QB (or Center/Kicker/Punter, but they aren't generally taken really high)

 
While for the most part I agree, in one draft you had Roeths, Rivers and Eli. Two of those have already resulted in a SB ring for their team and Rivers might end up the best pure QB of the group.

If a team is VERY confident that a particular QB IS the goods, then they have a shot. The idea that you are desperate for a QB so you just take the top QB or 2 available seems to be where teams fail.

 
While for the most part I agree, in one draft you had Roeths, Rivers and Eli. Two of those have already resulted in a SB ring for their team and Rivers might end up the best pure QB of the group.

If a team is VERY confident that a particular QB IS the goods, then they have a shot. The idea that you are desperate for a QB so you just take the top QB or 2 available seems to be where teams fail.
I think this will happen this year.
 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
Chad Sexington was an 18th overall pick, and he's been pretty solid (when healthy).
 
Every position has a high likelihood of being a bust so why pick any player in a draft? If you hit on a QB it could be a franchise changing happening affecting the next 10 years and no other position can claim that effect, so many believe it's worth the risk based on the possible reward.
I believe that the money that is being offered to QB's in the first round is too much of a gamble. Defensive/Offensive lineman seem to pan out better. But, my original point was that it seems with such a high risk/return that most NFL clubs would just try and pick up a FA QB that has proven they can play. Sure it would cost a little more money, but you have a proven QB.
Have you seen the list of FA QBs over the last few years?
 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
Drew Brees: Second round but 32nd overall pick so a first rounder of sorts at least.
 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
There's iron, there's clad, and then there's this.
 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
Chad Sexington was an 18th overall pick, and he's been pretty solid (when healthy).
:goodposting: Love these stats, as they obviously mean "21 years ago. there was a QB drafted..." or "QBs drafted in the 11 spot make it to the pro bowl" FWIW, in 1983 there were 2 HOF QBs drafted in the 1st round after pick #11.

 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
There's iron, there's clad, and then there's this.
What round was Tom Brady drafted in and what year was it when he was drafted?
 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
There's iron, there's clad, and then there's this.
What round was Tom Brady drafted in and what year was it when he was drafted?
:thumbdown: Sixth, 199th overall in 2000....but he is only discussing first rounders.

Hey, I didn't write the article, just thought it was an interesting piece of data for someone who already did some analysis.

Please forward additional comments/issues/questions to: rdemovsk@greenbaypressgazette.com

 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
There's iron, there's clad, and then there's this.
What round was Tom Brady drafted in and what year was it when he was drafted?
:goodposting: Sixth, 199th overall in 2000....but he is only discussing first rounders.

Hey, I didn't write the article, just thought it was an interesting piece of data for someone who already did some analysis.

Please forward additional comments/issues/questions to: rdemovsk@greenbaypressgazette.com
The article meant ONLY QB taken in the first round from picks 12 on . . . not ALL QB taken past pick 11. I had to read it a couple times too to figure it out.As for guys taken past the 11th pick that went on to the Pro Bowl drafted in the past 20 years:

Derek Anderson 213th pick

Drew Brees 32nd pick

Marc Bulger 168th pick

Tom Brady 199th pick

Brian Griese 91st pick

Matt Hasselbeck 187th pick

Jake Plummer 42nd pick

Kordell Stewart 60th pick

Gus Frerotte 197th pick

Marc Brunell 188th pick

Elvis Grbac 219th pick

Trent Green 222nd pick

Jeff Blake 166th pick

Brad Johnson 227th pick

Brett Favre 33rd pick

Neil O'Donnell 70th pick

 
We could debate what slots do well for each position, but that is pretty arbitrary. The article showing how many exceeded and busts is a good one to get a gauge from (although the slots to avoid seem silly to me).

The way I look at this is QB's cost a lot more than other positions and the fact they have the 2nd highest "failure" ratio makes them the most suspect draft choice. Therefore, if there is a good QB that is available via free agency (does not happen often - Drew Brees) he is most definitely worth spending big bucks on. But, don't go after a backup who put up a few good games, go after a guy you "know" is solid.

 
Try as they might, NFL teams cannot predict which draft prospects will turn into productive players. Teams do their homework and still draft players who fail miserably. It happens every year. But with their owners' money and co-workers' careers at stake, smart personnel people can avoid falling into the same traps.

