What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL 2008 Washington Redskins Thread**** (1 Viewer)

Well, here it is...Dallas week.

And I'm hearing the naysayers already, after that Pittsburgh travesty. First half of the season was a mirage...bunch of close games against poor/hurt teams, got beat up by the two really physical teams the Skins played, yadda yadda yadda. A lot of people seem to be expecting the Skins to fold up bad the last seven games now, starting with the now-healthy Cowboys.

This is it. The one. Skins win, and they are 7-3, and looking very promising for the playoffs. They lose, and then the questions really start. They will lose all momentum, and it would be very easy to start pressing.

I sure hope Zorn stays as "medium" as he has been preaching. It would be very easy for the team to get too worked up. I think if the Skins avoid mistakes, they should do all right. But I bet it's a close game - they all seem to be in the NFC East. And hopefully there will be more burgundy and gold than blue and white in the stands...

 
Romo to play vs. Redskins with a splint on his broken pinky.

...he told me, naturally, that he would definitely play against Washington on Sunday night at FedEx Field. But it sounded like he'd be affected by his partially healed broken right pinky finger. The break is just below the top knuckle on his right little finger, and he'll play with a splint on it.

"It won't be all the way healed,'' he said. "It's still probably a good two or three weeks away from that. I don't know where it's exactly going to be, healing-wise, in Washington, but my timing will be fine.''
 
From Matt Terl's blog:

Fred Smoot shrugged off concerns about there being too much depth at the cornerback position. “The first time I walked into a meeting room,” he said, “it was me, Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, and Champ Bailey. So I’ve seen worse.”
When was Deion let go? Deion played during the '00 season and Smoot wasn't drafted until '01. Just trying to figure out when all 4 of them would have been in the same meeting.I wonder how much of Champ's success can be attributed to his exposure to Green and Sanders. Those must have been some great meetings for a young CB to have been in.

 
I guess I'm fine with the Hall signing given the lack of commitment from the team. They're essentially kicking the tires of a talented if erratic former 1st round CB who supposedly is better suited to this defense than his last one. I'm not a big fan of his attitude or mouth, so we'll have to see how that works out. There's good veteran leadership on that team unlike Hall's days with the Raiders and Falcons so maybe that'll temper his attitude a bit. Maybe. I can hope, right?

As for Torrence, I can't say I'm stunned when a former UDFA and 4th string CB is cut, but I'm as close to stunned as I can be under those circumstances. He seemed like another James Thrash type of player, an unlikely overachiever who excels in various "dirty jobs" for the team because of his brains, toughness and hard work. I can't understand how he and not Tryon was cut. I think that that sends the wrong message to the team, especially now that the team has chosen to retain two of its draft picks despite the fact that they didn't prove their worth, Durant Brooks after training camp being the other one. At a minimum I hope Blache and Gray signed off on this, because at least that would signal that they didn't think he could develop much more. Still, I don't get it. :yes:

 
From Matt Terl's blog:

Fred Smoot shrugged off concerns about there being too much depth at the cornerback position. “The first time I walked into a meeting room,” he said, “it was me, Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, and Champ Bailey. So I’ve seen worse.”
When was Deion let go? Deion played during the '00 season and Smoot wasn't drafted until '01. Just trying to figure out when all 4 of them would have been in the same meeting.I wonder how much of Champ's success can be attributed to his exposure to Green and Sanders. Those must have been some great meetings for a young CB to have been in.
Smoot's right. Remember teh staring contest that Marty got into with Deion during the 2001 off-season, trying to get Deion to quit or retire so that the team could save cap $? I'm pretty sure that that extended beyond the first post-draft mini-camp that Smoot attended. Regardless, I'd doubt that Smoot would forget his first meeting with his idol. :yes:
 
From Matt Terl's blog:

Fred Smoot shrugged off concerns about there being too much depth at the cornerback position. “The first time I walked into a meeting room,” he said, “it was me, Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, and Champ Bailey. So I’ve seen worse.”
When was Deion let go? Deion played during the '00 season and Smoot wasn't drafted until '01. Just trying to figure out when all 4 of them would have been in the same meeting.I wonder how much of Champ's success can be attributed to his exposure to Green and Sanders. Those must have been some great meetings for a young CB to have been in.
Smoot's right. Remember teh staring contest that Marty got into with Deion during the 2001 off-season :excited: , trying to get Deion to quit or retire so that the team could save cap $? I'm pretty sure that that extended beyond the first post-draft mini-camp that Smoot attended. Regardless, I'd doubt that Smoot would forget his first meeting with his idol. :hot:
actually, I do not. do you have any links or whatever that would speak to this? as Zorny as I am, 7 years later I still miss Marty. when you start 0-5 and finish at 8-8...well, you know where I'm going with that...
 
buster c said:
From Matt Terl's blog:

Fred Smoot shrugged off concerns about there being too much depth at the cornerback position. “The first time I walked into a meeting room,” he said, “it was me, Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, and Champ Bailey. So I’ve seen worse.”
When was Deion let go? Deion played during the '00 season and Smoot wasn't drafted until '01. Just trying to figure out when all 4 of them would have been in the same meeting.I wonder how much of Champ's success can be attributed to his exposure to Green and Sanders. Those must have been some great meetings for a young CB to have been in.
Smoot's right. Remember teh staring contest that Marty got into with Deion during the 2001 off-season :shock: , trying to get Deion to quit or retire so that the team could save cap $? I'm pretty sure that that extended beyond the first post-draft mini-camp that Smoot attended. Regardless, I'd doubt that Smoot would forget his first meeting with his idol. :D
actually, I do not. do you have any links or whatever that would speak to this? as Zorny as I am, 7 years later I still miss Marty. when you start 0-5 and finish at 8-8...well, you know where I'm going with that...
It's hard to believe, but that was 7.5 years ago now. I don't know where to find a link.Basically what happened was that the exorbitant spending for the 2000 Super Bowl run ( :rolleyes: ) which had landed Bruce Smith, Mark Carrier, Jeff George and Deion had the team in severe cap trouble (the only time, contrary to popular belief, that that's ever happened with Snyder) and so Marty was ruthlessly clearing out the old, expensive players to clear cap space. Deion was one such player, and had already made noise about retiring IIRC. Deion had signed a multi-year contract with the team with a large ($8M?) bonus, but if he retired the team would recoup the prorated share of that bonus; if he was cut, the team would have to eat it. And I think part of or the remainder of the bonus was due to be paid to Deion in 2001, maybe on June 1 or something. So Marty was in this battle of wills with Deion trying to force him to retire to prevent the team from having to pay him that roster bonus or swallow the signing bonus, something like that. That was still going on when Smoot was drafted and arrived for his first mini-camp, which I guess Deion attended as part of this contest with Marty.

 
buster c said:
From Matt Terl's blog:

Fred Smoot shrugged off concerns about there being too much depth at the cornerback position. “The first time I walked into a meeting room,” he said, “it was me, Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, and Champ Bailey. So I’ve seen worse.”
When was Deion let go? Deion played during the '00 season and Smoot wasn't drafted until '01. Just trying to figure out when all 4 of them would have been in the same meeting.I wonder how much of Champ's success can be attributed to his exposure to Green and Sanders. Those must have been some great meetings for a young CB to have been in.
Smoot's right. Remember teh staring contest that Marty got into with Deion during the 2001 off-season :confused: , trying to get Deion to quit or retire so that the team could save cap $? I'm pretty sure that that extended beyond the first post-draft mini-camp that Smoot attended. Regardless, I'd doubt that Smoot would forget his first meeting with his idol. :confused:
actually, I do not. do you have any links or whatever that would speak to this? as Zorny as I am, 7 years later I still miss Marty. when you start 0-5 and finish at 8-8...well, you know where I'm going with that...
It's hard to believe, but that was 7.5 years ago now. I don't know where to find a link.Basically what happened was that the exorbitant spending for the 2000 Super Bowl run ( :goodposting: ) which had landed Bruce Smith, Mark Carrier, Jeff George and Deion had the team in severe cap trouble (the only time, contrary to popular belief, that that's ever happened with Snyder) and so Marty was ruthlessly clearing out the old, expensive players to clear cap space. Deion was one such player, and had already made noise about retiring IIRC. Deion had signed a multi-year contract with the team with a large ($8M?) bonus, but if he retired the team would recoup the prorated share of that bonus; if he was cut, the team would have to eat it. And I think part of or the remainder of the bonus was due to be paid to Deion in 2001, maybe on June 1 or something. So Marty was in this battle of wills with Deion trying to force him to retire to prevent the team from having to pay him that roster bonus or swallow the signing bonus, something like that. That was still going on when Smoot was drafted and arrived for his first mini-camp, which I guess Deion attended as part of this contest with Marty.
Thanks, TB. :confused: I couldn't recall any specifics about when and why Deion left the 'Skins.
 
I *think* Campbell said it was an MCL with Portis just now on Doc's show. He pointed to a horse collar-ish tackle in the Steeler game as where it happened. Sounded like he would sit this week, try to go on Saturday in practice and see what happens for Sunday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I *think* Campbell said it was an MCL with Portis just now on Doc's show He pointed to a horse collar-ish tackle in the Steeler game as where it happened. Sounded like he would sit this week, try to go on Saturday in practice and see what happens for Sunday.
Wasn't this horsecollar tackle on the sideline towards the end of the game when Portis should of no longer been in there? If that's the play I'm thinking of, Zorn really blew it. I remember Portis going down awkwardly and walking gingerly.
 
Portis GTD. Betts GTD. Moss nursing the hammy again.

Dagnabit, I thought coming out of the bye week we were supposed to be healthier! Grrr...

 
I have a bad feeling about Sunday.
:thumbup: Me too, and I hate saying that during Cowboys week.
I thought the reason why you guys won the last game was some lights out play by your defense. The Horton INT stands out in my mind. Also Springs was able to take TO out of the game. You also DOMINANTED the T.O.P. stat 38 mins to 21 mins. With Portis likely out, I'm not sure you will be able to duplicate that. It certainly doesn't mean doom and gloom for the Skins, however I am liking the Cowboys chances as well at this point.They still have to line up and play-anything can and often happens in this rivarly.
 
It will take a similar defensive effort on Sunday by Washington, which I think they're capable of. But if the running game is crippled, and there is a chance it won't be too good with Cartwright and Alexander as the 2 RB's, then the quick passing game is going to have to really perform to avoid a lot of 3-and-outs.

This could be a 16-13 game.

 
I have a bad feeling about Sunday.
funny, as a Cowboys fan, i have a bad feeling. the Cowboys have not been playing to potential, and getting somewhat healthy may not help. we'll see. this team has no swagger, and many have questioned their heart. can getting Romo back bring them back to life?this game is HUGE for both teams. if the gmen keep it up we'll both be playin for wild cards. both could come from the NFC East. and the Eagles are playing pretty good ball.NFC East grudge match, baby! :goodposting:
 
I have a bad feeling about Sunday.
:unsure: Me too, and I hate saying that during Cowboys week.
I find myself nervous about Sunday, but not necessarily with a "bad feeling" nervousness. It's more like the nervousness I felt going in to the Steeler game. It's a big opponent and a big game, yet I know the 'Skins have a better than average chance of winning. Not sure I could have said the same last year in a similar situation.For some reason I think our defense is really going to shine. I think (somewhat obviously) that it's all going to come down to the passing game being in sync. I think an out-of-sync passing game was the biggest culprit in the losses to the Giants and the Steelers, and will be the biggest stumbling block for the team the rest of the season. It's just the way Zorn's O seems to be set up. Granted, a solid running game can go a long way to helping the passing game click, but I really think it's on Campbell, the receivers and the pass-blocking of the O-line this game.
 
