What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (4 Viewers)

Salary Cap PPR Dynasty

Gave Antonio Brown $50

Get Rookie 1.1 $40

Willing to gamble that there is a good situation post draft that the 1.1 will increase in value
Any opinions on this?
I like Brown better. Cap may play some factor but the 10 difference probably wouldn't sway me much...1.01 won't gain much more value than it has now and I still like Brown better in PPR even for a few bucks more

 
12 Team PPR

Gave:

1.02

1.07

1.08

2.06

Got:
Colin Kaepernick

Jimmy Graham

Tannehill was my QB1 and Gresham was my TE1. Loaded up on picks last year as my team was hurt and not going to make a push. Cashing them in.

 
12 Team PPR

Gave:

1.02

1.07

1.08

2.06

Got:

Colin Kaepernick

Jimmy Graham

Tannehill was my QB1 and Gresham was my TE1. Loaded up on picks last year as my team was hurt and not going to make a push. Cashing them in.
Very good price to acquire Graham. Nice.

 
12 Team PPR

Gave:

1.02

1.07

1.08

2.06

Got:

Colin Kaepernick

Jimmy Graham

Tannehill was my QB1 and Gresham was my TE1. Loaded up on picks last year as my team was hurt and not going to make a push. Cashing them in.
No need to explain, well done
Yeah, I know. I just find it interesting when guys actually give some insight into the decision (even if it wasn't much of one).

 
First Trade:

Gave: 1.10

Received: Mike Wallace

Really needed WR help and figured a bona fide #1 receiver is worth that much.

Second Trade:

Gave: Victor Cruz, 2.10

Received: Desean Jackson (prior to all the cut/trade rumors)

Not as a warm, fuzzy feeling about this one but with Nicks gone, double teams go Cruz's way and his production goes down. Plus, I own NYG TE.
1st trade is alright. Not a Wallace fan. You might have been able to land someone like Brandin Cooks with that pick in the draft. If Wallace bounces back, it might not be a bad deal.

2nd trade I don't like at all. I have Cruz ahead of DJax and then you threw in a pick too. I think Cruz will be just fine without Nicks. The Giants have Randle and Jernigan who should fill the void.
Pretty much exactly this.
I actually had DJax higher than Cruz due to crappy NYG offensive line and recent QB play, but one could argue other way. My MO is to trade away picks for players that have 3-4 years left on their value. It seems to me a lot of people overvalue rookies that have about a 10% success rate overall it seems No regrets. It's only money.

 
12 Team PPR

Gave:

1.02

1.07

1.08

2.06

Got:

Colin Kaepernick

Jimmy Graham

Tannehill was my QB1 and Gresham was my TE1. Loaded up on picks last year as my team was hurt and not going to make a push. Cashing them in.
No need to explain, well done
Yeah, I know. I just find it interesting when guys actually give some insight into the decision (even if it wasn't much of one).
Agreed, well done. I would trade my entire rookie class for THE top TE and another quality starter. I don't like Kap for FF, okay for real NFL. Your choice.

 
Ppr 12 team can start up to 4 receivers

A gets Julio Jones

B gets Keenan Allen and the 1.01
Tough one, but Julio.
It is a pretty fair trade but I would take 1.01 and Allen without seeing the rosters
I think it's you and I against the world here.
I'd take Keenan and (presumably) Sammy Watkins.
Yeah, I normally fall on the side of "best player wins the trade" but I think I take Allen and Watkins too here.

 
14 team PPR with development players. Start 2 RB 2 WR/TE and 2 flex. TE's get 1.5 PPR,

Gave: Ben Tate

Got: 1.07 and Burleson

Have Gio, Ball, Lacy , Seastrunk and Lattimore at RB.

Have picks 6 and 7 now, should get two good WR/TE's there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pretty sure the "ummmm" meant wtf were you thinking. Pretty sure the good posting meant he agreed. Pretty sure most people here probably side with them.That being said, it looks like a really bad trade the way you posted it. Not that you can't get two players in the second round who are better than the guy you would have gotten at 1.06, but the odds are pretty high against that. No one knows if you tried trading 8 other guys and that was your best offer. Or if one guy at 1.06 is not enough to help your team so you split it into three guys. Also looks better if your league is 10 teams as opposed to 12 or higher. A little more info might have shed some light on the thought behind the deal. Not that ummmm is a great response but the deal is a bit perplexing. Don't let it discourage you from posting future trades in this thread.
Pretty much, yeah. Your post =my "ummmm", lol. Thanks, I was being lazy.

It's also hard to give legit feedback on a deal like that when you don't know ANYTHING about the league. Some leagues that is an absolute horrific trade, such as leagues with smaller rosters.