An evaluation of all 254 first-round picks since 2000 revealed the potential risks and rewards teams face heading into the draft this weekend.

The No. 1 Issue

A Scouts Inc. evaluation of all 254 first-round picks since 2000 reveals the potential risks and rewards teams face. Column

SCOUTS INC.: We rate 254 first-round draft picks since 2000.

AFC | NFC

CLEVELAND DRAFT: Browns are prime example of how success or failure in first round can determine a team's fate. Column

HASHMARKS: More on what Scouts Inc.'s evaluation of first round since 2000 reveals. Blog

PODCAST: Jeremy Green and Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc. discuss No. 1 picks since 2000. Listen

FIRST-ROUND HISTORY

• 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003

• 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007

Scouts Inc. marked each first-round player as having exceeded, met or failed to meet expectations. The categories were broad enough to head off debate in most cases, yet powerful enough to produce useful information when harnessed collectively.

Overall, 169 of the 254 first-round selections (66.5 percent) have met or exceeded expectations. Twenty-four percent exceeded expectations. One-third failed to measure up.

Receivers failed to meet expectations 52.4 percent of the time, surpassing quarterbacks (47.6 percent) for the highest rate of failure.

Based on the findings, teams holding the seventh through 10th overall choices should exercise extreme caution before drafting a receiver in those slots. Teams hoping to find quality defensive backs with the 21st through 32nd choices should also beware. And any team looking for a defensive end with the 16th through 20th choices might want to say a prayer first.

For while making wise use of first-round draft selections does not ensure success, repeatedly botching those choices essentially guarantees failure.

That's where you can really get hammered," Carolina Panthers coach John Fox said. "Especially if it's a real early pick, because you're paying that guy like a future Hall of Famer and he hasn't played a down yet."

A look at what the past eight drafts can tell teams as they balance needs with value heading into the 2008 draft:

The safest positions

1. Interior offensive line

2. Linebacker

3. Tight end

4. Defensive tackle, offensive tackle and running back.

The high-risk positions

1. Receiver.

2. Quarterback

2. Defensive backs taken 26th to 32nd overall

Five of the 10 failed to meet expectations. Only Oakland's Nnamdi Asomugha, drafted 31st overall in 2003, has exceeded expectations within that range since 2000. Disappointments included Jamar Fletcher, Mike Rumph, Andre Woolfolk, Derrick Gibson and Sammy Davis.

The 21st through 25th overall spots also produced five disappointments in NFL secondaries. Eleven defensive backs have been drafted in this range, with two becoming Pro Bowl players: cornerback Nate Clements and safety Ed Reed.

3. Defensive ends taken 16th to 20th overall

Four of the eight have failed to meet expectations. None has exceeded expectations. Bad luck might be to blame. Jarvis Moss, David Pollack and Kenechi Udeze experienced injuries or health issues early in their careers.

4. Quarterbacks taken among the top 10 overall

Ten of the 40 players drafted among the top five since 2000 have exceeded expectations. None was a quarterback. Four of the nine quarterbacks drafted that early have yet to meet expectations.

Byron Leftwich and Matt Leinart are the only quarterbacks drafted sixth through 10th overall since 2000. Both have fallen below expectations set by Scouts Inc.

5. Receivers drafted 26th to 32nd

Four of the eight receivers drafted in this range have failed to meet expectations. Only one -- the Colts' Wayne -- exceeded them.

Five safe havens

1. Defensive backs drafted fifth overall and 11th through 15th

[+] EnlargeJosh Umphrey/Getty Images

Chargers cornerback Quentin Jammer has justified his No. 5 overall selection with solid play for San Diego.NFL teams drafted three defensive backs among the top five -- Sean Taylor, Terence Newman and Quentin Jammer -- and all three justified the investment. Each was the fifth player chosen in his draft class. Taylor was named to the most recent Pro Bowl posthumously.

Expectations were met or exceeded by all five defensive backs drafted 11th to 15th: Marcus Trufant, Darrelle Revis, Thomas Davis, Tye Hill and Deltha O'Neal. Trufant picked off seven passes last season. O'Neal disappointed in Denver, but he has two seasons with at least nine picks.

2. Linebackers drafted ninth to 12th overall

NFL teams found six linebackers in this range without making a bad choice. Brian Urlacher, Patrick Willis and Shawne Merriman exceeded expectations. Ernie Sims, Dan Morgan and Jonathan Vilma have played well enough to justify their draft status, Scouts Inc. determined.

