Bob Magaw
Footballguy
DJ is consensus best LB in the class of 2005... yet he plays OLB, and worse, may get saddled with SLB role if bell plays WLB & mitchell stays in the middle. there are rare SLB that are productive (marcus washington last season), but WLB would have been the preferred spot.ruud & thurman appear to be the top MLB choices... traditionally the position of choice to maximize scoring (again, there are stud WLBs like brooks, briggs & witherspoon... but the very top tend to come from MLB/ILB)... and since they can be gotten a round or two later than DJ... and there may be a drop-off after these two (crowder could easily be as good or better, but tends to go a little later)... getting the choice right with ruud & thurman could make some drafts & have long term repercussions for your dynasty squad.it may appear ruud has a clearer path to starting. will compete for SLB with neece & gooch, even if he doesn't start in '05, he is expected to step into quarles MLB slot no later than '06. while maybe not the physical specimen of the other DJ & vilma from class of '04 (didn't run a 4.5), he is plenty athletic, has functional playing speed, is smart (30 wonderlic?), and has great bloodlines... his dad was a first rounder with the bills (crowder's father randy was a bronco i think).i was talking to free-lance saints scout mike detwillier the other day, & he talked about how his mentors in the scouting business told him the first thing to look for with LBs was their first step... in the obvious quickness connotation, but also relates to instincts and is the first step in the right direction.imo, both ruud & thurman have great instincts & a great first step.we were faced with this choice tonight... i saw it coming a few times from afar but ended up not having to make it in other ongoing drafts... until tonight.this isn't a who should we pick thread... we decided on thurman, but i will share our thought process & i am interested in the board's thoughts on who they see as the better dynasty choice (if it wasn't obvious, this has more important dynasty than redraft implications).there is some confusion about where & when thurman will play. pollack is being handed the SLB position... lewis has said landon johnson is the MLB... and simmons is stil playing at a high level at WLB.but thurman seems so talented, we gambled on greatness (we have mike peterson, farrior, vilma & witherspoon as starters, tino & daryl smith as depth so can afford to be patient). the bengals were raving about him in the recent mini-camp, & it wouldn't be a surprise if he wins the starting MLB job b4 the season starts. some scouts think he is a more natural WLB... i don't agree... i think he has the athleticism to make the switch, & even do quite well, but he looks like a natural born MLB. he is the same approx. size as vilma (6'0" 230), & he held up fine... DROY.so possibly he emerges at WLB, maybe in '06 (don't have simmons contract staus at hand), which wouldn't be such a bad thing... but i think landon johnson ends up there. when the CIN coach worked him out he was crestfallen as it didn't look like there was any way they would get him. draft slot not conducive to it, as first was too high & second seemed to far away where he would be long gone. but in part due to off field concerns, he in fact dropped to them in second. for a team that still has needs (not 1-2 players from super bowl... probably... i thought same of CAR in '03 :^), a second seems like a high pick for a guy to languish on bench for a few season. there are some compelling reasons to think he will see field early & often. the team was 26th in run defense in '04, and has to face jamal lewis, rudi & the bus/staley six times a season.to my eye, thurman stood out as the more explosive athlete... he seems to play the game faster. not to say ruud is slow (he isn't)... but thurman's speed, power and agility roar off the screen in highlights.
Last edited by a moderator: