What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official*** 2009 Washington Redskins Thread (1 Viewer)

The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
Dan Snyder fires Chris Samuels.Dan Snyder fires Chris Cooley.Dan Snyder trades Albert Haynesworth for Jim Sorgi.Cry me a river. The team is owned by Snyder. Get over it.
 
Living near detroit let me clue you in how this sort of thing worked for the Lions. They were trying to supress the fire Millen signs that were carpeting Ford Field. So people brought them in anyway, the media made a bigger deal of pointing them out, and then thy started appearing at UofM games, at MSU games, at Redwings games. It made the matter much much worse.

Trying to take away the fans ability to voice displeasure is just not a good idea. They'll find a way, and it will become a bigger story.
:goodposting: Snyder has a far better chance of actually improving the team than he does of supressing this dissent via censorship, which should tell you something about how futile it all is.
:lmao: "Let's not figure out what the problems are and how to solve them. Let's stop thousands of people from talking publicly about the problems."

Really, unless you have an army and nobody else has one, this idea always fails. It's childish to even attempt it.

 
The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
Dan Snyder fires Chris Samuels.Dan Snyder fires Chris Cooley.Dan Snyder trades Albert Haynesworth for Jim Sorgi.Cry me a river. The team is owned by Snyder. Get over it.
Correct. He owns it. It's not a free speech issue and I don't want to hear people try to take that stance. The attempt to control the fans and media is a stupidity issue - and one that is especially hard to understand given that Snyder made the money to buy the team through a marketing business.
 
This is Lions pt. 2.

The difference is that the Lions are owned by a doddering old man whose son finally talked him into doing the right thing. The Skins are owned by a tyrant who won't listen to any kind of criticism at all.

 
Ted Leonsis, owner of the Washington Capitals, has a blog

So never blame the media for your troubles. Never call one out for saying something provocative - one member of the media said something this weekend about one of our players - rather than respond. We shall disregard and minimize the individual.

Treat them with dignity.

Expand the outlets of media.

Communicate often and directly. Be unfiltered.

Honesty is the best policy.

Transparency is better than no comment.

Be yourself. Be authentic. Don’t be too handled.

Don’t get too high with the highs and too low with the lows.

And just win. The rest will take care of itself.
 
If I owned a team, would I do that to them? I'd hope not. But, cry me a river. You can't wear something like that and expect everything to be just business as usual.
Actually that's exactly what I would expect. You see it all the time at other stadiums (Lions and Millen ring a bell?). I can't even fathom this taking place at a stadium in the US.
The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Correct. He owns it. It's not a free speech issue and I don't want to hear people try to take that stance. The attempt to control the fans and media is a stupidity issue - and one that is especially hard to understand given that Snyder made the money to buy the team through a marketing business.
If it's stupid, why are you and others sticking up so firmly for Snyder's right to do it? Seriously. You can use the exact same reasoning to stop all complaining about the Redskins: they're his team, he has the right to do that. The man's been degrading an entire football operation for 10 years, and there's a need to speak up for his rights to do so?
 
If I owned a team, would I do that to them? I'd hope not. But, cry me a river. You can't wear something like that and expect everything to be just business as usual.
Actually that's exactly what I would expect. You see it all the time at other stadiums (Lions and Millen ring a bell?). I can't even fathom this taking place at a stadium in the US.
The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
:shrug: A stadium is a far more public place for the purposes of expression than is a regular office building.
 
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
 
If I owned a team, would I do that to them? I'd hope not. But, cry me a river. You can't wear something like that and expect everything to be just business as usual. They were given an option to remove their shirts and keep their tickets. They made their choice. Live with it and don't whine when a confrontation, partly created by you, arises.

Should that have happened to those fans? No. But, if something big happens one day, the fans aren't faultless.
So there is a Danny Snyder fan...
 
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
 
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
 
WINNERS

Devin Thomas — Debuted the blond mohawk, caught first career TD.

Albert Haynesworth — ESPN showed a graphic to Chris’ point, that Haynesworth makes teammates better. Bonus: Got a sack of his own.

London Fletcher — Got all kinds of ESPN love and even puked on camera:

Shaun Suisham — Nailed a 47-yarder, is perfect on the season.