3. Running backs drafted 19th to 25th overall

NFL teams found five running backs in this range, and all met or exceeded expectations: Steven Jackson, Deuce McAllister, Willis McGahee, Laurence Maroney and Shaun Alexander.

4. Offensive tackles drafted third to 18th overall

Six of 12 drafted in this range exceeded expectations. Only two -- Mike Williams and Kenyatta Walker -- failed to measure up.

Joe Thomas, Chris Samuels, Bryant McKinnie, Jammal Brown, Shawn Andrews and Jeff Backus exceeded expectations.

5. Guards and centers drafted in the second half of the round

NFL teams have drafted nine of them in the first round, all after the 16th pick, and none has disappointed.

Steve Hutchinson, Nick Mangold and Logan Mankins have exceeded expectations. Hutchinson is a perennial Pro Bowl choice. The others have become solid or promising starters.
:goodposting: This info. is of great value and supports the OP's main opinion. In my IDP dynasty league, I've come to nearly the same conclusions as this info. documents (but was just on my observations), that 1st rounder DB's, QB's and WR's have a much greater "bust" potential than RB's, D-linemen, linebackers...and from an NFL perspective O-linemen are usually the lowest risk bet position of all.One thing I have noticed is that usually the 1st WR chosen in the top 10 of a draft pans out and usually is not a bust. Its a crapshoot for the 2nd, 3rd + WR's chosen in the 1st round...some are busts and some pan out, but the highly ranked 1st WR chosen (Fitz, Calvin Johnson etc.) usually are a much safer bet.

 
More food for thought, don't take a QB in the first round after the 11th pick:

Rob Demovsky of the Green Bay Press Gazette wrote an interesting piece on this yesterday. According to Demovsky, in the last 20 drafts, there have been 42 quarterbacks selected after the 11th pick in the first round, and none has ever made a Pro Bowl.
There's iron, there's clad, and then there's this.
I went back about 20 years checking this stat. Here's what I noticed. First of all, there were only 13 QBs taken after #11 by my count. It was a quick scan, but no way were there 42.

Cutler, Roethlisberger and Culpepper were all taken #11.

Rodgers was #24, and he'll probably log a few pro bowls before all is said and done. Flacco was #18, he's got a chance to do the same. Quinn was #22, who knows there.

There were some real reaches early on, but recently, it seems like teams have gotten good value out of late round QBs.

 
As for guys taken past the 11th pick that went on to the Pro Bowl drafted in the past 20 years:

Derek Anderson 213th pick

Drew Brees 32nd pick

Marc Bulger 168th pick

Tom Brady 199th pick

Brian Griese 91st pick

Matt Hasselbeck 187th pick

Jake Plummer 42nd pick

Kordell Stewart 60th pick

Gus Frerotte 197th pick

Marc Brunell 188th pick

Elvis Grbac 219th pick

Trent Green 222nd pick

Jeff Blake 166th pick

Brad Johnson 227th pick

Brett Favre 33rd pick

Neil O'Donnell 70th pick
Several guys make the Pro Bowl each year and only one wins the Super Bowl. Only three of them won it all on that list and only one guy won a Super Bowl for the team that drafted him. The discussion here is why an NFL team would take a QB in the first round instead of waiting or going FA. Assuming winning a Super Bowl is the goal for the franchise, you appear to be giving merit to the justification of taking a QB early. Not sure if that was your intent or not though.If more than half the teams in the league who ever won a Super Bowl did it with a QB in the later rounds or through FA, I am sure the justification would be there for passing on great QB prospects early.

However, the most common denominator for SB winners at the QB position is with a first rounder, even just getting to the title game justifies a first rounder.

Looking at every starting Super Bowl QB including this year, 44 have been first rounders, 42 have been "other". link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're franchise is any good at scouting, its not a crap shoot at all.
What is the percentage of success even among the best teams?
When Parcells was in dallas he used to say that an organization is doing good if hits on 50% of its personnel decisions.I think you also have to consider degree. In other words, it is one thing to say that a player is not a bust, but another for him to be an top 5 or 10 at a given poistion for a good portion of a career.
 
