formatting errorsSo many ?I don't think the Bears take a QB in the first and maybe not at all. Oline, safety.
Thanks - yeah I almost wussed out on the McFadden thing. I went back and forth on that alot as I really think he is a very talented player. On the other hand, many of the first teams need something else worse. Although the question on my mind post Super Bowl is - is Maroney really the go to RB the Pats need - he did well all playoffs, but didn't find much room last night. On the other hand, the Pats Oline was not as effective as it had been.Re: Chargers pick - the hardest thing as you hit the second half of the first round is value. What is there that a team needs and is that guy worth the first round pick (and let's face it, first round money). re: green7cat - I figure people could disagree alot with parts of it, but am glad you found it intriguing - really, at this point in the pre-draft/pre-combine/post Senior Bowl days, I find alot of rankings are all over the place - and I think that's because it can be really hard to definitively nail it all down so early. At this point, the point in a mock is to spur on discussion - you can love it, you can hate it, as long as it gets you talking and thinking.Which is not to say I was doing things just for the heck of it. But if I was on the fence on something, it was on my mind.lots of guts dropping mcfadden that far but it could happen.I am not a fan of the Chargers pick. OT depth is needed but Inside LB, CB, Safety and depth at DT may be more of a need. Not sure if there is someone there at their pick worth a 1st in those positions though. with no 2nd, 3rd or 4th (they may get a compensatory one though) they cant afford to waste their 1st.It may be worth trading down to the top of the 2nd to get another 2nd or thrid or even a 1st next year (seems to work for dallas and NE)
I don't disagree - both with wanting Ellis and trading down. I avoided trades because a) the value table makes my head hurt and b) it's easier to pick top fantasy kicker than it is to guess who might trade for something.If McFadden drops outside the top 5, I expect a trade. I just didn't want to guess who it might be. Bengals have lots of work to do in a few areas - so if they could trade for a bucket of quality players and picks, they not only would, they should.If McFadden falls to my Bengals at #9, I think we get a good haul of picks and trade down (though if Ellis is also there at 9 as in this mock, we'd probably keep the pick and take him)-QG
I wish I could say you had a shot at Ellis, but short of trading up for him, it ain't happening. Assuming Ellis keeps going the way he has, he'll only get more valuable. Lynch - that dude just really amazed me last season.I would puke out of my mouth if the Bills just miss out on Ellis and settle for a MUCH less talent in the pick of Balmer.To me it would be similar to how I felt when we settled for Lynch.But even then I think Balmer will not be as good as Lynch has been.
No Peterson though, and I guess that was the point I was trying to make.I wish I could say you had a shot at Ellis, but short of trading up for him, it ain't happening. Assuming Ellis keeps going the way he has, he'll only get more valuable. Lynch - that dude just really amazed me last season.I would puke out of my mouth if the Bills just miss out on Ellis and settle for a MUCH less talent in the pick of Balmer.To me it would be similar to how I felt when we settled for Lynch.But even then I think Balmer will not be as good as Lynch has been.
See I tried very hard not to overrate the Senior Bowl - some guys clearly moved up and affected my ranking (Cromartie most notably). (*edited - forgot to finish my thought before I posted) But I didn't want to overreatc too much to the week and ther has been some over-reaction in some circles regarding various players. It's a tight rope that I admit I could very well have slipped off of.The Rbs in round 2 - yeah, I thought about that when I reviewed the article. And I kept wanting to force one in, but I just felt there were bigger needs for many teams and that - given the RB depth this year - teams would lean towards filling talent out of shallower spots and wait on a RB.Woodson and Sweed were the two other ?? for me aside from McFadden. I guess I fall on the side of Martz's affect on Woodson being enough that I want to give the kid some more eye-time before I toss him out of the 1st.Appreciate the input EBF! All will be taken into consideration for the next versions.McFadden to the Raiders seems like the perfect storm of an overrated talent being sucked into a black hole of an organization. It's almost too perfect to not happen. Woodson at 14 seems like a big stretch after he bombed in Mobile. Sweed in the 1st also looks like a huge stretch to me. I don't even have him as a top 10 WR in this class. You don't have a single RB going in the 2nd round, which I disagree with. Some team will fall in love with a guy like Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, or Matt Forte. I see at least 1-2 of those guys sneaking into the 2nd round. I also think you're overlooking some of the WRs. I've heard that Andre Caldwell and Lavelle Hawkins are borderline 1st round picks after the Senior Bowl. I can't see both of them falling out of the top 60. Earl Bennett and Devin Thomas also have a good chance of being top 50-60 picks.
Right - I see what you're saying there.Well, like it says in the article - he's got some good upside.No Peterson though, and I guess that was the point I was trying to make.I wish I could say you had a shot at Ellis, but short of trading up for him, it ain't happening. Assuming Ellis keeps going the way he has, he'll only get more valuable. Lynch - that dude just really amazed me last season.I would puke out of my mouth if the Bills just miss out on Ellis and settle for a MUCH less talent in the pick of Balmer.To me it would be similar to how I felt when we settled for Lynch.But even then I think Balmer will not be as good as Lynch has been.
