How so? He was 49-59-1 with ONE playoff appearance.I actually think Turner got the shaft in Washington.
Well, yeah, it won't be his last chance if he wins the next six Super Bowls.But if he fails to make the playoffs in 2007 and 2008, I think he'll be done as a head coach for good.With Turner going to SD, it all but insures his name in the hat for future HC jobs, unless he transforms SD into a bad team in his first year.
exactamundoYes and Yes.
Yeah, but how is his career in SD going to end? With a winning streak?He'll get little credit for doing anything with the current players, barring a 6 or 7 year career there with steady wins, and a championship along the way. If that happens, and he quits for another job, then I suppose SD wouldn't be his last chance.But that is unlikely. Chances are, he'll get fired from SD somewhere along the line. I doubt he'll get fired for doing a "good" job.Do I think it's his last chance? Yeah. And I think he shouldn't have gotten this chance.The reason I believe this will NOT be the last HC job for Turner is because he's in a perfect situation to win games because SD is so good. Whether or not he takes them deep in the playoffs is irrelevant, because his coaching ability will be masked by the fact that SD was a good team to begin with. With Turner going to SD, it all but insures his name in the hat for future HC jobs, unless he transforms SD into a bad team in his first year.
I agree with that. The best coach for SD currently, just got fired, not that he was great (we all know Marty's playoff record), but he certainly was a better choice than Norv. The one that should have received the ax was the GM. On the other hand, he was the one who bought the groceries, so what the hell do I know? Probably not much.And I think he shouldn't have gotten this chance.
When you want to hire your brother as the DC when your brother has had little record of success over the guy the GM wants (Ted Cottrell) who has a much better resume, and you refuse to take no for an answer, you get FIRED.Schottenheimer got what he deserved and wanted. When he didnt sign the extension, you knew he wasnt going to go quietly as a lame duck. He was going to make a my way or the highway stance at some point. He just did it much earlier than anyone thought.JohnnyU said:I agree with that. The best coach for SD currently, just got fired, not that he was great (we all know Marty's playoff record), but he certainly was a better choice than Norv. The one that should have received the ax was the GM. On the other hand, he was the one who bought the groceries, so what the hell do I know? Probably not much.massraider said:And I think he shouldn't have gotten this chance.
Then the powers that be weren't using their noggins.The reason Smith and Spanos were forced into this move, is because they badly misjudged how this offseason was going to play out. They thought that Smith could deal with Marty for another year, and probably underestimated Cam and Wade's chance for getting new jobs.I have no problem with firing Marty. If you have to choose Smith or Marty, I'd choose the quality personnel guy every day. Doesn't matter if he's a ####. Norv is a swell guy, doesn't make him a better coach.There's no way anyone could ever convince me that if Marty got fired the day after the season ended, that Norv Turner would currently be the head coach. Marty may have deserved to go, but the way it happened, and the resulting events are all on Smith and Spanos.When you want to hire your brother as the DC when your brother has had little record of success over the guy the GM wants (Ted Cottrell) who has a much better resume, and you refuse to take no for an answer, you get FIRED.Schottenheimer got what he deserved and wanted. When he didnt sign the extension, you knew he wasnt going to go quietly as a lame duck. He was going to make a my way or the highway stance at some point. He just did it much earlier than anyone thought.JohnnyU said:I agree with that. The best coach for SD currently, just got fired, not that he was great (we all know Marty's playoff record), but he certainly was a better choice than Norv. The one that should have received the ax was the GM. On the other hand, he was the one who bought the groceries, so what the hell do I know? Probably not much.massraider said:And I think he shouldn't have gotten this chance.
Balco said:I actually think Turner got the shaft in Washington.
Hard to argue that any coach given seven years was shafted. That said,Balco said:I actually think Turner got the shaft in Washington.(if by "shaft" you mean an undeserved 2nd chance due to a changing ownership situation that prevented his firing after the 1998 season)
You're not implying that 'Skins fans should prefer Turner over Gibbs, are you?Hard to argue that any coach given seven years was shafted. That said,Balco said:I actually think Turner got the shaft in Washington.(if by "shaft" you mean an undeserved 2nd chance due to a changing ownership situation that prevented his firing after the 1998 season)
Washington Redskins under Turner: 49-59-1 (.450 winning percentage)
Washington Redskins since Turner: 42-57 (.424 winning percentage)
Washington Redskins under Joe Gibbs [current tenure]: 21-27 (.4375 winning percentage)
Patterson was taking a leap no matter what. Is patterson a deep ball threat though? he seems more like a catch it at the LOS and make plays type. Norv likes to throw it longNorv is back.
