Concept Coop
Footballguy
I think George Bush has something to say to those still paying top dollar for Josh Gordon.
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, some fools will still give up multiple 1sts for you."I think George Bush has something to say to those still paying top dollar for Josh Gordon.
Pardon my jest.I'm the one getting Gordon, I've giving a lot for a huge risk, but believe it, my team is stacked enough to make this deal and not be put into much of a hole.
The 1 and only reason I want Gordon so badly is Manziel. I have a feeling, even if it's next year, that combo will set the NFL on fire.
You should offer it. I'd take Floyd easily as wellI'd take Floyd all day. In fact, this is making me want to offer 1.5 for Floyd!12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR - TE - FL
- Team A gave up Cooks, Brandin NOS WR
- Team B gave up Floyd, Michael ARI WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 3.11 (Derek Carr, QB)
typical rookie over-hype.I think I'd rather have Floyd, etc. than Cooks. I like Cooks but he seems like option 3/4 in that offense where Floyd will be #2 with the possibility of being #1 if the reports out of Arizona are true.12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR - TE - FL
- Team A gave up Cooks, Brandin NOS WR
- Team B gave up Floyd, Michael ARI WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 3.11 (Derek Carr, QB)
typical rookie over-hype.I think I'd rather have Floyd, etc. than Cooks. I like Cooks but he seems like option 3/4 in that offense where Floyd will be #2 with the possibility of being #1 if the reports out of Arizona are true.12 team ppr QB - 2 RB - 3 WR - TE - FL
- Team A gave up Cooks, Brandin NOS WR
- Team B gave up Floyd, Michael ARI WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 3.11 (Derek Carr, QB)
Which part?I don't know that I'd say that. Cooks was a legit 1st round talent in his own right, is in a better situation, and is four years younger. I think it's perfectly logical to like Cooks more than Floyd. I'd likely take Floyd, but I don't think this is an example of someone over-valuing rookies.typical rookie over-hype.
Agreed.A little too much for Mason imo. Also, although I like the roster for dynasty, I do think the 2015 1st will be an earlier one rather than later (for the same reasons indicated above).Graham is a bonafide stud of course, but Luck and Fitz are really just solid starters that are good for consistent points on teams that are very strong elsewhere. Luck, of course, could make that big turn at any moment to become an elite FF stud, but he hasn't yet. QB7 last year in PPG and a full 4+ ppg behind the truly elite QBs. Not really a difference maker to this point in his career.I see Luck, Fitz, Graham, and Cameron as pretty strong redraft options. It's more uncertain with TRich, Gerhart, and Eifert, but if 1-2 of those guys are decent then I don't see my team in the bottom 4-5 this next year.FreeBaGeL said:A reasonable trade since the 2015 1st will be dinged by the devy players being gone.EBF said:14 team w/ dev players. Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR/TE, 2 FLEX. .5/1/1.5 PPR for RB/WR/TE.
Gave:
1.08 dev pick
2015 1st
Got:
RB Tre Mason
Couple decent options in the devy pool. This is a draft-eligible devy only, so Gurley, Gordon, Yeldon, Davis, Karlos, etc. are all still out there. I didn't anticipate anyone falling to 1.08 that I'm very high on. Gambling that my first will be a late one next year. Had a horrible season in 2013, but have a pretty good roster of Luck/TRich/Gerhart/Fitzgerald/Graham/Cameron/Eifert/Ebron/Moncrief/etc.
I'm not sure I would be banking on that 2015 1st being a late one though. It's going to take several of those players having huge breakout years for that to happen.
Late 1sts actually had a lot of value in this league this year (Mason went 1.13 and Hill 1.14), but I don't think next year's pool is nearly as deep.
Cameron started really strong but faded big-time after the first month of the season. The return of Hoyer could propel him back into elite status (he was at his best with Hoyer in there), but it's far from a guarantee. The rest of the roster is a lot of hope. The fact that you're listing Moncrief, who is likely to be a part-time WR4 on his own team this year, and Ebron, a rookie at a position where rookies rarely every contribute majorly, amongst your guys competing for playing time is telling. To be fair though, I have never played in a 1.5 TE ppr league so that could be boosting those guy's value a lot higher than I'm giving them credit for.
