What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Obama: Worst President Ever? (1 Viewer)

Is Obama the worst president ever?

  • Yes

    Votes: 185 33.6%
  • No

    Votes: 365 66.4%

  • Total voters
    550
Status
Not open for further replies.
Think of it this way: TGunz, belongs to the  "Scientology of the far left" (so to speak).  You aren't going to get him to change his mind.  You aren't going to get him to think critically.  You aren't going to get him to listen to other viewpoints.  You aren't going to get him to understand anyone else's position but those given to him by his leaders.  You aren't going to get him to realize that his positions don't make sense and simply cannot and do not work in the real world.  He lives in the Utopia that is created by his masters' talking points and he exists in no other reality.  He simply would not be able to function if he had to live in truth and facts.

I understand your frustration, but most everyone here knows he's a shill for the far left and most, if not all, of his posts aren't based in reality, fact or truth.

The only thing I don't understand is why he doesn't move to a place more to his views, like Venezuala or Cuba or any other number of failed Socialist states.
TGunz is a lot of things, but "far left" isn't one of them....that requires standing FOR something and blazing a new path.  He's good with the mediocrity of the hear and now as long as his guy is at the wheel.

 
The only think that will keep Obama from being the worst president ever, is Hillary Clinton.
Anyone who doesn't put GWB at the top of a worst presidents list has an incorrect list.  His entire administration from the deficit, starting wars, the economy, American citizens loss of privacy, etc. etc etc. was a freaking train wreck.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fourth Islamic terrorist attack on US soil under his watch (not including Benghazi, Chattanooga, and other attacks with only 1-2 victims)

Worst terrorist attack since 9/11.

Deadliest shooting in US history. 

50 dead Hispanics and/or gays.

You could tell from his tone during the address that he realizes what a failure he has been in keeping Americans safe. 
What does the ethnicity or the sexual orientation of the victims have to do with whatever point you are making?

 
Fourth Islamic terrorist attack on US soil under his watch (not including Benghazi, Chattanooga, and other attacks with only 1-2 victims)

Worst terrorist attack since 9/11.

Deadliest shooting in US history. 

50 dead Hispanics and/or gays.

You could tell from his tone during the address that he realizes what a failure he has been in keeping Americans safe. 




 
Yeah, I'm sure tougher gun laws, including banning automatic weapons wouldn't have made a difference. Just blame Obama, it fits into your narrative.

 
Now instead of Obama,  Hilary,  and their cronies changing their tone and saying maybe they miscalculated the effects of radical Islam,  they double down and reinforce their agendas on stricter gun control while avoiding the term "Islam" altogether.  Nice.  

Fortunately,  only a few remaining suckers are falling for the argument of guns being the only problem.  You've lost half the country because you're a coward,  Obama. 

 
Libs crack me up with this gun control talk.  

Gun control too lax.  Need to make it stricter.  I agree with that.   But go try making it stricter and then marking someone of suspicion and watch all hell break loose screaming racism and bigotry.  Can't have it both ways,  libs. You want stricter gun laws but can't deal with the side effects of it.   Personally,  I'm completely fine with stricter gun laws.  Deep down,  the libs won't be able to stomach it.  All they will do is whine racism and bigotry when people start getting marked who they think shouldn't.  It's how this stuff always goes.  Then they'll just go blame something else. 

 
Or never blame him for anything and praise every action he takes.  Fits your narrative. 
Actually, find one post where I've ever praised him...? He deserves blame on other issues, but I don't see how you can pin this on him. The gunman was a US citizen from birth. Keeping Muslims out wouldn't have helped in the slightest.  'Murica! #### yeah!

 
Libs crack me up with this gun control talk.  

Gun control too lax.  Need to make it stricter.  I agree with that.   But go try making it stricter and then marking someone of suspicion and watch all hell break loose screaming racism and bigotry.  Can't have it both ways,  libs. You want stricter gun laws but can't deal with the side effects of it.   Personally,  I'm completely fine with stricter gun laws.  Deep down,  the libs won't be able to stomach it.  All they will do is whine racism and bigotry when people start getting marked who they think shouldn't.  It's how this stuff always goes.  Then they'll just go blame something else. 
I mean I suppose to the extent that liberals would expect that laws be applied without racial bias or profiling, which doesn't seem like a particularly unreasonable expectation.