Brian Mitchell – Added to the Redskins Ring of Fame, giving him an excuse to wear a ridiculous suit.

LOSERS

Vinny Cerrato — DeSean Jackson, who was also selected in the second round of last year’s draft, made more of an impact in this game than Devin Thomas, Fred Davis and Malcolm Kelly have made in their entire careers.

Chris Cooley — Showed up with this hair, got knocked out for the year.

Jim Zorn — Seemed to be in charge of timeouts, and that was about it.

The O-line — Six sacks, 3.3 yards/carry, two holds on Stephon Heyer, etc.

Carlos Rogers/Chris Horton — Not sure whose fault it was, but they got BURNT on Jackson’s 3rd-and-23 TD.

Antwaan Randle El — The fumbled punt was beyond awful.

MEDIUM

Sherm Lewis — There were no discernible problems with the play calling.

Andre Carter – Lost contain on Jackson’s long TD run, stuffed Michael Vick behind the line and NAILED Donovan McNabb from the blind side.

Jason Campbell –Made some terrible plays, but I’m not sure what people expect from him in this situation. Rebounded to put up strong numbers (29-43, 284 yards, two touchdowns). Also, didn’t get benched!

Fred Davis – Eight catches for 78 yards and a touchdown. Still can’t block.
Link
 
Ted Leonsis, owner of the Washington Capitals, has a blog

So never blame the media for your troubles. Never call one out for saying something provocative - one member of the media said something this weekend about one of our players - rather than respond. We shall disregard and minimize the individual.

Treat them with dignity.

Expand the outlets of media.

Communicate often and directly. Be unfiltered.

Honesty is the best policy.

Transparency is better than no comment.

Be yourself. Be authentic. Don’t be too handled.

Don’t get too high with the highs and too low with the lows.

And just win. The rest will take care of itself.
:goodposting: by Ted. It ain't that hard to figure out.
 
WINNERS

Devin Thomas — Debuted the blond mohawk, caught first career TD.

Albert Haynesworth — ESPN showed a graphic to Chris’ point, that Haynesworth makes teammates better. Bonus: Got a sack of his own.

London Fletcher — Got all kinds of ESPN love and even puked on camera:

Shaun Suisham — Nailed a 47-yarder, is perfect on the season.

Brian Mitchell – Added to the Redskins Ring of Fame, giving him an excuse to wear a ridiculous suit.

LOSERS

Vinny Cerrato — DeSean Jackson, who was also selected in the second round of last year’s draft, made more of an impact in this game than Devin Thomas, Fred Davis and Malcolm Kelly have made in their entire careers.

Chris Cooley — Showed up with this hair, got knocked out for the year.

Jim Zorn — Seemed to be in charge of timeouts, and that was about it.

The O-line — Six sacks, 3.3 yards/carry, two holds on Stephon Heyer, etc.

Carlos Rogers/Chris Horton — Not sure whose fault it was, but they got BURNT on Jackson’s 3rd-and-23 TD.

Antwaan Randle El — The fumbled punt was beyond awful.

MEDIUM

Sherm Lewis — There were no discernible problems with the play calling.

Andre Carter – Lost contain on Jackson’s long TD run, stuffed Michael Vick behind the line and NAILED Donovan McNabb from the blind side.

Jason Campbell –Made some terrible plays, but I’m not sure what people expect from him in this situation. Rebounded to put up strong numbers (29-43, 284 yards, two touchdowns). Also, didn’t get benched!

Fred Davis – Eight catches for 78 yards and a touchdown. Still can’t block.
Link
I love the Mister Irrelevant guys and it's great that we have a good local sports blog like that, but their Jason Campbell love is getting out of control. Medium? Really? Virtually all of his completions and yards came against a defense that was soft because they knew the only way they could lose was by allowing huge plays over the top. A high school quarterback can run up decent numbers against an NFL defense playing with a three-touchdown lead in the second half. They also cite his stats but ignore his fumble numbers (which at this point have crossed the line from bad to surreal), his INT, and his sack numbers- obviously the sacks weren't all his fault, but a good QB gets rid of the ball on at least a couple of those.Anyone who watched the game knows that Campbell wasn't the worst Redskins on the field by a longshot, but he is one of the worst starting QBs in the league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
fatness said:
Maroney=Sped said:
fatness said:
TobiasFunke said:
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
It's definitely feasible with a group paying for it. Here's an example.
 
fatness said:
Maroney=Sped said:
fatness said:
TobiasFunke said:
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
It's definitely feasible with a group paying for it. Here's an example.
Danny would call up the Air Force and they'd scamble some F-16s from Andrews and shot the plane towing the banner down. Probably blame it on the Taliban anyway.
 
fatness said:
Maroney=Sped said:
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
It's definitely feasible with a group paying for it. Here's an example.
Danny would call up the Air Force and they'd scamble some F-16s from Andrews and shot the plane towing the banner down. Probably blame it on the Taliban anyway.
Snyder probably wouldn't have too. Following 9/11, weren't there extra rules and restrictions put in place by the FAA regarding private aircraft in the vicinity of large public venues, such as NFL stadiums?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I owned a team, would I do that to them? I'd hope not. But, cry me a river. You can't wear something like that and expect everything to be just business as usual.
Actually that's exactly what I would expect. You see it all the time at other stadiums (Lions and Millen ring a bell?). I can't even fathom this taking place at a stadium in the US.
The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
You should probably pull it back a bit on the feaux outrage schtick. You're going just a bit over the top. As for the whole "It's his stadium" thing, what's your point? Pretty sure if you want to run a profitable franchise, you need to grow a little thicker skin and mature a little more than your normal six year old who doesn't get his way. In the long run, I really don't think that's going to work out the way he thinks it is. As for your Microsoft example, I'm pretty sure if you dropped $100 on a ticket to walk in the door of Microsoft and Bill Gates himself saw you wearing a shirt that said "Fire Bill Gates," that he seriousy wouldn't give a rats ### and would probably even get a chuckle out of it. I definitely don't think you'd get surrounded by seven security gaurds or whatever it was.I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now. :shrug:
 
fatness said:
Maroney=Sped said:
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
It's definitely feasible with a group paying for it. Here's an example.
Danny would call up the Air Force and they'd scamble some F-16s from Andrews and shot the plane towing the banner down. Probably blame it on the Taliban anyway.
Snyder probably wouldn't have too. Following 9/11, weren't there extra rules and restrictions put in place by the FAA regarding private aircraft in the vicinity of large public venues, such as NFL stadiums?
I've seen airplanes towing banners around sporting events. It certainly isn't an absolute ban.
 
If I owned a team, would I do that to them? I'd hope not. But, cry me a river. You can't wear something like that and expect everything to be just business as usual.
Actually that's exactly what I would expect. You see it all the time at other stadiums (Lions and Millen ring a bell?). I can't even fathom this taking place at a stadium in the US.
The stadium is owned by Snyder. Get over it. Maybe I'll make a Fire Bill Gates t-shirt and go hang out in Microsoft's headquarters. Since I'm in America, I think that's ok for me to do!
The issue isn't only what Snyder has the right to do, it's also how he exercises that right. Nobody disputes that he can eject fans from the stadium for virtually any reason or no reason at all. The issue is why he has opted to do this based upon pretty mild and even humorous personal attacks. He's a public figure (very much so in the D.C. area) and public figures take criticism. It makes him look thin-skinned, and by the way seems to confirm all the things people criticize him for, to try to censor this. It makes him look like a guy who wants to be out front when times are good, but who wants to hide from negative attention when things aren't going well. To me, in his position you simply take it and do what you can to improve your team, knowing that these things will take care of themselves over time with success. That's what a strong leader does. Dan's not a strong leader - he's a martinet with a big time fear of being inadequate that he wears on his sleeve.
 
I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now.
This really isn't rocket surgery, people. I would say that I'm not sure how so many people are misinterpreting my position, but I've been at FBG far too long to say something like that.It's simple.Danny = childish behaviorFan = childish behavior
 
I feel bad for DC fans. At least the joke of an owner in Oakland has a history and credentials (even if the game passed him by a decade ago). Not to mention he won't be around to continue to embarass and humiliate a once proud franchise for decades to come.

Snyder's petulance, arrogance and patheticness are a terrible combination.

 
Nobody disputes that he can eject fans from the stadium for virtually any reason or no reason at all.
Some do dispute that. Can't remember if anyone here did. But, I've certainly heard it on talk radio. Admittedly, callers on talk radio aren't necessarily representative of the general population.More importantly, where I was coming from is that the fans involved in these issues seem to dispute this. Or, at least, they act as if the situation escalated to where it did ONLY BECAUSE OF SNYDER. That's simply not true.
 
I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now.
This really isn't rocket surgery, people. I would say that I'm not sure how so many people are misinterpreting my position, but I've been at FBG far too long to say something like that.It's simple.Danny = childish behaviorFan = childish behavior
If wearing a shirt like that is childish, thenBooing = childish behaviorCrowd chanting = childish behaviorNegative posts about the Redskins = childish behaviorNews articles about the Redskins ineptitude = childish behavior
 
Nobody disputes that he can eject fans from the stadium for virtually any reason or no reason at all.
Some do dispute that. Can't remember if anyone here did. But, I've certainly heard it on talk radio. Admittedly, callers on talk radio aren't necessarily representative of the general population.More importantly, where I was coming from is that the fans involved in these issues seem to dispute this. Or, at least, they act as if the situation escalated to where it did ONLY BECAUSE OF SNYDER. That's simply not true.
If Snyder didn't send security to remove signs and shirts and to escort people out of the stadium, then they were just Redskin fans voicing their opinions. Which fans will always do.The issue is Snyder having them removed, not the displeasure.
 
I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now.
This really isn't rocket surgery, people. I would say that I'm not sure how so many people are misinterpreting my position, but I've been at FBG far too long to say something like that.It's simple.Danny = childish behaviorFan = childish behavior
If wearing a shirt like that is childish, thenBooing = childish behaviorCrowd chanting = childish behaviorNegative posts about the Redskins = childish behaviorNews articles about the Redskins ineptitude = childish behavior
I never said wearing the shirt was childish behavior.
 
Snyder's petulance, arrogance and patheticness are a terrible combination.
And yet if he hires a good GM in the offseason, who then hires a good coach and begins to rebuild the team, Snyder will be at least partly forgiven right away by fans. The only good thing about this terrible season is the national scrutiny on the team, finally. It must be torture on Snyder. And that is a good thing. He'll want to avoid this in the future.
 
I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now.
This really isn't rocket surgery, people. I would say that I'm not sure how so many people are misinterpreting my position, but I've been at FBG far too long to say something like that.It's simple.

Danny = childish behavior

Fan = childish behavior
If wearing a shirt like that is childish, thenBooing = childish behavior

Crowd chanting = childish behavior

Negative posts about the Redskins = childish behavior

News articles about the Redskins ineptitude = childish behavior
I never said wearing the shirt was childish behavior.
How about you just tell us what you're saying regarding that "childish behavior" by fans, rather than what you're not saying...
 
Snyder's petulance, arrogance and patheticness are a terrible combination.
And yet if he hires a good GM in the offseason, who then hires a good coach and begins to rebuild the team, Snyder will be at least partly forgiven right away by fans. The only good thing about this terrible season is the national scrutiny on the team, finally. It must be torture on Snyder. And that is a good thing. He'll want to avoid this in the future.
Trouble is, I'm not sure he knows how or is disciplined or mature enough to do it even if he figures it out.
 
I have to admit, I really can't fathom anyone defending this behavior. Adults acting like spoiled children, I guess it's what passes for normal now.
This really isn't rocket surgery, people. I would say that I'm not sure how so many people are misinterpreting my position, but I've been at FBG far too long to say something like that.It's simple.

