What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (2 Viewers)

I have Steven Jackson. Just offered Jacquizz Rodgers for my 3rd round rookie pick. Would you take it?

12 team 0.5ppr.
I wouldn't feel the need to handcuff that situation.
I like Jackson, and with his age, running style and his injury last year, it couldnt hurt. Rodgers is still young and is a good COP guy anyways. For a 3rd? I'd do it.
That is throwing the 3rd away IMO.
Rodgers helped me win a few games (I didn't even want to win) last season when Jackson was out. He looked better last season than he had in the past.
Agree. I thought he looked pretty decent between the tackles as a starter...something he struggled with in 2012. He's not a sexy name, but I could see him be a decent flex/bye week guy this year given the right circumstances (which is more than what I expect from my 3rd rounders).

 
12 team PPR

Team A gave:

Spiller

Nicks

Team B gave:

Hopkins

1.05

1.07
Love how Team A came out here. Losing Spiller is sad, but if Team A need WRs, then they are in fantastic shape for the future.
This one seems like a no brainer to get Hopkins and the picks.

Hopkins>>NIcks

5/7>> spiller
Disagree strongly with 1.05 and 1.07 being worth more than Spiller. Spiller is an elite talent who happened to suffer a high ankle sprain last year. One injury shouldn't drop a guy that far -- he was a 1st round startup pick (for good reason) heading into last year.

As for the trade as a whole, I think it's fair. I'd prefer the Spiller / Nicks side with a competitive team and the other side if I was looking to move value out towards the future.

 
12 team 1/2/3/1 + flex PPR

Dion Lewis, 2.12, 3.03 for Kenbrell Thompkins and a 2015 2nd (early / mid)
CloseThompkins and the 2015 2nd if it is going to be a top 6. Thompkins has enough upside I might take a chance on him for this
I thought it was pretty even. It worked for me d/t being deeeeeep at RB and pretty thin on WR prospects. I also had more 2nds / 3rds this year than guys I am willing to cut, so shifting some to next year makes sense, even if the pick ends up later than expected.

 
I have Steven Jackson. Just offered Jacquizz Rodgers for my 3rd round rookie pick. Would you take it?

12 team 0.5ppr.
I wouldn't feel the need to handcuff that situation.
I like Jackson, and with his age, running style and his injury last year, it couldnt hurt. Rodgers is still young and is a good COP guy anyways. For a 3rd? I'd do it.
That is throwing the 3rd away IMO.
30th pick is not a bad swap in regards to what you draft there are barely rosterable fantasy players anyways. Fantasy isnt just a game about value, its about strategy too. Having a cuff in this situation has been important the situation wasn't right. Rodgers could have done much better in his role with 2 healthy WRS, which Atlanta really didn't have at all last year. You gonna roster some one you gonna cut for the next best thing or a player who could serve value to your team.
That's highly dependent on the league. In an IDP league, you can get impact defensive players there. I see a lot of threads around here that people think 3's and 4's are worthless and I just have to believe they aren't IDP leagues. In a start 9 IDP league, those picks are far from throwaway. Kiki Alonso, Cyprien, Wagner, Vaccaro, Harrison Smith, Peterson - all in 3/4 rounds. IDP also means that the offensive flier picks end up being a round or two lower. Last year we had 12 IDP drafted in rounds 1-3, so getting Ellington in the 4th as opposed to the 3rd makes a big difference to those middle pick values.

 
Overpaid a bit given his current value, but I have a gut feeling Decker is going to sign with a team that features him heavily.

Gave - 1.09, 2.09, Pitta

Got - Decker
Pretty close but I prefer Pitta and the picks
If Decker leaves, I can see Pitta outscore him. I think ur leaves, so I will take the picks and pitta.

Decker already dropped the "I have to take care of my family" line. He is gonna end up taking the most money from a bad team, I can feel it.

 
Overpaid a bit given his current value, but I have a gut feeling Decker is going to sign with a team that features him heavily.

Gave - 1.09, 2.09, Pitta

Got - Decker
Pretty close but I prefer Pitta and the picks
If Decker leaves, I can see Pitta outscore him. I think ur leaves, so I will take the picks and pitta.

Decker already dropped the "I have to take care of my family" line. He is gonna end up taking the most money from a bad team, I can feel it.
That could mean he will take less to stay where he is.

 
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Torry and Desean are a wash. So it depends on 1.08 vs Trent. Pretty even in my book.
I don't see Torrey Smith and DeSean Jackson as remotely close to a wash.
Desean had a huge 2013 season but they have basically been the same player the past few years. Only thing better about Desean is situation but he's 2 years older than Torrey.

I value Desean higher, but not by much at all. To each their own.

 
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
I like DJax more than Torrey but like 1.8 over Trent. Pretty close but I would take DJax/Trent
I'm certainly no Trent fan. At all. But 1.08? Really?
Definitely a good chance of getting a more productive player at 1.8 than what Trent has done. If I owned him I would deal him for 1.8 right away

 
Coeur de Lion said:
maxhyde said:
Coeur de Lion said:
12 team 1/2/3/1 + flex PPR

Dion Lewis, 2.12, 3.03 for Kenbrell Thompkins and a 2015 2nd (early / mid)
CloseThompkins and the 2015 2nd if it is going to be a top 6. Thompkins has enough upside I might take a chance on him for this
I thought it was pretty even. It worked for me d/t being deeeeeep at RB and pretty thin on WR prospects. I also had more 2nds / 3rds this year than guys I am willing to cut, so shifting some to next year makes sense, even if the pick ends up later than expected.
Smart move if you have the extra picks to give up.

Truth is I think the picks in this deep draft are pretty nice but a top 6 2nd next year might be as good or better. Thompkins however is more appealing to me than Lewis

It is close and if I were short on picks/prospects I could see the other side being a solid move looking at possibilities for player 24/27 in this draft. In a vacuum I like your side better

 
One More Rep said:
Coeur de Lion said:
One More Rep said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
I like DJax more than Torrey but like 1.8 over Trent. Pretty close but I would take DJax/Trent
I'm certainly no Trent fan. At all. But 1.08? Really?
Definitely a good chance of getting a more productive player at 1.8 than what Trent has done. If I owned him I would deal him for 1.8 right away
Well, yeah, if 2013 is Trent's baseline moving forward. But not if 2012 is...

 
One More Rep said:
Coeur de Lion said:
One More Rep said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
I like DJax more than Torrey but like 1.8 over Trent. Pretty close but I would take DJax/Trent
I'm certainly no Trent fan. At all. But 1.08? Really?
Definitely a good chance of getting a more productive player at 1.8 than what Trent has done. If I owned him I would deal him for 1.8 right away
Well, yeah, if 2013 is Trent's baseline moving forward. But not if 2012 is...
I expect him to end up somewhere in between

 
ILUVBEER99 said:
Coeur de Lion said:
ILUVBEER99 said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Torry and Desean are a wash. So it depends on 1.08 vs Trent. Pretty even in my book.
I don't see Torrey Smith and DeSean Jackson as remotely close to a wash.
Desean had a huge 2013 season but they have basically been the same player the past few years. Only thing better about Desean is situation but he's 2 years older than Torrey.

I value Desean higher, but not by much at all. To each their own.
I'm a HUGE believer in Chip Kelly and his ability to get the most out of his offensive talent -- so I think that 2013 is a more useful barometer for DJax moving forward than his last few seasons under Reid. Torrey Smith is what he is at this point IMO, a low end WR2 / strong WR3. DJax IMO is at least a full tier higher as a low end WR1 / strong WR2. YMMV.

 
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Even in a rebuild it would be hard for me to give up TRich and DeSean for that.

I could see Torrey/DeSean being close but in a rebuild TRich isn't really a piece I would feel I must move for 1.08

 
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Not enough for Desean Jackson, Richardson is meaningless in this trade.

 
One More Rep said:
Coeur de Lion said:
One More Rep said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
I like DJax more than Torrey but like 1.8 over Trent. Pretty close but I would take DJax/Trent
I'm certainly no Trent fan. At all. But 1.08? Really?
Definitely a good chance of getting a more productive player at 1.8 than what Trent has done. If I owned him I would deal him for 1.8 right away
Well, yeah, if 2013 is Trent's baseline moving forward. But not if 2012 is...
I expect him to end up somewhere in between
A 22 year old multi year RB2 would be a great outcome for 1.08 -- that's not a premium pick at all, even in deep class like this one.

 
I'm a HUGE believer in Chip Kelly and his ability to get the most out of his offensive talent -- so I think that 2013 is a more useful barometer for DJax moving forward than his last few seasons under Reid. Torrey Smith is what he is at this point IMO, a low end WR2 / strong WR3. DJax IMO is at least a full tier higher as a low end WR1 / strong WR2. YMMV.
I get this but I have a few issues with DeSean either as a person or player...maybe both


Season was less than a month over and DJax was #####ing about his contract again...so lets check the career path - solid rookie season - career year - contract problems - 2 years of blah - career year and contract problem. I might sell before the next 2 years of blah and I might sell because I just don't like/trust him...either way I would be fine dealing DJax for Smith

ETA: I get that the Eagles offense was dysfunctional for some of that time but he isn't much of a teammate or leader and seems to play when he wants. I just don't trust him to consistently put up great seasons based on his short history
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One More Rep said:
Coeur de Lion said:
One More Rep said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
I like DJax more than Torrey but like 1.8 over Trent. Pretty close but I would take DJax/Trent
I'm certainly no Trent fan. At all. But 1.08? Really?
Definitely a good chance of getting a more productive player at 1.8 than what Trent has done. If I owned him I would deal him for 1.8 right away
Well, yeah, if 2013 is Trent's baseline moving forward. But not if 2012 is...
I expect him to end up somewhere in between
A 22 year old multi year RB2 would be a great outcome for 1.08 -- that's not a premium pick at all, even in deep class like this one.
I don't think I would miss the week to week production of Trent at all. I would rather take a shot at finding a better player, and if I miss I would be okay with losing the ho hum production Trent would give me.

 
I'm a HUGE believer in Chip Kelly and his ability to get the most out of his offensive talent -- so I think that 2013 is a more useful barometer for DJax moving forward than his last few seasons under Reid. Torrey Smith is what he is at this point IMO, a low end WR2 / strong WR3. DJax IMO is at least a full tier higher as a low end WR1 / strong WR2. YMMV.
I get this but I have a few issues with DeSean either as a person or player...maybe both


Season was less than a month over and DJax was #####ing about his contract again...so lets check the career path - solid rookie season - career year - contract problems - 2 years of blah - career year and contract problem. I might sell before the next 2 years of blah and I might sell because I just don't like/trust him...either way I would be fine dealing DJax for Smith

ETA: I get that the Eagles offense was dysfunctional for some of that time but he isn't much of a teammate or leader and seems to play when he wants. I just don't trust him to consistently put up great seasons based on his short history
So you devalue his fantasy value based on how he negotiates his contract. Do you do this with other players, or just him. How successful are you with this strategy?

 
False Start said:
ghostguy123 said:
One More Rep said:
solorca said:
Overpaid a bit given his current value, but I have a gut feeling Decker is going to sign with a team that features him heavily.

Gave - 1.09, 2.09, Pitta

Got - Decker
Pretty close but I prefer Pitta and the picks
If Decker leaves, I can see Pitta outscore him. I think ur leaves, so I will take the picks and pitta.Decker already dropped the "I have to take care of my family" line. He is gonna end up taking the most money from a bad team, I can feel it.
That could mean he will take less to stay where he is.
Umm, mind explaining that one?

 
False Start said:
ghostguy123 said:
One More Rep said:
solorca said:
Overpaid a bit given his current value, but I have a gut feeling Decker is going to sign with a team that features him heavily.

Gave - 1.09, 2.09, Pitta

Got - Decker
Pretty close but I prefer Pitta and the picks
If Decker leaves, I can see Pitta outscore him. I think ur leaves, so I will take the picks and pitta.Decker already dropped the "I have to take care of my family" line. He is gonna end up taking the most money from a bad team, I can feel it.
That could mean he will take less to stay where he is.
Umm, mind explaining that one?
You really no how to kill someones hope. dang.

