What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nice job EPA! (1 Viewer)

Not bad enough they're a completely ineffectual agency, now they're an active polluter to boot. Nice job, #######s.

 
I heard early quotes from EPA talking heads saying "there is no real danger to humans". Unless they get that water in them or on them directly or indirectly? Arsenic is harmless!

 
I heard early quotes from EPA talking heads saying "there is no real danger to humans". Unless they get that water in them or on them directly or indirectly? Arsenic is harmless!
I think they are saying that the river is fast moving and the hazardous chemicals will dissipate by the natural order of things. Then again, they probably thought their plug was going to hold too so it's hard to believe anything they say. This is the problem with government. Agencies can do everything right for years and then something like this happens and they are all stooges. It's a tough racket at times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if you had a house on the river near where this occurred, what now? Do you sue the EPA?
Sue the people who created the pollution and abandoned the mine? :shrug:
The mine had been closed for almost 100 years. This is on the EPA. No reason to make excuses for them. They royally ####ed up.
Didn't realize it had been closed that long, and not making excuses. My point was that we should be careful in allowing businesses to make messes they can't clean up on their own dime.

 
So if you had a house on the river near where this occurred, what now? Do you sue the EPA?
Sue the people who created the pollution and abandoned the mine? :shrug:
The mine had been closed for almost 100 years. This is on the EPA. No reason to make excuses for them. They royally ####ed up.
Didn't realize it had been closed that long, and not making excuses. My point was that we should be careful in allowing businesses to make messes they can't clean up on their own dime.
These mines were built during the Colorado gold rush, before environmental regulations even existed. They are all abandoned.

 
So if you had a house on the river near where this occurred, what now? Do you sue the EPA?
Sue the people who created the pollution and abandoned the mine? :shrug:
The mine had been closed for almost 100 years. This is on the EPA. No reason to make excuses for them. They royally ####ed up.
Didn't realize it had been closed that long, and not making excuses. My point was that we should be careful in allowing businesses to make messes they can't clean up on their own dime.
The point is you are making a ridiculous attempt at deflecting and trying to make this about business, instead of about the government agency which is funded billions of dollars to take care of these things.

 
I wonder if the average person can visualize what 3m gallons looks like.

A cube that is 100 gallons wide, 100 gallons long, and 100 gallons high is exactly 1 million gallons. Multiple that image in your mind by 3 and you've got it.

 
I heard early quotes from EPA talking heads saying "there is no real danger to humans". Unless they get that water in them or on them directly or indirectly? Arsenic is harmless!
I think they are saying that the river is fast moving and the hazardous chemicals will dissipate by the natural order of things. Then again, they probably thought their plug was going to hold too so it's hard to believe anything they say. This is the problem with government. Agencies can do everything right for years and then something like this happens and they are all stooges. It's a tough racket at times.
but this one is a colossal ####-up...

 
I wonder if the average person can visualize what 3m gallons looks like.

A cube that is 100 gallons wide, 100 gallons long, and 100 gallons high is exactly 1 million gallons. Multiple that image in your mind by 3 and you've got it.
Since when did gallons become a measure of length???? Exactly how wide is a gallon?

 
Just FYI, there are 7.48 gallons in a cubic foot. Thus 3 million gallons is roughly 400,000 cubic feet, which is about a 74' x 74' x 74' cube..

 
Is the leak still flowing? Did the EPA hire BP to monitor this or what? I know they set up retention pools, so I'm guessing this will be a thing for quite a while.

 
I wonder if the average person can visualize what 3m gallons looks like.

A cube that is 100 gallons wide, 100 gallons long, and 100 gallons high is exactly 1 million gallons. Multiple that image in your mind by 3 and you've got it.
Since when did gallons become a measure of length???? Exactly how wide is a gallon?
I was visualizing a gallon of milk. Arrange them 100 wide and long at the base. Stack them 100 high on top of that base. You get 1 million gallons. A cube about 75 feet on a side sounds exactly what I was attempting to visualize.

 
Is the leak still flowing? Did the EPA hire BP to monitor this or what? I know they set up retention pools, so I'm guessing this will be a thing for quite a while.
I don't know how damaging the material is to begin with in any volume, but this was why I was attempting to give a visual of how much material we're talking about here. When people see the word million thrown out it tends to lead to hyperbole.

 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...

 
Is the leak still flowing? Did the EPA hire BP to monitor this or what? I know they set up retention pools, so I'm guessing this will be a thing for quite a while.
I don't know how damaging the material is to begin with in any volume, but this was why I was attempting to give a visual of how much material we're talking about here. When people see the word million thrown out it tends to lead to hyperbole.
The color of the river dramatically changed for 100 miles. The effect on habitat and spawning grounds will not be known for some time. Heavy metals tend to persist in the environment and arsenic tends to leach additional heavy metals into the water from the stream beds over which it flows.

These high desert ecosystems are fragile. I hope for the best.

 
I wonder how the Tamarisk invasion will effect this. That invasive, thirsty little shrub pulls a lot of water from the river. Will it help filter the water? Will the contamination help eliminate the tamarisk?

 
Is the leak still flowing? Did the EPA hire BP to monitor this or what? I know they set up retention pools, so I'm guessing this will be a thing for quite a while.
I don't know how damaging the material is to begin with in any volume, but this was why I was attempting to give a visual of how much material we're talking about here. When people see the word million thrown out it tends to lead to hyperbole.
The color of the river dramatically changed for 100 miles. The effect on habitat and spawning grounds will not be known for some time. Heavy metals tend to persist in the environment and arsenic tends to leach additional heavy metals into the water from the stream beds over which it flows.

These high desert ecosystems are fragile. I hope for the best.
Understood that the color change was temporarily visible on a short stretch as the spill passed through, but we're not talking about 100 miles of complete color change. From the article it sounds as if the clear color has already returned after the spill passed. This was why I tried to estimate the actual amount of the spill. Its possible this spill has almost no effect. Perhaps it has a huge effect. I don't know.

 
I've hiked, photographed, hunted, fished, camped, and kayaked that area many times.
Along with the Columbia, Bella Coola, and the Orinoco it is my personal favorite, though there are many, many rivers I have yet to see and sadly never will. I hope it recovers well and swiftly.

 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...
well, seeing as the EPA was there to "shore up" this site when they accidentally broke the earthen damn, it's kinda hard to pin this on money or republicans. But nice try tho. I'll give you a C+ for effort.

 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...
You mean like how the EPA has been trying to get the site designated a Super Fund site so they could get money to clean it up and locals have been fighting to stop that? Yeah all EPAs fault.

 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...
well, seeing as the EPA was there to "shore up" this site when they accidentally broke the earthen damn, it's kinda hard to pin this on money or republicans. But nice try tho. I'll give you a C+ for effort.
Maybe with more money they could have hired brighter people.

####### Bush :hot:

 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...
You mean like how the EPA has been trying to get the site designated a Super Fund site so they could get money to clean it up and locals have been fighting to stop that? Yeah all EPAs fault.
Keeping the EPA out was clearly the right move. Unfortunately, it looks like they got in somehow anyway.

 
I've hiked, photographed, hunted, fished, camped, and kayaked that area many times.

Along with the Columbia, Bella Coola, and the Orinoco it is my personal favorite, though there are many, many rivers I have yet to see and sadly never will. I hope it recovers well and swiftly.
This is why I love HD television. Pop in your Planet Earth DVD, and it's like you're right there, man.
 
I predict we will discover in time that a big part of the problem is not enough monies to properly shore up these sites, and that the EPA complained about this in the past, and that conservative lawmakers actually reduced funds.

Just a hunch...
You mean like how the EPA has been trying to get the site designated a Super Fund site so they could get money to clean it up and locals have been fighting to stop that? Yeah all EPAs fault.
Keeping the EPA out was clearly the right move. Unfortunately, it looks like they got in somehow anyway.
Yea clearly the right move to keep them out then blame them for what happened.

 
So if you had a house on the river near where this occurred, what now? Do you sue the EPA?
Sue the people who created the pollution and abandoned the mine? :shrug:
The mine had been closed for almost 100 years. This is on the EPA. No reason to make excuses for them. They royally ####ed up.
Didn't realize it had been closed that long, and not making excuses. My point was that we should be careful in allowing businesses to make messes they can't clean up on their own dime.
The point is you are making a ridiculous attempt at deflecting and trying to make this about business, instead of about the government agency which is funded billions of dollars to take care of these things.
You are ridiculous. We taxpayers are paying to clean up some company's mess. That sucks. I don't like it. What's done is done but, going forward, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I'd much rather us spend a few billion dollars now enforcing tighter regulations and corporate accountability than spending the bigger money cleaning up after they take the money and run.

FWIW I agree the EPA botched this cleanup, and heads should roll. Unacceptable.


 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top