I haven't seen it mentioned, but did anyone catch LaVar Arrington's comments about Joe Gibbs??
What did he say?
From PFT:
Posted by Michael David Smith on November 11, 2008, 10:25 a.m. ESTDuring his first few years in the league, former Redskins linebacker LaVar Arrington looked like one of the NFL’s most promising young defensive players. By the age of 25 he had been chosen to three Pro Bowls and had signed an eight-year contract extension, and he appeared on his way to becoming a Redskins legend.But when Joe Gibbs became the coach, things started to change. Arrington and Gibbs didn’t see eye to eye, and Arrington wasn’t a good fit in the defense of assistant head coach Gregg Williams. By the age of 27 Arrington was out of Washington, and by 28 he was out of the NFL.Arrington is now retired, and he seems to blame Gibbs for the way his career headed south. He also suggests that if Gibbs really cared about his team, he wouldn’t have quit after the 2007 season.“I called Joe Gibbs a coward for leaving,” Arrington said, per the Washington Times. “You came in, you made some money for your NASCAR team. No one else is going to say that. I’m sure more people thought I was a [jerk] for saying that. Joe wouldn’t call me because he knows. There are a lot of people who know the truth about what went down with me and the Redskins.”Arrington is now the owner of a sports-themed restaurant that tries to attract Redskins fans, and as Dan Steinberg of the Washington Post notes, a lot of those Redskins fans probably won’t be too happy to hear that Arrington is calling Gibbs a coward.
If Lavar never played smart and took responsibility as a player, why should we expect him to say smart things as a retired player and commentator. The truth is that he's an idiot who unnecessarily rushed himself back into the lineup with an injured knee and ruined his career physically, all while demonstrating an unwillingness and/or incapability to learn the defense, discipline himself and play within the scheme. Is it any wonder why a team-oriented coaching staff would show him the door under such circumstances? He was and is an overrated idiot who peaked in college and got by on flashy physical talent and an oversized personality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't seen it mentioned, but did anyone catch LaVar Arrington's comments about Joe Gibbs??
What did he say?
From PFT:
Posted by Michael David Smith on November 11, 2008, 10:25 a.m. ESTDuring his first few years in the league, former Redskins linebacker LaVar Arrington looked like one of the NFL’s most promising young defensive players. By the age of 25 he had been chosen to three Pro Bowls and had signed an eight-year contract extension, and he appeared on his way to becoming a Redskins legend.But when Joe Gibbs became the coach, things started to change. Arrington and Gibbs didn’t see eye to eye, and Arrington wasn’t a good fit in the defense of assistant head coach Gregg Williams. By the age of 27 Arrington was out of Washington, and by 28 he was out of the NFL.Arrington is now retired, and he seems to blame Gibbs for the way his career headed south. He also suggests that if Gibbs really cared about his team, he wouldn’t have quit after the 2007 season.“I called Joe Gibbs a coward for leaving,” Arrington said, per the Washington Times. “You came in, you made some money for your NASCAR team. No one else is going to say that. I’m sure more people thought I was a [jerk] for saying that. Joe wouldn’t call me because he knows. There are a lot of people who know the truth about what went down with me and the Redskins.”Arrington is now the owner of a sports-themed restaurant that tries to attract Redskins fans, and as Dan Steinberg of the Washington Post notes, a lot of those Redskins fans probably won’t be too happy to hear that Arrington is calling Gibbs a coward.
If Lavar never played smart and took responsibility as a player, why should we expect him to say smart things as a retired player and commentator. The truth is that he's an idiot who unnecessarily rushed himself back into the lineup with an injured knee and ruined his career physically, all while demonstrating an unwillingness and/or incapability to learn the defense, discipline himself and play within the scheme. Is it any wonder why a team-oriented coaching staff would show him the door under such circumstances? He was and is an overrated idiot who peaked in college and got by on flashy physical talent and an oversized personality.
:X
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
hate to say, but ol' #53 is more of a liability to the Skins anymore. Addition by subtraction, in my book.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
...Montgomery is hurt too?Holy crap.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
...Montgomery is hurt too?Holy crap.
Monty's just not practicing. I'm not sure if that's just the team resting him (they do that a lot with both him and Kendall) or because he's got an injury that will affect him Sunday, unless I've completely missed something here.If he can't go, that's a bigger problem for the team than Springs, IMHO because Monty keys that entire line.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
...Montgomery is hurt too?Holy crap.
With the return of Jason Taylor (who, by all accounts, is looking great this week) I think Griffin, Golston and Evans can man the tackle rotation well enough. It hurts the inside depth some, but Montgomery's absence shouldn't make or break the defense.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
hate to say, but ol' #53 is more of a liability to the Skins anymore. Addition by subtraction, in my book.
Agreed. I don't know if he's just not fully healthy, or if he's washed up, but I haven't seen him play at the peak level we'd grown accustomed to since 2006. He's not the same guy.
 