 
False Start said:
ghostguy123 said:
One More Rep said:
solorca said:
Overpaid a bit given his current value, but I have a gut feeling Decker is going to sign with a team that features him heavily.

Gave - 1.09, 2.09, Pitta

Got - Decker
Pretty close but I prefer Pitta and the picks
If Decker leaves, I can see Pitta outscore him. I think ur leaves, so I will take the picks and pitta.Decker already dropped the "I have to take care of my family" line. He is gonna end up taking the most money from a bad team, I can feel it.
That could mean he will take less to stay where he is.
Umm, mind explaining that one?
They're still going to be R-I-C-H, and uprooting your wife and kids is a pretty big deal. Not saying I think he'll stay, because I don't, but a couple million more a year when your net worth is going to be in the tens of millions isn't the only way to measure "what's best for your family." I've turned down significantly more money to move across the country because it was more important to me that my kids grow up around their grandparents / cousins / etc.

 
I'm a HUGE believer in Chip Kelly and his ability to get the most out of his offensive talent -- so I think that 2013 is a more useful barometer for DJax moving forward than his last few seasons under Reid. Torrey Smith is what he is at this point IMO, a low end WR2 / strong WR3. DJax IMO is at least a full tier higher as a low end WR1 / strong WR2. YMMV.
I get this but I have a few issues with DeSean either as a person or player...maybe both


Season was less than a month over and DJax was #####ing about his contract again...so lets check the career path - solid rookie season - career year - contract problems - 2 years of blah - career year and contract problem. I might sell before the next 2 years of blah and I might sell because I just don't like/trust him...either way I would be fine dealing DJax for Smith

ETA: I get that the Eagles offense was dysfunctional for some of that time but he isn't much of a teammate or leader and seems to play when he wants. I just don't trust him to consistently put up great seasons based on his short history
So you devalue his fantasy value based on how he negotiates his contract. Do you do this with other players, or just him. How successful are you with this strategy?
Successful in that I don't own him anywhere anymore and others value him more than I do so it really hasn't been an issue...yet. It may be.

I devalue him because he is inconsistent...I think his inconsistency is related to his "happiness" which seems to be contract related. Maybe he has matured and I will miss out on his greatness but I think I will still be able to compete with or without Desean.

Anyway I am no doctor certainly not a psychologist so it is all my opinion and certainly not measurable. It is human nature to get distracted by money in our society and especially when it comes to work...if you think you are underpaid it can affect your work. Not talking about the NFL or pro sports even...and certainly not specifically DeSean Jackson. It happens all the time. I mean we see guys "turn it up" a level in contract years...not uncommon at all. We also see some guys get complacent after they get "paid".

If I could predict it I would be much better for it but I don't think anyone can. For me Jackson carries enough risk in this situation based on his history it has affected his value for me. If I am an idiot or a lesser player in fantasy for it...so be it

Rate risk however you want...your team you get to rank players how you like

 
They're still going to be R-I-C-H, and uprooting your wife and kids is a pretty big deal. Not saying I think he'll stay, because I don't, but a couple million more a year when your net worth is going to be in the tens of millions isn't the only way to measure "what's best for your family." I've turned down significantly more money to move across the country because it was more important to me that my kids grow up around their grandparents / cousins / etc.
Weird, players do this very frequently.

And as for Decker, his country pop star wife is pregant with their first child. I am sure she would be ok moving and living somewhere till the kid is like 3 while Decker makes 10 million a year. Small sacrifice to make to get paid a couple million a year more than Denver will pay.

 
Coeur de Lion said:
ILUVBEER99 said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Torry and Desean are a wash. So it depends on 1.08 vs Trent. Pretty even in my book.
I don't see Torrey Smith and DeSean Jackson as remotely close to a wash.
I don't either.