Danny = childish behavior

Fan = childish behavior
If wearing a shirt like that is childish, thenBooing = childish behavior

Crowd chanting = childish behavior

Negative posts about the Redskins = childish behavior

News articles about the Redskins ineptitude = childish behavior
I never said wearing the shirt was childish behavior.
How about you just tell us what you're saying regarding that "childish behavior" by fans, rather than what you're not saying...
I have said it...I think...If I haven't, I apologize.Refusing to remove the shirt (or get rid of a sign or whatever) when told to do so by the Redskins on the Redskins' property and then acting like you're some patriot for fighting the good fight is childish in my opinion. I heard the shirt guy on The Sports Junkies today. The way he told the story, it escalated to where it did because he refused to remove the shirt. He demanded to see written policy. But, hey, if the thinks that worth being hauled off, then so be it. I just think it's childish.

And, apparently, according to most of those here, that makes me a Snyder Lover. I'm done with this topic. Sorry if I derailed this thread for a day. It's not that big of a deal to me and I've spent more time on it that I expected to. Back to football.

 
fatness said:
Maroney=Sped said:
fatness said:
TobiasFunke said:
This is a false analogy. Nobody is walking into the team's Ashburn headquarters with signs and t-shirt, nor would anyone claim that Snyder and friends would be in the wrong if they threw such a person out on their rear end. A stadium is totally different from a company's headquarters.
The next step will be trying to stop the "Sell the Team" and "Fire Vinnie" chants during games.
Anyone willing to chip in on a "SELL THE TEAM, DANNY" airplane banner?
What does something like that cost?
It's definitely feasible with a group paying for it. Here's an example.
50 people with 10 bucks each could get this done?I'm in.

I want the man terribly uncomfortable for the rest of the season. It's the best hope to improve my team.

 
I've seen airplanes towing banners around sporting events. It certainly isn't an absolute ban.
I haven't seen that in DC in many, many years. Pretty sure I haven't seen it since 9/11.I think fans just showing up to the game but hanging out in the parking lot would be a pretty powerful scene.
 
I've seen airplanes towing banners around sporting events. It certainly isn't an absolute ban.
I haven't seen that in DC in many, many years. Pretty sure I haven't seen it since 9/11.I think fans just showing up to the game but hanging out in the parking lot would be a pretty powerful scene.
Maybe it's different around D.C., which makes sense for obvious reasons, but it's certainly not a national ban. Last Saturday there were multiple banner-towing planes flying around a full L.A. Coliseum for the USC game.
 
Re: plane banner (Won't let me quote the post. Too many quote blocks. I tired of trying to edit)

What would a banner like that being trying to accomplish exactly? Do you want Snyder to sell the team? Do you think he'll read it and go, "these guys make a good point. Vinny, put the team on craiglist."

Or do you want to do a "Frie Vinny" banner? Snyder is already going to fire Vinny. It is pointless.

Dan hired a below average GM in Vinny. It didn't work. Time for another try. Vinny-Gibbs team gave it their best, then Vinny by himself took a crack at it. He has let them all play their course as he should. Firing Vinny last year would have been too early. At the end of this year and tied to his coaching hire's success is the right time, and it will be done.

No need to be so dramatic guys.

 
Re: plane banner (Won't let me quote the post. Too many quote blocks. I tired of trying to edit)What would a banner like that being trying to accomplish exactly? Do you want Snyder to sell the team? Do you think he'll read it and go, "these guys make a good point. Vinny, put the team on craiglist."
It would make Snyder more uncomfortable and more embarrassed, at both the team's condition and the fan reaction (and media coverage of both of those). Why do you want him insulated from that?
 
Re: plane banner (Won't let me quote the post. Too many quote blocks. I tired of trying to edit)What would a banner like that being trying to accomplish exactly? Do you want Snyder to sell the team? Do you think he'll read it and go, "these guys make a good point. Vinny, put the team on craiglist."
It would make Snyder more uncomfortable and more embarrassed, at both the team's condition and the fan reaction (and media coverage of both of those). Why do you want him insulated from that?
It's also something he can't censor. Speaking of which, how about a "CENSOR THIS, DAN!" banner?
 