Teams trying to rebuild will always bite on QB's early in the draft. alot can be said of how important O lineman are but it remains true that QB is the most important position. rebuilding teams will always hope they can draft a guy who can lead them for 10years rather than sign a guy who may be at the helm for 3-4. its usually solid teams that sign the veteran QB, they usually are the one's with that 1missing piece to get over the hump.

there should be more QB busts than any other position, it is the most intense/stressful position on the field. to play QB in the NFL u need like a 150 IQ and like having to study tape like a fiend to be sucessful, that can't be said for some of the other positions. Tony Mandarich is much more of a shock being a Bust than Ryan Leaf. how can u suck that bad as a OL, Robert Gallery has shown if u can't play LT u can move in to guard and be effective if u just have size. a lineman's job doesn't change much from college no matter what the scheme, QB's have immense learning curves.

the falcons drafted Justin Blalock who had a very good year last year, they had veteran QB's and struggled to win games. Matt Ryan comes in to same team and his impact is 10x as great(coaching staff helped a bit as well,lol).

 
As for guys taken past the 11th pick that went on to the Pro Bowl drafted in the past 20 years:

Derek Anderson 213th pick

Drew Brees 32nd pick

Marc Bulger 168th pick

Tom Brady 199th pick

Brian Griese 91st pick

Matt Hasselbeck 187th pick

Jake Plummer 42nd pick

Kordell Stewart 60th pick

Gus Frerotte 197th pick

Marc Brunell 188th pick

Elvis Grbac 219th pick

Trent Green 222nd pick

Jeff Blake 166th pick

Brad Johnson 227th pick

Brett Favre 33rd pick

Neil O'Donnell 70th pick
Several guys make the Pro Bowl each year and only one wins the Super Bowl. Only three of them won it all on that list and only one guy won a Super Bowl for the team that drafted him. The discussion here is why an NFL team would take a QB in the first round instead of waiting or going FA. Assuming winning a Super Bowl is the goal for the franchise, you appear to be giving merit to the justification of taking a QB early. Not sure if that was your intent or not though.If more than half the teams in the league who ever won a Super Bowl did it with a QB in the later rounds or through FA, I am sure the justification would be there for passing on great QB prospects early.

However, the most common denominator for SB winners at the QB position is with a first rounder, even just getting to the title game justifies a first rounder.

Looking at every starting Super Bowl QB including this year, 44 have been first rounders, 42 have been "other". link
I didn't particularly have a point. I was only posting the guys that made the Pro Bowl that were drafted in Round 2 or later. But since you seem to be wanting an opinion, all I really care about history wise is the modern relevancy, which to me is the salary cap era forward (so 1994 to now):Looking at each SB on it's own:

Round 1 picks: 14

Round 2 picks: 2

Round 3 picks: 2

Round 4 picks: 1

Round 5 picks: 0

Round 6 or later: 11

Counting only the QBs:

Round 1 picks: 11

Round 2 picks: 1

Round 3 picks: 2

Round 4 picks: 1

Round 5 picks: 0

Round 6 or later: 6

Obviously there are more first round picks than any other category, but I'm not sure a team has to have a first round QB to win.

 
I have never understood why teams take a QB out of college, with all of the high dollar "busts" that happen. Why wouldn't a team just try and spend a little more money on a seasoned guy, and not try and play the lottery? Sure every know and then a team gets lucky with a HOF QB, but it seems more busts happen than HOFers. Just my 2 cents.
If no teams draft them, where will they come from and have the experience to be considered "seasoned"? I haven't seen many undrafted free agents that have done great, Warner is the only one that comes to mind. Romo has put up good numbers, but hasn't had great success.
 
I often wonder if first round QBs are more successful because they have more talent or because they have been given every opportunity to play. I’m staring to think that opportunity might be the more important factor.

It seems obvious that teams are going to give their drafted players every chance to succeed over their lower drafted counterparts. In fact, if it wasn’t for injuries to the starters maybe QBs like Tom Brady and Kurt Warner never get discovered. If teams are going to waste 4 or more years trying to develop the David Carrs and the Joey Herringtons of the world, what chance do lower drafted QBs have to get playing time to impress coaches? Even when a first round QB becomes an obvious bust, they always seem to find work as “experienced” backups. Thus, again they prevent other undrafted QBs from gaining the required experience to lead a team.

Maybe this is why I have always liked **** Vermeil as a head coach. He doesn’t seem to prejudge players based on their draft position. He was always the coach that discovered undrafted players with talent and gave them the opportunity to play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top