Pretty sure the "ummmm" meant wtf were you thinking. Pretty sure the good posting meant he agreed. Pretty sure most people here probably side with them.That being said, it looks like a really bad trade the way you posted it. Not that you can't get two players in the second round who are better than the guy you would have gotten at 1.06, but the odds are pretty high against that. No one knows if you tried trading 8 other guys and that was your best offer. Or if one guy at 1.06 is not enough to help your team so you split it into three guys. Also looks better if your league is 10 teams as opposed to 12 or higher. A little more info might have shed some light on the thought behind the deal. Not that ummmm is a great response but the deal is a bit perplexing. Don't let it discourage you from posting future trades in this thread.
Pretty much, yeah. Your post =my "ummmm", lol. Thanks, I was being lazy.
It's also hard to give legit feedback on a deal like that when you don't know ANYTHING about the league. Some leagues that is an absolute horrific trade, such as leagues with smaller rosters.
In other leagues, like one I am in with 35 man rosters and 30 man taxi squad, that would be a MUCH better deal and probably not considered "bad". Still not sure I do it but would make a lot more sense if you know you can roster those picks for a few years no matter what.
It's simple, when you have a deal like this, include some league specs.