 
They're still going to be R-I-C-H, and uprooting your wife and kids is a pretty big deal. Not saying I think he'll stay, because I don't, but a couple million more a year when your net worth is going to be in the tens of millions isn't the only way to measure "what's best for your family." I've turned down significantly more money to move across the country because it was more important to me that my kids grow up around their grandparents / cousins / etc.
Weird, players do this very frequently.

And as for Decker, his country pop star wife is pregant with their first child. I am sure she would be ok moving and living somewhere till the kid is like 3 while Decker makes 10 million a year. Small sacrifice to make to get paid a couple million a year more than Denver will pay.
It's very much an individual decision based on individual priorities. Some guys move around, some guys sign extensions and stay put. I was just making the point that getting the most money isn't always the only or most important priority for every person. If his next deal is $35 million in Denver, would getting $50 million from say Cleveland represent a significant upgrade in overall quality of life for Decker and his family?

 
MoveToSkypager said:
maxhyde said:
jonboltz said:
doowain said:
12 team PPR 4 pts per passing TD

Team A gave:

Aaron Rodgers

Team B gave:

Dalton

1.02
Aaron.
+1
I'm sure there is an underlying situation here that gives the AR owner to trade, but without those facts, A Rodgers will always be favored over Dalton and the 2.
Former Rodgers owner also owns Kaepernick
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coeur de Lion said:
ILUVBEER99 said:
Winning IS Everything said:
Team A Gave:

Trent Richardson

Desean Jackson

Team B Gave:

Torrey Smith

1.8 rookie pick

Team getting 1.8 pick also has 1.1 and 1.9 pics......
Torry and Desean are a wash. So it depends on 1.08 vs Trent. Pretty even in my book.
I don't see Torrey Smith and DeSean Jackson as remotely close to a wash.
I don't either.
I don't see 1.8 for Trent to be a wash or Jackson and Smith to be a wash. Give me Torrey and 1.8

 
They're still going to be R-I-C-H, and uprooting your wife and kids is a pretty big deal. Not saying I think he'll stay, because I don't, but a couple million more a year when your net worth is going to be in the tens of millions isn't the only way to measure "what's best for your family." I've turned down significantly more money to move across the country because it was more important to me that my kids grow up around their grandparents / cousins / etc.
Weird, players do this very frequently.

And as for Decker, his country pop star wife is pregant with their first child. I am sure she would be ok moving and living somewhere till the kid is like 3 while Decker makes 10 million a year. Small sacrifice to make to get paid a couple million a year more than Denver will pay.
It's very much an individual decision based on individual priorities. Some guys move around, some guys sign extensions and stay put. I was just making the point that getting the most money isn't always the only or most important priority for every person. If his next deal is $35 million in Denver, would getting $50 million from say Cleveland represent a significant upgrade in overall quality of life for Decker and his family?
He used it in the context of "I'd like to stay in Denver, BUT I need to do what's best for my family." It was the classic, I'm following the money response. I can't blame him for that of course.

 
They're still going to be R-I-C-H, and uprooting your wife and kids is a pretty big deal. Not saying I think he'll stay, because I don't, but a couple million more a year when your net worth is going to be in the tens of millions isn't the only way to measure "what's best for your family." I've turned down significantly more money to move across the country because it was more important to me that my kids grow up around their grandparents / cousins / etc.
Weird, players do this very frequently.

And as for Decker, his country pop star wife is pregant with their first child. I am sure she would be ok moving and living somewhere till the kid is like 3 while Decker makes 10 million a year. Small sacrifice to make to get paid a couple million a year more than Denver will pay.
It's very much an individual decision based on individual priorities. Some guys move around, some guys sign extensions and stay put. I was just making the point that getting the most money isn't always the only or most important priority for every person. If his next deal is $35 million in Denver, would getting $50 million from say Cleveland represent a significant upgrade in overall quality of life for Decker and his family?
i get what you're saying but for Decker specifically he and his wife have no family ties in Denver. Neither grew up there and they are just now starting a family.

Moving wouldn't uproot anything in his case. For players with kids in the 5-15 age range or with family ties in the area this could definitely be an issue, but not for Decker.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top