In other leagues, like one I am in with 35 man rosters and 30 man taxi squad, that would be a MUCH better deal and probably not considered "bad". Still not sure I do it but would make a lot more sense if you know you can roster those picks for a few years no matter what.

It's simple, when you have a deal like this, include some league specs.
Want more info? No problem, just ask. 12 team PPR 4pt passing TDs, QRRWWTFFKD

The point of thread though is to post done deals. I thought I would contribute with a deal that I was able to complete. I don't need approval or reassurance from anyone only wanted to add value to what I see as a great thread. I thought the whole idea is for people to see trades going on in other leagues to maybe gain insight into the values of players/picks in general. Ummmm adds what exactly? To me it comes off pretentious to say the least. Who cares if it's lopsided or not? It happened, maybe you could get a similar deal done if you tried, maybe not. Every league and owner is different.

FWIW - I got 1.06 and I'm done bunging up the thread.

 
Superflex league:

Team A Gets: EJ Manuel, Wes Welker, Jimmy Graham, and 2014 (2.10)

Team B Gets: Trent Richardson, AJ Green, Jason Witten, and 2014 (1.07)

 
Jeremy said:
JayJay328 said:
What does that mean? Why would that deserve a good post? The thread is about dynasty trades that are completed, that's what I posted. Get off the high horse jerkoff. You post plenty, that makes you better than absolutely nobody.
Pretty sure the "ummmm" meant wtf were you thinking. Pretty sure the good posting meant he agreed. Pretty sure most people here probably side with them.

That being said, it looks like a really bad trade the way you posted it. Not that you can't get two players in the second round who are better than the guy you would have gotten at 1.06, but the odds are pretty high against that. No one knows if you tried trading 8 other guys and that was your best offer. Or if one guy at 1.06 is not enough to help your team so you split it into three guys. Also looks better if your league is 10 teams as opposed to 12 or higher. A little more info might have shed some light on the thought behind the deal. Not that ummmm is a great response but the deal is a bit perplexing. Don't let it discourage you from posting future trades in this thread.
I read the trade to mean the poster received the 1.06 and traded away the 2nd rounders. Agreed though, the team getting the 1.06 traded away 3 dimes for one dollar.
Yeah, it was so obviously lopsided in the favor of the team getting the 1.06 that "ummm" is probably all that needed to be said.

On this trade value chart (which I think is pretty good), the 1.06 got 1058pts and the guy getting 3 much lower picks got only 624. http://dynastyleaguefootball.com/2014/03/14/updated-rookie-trade-value-chart/

Assuming this is a 12 team league, of course.
nice reference tool.

thx for sharing.

edit: there wasn't a comma in there, im not calling you a tool.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Superflex league:

Team A Gets: EJ Manuel, Wes Welker, Jimmy Graham, and 2014 (2.10)

Team B Gets: Trent Richardson, AJ Green, Jason Witten, and 2014 (1.07)
AJ Green by quite a bit.
Seems pretty even IMO. I consider Graham and Green to be close, and in a superflex Manuel is the next most valuable piece. Probably fairer without the picks, but not bad IMO.
My only superflex has depressed QB scoring, but even with regular scoring I can't see Manuel worth anything more than 1.05. So Green + 1.07 > Graham + Manuel by a fair margin. And I like Trent + Witten more than 2.10 + Welker.
 
doowain said:
12 Team PPR

Gave:

1.02

1.07

1.08

2.06

Got:

Colin Kaepernick

Jimmy Graham

Tannehill was my QB1 and Gresham was my TE1. Loaded up on picks last year as my team was hurt and not going to make a push. Cashing them in.
Graham side prtty easy

 
Pretty sure the "ummmm" meant wtf were you thinking. Pretty sure the good posting meant he agreed. Pretty sure most people here probably side with them.That being said, it looks like a really bad trade the way you posted it. Not that you can't get two players in the second round who are better than the guy you would have gotten at 1.06, but the odds are pretty high against that. No one knows if you tried trading 8 other guys and that was your best offer. Or if one guy at 1.06 is not enough to help your team so you split it into three guys. Also looks better if your league is 10 teams as opposed to 12 or higher. A little more info might have shed some light on the thought behind the deal. Not that ummmm is a great response but the deal is a bit perplexing. Don't let it discourage you from posting future trades in this thread.
Pretty much, yeah. Your post =my "ummmm", lol. Thanks, I was being lazy.

It's also hard to give legit feedback on a deal like that when you don't know ANYTHING about the league. Some leagues that is an absolute horrific trade, such as leagues with smaller rosters.

In other leagues, like one I am in with 35 man rosters and 30 man taxi squad, that would be a MUCH better deal and probably not considered "bad". Still not sure I do it but would make a lot more sense if you know you can roster those picks for a few years no matter what.