Of course, this is fantasy football where preseason rankings mean little so that could very well be a championship team. It just looks to me like it would take a lot of good fortune and several major breakouts from those guys for that to be anywhere near a late pick, not something I'm sure I'd bank/gamble on when moving the pick.
That said, I think the trade itself is pretty fair. Even if the pick next year is early or mid it might not net a better prospect than Mason.
I can see doing that if your guy is one that may not make it to 1.13. 2.10 and a 2015 2nd is not a bad price to pay to ensure getting your guy imho.QRRWWWTF - 12Tm - PPR
Gave: 1.13, 2.10, 2nd(2015)
Got: 1.08
It's a lot to give up, considering the deep class, but my tier drop is at 9 and is big.
I feel you, I have it at #10 in that format - but would still do something similar. Especially if you think that will be a late 2nd next year.Winning IS Everything said:I can see doing that if your guy is one that may not make it to 1.13. 2.10 and a 2015 2nd is not a bad price to pay to ensure getting your guy imho.Concept Coop said:QRRWWWTF - 12Tm - PPR
Gave: 1.13, 2.10, 2nd(2015)
Got: 1.08
It's a lot to give up, considering the deep class, but my tier drop is at 9 and is big.
12tm PPR
TRich and Nicks
For
1.05
Give me the picks.12tm PPR
Gordon
For
1.04
Gronkowski side by a good bit. He's only a year and a half older then Ertz.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Longer career is what I meant by "younger". Team A is worried about Gronk's future.Gronkowski side by a good bit. He's only a year and a half older then Ertz.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Floyd has shown he can produce. To add anything to him to get a rookie who, while in a good situation, hasn't shown anything, seems like a typical "this rookie is awesome" line of thinking.Concept Coop said:I don't know that I'd say that. Cooks was a legit 1st round talent in his own right, is in a better situation, and is four years younger. I think it's perfectly logical to like Cooks more than Floyd. I'd likely take Floyd, but I don't think this is an example of someone over-valuing rookies.FUBAR said:typical rookie over-hype.
I tend to agree with this. The first one is close for me but I still like the pick.12tm PPR
TRich and Nicks
For
1.05Give me the picks.12tm PPR
Gordon
For
1.04
Oof! A start 2 TE league? This is as bad as it gets. I haven't done the math, but I feel safe suggesting that Gronk, PPG, is one of the best fantasy options of all time in this format.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
so this is AD's value? I've looking to deal him but I don't know if I'd add Eifert to this package.12 Team PPR, start 1 RB with 2 FLEX:
Team A Gave: Adrian Peterson, Tyler Eifert, Anquan Boldin, 2.04
Team B Gave: Alshon Jeffrey
In start one, I think this is a good deal for the new Alshon owner. In start 2x RB leagues--I'm with you. Not enough value for Peterson, unless you're rebuilding.so this is AD's value? I've looking to deal him but I don't know if I'd add Eifert to this package.12 Team PPR, start 1 RB with 2 FLEX:
Team A Gave: Adrian Peterson, Tyler Eifert, Anquan Boldin, 2.04
Team B Gave: Alshon Jeffrey
I was the team getting Jeffrey. I have Gronk at TE so I felt comfortable letting Eifert go (have Olsen too as a stop-gap). Start 1 RB is the reason why I gave up the haul, I have Foster, Vereen and Rice that can all chip in, and had Allen and Floyd as my WR.so this is AD's value? I've looking to deal him but I don't know if I'd add Eifert to this package.12 Team PPR, start 1 RB with 2 FLEX:
Team A Gave: Adrian Peterson, Tyler Eifert, Anquan Boldin, 2.04
Team B Gave: Alshon Jeffrey
Yeah this is horrid.Oof! A start 2 TE league? This is as bad as it gets. I haven't done the match, but I feel safe suggesting that Gronk, PPG, is one of the best fantasy options of all time in this format.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Gronk could tear his ACL again and still be worth more than this.