McFadden to the Raiders seems like the perfect storm of an overrated talent being sucked into a black hole of an organization. It's almost too perfect to not happen. Woodson at 14 seems like a big stretch after he bombed in Mobile. Sweed in the 1st also looks like a huge stretch to me. I don't even have him as a top 10 WR in this class. You don't have a single RB going in the 2nd round, which I disagree with. Some team will fall in love with a guy like Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, or Matt Forte. I see at least 1-2 of those guys sneaking into the 2nd round. I also think you're overlooking some of the WRs. I've heard that Andre Caldwell and Lavelle Hawkins are borderline 1st round picks after the Senior Bowl. I can't see both of them falling out of the top 60. Earl Bennett and Devin Thomas also have a good chance of being top 50-60 picks.
I don't think the backs will fall because of the depth. IMO, it usually doesn't work that way. If there are a lot of good backs in the draft, then all that means to me is that there will be a lot of backs drafted early. Charles and Johnson have an edge because of their elite speed. Forte and Rice are likely 3rd round picks.Hawkins and Caldwell have been first day guys all along. Ditto Devin Thomas. I see all 3 pushing for spots in round 2 on draft day.NoFBinLA said:See I tried very hard not to overrate the Senior Bowl - some guys clearly moved up and affected my ranking (Cromartie most notably). (*edited - forgot to finish my thought before I posted) But I didn't want to overreatc too much to the week and ther has been some over-reaction in some circles regarding various players. It's a tight rope that I admit I could very well have slipped off of.The Rbs in round 2 - yeah, I thought about that when I reviewed the article. And I kept wanting to force one in, but I just felt there were bigger needs for many teams and that - given the RB depth this year - teams would lean towards filling talent out of shallower spots and wait on a RB.Woodson and Sweed were the two other ?? for me aside from McFadden. I guess I fall on the side of Martz's affect on Woodson being enough that I want to give the kid some more eye-time before I toss him out of the 1st.Appreciate the input EBF! All will be taken into consideration for the next versions.EBF said:McFadden to the Raiders seems like the perfect storm of an overrated talent being sucked into a black hole of an organization. It's almost too perfect to not happen. Woodson at 14 seems like a big stretch after he bombed in Mobile. Sweed in the 1st also looks like a huge stretch to me. I don't even have him as a top 10 WR in this class. You don't have a single RB going in the 2nd round, which I disagree with. Some team will fall in love with a guy like Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, or Matt Forte. I see at least 1-2 of those guys sneaking into the 2nd round. I also think you're overlooking some of the WRs. I've heard that Andre Caldwell and Lavelle Hawkins are borderline 1st round picks after the Senior Bowl. I can't see both of them falling out of the top 60. Earl Bennett and Devin Thomas also have a good chance of being top 50-60 picks.
I can certainly see your point with the RBs. I suppose it depends on who needs them and how badly. Out of curiosity, I might go take a look at some historical stats and see how deep RB drafts have played out in the past. Not that it's a definitive thing, but trends are important!As I said, as the next few weeks progress I expect alot of movement on my boards.And again, I appreciate the input EBF. (and everyone for that matter).I don't think the backs will fall because of the depth. IMO, it usually doesn't work that way. If there are a lot of good backs in the draft, then all that means to me is that there will be a lot of backs drafted early. Charles and Johnson have an edge because of their elite speed. Forte and Rice are likely 3rd round picks.Hawkins and Caldwell have been first day guys all along. Ditto Devin Thomas. I see all 3 pushing for spots in round 2 on draft day.
I don't think I'm that down on him - he has a few knocks (not the greatest tackler, can get wrapped up at the line when trying to jam up a WR) but will probably be a guy who succeeds as he gains more experience. I like the guys ahead of him a little more right now - he's someone i wrestled with a little bit and have been trying to read up on more since the mock was finished.Why is everyone so down on Cason?
29. San Francisco (from Indy) OLB Keith Rivers, USC39. San Francisco WR James Hardy, Indiana
Good read, nice job. Nice to see draftguys has some new talent this year![]()
You may be right. But just because you think so doesn't mean everyone else is wrong about it.1. McFadden will not fall to 9.
2. The Titans will almost certainly NOT draft a WR in round 1. Why must every mock draft have the Titans taking a WR in the 1st round? Lemmings.
the lions couldnt possible take a wr in the 1st 3 years in a row!Why cant the titans? IF Young is ever going to be a passer they need a big time wr. givens? no. B jones? no. roydell williams? no.what other needs do they have?1. McFadden will not fall to 9.2. The Titans will almost certainly NOT draft a WR in round 1. Why must every mock draft have the Titans taking a WR in the 1st round? Lemmings.