Anyone want to discuss potential implications for:
Peterson
Patterson
Rudolph
Jennings
I realize the QB needs to be determined, but I'm thinking no matter what Patterson will be taking a big leap forward.
Like Rudolph going into next year, especially if they upgrade at QB. Look at what Jordan Cameron was doing with a decent QB earlier this season. No reason Rudolph couldn't do something similar.Norv is back.
Anyone want to discuss potential implications for:
Peterson
Patterson
Rudolph
Jennings
I realize the QB needs to be determined, but I'm thinking no matter what Patterson will be taking a big leap forward.
no dome for 2 yearsShould be interesting... Norv's an Air Coryell guy... vertical passing game. Not sure they have that QB on the roster, and new regimes generally mean new QBs anyway.
That's honeslty a pretty good situation for a QB to enter in my mind. Peterson to lean on, several weapons in the passing game, and a dome to play your home games.
I've never really liked the air coryell term with norv. To me he was too far of a "descendant" and the offense had enough different that it really wasn't "Air Coryell" but more like something a wise coach would do during the evolution of the league like this works, that works, here's my system.Should be interesting... Norv's an Air Coryell guy... vertical passing game. Not sure they have that QB on the roster, and new regimes generally mean new QBs anyway.
That's honeslty a pretty good situation for a QB to enter in my mind. Peterson to lean on, several weapons in the passing game, and a dome to play your home games.
I didn't realize that.no dome for 2 yearsShould be interesting... Norv's an Air Coryell guy... vertical passing game. Not sure they have that QB on the roster, and new regimes generally mean new QBs anyway.
That's honeslty a pretty good situation for a QB to enter in my mind. Peterson to lean on, several weapons in the passing game, and a dome to play your home games.
yes the greatest show on turf was basically Air Coryell, I saw Kellen Winslow Sr. on a show once basically saying he walk on the field for the Rams and run the routes and understand everything they were doing.I've never really liked the air coryell term with norv. To me he was too far of a "descendant" and the offense had enough different that it really wasn't "Air Coryell" but more like something a wise coach would do during the evolution of the league like this works, that works, here's my system.Should be interesting... Norv's an Air Coryell guy... vertical passing game. Not sure they have that QB on the roster, and new regimes generally mean new QBs anyway.
That's honeslty a pretty good situation for a QB to enter in my mind. Peterson to lean on, several weapons in the passing game, and a dome to play your home games.
Vermeil or Martz...that seemed more Coryell like to me.
What do you think?
No, he's not really a deep threat. He can get open but his hands are nothing special. He had a drop or two per game once they started trying to get him the ball more. He's definitely a guy you want to get it to in the short or intermediate zone with a chance to run after the catch.Patterson was taking a leap no matter what. Is patterson a deep ball threat though? he seems more like a catch it at the LOS and make plays type. Norv likes to throw it longNorv is back.
Anyone want to discuss potential implications for:
Peterson
Patterson
Rudolph
Jennings
I realize the QB needs to be determined, but I'm thinking no matter what Patterson will be taking a big leap forward.
I want to see what they do at QB, Norv hasnt exactly had to deal with Rookie QBs much from what I recall
Really kind of the first 3-wheel offense I can remember. He was a mixed bag as a coach, I don't think whatever is going on in Minny is his fault either.Norv Turner is a fantasy football god as far as I'm concerned. I had LT2 twice in his heyday, and Nor luv was the reason he was a monster. He'all always have a special place in my heart.![]()
I agree - you lose AP and your starting QB that early, it's inevitable that the team's gonna take a downturn - I'm not sure if Norvell retired or was "retired"....maybe he sensed he'd be the scapegoat, or maybe he just tried to do what he wanted with the existing offense and couldn't.Really kind of the first 3-wheel offense I can remember. He was a mixed bag as a coach, I don't think whatever is going on in Minny is his fault either.