It's simple, when you have a deal like this, include some league specs.
Want more info? No problem, just ask. 12 team PPR 4pt passing TDs, QRRWWTFFKD

The point of thread though is to post done deals. I thought I would contribute with a deal that I was able to complete. I don't need approval or reassurance from anyone only wanted to add value to what I see as a great thread. I thought the whole idea is for people to see trades going on in other leagues to maybe gain insight into the values of players/picks in general. Ummmm adds what exactly? To me it comes off pretentious to say the least. Who cares if it's lopsided or not? It happened, maybe you could get a similar deal done if you tried, maybe not. Every league and owner is different.

FWIW - I got 1.06 and I'm done bunging up the thread.
If you dont provide league specifics, you are adding nothing of value by posting that particular deal.

And you seem easily angered. :nerd: :nerd: :nerd: :nerd: :nerd:

 
14 team standard scoring 1121 one flex

Team A gets

Arian Foster

Roddy White

2015 2nd round pick

Team B gets

T.Y. Hilton

Rashad Jennings

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Superflex league:

Team A Gets: EJ Manuel, Wes Welker, Jimmy Graham, and 2014 (2.10)

Team B Gets: Trent Richardson, AJ Green, Jason Witten, and 2014 (1.07)
AJ Green by quite a bit.
Seems pretty even IMO. I consider Graham and Green to be close, and in a superflex Manuel is the next most valuable piece. Probably fairer without the picks, but not bad IMO.
My only superflex has depressed QB scoring, but even with regular scoring I can't see Manuel worth anything more than 1.05. So Green + 1.07 > Graham + Manuel by a fair margin. And I like Trent + Witten more than 2.10 + Welker.
How much more is Green worth than Graham? (In your view) That seems to be the only part we disagree on.

I'd want something added to Graham for Green but it wouldn't take too much. The 2.10 might get it done. So if it's Graham and 2.10 for Green. Welker roughly = Witten. Just leaves Trent and 1.07 for Manuel, so depends on your value of Trent.

 
A few recent trades in various leagues...

Gave - Knowshon Moreno, Charles Clay

Received - Tyler Eifert, Da'Rick Rogers

Gave - Philip Rivers, 3.06

Received - CJ2K, Matt Schaub

Gave - Reggie Bush

Received - Desean Jackson

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gave Michael Floyd

Got Montee Ball

Thin at RB with only Murray, Gore, and Wilson.

Rich at WR with Julio Jones, Cobb, Decker, Patterson, Randle, Sammy Watkins, and MIke Evans.

Fair trade, but a no brainer for me.

 
Gave Michael Floyd

Got Montee Ball

Thin at RB with only Murray, Gore, and Wilson.

Rich at WR with Julio Jones, Cobb, Decker, Patterson, Randle, Sammy Watkins, and MIke Evans.

Fair trade, but a no brainer for me.
Floyd EASILY. You don't lose that much value on a guy to fill a "need".

 
Gave Michael Floyd

Got Montee Ball

Thin at RB with only Murray, Gore, and Wilson.

Rich at WR with Julio Jones, Cobb, Decker, Patterson, Randle, Sammy Watkins, and MIke Evans.

Fair trade, but a no brainer for me.
Floyd EASILY. You don't lose that much value on a guy to fill a "need".
I figure Floyd is good for about 1050 yards and 3 or 4 tds 6 at the most. Ball should match that if he's the starter this year and I think he will be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gave Michael Floyd

Got Montee Ball

Thin at RB with only Murray, Gore, and Wilson.

Rich at WR with Julio Jones, Cobb, Decker, Patterson, Randle, Sammy Watkins, and MIke Evans.

Fair trade, but a no brainer for me.
Floyd EASILY. You don't lose that much value on a guy to fill a "need".
I figure Floyd is good for about 1050 yards and 3 or 4 tds 6 at the most. Ball should match that if he's the starter this year and I think he will be.
But why take that chance? At best I think you are breaking even with much better of a chance to lose big.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bu

Gave Michael Floyd

Got Montee Ball

Thin at RB with only Murray, Gore, and Wilson.

Rich at WR with Julio Jones, Cobb, Decker, Patterson, Randle, Sammy Watkins, and MIke Evans.

Fair trade, but a no brainer for me.
Floyd EASILY. You don't lose that much value on a guy to fill a "need".
I figure Floyd is good for about 1050 yards and 3 or 4 tds 6 at the most. Ball should match that if he's the starter this year and I think he will be.
But why take that chance? At best I think you are breaking even with much better of a chance to lose big.
I see your logic, but the deal maker for me is Carson Palmer at QB. At best Floyd is a WR 3 with WR 2 upside if Palmer has a good year (doubtful). I think Ball has the ability to be a 1200+ yd back who scores double digit TDs and he's only 23.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top