What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (1 Viewer)

Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...

 
Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...
:lmao:

 
Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...
Croatia's goal, they both had a chance for the ball. No foul.

Again, to me- it looked like RVP wasn't getting anywhere near that ball- so it's a foul.

 
Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...
Croatia's goal, they both had a chance for the ball. No foul.

Again, to me- it looked like RVP wasn't getting anywhere near that ball- so it's a foul.
not sure the keeper was getting anywhere near it either though.

 
Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...
Croatia's goal, they both had a chance for the ball. No foul.

Again, to me- it looked like RVP wasn't getting anywhere near that ball- so it's a foul.
not sure the keeper was getting anywhere near it either though.
Well, not with a shoulder in the gut he wasn't...

 
Sorry that is a foul on Van Persie
Wow, 9 times out of 10 they call a foul on that type of play.

Ugly goal :)
hmmmm... to my eyes, RVP has no chance at that- IMO, he fouled the GK.
Touching the keeper is not a foul! Finally a no call on that. A challenge is a challenge and if its legal it doesnt matter if its vs the keeper. Keeper has his hands and needs to go up stronger

Just like Croatia's goal that was wrongly disallowed...
Pretty hard to get to the ball when you are getting rammed in the ribs and knocked back in the 6 yard box - I play keeper and you get that call all the time unless Stevie Wonder is your referee

 
It could have been called, sure. I'm still a believer in keepers really owning their box. I had few virtues as a keeper, but strikers challenging me in the six yard box regretted it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top