me too.. Manny actually should be in the talks as well. The year Pujols is having is great but Howard seems to be carrying the Phils lately. He's only hitting .250 but has 46 Homers & 141 RBI's.. I'm thinking he would be an easy winner but I have to admit I haven't been keeping that close a tabs..thanks for the reply..Put me in the camp that believes that unless a player has a astronomically good season playing for a losing club.......the MVP should go to the most productive player on a playoff team...or a player that is credited as being the "straw that stirs the drink" on a playoff team. I think that Manny deserves some consideration.....Sabathia......Delgado and Howard.
really.. I guess I will most likely lose my bet then but if Howard ends up with 50 HR's & 150 RBI's.. you think Burrell has been more valuable..Ryan Howard has an OBP of .336. That is pathetic. Pat Burrell has been more valuable to the Phillies this year that Howard.My voting would be.1. Albert Pujols2. Lance Berkman3. Hanley Ramirez
the closest the cubs have is aramis ramirez or soto.Ghost Rider said:Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all. Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs. Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award. Phillies - Nope. Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
Such a ridiculous argument.Ghost Rider said:.......and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
You must not watch the Phillies.Add in the fact that Howard is a lot quicker than most compared to him size-wise. Look at the triple he had the other night. Defensive liability? Like I said, you must not watch the Phillies, or baseball for that matter.the closest the cubs have is aramis ramirez or soto.Ghost Rider said:Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all. Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs. Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award. Phillies - Nope. Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
With RISP, Albert Pujols has a .509 OBP. Howard, .436. Howard has also had a startling 61 more at-bats with runners in scoring position, than Pujols has. I cannot imagine anybody voting for Howard over Pujols, but I imagine it will happen.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
I dont think OBP is the stat you should be looking at in respect to how a player does with RISP. Barring record breaking numbers, the MVP award goes to a player who's on a team that makes the playoffs.With RISP, Albert Pujols has a .509 OBP. Howard, .436. Howard has also had a startling 61 more at-bats with runners in scoring position, than Pujols has. I cannot imagine anybody voting for Howard over Pujols, but I imagine it will happen.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
Ryan Howard didn't have record breaking numbers in 06 when he won the MVP in '06. Barry Bonds didn't have record breaking numbers every year when he was winning multiple MVPs earlier this decade. Alex Rodriguez, Andre Dawson, yada, yada, yada. No one has been more valuable to his team in the NL this year than Pujols. Imagine if the Cards bullpen hadn't blown 30 plus saves.Barring record breaking numbers, the MVP award goes to a player who's on a team that makes the playoffs.
Riiight. Players who suck for half a season and then get hot down the stretch are always more valuable than players who are consistently great all season. And what is Delgado's current batting average again?Such a ridiculous argument.Ghost Rider said:.......and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
Quicker than most his size? That doesn't mean squat. What are you saying...that he is the one of the fastest fat men in the league? Big deal. He still lacks speed. And, yes, he is somewhat of a defensive liability. His zone rating is better than I thought it was, but he does have the most errors among full-time first baseman in the NL. Meanwhile, Pujols is first across the board in the NL among first baseman.You must not watch the Phillies.Add in the fact that Howard is a lot quicker than most compared to him size-wise. Look at the triple he had the other night. Defensive liability? Like I said, you must not watch the Phillies, or baseball for that matter.the closest the cubs have is aramis ramirez or soto.Ghost Rider said:Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all. Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs. Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award. Phillies - Nope. Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
You must watch them too much. Your fan boy attitude has clouded your judgment.You must not watch the Phillies.
I love the stat geeks who think that April hitting is as important as Sept hitting.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
lol at Sportscenter watching dudes thinking Howard had a better season because he is ahead in HR and RBI... It is not really closeGhost Rider said:Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all. Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs. Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award. Phillies - Nope. Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
I am glad that some people here understand what the MVP actually is. If Pujols was not on the Cardinals, they wouldn't even be fighting for a playoff spot the last week of the season.No one has been more valuable to his team in the NL this year than Pujols. Imagine if the Cards bullpen hadn't blown 30 plus saves.
Wow quite a campaign you're running here. Claiming people who think Pujols should win over Howard don't watch baseball is a pretty vanilla and ignorant comment. Timely hitting does matter and Pujols hits better with RISP. Guess what that is?Stat geeks might not like it but in regards to awards..... HR's matter. Wins matter (in the Cy Young race). RBI's matter. Players who play for a playoff team matter. Timely hitting matters. Stretch run hitting matters. To think otherwise is just dumb.
I love people who think a guy hitting .245 should be MVP of the entire league.I love the stat geeks who think that April hitting is as important as Sept hitting.