How ya' doing, Andy? Yes, I post the SAME thing in EVERY mock draft thread. You noticed that, huh?The only reason I do that...is because everyone has them selecting a WR.You may be right. But just because you think so doesn't mean everyone else is wrong about it.1. McFadden will not fall to 9.
2. The Titans will almost certainly NOT draft a WR in round 1. Why must every mock draft have the Titans taking a WR in the 1st round? Lemmings.
Just about everyone needs an impact WR NOW. Problem is there aren't many to go around. And I don't think the Titans are going to get into a bidding war over the mediocre free agent WR talent.Sure it sucks that you have to draft a young WR, but it's okay to roll the dice with one of the top rated WRs rather than get hopeful that a later round one will pan out.How ya' doing, Andy? Yes, I post the SAME thing in EVERY mock draft thread. You noticed that, huh?The only reason I do that...is because everyone has them selecting a WR.You may be right. But just because you think so doesn't mean everyone else is wrong about it.1. McFadden will not fall to 9.
2. The Titans will almost certainly NOT draft a WR in round 1. Why must every mock draft have the Titans taking a WR in the 1st round? Lemmings.
I'll either be right or wrong. But the only reason that 10/10 mock drafts have the Titans taking a WR is because the other ones did, too.
Do the Titans need a WR? Holy crap, of course. However, the LAST thing they need is another young, rookie WR. They need impact NOW. I am fully convinced that they'll address this via free agency or trade...or both. They may very well draft a WR, as well, but not in the 1st.
Well - and normally I wouldn't type these words, but in my defense I wasn't worried about the other mocks. It's not the reason I have them take a WR. They take a WR in my world because they need someone for Young to throw to. Can they do this in Free Agency? Yup. In fact they should. But until they do, I think it's a need. But I appreciate the input.To other comments -How ya' doing, Andy? Yes, I post the SAME thing in EVERY mock draft thread. You noticed that, huh?
The only reason I do that...is because everyone has them selecting a WR.
I'll either be right or wrong. But the only reason that 10/10 mock drafts have the Titans taking a WR is because the other ones did, too.
Do the Titans need a WR? Holy crap, of course. However, the LAST thing they need is another young, rookie WR. They need impact NOW. I am fully convinced that they'll address this via free agency or trade...or both. They may very well draft a WR, as well, but not in the 1st.
QB...sorry, I had to. In the Titans' case I think they need to choose BPA and at that point in the draft WR isn't it, maybe a few picks later but not then.the lions couldnt possible take a wr in the 1st 3 years in a row!Why cant the titans? IF Young is ever going to be a passer they need a big time wr. givens? no. B jones? no. roydell williams? no.what other needs do they have?1. McFadden will not fall to 9.2. The Titans will almost certainly NOT draft a WR in round 1. Why must every mock draft have the Titans taking a WR in the 1st round? Lemmings.
Some further thoughts on this...A lot of people have Dallas taking a RB in the first. I suppose its possble. But I don't think its likely. First off, you're talking about a guy who may play 40% of the snaps for the next several years. Dallas has its starting RB in Barber. I think he gets signed long term. So any back would be a COP guy. Does it make any sense to burn a 1st rounder on a guy you know won't play that much for several years? Also, this is a very deep RB class. Quality guys will be found much later. And given how many teams are getting quality RBs with second day picks and UFAs, its tough to justify using scarce resources (1st round picks) on this position. One crazy thought I had for Miami. Gholston. Going off memory, Tuna has used first roudn picks on OLBs: Lawrence Taylor, Carl Banks, Willie McGinest, John Abraham, DeMarcus Ware, and Bobby Carpenter. IIRC, LT, Banks, and McGinnest were all top 5 picks. Another top 10 LB Tuna pick was James Farrior.Not sure if Gholston rates out as high as Long and Dorsey. But the position sure is one that Tuna favors. Might be a way to really step out from the mainstream. And have a reason to do so.Hey ridgelake,I also agree that they will probably need a compliment to Barber come draft time and they;ll get one somewhere in this draft. That first parcells/miami pick also was one I went back and forth on, for exactly the reason you mention. It might be one where history should have dictated more than what I think is a top need for them. I almost swapped the Rams and Phins pick more than once. I think it will be one I look at for a long time.
Why's that?man I hope thats not how the Cowboys draft goes
I like them getting a corner with the first pick but Im not a fan of Manningham and would hate to see them go with him that high. Also I would rather see them go T or RB in the second or even another CBWhy's that?man I hope thats not how the Cowboys draft goes
I can see why you wouldn't like Manningham. Personally, I think he's going to be pretty good.I like them getting a corner with the first pick but Im not a fan of Manningham and would hate to see them go with him that high. Also I would rather see them go T or RB in the second or even another CBWhy's that?man I hope thats not how the Cowboys draft goes