Unless Ertz turns into a stud and he gets ASJ or Amaro at 2.2.Yeah this is horrid.Oof! A start 2 TE league? This is as bad as it gets. I haven't done the match, but I feel safe suggesting that Gronk, PPG, is one of the best fantasy options of all time in this format.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Gronk could tear his ACL again and still be worth more than this.
I think it could be one of those trades that looks great/regrettable down the road. Depending on how those picks end up and how the rest of Gronk's career goes.Unless Ertz turns into a stud and he gets ASJ or Amaro at 2.2.Yeah this is horrid.Oof! A start 2 TE league? This is as bad as it gets. I haven't done the match, but I feel safe suggesting that Gronk, PPG, is one of the best fantasy options of all time in this format.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Gronk could tear his ACL again and still be worth more than this.
This is the type of deal that can turn out to be a major steal for either side.12tm PPR
TRich and Nicks
For
1.05
The former Gronk trade could technically have won this trade in hindsight in terms of production. BUT he left value on the table IMO. So give me Gronk.I think it could be one of those trades that looks great/regrettable down the road. Depending on how those picks end up and how the rest of Gronk's career goes.Unless Ertz turns into a stud and he gets ASJ or Amaro at 2.2.Yeah this is horrid.Oof! A start 2 TE league? This is as bad as it gets. I haven't done the match, but I feel safe suggesting that Gronk, PPG, is one of the best fantasy options of all time in this format.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
Gronk could tear his ACL again and still be worth more than this.
In case he wins the lottery and decides to retire?Longer career is what I meant by "younger". Team A is worried about Gronk's future.Gronkowski side by a good bit. He's only a year and a half older then Ertz.2TE 10 team .5ppr (all that matters), not involved
Team A trades: Gronkowski
Team B trades: Ertz, 2.2, 2015 2nd
Team A is trying to get a little younger
You could use potential hindsight to justify any trade. If the player drafted 2.07 ends up being better than the player drafted at 1.01--was it a good trade to send the 1.01 for the 2.07?Unless Ertz turns into a stud and he gets ASJ or Amaro at 2.2.
I would take:1QB-2RB-3WR-1TE-1Flex-K-D, 4pt passing tds, PPR (1.5ppr for TEs)
Team A receives: Terrence Williams, 2.2
Team B receives: DJax
Team C receives: Brandon Marshall, Rashad Jennings
Team D receives: DeMarco Murray, Colin Kaepernick, Justin Hunter, 1.12
Team E receives: Ertz, 3.4
Team B receives: Dwayne Allen, Danny Amedola, 2.2
Team C receives: Alfred Morris, Heath Miller, 3.9
Team F receives: Ladarius Green, 1.11
I can respect people being weery of Gronk's injury history, though I think much of it is unjustified panic (to sneak that in thereI think I like the Gronk side in that deal, but how highly you rate him is going to hinge on how fully you accept that:
).Is everyone from this league on these boards? Lol.Should also be noted that it's a 14 team leagueI would have held the picks. 2014 is a great year to re-build. 1.09 and 1.11 are the estimated equivalent of 1.04 and 1.06 in a normal year. 2015 COULD be a good year as well, but no guarantees.... Bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush...In a rebuild I had 1.03 / 1.06 / 1.09 / 1.11 / 1.13 (too many eggs in one basket for my taste)
Combo of 2 trades
gave 1.09 / 1.11 / 3.10 / 3.11 for 2 2015 1sts ( I expect 1 of them to be in the bottom half) 2nd & 3rd
Why get cute? Too many eggs in one basket is not a valid reason to make a deal. I'm sure that your trade partners were thrilled to get another pick in this stacked year!
I like the Gronk side for the reasons you mentioned. Unlikely Ertz will ever sniff what he's capable of.I can respect people being weery of Gronk's injury history, though I think much of it is unjustified panic (to sneak that in thereI think I like the Gronk side in that deal, but how highly you rate him is going to hinge on how fully you accept that:).
But in this format, a healthy Gronk is a top 2 player, worse case, by a wide margin (unless you start 4+ WRs). How could you jusftiy moving that potential for Ertz--an unproven/non-elite prospect--and a couple 2nd rounders?
