The Mechanic
Footballguy
Would I be presumed correct to say the Walters is the starer for week 4 and beyond IF he can move the OFF.
Walter will not move the offense, and Brooks will start whenever he's healthy.Would I be presumed correct to say the Walters is the starer for week 4 and beyond IF he can move the OFF.
Thanks Skinsfan....Does this Walter have a long range arm or will he tossing the underneath type.?Edit 4 spellingSince nobody wanted to answer your question, it's Walter in week 4.If he plays well, he'll keep the job.
Really..?It doesn't matter.
No, it doesn't. All the QB's currently on that team are incompetent behind that line and in that offense. They are gonna get pummeled and be turnover machines.Really..?It doesn't matter.![]()
No, it doesn't. All the QB's currently on that team are incompetent behind that line and in that offense. They are gonna get pummeled and be turnover machines.Really..?It doesn't matter.![]()
Brooks looked decent week 1, but ran for his life a lot. Fix the damn line before doing anything. At least Brooks can run. He'll need to.Walter will not move the offense, and Brooks will start whenever he's healthy.Would I be presumed correct to say the Walters is the starer for week 4 and beyond IF he can move the OFF.
He did?Brooks looked decent week 1
YES, 0 INT behind that line is impresive. Did you watch the game?He did?Brooks looked decent week 1![]()
Did you? Dude was 6-14 for 68 yards, got sacked SEVEN times in 3 quarters. How in the HECK is that looking 'decent'?YES, 0 INT behind that line is impresive. Did you watch the game?He did?Brooks looked decent week 1![]()
Simply because that was the worst Ofensive line play I have seen in years even worse than the ofensive line play I have seen from HOU, the few HOU games I have seen. He did not exactly have 2-3 seconds to wait for his WR to go down field to make a pass longer than a few yards. He was not exactly given the best game plan out there also. I simply do not think that to many QBs would have done much better. In addition to many people on this board are making too many assumptions about individual players after 1-2 games with just looking at the stats of one 1-2 games. Prior to last year Brooks had some pretty good seasons, and I do not believe that you could put NO last year's performance on his shoulders.Did you? Dude was 6-14 for 68 yards, got sacked SEVEN times in 3 quarters. How in the HECK is that looking 'decent'?YES, 0 INT behind that line is impresive. Did you watch the game?He did?Brooks looked decent week 1![]()
i see this happening as well. not that he looked good, but walter seems to be a much better option than brooks. aaron dances way too much, walter should be more solid in the pocket. LOL.....now i made myself laugh, like the raiders oline can form a pocket.I believe Walter is the starter the rest of the season. Art knows they're not going to make the playoffs, might as well try and see what they have in Walter.
it was reported that jesus was seen on the practice field, saying that he had been throwing it around with some cherubs & should be ready to go week 4.For Art Shell's sake, I hope the answer is Jesus.But I think it will be Walters also.
Jeff George didn't make the team in real life so the Raiders will move George Blanda to the starter in week 5.I hope the person who started this discussion doesn't need to start the Raiders starting QB.Week 4: Andrew WalterWeek 5: Jeff GeorgeWeek 6: Rich GannonWeek 7: Jim PlunkettWeek 8: Ken StablerWeek 9: George BlandaWeek 10-17: TBA per weekly walk on tryouts.................
Week 4: Andrew Walter
Week 5: Jeff George
Week 6: Rich Gannon
Week 7: Jim Plunkett
Week 8: Ken Stabler
Week 9: George Blanda
Week 10-17: RAIDERNATION
Most QBs: "Blue, 32! Blue, 32! Sixteen, 65! Hut, hut, hut!"Raider QBs: "Red rover! Red rover! Send the D-line on over!"
Well No, I have Warner & Brunell the SniperJeff George didn't make the team in real life so the Raiders will move George Blanda to the starter in week 5.I hope the person who started this discussion doesn't need to start the Raiders starting QB.Week 4: Andrew WalterWeek 5: Jeff GeorgeWeek 6: Rich GannonWeek 7: Jim PlunkettWeek 8: Ken StablerWeek 9: George BlandaWeek 10-17: TBA per weekly walk on tryouts.................![]()
You forgot Rick Mirer :headslap:Week 4: Andrew WalterWeek 5: Jeff GeorgeWeek 6: Rich GannonWeek 7: Jim PlunkettWeek 8: Ken StablerWeek 9: George BlandaWeek 10-17: TBA per weekly walk on tryouts.................
Fixed.The way the Raiders are going, Walter could come out and tear it up, lead the Raiders to .500 or better, only to get benched when Brooks returns.
conventional wisdom common sense does not apply