Re: plane banner (Won't let me quote the post. Too many quote blocks. I tired of trying to edit)What would a banner like that being trying to accomplish exactly? Do you want Snyder to sell the team? Do you think he'll read it and go, "these guys make a good point. Vinny, put the team on craiglist."
It would make Snyder more uncomfortable and more embarrassed, at both the team's condition and the fan reaction (and media coverage of both of those). Why do you want him insulated from that?
I don't think any more can be done. We get way more attention than a 2-5 team should already. Everyone knows what the problem is and everyone knows it will try to be fixed after the season. No need to keep the self-serving drama spotlight on us for 2+ more months.No one has anything to say about Garcia or Booty coming in? I don't like having a lame duck QB. All Campbell is doing at this point is auditioning for his next job. Collins serves no purpose. What else can we do? Two more random Skins thoughts:1. I really want to like Danny Smith, but he keeps putting El back to return punts!!! He is making it very hard for me to hope he comes back next year.2. Where did all this Jerry Gray talk come from? To me this guy is part of the problem. He has not done well in my eyes as a postion coach. A few weeks ago someone says he might be the best guy for the interim job, the rest of the media keep bringing him up, and there is talk that he could be our next defensive coordinator? Who does this guy have doing his PR?
 
Transcript of Cerrato's PC yesterday:

Are you surprised by the lack of production of the backup offensive linemen?

"I think when you look at the -- Are you talking about all the sacks and stuff?"

Yeah, I'm talking about everything.

"Such as?"

Sacks, no pass protection, many players today said you guys didn't address the line, you knew it was a problem and you didn't address it, people have said it's one of the worst lines in the league. All that.

"Who's people around the league?"

People on other teams, commentators on TV, say you haven't addressed the line.

"We tried to address the line. We added Dockery, we added Mike Williams. When we were in the draft there was nobody at 13 worthy of it. Are you having the results you wanted? No, we don't want to have sacks. If it was Chris Samuels and Randy Thomas in there would it be better? Absolutely. If you lose a Pro Bowler it's definitely going to drop off. I guess where we're standing right now, to have more depth, that would be great."

Is it too early to say this is going to be the main target going into the offseason?

"It's too early to tell."

Did you think the depth was acceptable?

"Look at the depth around the league. Nobody has a pro bowler to back up a pro bowler. Look at Philadelphia last week when Jason Peters went out and they had six sacks against the Raiders. When you lose some quality people there is a dropoff. I'm not making excuses."

You had to think you wouldn't get 16 games out of Chris Samuels and Randy Thomas.

"Chris Samuels has been -- With Randy we anticipated not going 16 games. We anticipated that part."
:lmao:
 
No one has anything to say about Garcia or Booty coming in? I don't like having a lame duck QB.
Anyone put behind center from now until the end of the season will be a lame duck QB. Next year's QB will come from the draft or an offseason trade.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hall of Fame receiver Steve Largent thinks that the Redskins have been trying to get his former teammate, Jim Zorn, to quit his job as head coach of the team.

It now appears that Zorn might be throwing caution to the wind in the hopes of being fired.

On Tuesday, executive V.P. of football operations Vinny Cerrato defended his work while also throwing Zorn a little deeper into the undercarriage of the bus. Specifically, Cerrato says he thinks he gave Zorn a roster with sufficient talent to make it to the playoffs.

Though Zorn hasn't spilled strawberry sauce on Sammy Baugh's uniform (yet), the second-year coach tempted a fate he might welcome in responding to Cerrato's statement.

"If we've got a playoff roster, we'll earn the right to be in the playoffs," Zorn said during a Wednesday radio appearance, per Ryan O'Halloran of the Washington Times.
PFT
 
Firing Vinny last year would have been too early.
:unsure:Vinny has been part of player personnel decisions for as long as he's been employed by Snyder. Last year would have been about 8 years too late.
He was never THE guy until Gibbs left. I agree he had done enough to not get the job, but once Snyder decided to let him have the full reigns after Gibbs left he need to give him more than a year to put something together. Synder gave him enough rope. Vinny took his time, but he finally tied that up into a nice, tight, noose. At least Vinny will leave behind:OrakpoJarmonHorton (despite some troubles I think he is still developing into a quality starter)DoughtyMarkoFletcherHaynesworthI know that is a very short list, but I do like those guys. Hall and McIntosh might work out as well. I am really dissapointed in Rockyt this year. I thought this would be his break out year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top