 
I have a hard time believing any of you are this ####### stupid.  But stranger things have happened on the Internet, I suppose. 

 
Obama did not say we are to blame, but he did inappropriately (IMO) refer to lack of tolerance for LBGTs. It was not the time to do so. It was a time to express sorrow and unite Amercians.

 
Obama did not say we are to blame, but he did inappropriately (IMO) refer to lack of tolerance for LBGTs. It was not the time to do so. It was a time to express sorrow and unite Amercians.
Expressing a lack of tolerance for other Americans is a good way to unite us. 

 
Expressing a lack of tolerance for other Americans is a good way to unite us. 
Actually no, it isn't. Asking all Americans to have compassion (or pray for) for those killed and injured would be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now instead of Obama,  Hilary,  and their cronies changing their tone and saying maybe they miscalculated the effects of radical Islam,  they double down and reinforce their agendas on stricter gun control while avoiding the term "Islam" altogether.  Nice.  

Fortunately,  only a few remaining suckers are falling for the argument of guns being the only problem.  You've lost half the country because you're a coward,  Obama. 
Thanks for reminding me that radical Islam invented terrorism.  Now I hate Obama too!

 
Good point. Prayer and compassion seem to be winning the war on terror. 
You are such an ###. This is about people dying first and foremost. We have plenty of time to plan a counter-attack, though in this case, there doesn't appear to be a target does there?

 
Interesting.  A lot of posters in this thread seem to disagree.  Maybe they'll come back and clarify.
There was an implication when he said we should be more tolerant, but he was talking about being tolerant of gays, not of Islam.

 
Interesting.  A lot of posters in this thread seem to disagree.  Maybe they'll come back and clarify.
Also posted in the other thread on the massacre:

I was misled by the headline.  I take full responsibility for assuming the headline was accurate and not the opinion of the author.

 
You are such an ###. This is about people dying first and foremost. We have plenty of time to plan a counter-attack, though in this case, there doesn't appear to be a target does there?
Please make sure you call me out when we move past "compassion" and "prayer" and get to solving the problem. I'm sure Wayne Lapierre is ready with some constructive solutions. 

 
I find the vitriol in here so distasteful and I just don't get it. Obama has been a tireless fighter against terrorism his entire term in office, and I would argue he's been very effective- perhaps the most effective President on this issue we've ever had. 

 
I'm not his biggest supporter having only voted for him once but history will tell a much different story to how good he has been. Many people seem to not see or have any indication about the big picture of what the world is. I just see too many Americans wanting to be isolationists which does not work out all that well. 

 
I just read the transcript of the speech.  I am finding it hard to see what all the fuss is about.  He called it an act of terrorism and said the shooter was filled with hate.   He said that we will defend our country and take action against those that threaten us.  

He also said that we are still learning all the facts and that the precise motivations of the killer are still under investigation.   Is the problem because he didn't say the shooter was a Muslim terrorist?  

 
I just read the transcript of the speech. I am finding it hard to see what all the fuss is about. He called it an act of terrorism and said the shooter was filled with hate. He said that we will defend our country and take action against those that threaten us.

He also said that we are still learning all the facts and that the precise motivations of the killer are still under investigation. Is the problem because he didn't say the shooter was a Muslim terrorist?
The problem is that the speaker has a (D) after his name, which means that whatever he said is not what he should have said.

 
I just read the transcript of the speech.  I am finding it hard to see what all the fuss is about.  He called it an act of terrorism and said the shooter was filled with hate.   He said that we will defend our country and take action against those that threaten us.  

He also said that we are still learning all the facts and that the precise motivations of the killer are still under investigation.   Is the problem because he didn't say the shooter was a Muslim terrorist?  
He never said he'd build a wall, deport millions of people who had nothing to do with the act or call anyone a childish name.  Obviously, the man has no idea of how to lead.  

 
I just read the transcript of the speech.  I am finding it hard to see what all the fuss is about.  He called it an act of terrorism and said the shooter was filled with hate.   He said that we will defend our country and take action against those that threaten us.  

He also said that we are still learning all the facts and that the precise motivations of the killer are still under investigation.   Is the problem because he didn't say the shooter was a Muslim terrorist?  
Quite the opposite for me GB, I lost respect for Obama today because he did say this was somehow related to ISIL, he uses that term where most say ISIS but whatever. He opened with that and talked about the LGBT community a little but not enough IMO. 

We just passed all these laws for gay rights, this is the exact reason and even though the guy is DEAD we should still be talking on the media how this crime would be handled if the individual had been taken alive. 

It was a hate crime first IMO, the ISIS stuff was just a brand to hide behind. He was American born although that father seems questionable in the mental wellness category so it might have had a slight impact on the offspring. 

 
Quite the opposite for me GB, I lost respect for Obama today because he did say this was somehow related to ISIL, he uses that term where most say ISIS but whatever. He opened with that and talked about the LGBT community a little but not enough IMO. 

We just passed all these laws for gay rights, this is the exact reason and even though the guy is DEAD we should still be talking on the media how this crime would be handled if the individual had been taken alive. 

It was a hate crime first IMO, the ISIS stuff was just a brand to hide behind. He was American born although that father seems questionable in the mental wellness category so it might have had a slight impact on the offspring. 
I did not see that in the transcript.  Did he say this afterwards, MoP?      I went out at lunchtime for a quick bite and one of the local conservative talk show host was complaining that Obama called it a hate crime and refused to identify the shooter as an Islamist terrorist.

 
I did not see that in the transcript.  Did he say this afterwards, MoP?      I went out at lunchtime for a quick bite and one of the local conservative talk show host was complaining that Obama called it a hate crime and refused to identify the shooter as an Islamist terrorist.
Link

Maybe I heard ISIL and started getting upset, he does seem to think it is more like the San Bernadino incident. If that means someone who didn't adapt well to American society even if American born, and thru mental illness found a brand like ISIS to latch on to and work as a funnel for their hate...if that's what he actually means then perhaps GB I might stand corrected. I feel like this is gay hate/unhappy co-worker type thing than anything ISIS did and it angers me they are taking credit for this.

1st vid at time I linked it

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Link

Maybe I heard ISIL and started getting upset, he does seem to think it is more like the San Bernadino incident. If that means someone who didn't adapt well to American society even if American born, and thru mental illness found a brand like ISIS to latch on to and work as a funnel for their hate...if that's what he actually means then perhaps GB I might stand corrected. I feel like this is gay hate/unhappy co-worker type thing than anything ISIS did and it angers me they are taking credit for this.

1st vid at time I linked it
Thanks for the link.   I think Obama said the right things here, especially when he says that at the moment we still don't know for sure.

 
I find the vitriol in here so distasteful and I just don't get it. Obama has been a tireless fighter against terrorism his entire term in office, and I would argue he's been very effective- perhaps the most effective President on this issue we've ever had. 
It's not that hard to get.  Obama is a democrat.   He could cure cancer and certain people would complain that he wasn't wearing an American flag pin on his lapel when he made the announcement.

 
It's not that hard to get.  Obama is a democrat.   He could cure cancer and certain people would complain that he wasn't wearing an American flag pin on his lapel when he made the announcement.
Or, conversely, we could just praise him to the heavens day in and day out irregardless.

 
Don't Noonan said:
Obama is such a disappointment.   He can't even identify the enemy.  Well, unless he is attacking the conservative base.
He can't?  Why do you think he can't identify them?  Because he does not put certain words for you in public speeches?

That seems like a pretty naive stance.

 
Ministry of Pain said:
Quite the opposite for me GB, I lost respect for Obama today because he did say this was somehow related to ISIL, he uses that term where most say ISIS but whatever. He opened with that and talked about the LGBT community a little but not enough IMO. 

We just passed all these laws for gay rights, this is the exact reason and even though the guy is DEAD we should still be talking on the media how this crime would be handled if the individual had been taken alive. 

It was a hate crime first IMO, the ISIS stuff was just a brand to hide behind. He was American born although that father seems questionable in the mental wellness category so it might have had a slight impact on the offspring. 
I think he stated the guy had pledged allegiance to ISIL (among other things he may have said to the 911 dispatcher).

I will commend you though...even if you don't read this.  You seemed to be one of the more level headed people over the last couple of days on this.

 
Or, conversely, we could just praise him to the heavens day in and day out irregardless.
Who is doing that?  

I have no problem with people that criticize the president (or any pol) but at least get the facts straight and/or don't spin it until it fits your narrative.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top