Uncharacteristically, I tuned in this morning to the Junkies on 106.7 and they actually were talking Skins. It sounded like they were at a casino doing a remote (Vegas?) and Cakes was hammered on Irish Car Bombs (Guiness, with a shot glass filled with baileys & kahlua that you press to the bottom of the glass with a straw as you simultaneously lift up the glass and down the stout).

So he starts telling the audience that he's getting reports that a certain Skin is out every night getting plastered. Lurch was getting uncomfortable in revealing who the rumored Skin was, but Cakes was giving hints ("he loves Nick Saban"). I immediately start thinking MI State (?) and LSU (#30?). Not to character assassinate here, just curious whether this is relevant to anything or if it's a well known tid-bit.

 
FWIW, here's JLC's guesses at who will play and who won't come Sunday night (from today's on-line chat):

New York, N.Y.: Of all the guys who have missed practice or been limited in practice so far, who do you think plays? Give us your best guesses.

Jason La Canfora: I think Springs is gonna go for sure. Taylor is back. I think Marcus and Montgomery are not looking good. Samuels and Moss are playing.

I think Betts and Portis will come down to warmups, and as I said earlier, I have a sense that Portis is active. Again, I am totally guessing here and obviously 3 days away from the game and them making a decision, no one knows for sure.
This lines up with how I've been taking things up until now, too (which is now starting to make me worry :shrug: ).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uncharacteristically, I tuned in this morning to the Junkies on 106.7 and they actually were talking Skins. It sounded like they were at a casino doing a remote (Vegas?) and Cakes was hammered on Irish Car Bombs (Guiness, with a shot glass filled with baileys & kahlua that you press to the bottom of the glass with a straw as you simultaneously lift up the glass and down the stout). So he starts telling the audience that he's getting reports that a certain Skin is out every night getting plastered. Lurch was getting uncomfortable in revealing who the rumored Skin was, but Cakes was giving hints ("he loves Nick Saban"). I immediately start thinking MI State (?) and LSU (#30?). Not to character assassinate here, just curious whether this is relevant to anything or if it's a well known tid-bit.
That quote, FWIW, would almost certainly refer to Landry. Frankly, he's the least of our concerns right now, so I'm not going to pay any attention to it.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
Heard a radio report yesterday that Hall could see up to 30 snaps.
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
Heard a radio report yesterday that Hall could see up to 30 snaps.
That sounds about right. I imagine the 'Skins are expecting a lot of 3 WR sets. Any idea where that number originated (player, coach, journalist guess)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FWIW, here's JLC's guesses at who will play and who won't come Sunday night (from today's on-line chat):

New York, N.Y.: Of all the guys who have missed practice or been limited in practice so far, who do you think plays? Give us your best guesses.

Jason La Canfora: I think Springs is gonna go for sure. Taylor is back. I think Marcus and Montgomery are not looking good. Samuels and Moss are playing.

I think Betts and Portis will come down to warmups, and as I said earlier, I have a sense that Portis is active. Again, I am totally guessing here and obviously 3 days away from the game and them making a decision, no one knows for sure.
This lines up with how I've been taking things up until now, too (which is now starting to make me worry :lmao: ).
My concern with Portis is whether he can easily cause further damage by playing. If so, then there's no way he should play and hopefully he could be ready to go for the Giants in two weeks. If it's a pain thing and not an increased damage thing, then it would be nice if he could go this week and maybe rest for Seattle next week. But, will rest do anything?
 
Am I hearing correctly that Springs and Washington are likely out too?Can you guys give any insight?
I'm getting the feeling that Washington may not be able to go. Springs has been saying he'll be playing on Sunday. I doubt he's going to do any real practicing this week to give him the maximum amount of physical recovery time they can. If that gets him healthy enough to play, he should do just fine (again) covering TO.
I have a lot of confidence in Rogers covering TO too. He's demonstrated that he prepares this year, and press coverage with physical play is his strength, as it is with Springs. Springs' absence may mean more trouble with Roy Williams, however. It's going to be interesting to see how and how much they play Hall in this game . . .
Heard a radio report yesterday that Hall could see up to 30 snaps.
That sounds about right. I imagine the 'Skins are expecting a lot of 3 WR sets. Any idea where that number originated (player, coach, journalist guess)?
Pretty sure it originated from Jerry Gray, who apparently LOVES Hall. I didn't hear the direct quote, though. I heard the 980 beat reporter relaying what he heard.
 
So what do we do now at RT?A) Keep doing what we've been doing since Jansen stepped in. The Pittsburgh game was bad, but, hey, we don't have to play Pittsburgh again.B) Give Jansen more help with a TE or RB.C) Go back to Heyer.D) Other.
I also heard on the radio (same report as Hall) that Jansen will start again at RT.
 
If Portis was still lacking range of motion Tuesday, it's almost impossible to imagine that he could regain full motion and have enough strength and stability to perform in a game. Remember Willie Parker just returned (against the Redskins, in fact) after missing about a month with a similar injury. LaDainian Tomlinson tried to play in the 2007 AFC Championship game but lasted only a few plays because of a grade 2 MCL injury. Running backs' rapid directional changes stress the MCL significantly, and pain or a sense of instability will render them far less effective. This injury typically requires a few weeks of recovery, but a grade 2 (moderate) sprain represents a big range in terms of the extent of damage to the tissue -- the time frame for recovery is not automatic. If Portis is able to participate in practice late in the week, it bodes well for an earlier recovery, but even then, it would be a big surprise to see him in the lineup Sunday.
Stephania Bell, ESPN (who?)
Stephania is a physical therapist who is a board-certified orthopedic clinical specialist and a certified strength and conditioning specialist. An avid fantasy player, Stephania spent the past two years as a fantasy injury analyst at Rotowire.com and appeared weekly on XM Radio's fantasy sports show.

She is a clinician, author and teacher with extensive experience in the area of orthopedic manual therapy
:unsure:
 
There are currently only 439 tickets available on Stub Hub for Sunday's game. Many times you see anywhere from 1000 to 3000 tickets available a few days before a game.

Prices start at $147/ticket for the last row in the endzone of the upper deck. I believe face value for those seats is $49.

 
Am I the only that isn't buying in to all the Portis doom and gloom?

I could be way wrong, but nothing that has come from the team or Portis leads me to believe he'll be out an extended amount of time. In fact, I have a strong feeling that the chances of him playing Sunday night are better than "50-50".

It just seems like a lot of overreaction to the "Grade II" line Portis threw out. Again, I could be totally wrong on this, but as of now, I'm expecting to see Portis play this week.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top