Yes, but Brad Lidge has been a stud for the Phillies this year, while the Cardinals bullpen has blown over 30 saves, so that somehow makes Howard more valuable than Pujols.
And to think i thought R, HR, RBI, .BA were the most important important categories.
Shtick?Pujols sure is cold during the most important time of the baseball calendar. Batting .095 the last 7 days...
Defensive liability? Like I said, you must not watch the Phillies, or baseball for that matter.the closest the cubs have is aramis ramirez or soto.Ghost Rider said:Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all. Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs. Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award. Phillies - Nope. Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
I agree that Pujols is having the better year & should win this.. The main reason I made the bet with my brother is simply that the Cards won't make the playoffs which will hurt his chances IMO. I then tried to find somebody to give it to other than Pujols & came up with Howard based merely on his HR's & RBI's.. etc. I will add that I haven't watched as much of the NL as the AL so I'm letting the experts argue the points.. Funny thing I just looked up.. Since 1994 only once in the AL has the MVP been on a team that hasn't made the playoffs.. Since 1994 in the NL it's happend 6 or 7 times.. Most are Bonds but I did find it odd that it has happened much more in the NL.. which lends me to believe Pujols will in fact win it..With RISP, Albert Pujols has a .509 OBP. Howard, .436. Howard has also had a startling 61 more at-bats with runners in scoring position, than Pujols has. I cannot imagine anybody voting for Howard over Pujols, but I imagine it will happen.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
I never claimed that Howard should win over Pujols. My statement at the beginning of the thread is what my expectations as to what the MVP should be. As far as watching baseball goes, I understand that OBP and other measures of measuring a players success are coming to the forefront....but one who thinks that Howard doesn't have a chance obviously places to much emphasis on those measures at the expense of HR and RBI (something that still weighs in the mind of the fan and the voter).Doctor Detroit said:Wow quite a campaign you're running here. Claiming people who think Pujols should win over Howard don't watch baseball is a pretty vanilla and ignorant comment. Timely hitting does matter and Pujols hits better with RISP. Guess what that is?Stat geeks might not like it but in regards to awards..... HR's matter. Wins matter (in the Cy Young race). RBI's matter. Players who play for a playoff team matter. Timely hitting matters. Stretch run hitting matters. To think otherwise is just dumb.
I know. Amazing how wrong you could be all these years.awesomeness said:And to think i thought R, HR, RBI, .BA were the most important important categories.
That column is dead on.
Wright's September stats325/384/623 (1007 OPS)Howard shouldn't finish in the top 5. There is more to being a valuable player than just hitting home runs. He is a defensive liability, he strikes out a ton, his batting average sucks, and he has no speed at all.
Pujols should win, but I am not sure if he will. The Cardinals were in contention the entire season, so that'll work to his benefit, as will the fact that there really isn't a standout MVP candidate on the teams likely to make the playoffs.
Cubs - Have been the best overall team, but they really do not have any one player who has stood out enough to win the MVP award.
Phillies - Nope.
Dodgers - Nope (and I laugh at anyone who says Ramirez)
Mets - Nope (David Wright has really struggled down the stretch, and Delgado sucked for the first half of the season).
Do wins count for more in September than they do in April? I always thought you got credit for just one no matter what month it came in.I love the stat geeks who think that April hitting is as important as Sept hitting.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
If Howard had hit like this all season, the Phillies might not even have to worry about September.Also, for some stat geek numbers that factor in clutch play, look at WPA, where Howard is way behind the other candidates.Do wins count for more in September than they do in April? I always thought you got credit for just one no matter what month it came in.I love the stat geeks who think that April hitting is as important as Sept hitting.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
And as ridiculous as it is that Howard got any first place votes, it is ten times worse that 2 complete idiots managed to put Pujols 3rd on their ballot.Baseball writers are dumb.Howard still got way more votes than he should have, but Pujols won the MVP award. As he should have.
Holy ####. They are dumber than I thought.Apparently Pujols got 18 first place votes, 10 second place, 2 third, 1 fourth, and 1 seventh!!And as ridiculous as it is that Howard got any first place votes, it is ten times worse that 2 complete idiots managed to put Pujols 3rd on their ballot.Baseball writers are dumb.Howard still got way more votes than he should have, but Pujols won the MVP award. As he should have.
He must work for the Astros organization.Do wins count for more in September than they do in April? I always thought you got credit for just one no matter what month it came in.I love the stat geeks who think that April hitting is as important as Sept hitting.Ryan Howard. Timely hitting is priceless.
Baseball writers are dumb.