Interseptopus
Footballguy
Off the field issues seem to be an even bigger issue in the last few years than they ever have been. Goodell inherited a pretty raw deal. First the New England Cheating Patriots, then all kinds of riff raff to deal with (Vick, Pacman, now Burress).
With his efforts to expand the market for the NFL to Europe with a London game the last 2 years you have to believe that these incidents are even more important for the image of the NFL. I know they’re not all thugs. But for every poster child Tom Brady there’s a thug Pacman Jones. It just seems like this is getting out of control lately.
Why doesn’t Goodell just stage a no tolerance policy and leave it at that? Break the personal conduct policy, suspended for the year without pay, on probation for the next year. Get into trouble again and sorry but you’re gone for good. You start taking away money from these “ghetto fabs” and you can bet they’ll start to obey.
Probably will never happen because of the NFL players union. I believe the players union was behind the suspension of Pacman, but I wonder where they’d stand with a harsh no tolerance policy. I have to assume that they would be against it because it’s not in place already.
It’s kind of sad that players are involved in shootings and all kinds of other violations of the personal conduct policy and yet they get off easy. You can’t do much about the legal system, but Goodell can take a stand in the NFL.
If he’s worried about stars being removed from the game, stars are easily replaced. That’s the great thing about the NFL. The next big thing is just an injury away from showing his stuff and making himself known.
I have to wonder if Rodger Goodell would have a no tolerance policy regarding personal conduct if it weren’t for the NFL players union.
Let me add, this is not a shot at unions, it is not a political statement. It is merely an attempt to see what role people think the players union has in harsher penalties being brought down on the riff raff that the NFL has to deal with lately.
EDIT: If you plan to read the thread's responces before posting yourself, please begin at Post 47. Any posts prior to that include individuals who attempted to discredit this thread by offering nothing positive to say on topic. Thank you
DRDR
With his efforts to expand the market for the NFL to Europe with a London game the last 2 years you have to believe that these incidents are even more important for the image of the NFL. I know they’re not all thugs. But for every poster child Tom Brady there’s a thug Pacman Jones. It just seems like this is getting out of control lately.
Why doesn’t Goodell just stage a no tolerance policy and leave it at that? Break the personal conduct policy, suspended for the year without pay, on probation for the next year. Get into trouble again and sorry but you’re gone for good. You start taking away money from these “ghetto fabs” and you can bet they’ll start to obey.
Probably will never happen because of the NFL players union. I believe the players union was behind the suspension of Pacman, but I wonder where they’d stand with a harsh no tolerance policy. I have to assume that they would be against it because it’s not in place already.
It’s kind of sad that players are involved in shootings and all kinds of other violations of the personal conduct policy and yet they get off easy. You can’t do much about the legal system, but Goodell can take a stand in the NFL.
If he’s worried about stars being removed from the game, stars are easily replaced. That’s the great thing about the NFL. The next big thing is just an injury away from showing his stuff and making himself known.
I have to wonder if Rodger Goodell would have a no tolerance policy regarding personal conduct if it weren’t for the NFL players union.
Let me add, this is not a shot at unions, it is not a political statement. It is merely an attempt to see what role people think the players union has in harsher penalties being brought down on the riff raff that the NFL has to deal with lately.
EDIT: If you plan to read the thread's responces before posting yourself, please begin at Post 47. Any posts prior to that include individuals who attempted to discredit this thread by offering nothing positive to say on topic. Thank you
DRDR
Last edited by a moderator: