What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Offical: I sat Mcnabb (1 Viewer)

How about the I sat Curtis and lost because of it thread.
:ptts: - Curtis was worth 57.5 in our league and as I sat there this morning I thought surely he won't be worth more than Wayne or Marshall.... :ptts: I think I need Keith Bulluck to outscore Colston tomorrow night...maybe Bulluck will force 3 fumbles out of Colston so I can finally get my first win....Before anyone gives me the shirt! :thumbup:
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:thumbdown: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:thumbdown: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :unsure:
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:( not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :thumbup:
yeah, so what's your point?
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:towelwave: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :hifive:
yeah, so what's your point?
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ... :unsure: :unsure:
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:towelwave: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :hifive:
yeah, so what's your point?
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ... :unsure: :unsure:
No kiddin'. Why open this thread when there's a bragging thread as well?
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:towelwave: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :hifive:
yeah, so what's your point?
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ... :suds: :unsure:
nice! original! gotta love that. :unsure: In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:goodposting: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :P
yeah, so what's your point?
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ... :ptts: :pickle:
nice! original! gotta love that. :rolleyes: In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.
Thanks, Captain obvious!!! :thumbup:
 
Let me get this straight. You sat McNabb against the worst defense in the league.You have alot to learn.
:goodposting: not much else to add here
C'mon, give him some slack... McNabb has looked horrible the last two games -- he was immobile and couldn't hit a 10 feet target if he tried... Hasselbeck on the other hand, faced the Cincy D, who gave up 50+ points to the Brownies the week before. I don't think it was a stretch to sit McNabb.
... uhhhh ... we didn't start the thread ... he did :P
yeah, so what's your point?
SIMPLE ENOUGH, slats ... :ptts: :pickle:
nice! original! gotta love that. :rolleyes: In any event, those who sat McNabb for Hasselbeck lost points of course, but overall, the difference wasn't a back breaker between the two. Now if you started Bulger or the like instead of McNabb, I bet you lost.
Thanks, Captain obvious!!! :thumbup:
this just keeps getting better!keep it comin'!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top