Because he's not a "healthy Gronk" right now. Some people are higher on Ertz than you are, and it's not just "a couple of 2nd rounders"- it's the #12 overall in this deep draft class, and if it's the same team's pick next year, it's likely to be a fairly high one as well.I can respect people being weery of Gronk's injury history, though I think much of it is unjustified panic (to sneak that in thereI think I like the Gronk side in that deal, but how highly you rate him is going to hinge on how fully you accept that:).
But in this format, a healthy Gronk is a top 2 player, worse case, by a wide margin (unless you start 4+ WRs). How could you jusftiy moving that potential for Ertz--an unproven/non-elite prospect--and a couple 2nd rounders?
I see what you are saying too, and just disagree. In a 10 team league, it's all about studs. In a 10 team, start 2x TE league--especially so at TE.Because he's not a "healthy Gronk" right now. Some people are higher on Ertz than you are, and it's not just "a couple of 2nd rounders"- it's the #12 overall in this deep draft class, and if it's the same team's pick next year, it's likely to be a fairly high one as well.
I see what you're saying, but I just don't think it's as lopsided as you.
Likely the wrong thread for such questions, however:What can I get for D Thomas? Looking for Watkins/Evans plus picks
The #12 pick is worth more than say the #20 pick no matter how many teams are in the league- you're likely to get a better player there.I see what you are saying too, and just disagree. In a 10 team league, it's all about studs. In a 10 team, start 2x TE league--especially so at TE.Because he's not a "healthy Gronk" right now. Some people are higher on Ertz than you are, and it's not just "a couple of 2nd rounders"- it's the #12 overall in this deep draft class, and if it's the same team's pick next year, it's likely to be a fairly high one as well.
I see what you're saying, but I just don't think it's as lopsided as you.
The 2.02 is the 2.02. That fact that it's the #12 overall pick is offset by the fact that it's a 10 team league.
In 2011, Gronk produces 165 VBD in 10 team non-PPR leagues. Ertz is unlikely to do that in his career (correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the average late first rounder produces around 110-150 career VBD in 12 team leagues, where it is easier to rack up VBD). How many solid TE prospects are worth even a 50% chance at a healthy Gronk for 3 years? More than Ertz and a couple 2nds. And I think we can all agree that 50/50 odds on Gronk being healthy for 3 years is cautious, as he just turned 25 last week.
I'm a documented Gronk fan, with a documented pro-stance on his injury history (in relation to the market)--so take my opinion for what it's worth. But I honestly don't think trades get much worse than this.
You're likely to get a better player, but your baselines are higher the smaller your league is--you need better players to win.The #12 pick is worth more than say the #20 pick no matter how many teams are in the league- you're likely to get a better player there.
What is a "healthy Gronk for 3 years"? How many games does he play during that stretch? How many Is he 100% for? Is he with Brady for them all? He's obviously great, but so is Fitzgerald, and we've seen how limiting injuries and poor QB play have been for him.
As for bad trades, I've seen several just in the last couple of pages which seem much worse than this one.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I like the Gronk side of the deal as well, I just disagree with how lopsided you think it is and some of your reasoning.You're likely to get a better player, but your baselines are higher the smaller your league is--you need better players to win.The #12 pick is worth more than say the #20 pick no matter how many teams are in the league- you're likely to get a better player there.
What is a "healthy Gronk for 3 years"? How many games does he play during that stretch? How many Is he 100% for? Is he with Brady for them all? He's obviously great, but so is Fitzgerald, and we've seen how limiting injuries and poor QB play have been for him.
As for bad trades, I've seen several just in the last couple of pages which seem much worse than this one.
We have different opinions on the two players involved, so we're not going to agree on this trade.
I'm not going to convince you that Gronk's health history is laregly flukey--a nasty hit that would have torn anyone's ACL and a broken forearm which has been healed and is not likely to be an issue in the future. I'm not likely to convince you that Gronk's back history is overblown, with little chance to shorten his career, based on the 95% success rate of the initial surgery, and the 95% success rate of the follow up IF the first one doesn't do it.
You're not likely to convince me that his injury history is an accurate predictor of future injury issues.
Thus, we're not likely to agree on the deal.