*** Official 2015 College Football Thread *** (3 Viewers)

[bentley]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

I didn't realize that I was a WVU blogger since you continue to use "you guys." See, in the non-conference honk world, we don't refer to everyone that covers or is a fan of any single team in the entire conference "you guys." I know that's tough to understand for a dim bulb such as yourself.Also, nobody said $30 million per team. Somewhere in the low $20s was mentioned. I realized you're detached from reality, but you're off by a factor of 50%.

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

 

[fasteddie_21]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...

1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

2. Oklahoma should have dropped. They simply did not look good at all in any facet and struggled to be a team they should have run off the field.

3. West Virginia is underrated. I think that team is one to be reckoned with this season. I think Texas, in particular, is in for a rude awakening on Oct 6th. They seem to handle the Cowboys pretty well and WVU is their trap game before the OU game.

4. Texas is overrated. They will get exposed for what they are in their typical October fashion. They ramble through a bunch of no-names in September and to their fans' surprise each October get run out of the building by someone (this year it'll be WVU and/or OU).

5. Michigan is ranked properly now.

6. Funny enough, after the little noticed victory over the University of Houston, Texas State University garnered some AP attention after their first D1 game ever. The rankings of the D1 Texas schools currently sit at the following in the AP poll:

1. Texas (17th)

2. TCU (20th)

3. Baylor (30th)

3. Texas State (34th)

5. Texas A&M (37th)

4. Texas Tech, UH, SMU, UTEP (unranked)

They never should have been there to begin with. I don't think they are as bad as they looked in El Paso. But they sure aren't a Top 5 team this year. If they lose fewer than 3 games they'll be lucky.

I agree with this, but that's completely due to injuries. You guys got hammered w/ the injury stick early and often :(

 

[fasteddie_21]

6. Funny enough, after the little noticed victory over the University of Houston, Texas State University garnered some AP attention after their first D1 game ever. The rankings of the D1 Texas schools currently sit at the following in the AP poll:

1. Texas (17th)

2. TCU (20th)

3. Baylor (30th)

3. Texas State (34th)

5. Texas A&M (37th)

4. Texas Tech, UH, SMU, UTEP (unranked)

To be fair, Texas State got one rogue vote at No. 16, from the same pollster who jumped Michigan State from No. 22 to No. 5, and who dropped West Virginia after hanging 69 on Marshall.Ratto's ballot

Big Lead is tracking the AP vote weekly: Link

Yeah can't imagine what's wrong w/ voting for the teams to play in the MNC. Thanks for that link. Anxious to rip my hair out weekly following that.

 

[gump]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

Alabama shouldn't have been #2 to begin with. I think it was due to laziness and wanting to do something different than voting Alabama -LSU at the top.

 

[JaxBill]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

Alabama shouldn't have been #2 to begin with. I think it was due to laziness and wanting to do something different than voting Alabama -LSU at the top.

To me, the leapfrog points out how ridiculous the whole idea of a preseason poll is. IMO, they shouldn't put out a poll until after Week 4, when you're pretty much guaranteed that every team has played at least one conference game.

 

[gump]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

Alabama shouldn't have been #2 to begin with. I think it was due to laziness and wanting to do something different than voting Alabama -LSU at the top.

To me, the leapfrog points out how ridiculous the whole idea of a preseason poll is. IMO, they shouldn't put out a poll until after Week 4, when you're pretty much guaranteed that every team has played at least one conference game.

No doubt...but while they're there...might as well argue about em. I was glad to see writers change their mind and admit their mistake instead of blindly sticking with the initial vote.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

Right. You jump in an ACC thread attacking me. You start attacking me here. And I'm the one ####ting in a thread. Good one, jackass

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

You are the definition of obtuse. I mean you're turning into a complete in these threads, now I know why they hate you so much in those ACC threads.

I'm the trainwreck after you made a complete ### of yourself about expansion? I'm obtuse when you still don't realize why four good programs couldn't get out of that mess called the Big 12 fast enough and no one but WVU and TCU is interested in joining? I don't care if you like me on the internet but if you going to act like a dickbag in every thread then expect to get called out when you make an ### of yourself.

 

[Slapdash]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

You are the definition of obtuse. I mean you're turning into a complete in these threads, now I know why they hate you so much in those ACC threads.

They weren't calling him ACCHUCKS for nothing...

 

[Moe.]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...

1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

2. Oklahoma should have dropped. They simply did not look good at all in any facet and struggled to be a team they should have run off the field.

3. West Virginia is underrated. I think that team is one to be reckoned with this season. I think Texas, in particular, is in for a rude awakening on Oct 6th. They seem to handle the Cowboys pretty well and WVU is their trap game before the OU game.

4. Texas is overrated. They will get exposed for what they are in their typical October fashion. They ramble through a bunch of no-names in September and to their fans' surprise each October get run out of the building by someone (this year it'll be WVU and/or OU).

5. Michigan is ranked properly now.

6. Funny enough, after the little noticed victory over the University of Houston, Texas State University garnered some AP attention after their first D1 game ever. The rankings of the D1 Texas schools currently sit at the following in the AP poll:

1. Texas (17th)

2. TCU (20th)

3. Baylor (30th)

3. Texas State (34th)

5. Texas A&M (37th)

4. Texas Tech, UH, SMU, UTEP (unranked)

They never should have been there to begin with. I don't think they are as bad as they looked in El Paso. But they sure aren't a Top 5 team this year. If they lose fewer than 3 games they'll be lucky.

Have to agree. 10-2 or 9-3 seems most likely to me.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

You are the definition of obtuse. I mean you're turning into a complete in these threads, now I know why they hate you so much in those ACC threads.

They weren't calling him ACCHUCKS for nothing...

They = Bentley? Name the ACC teams I openly cheer for.

 

[GeauxTigers]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

I agree with this statement. Bama looked very good against a poor passing team. Bama's secondary is very suspect. LSU will throw all over them and so will Arkansas. I think Bama loses to Ark and LSU and possibly Tenn. That Sunseri guy is a liability in coverage.

 

[GeauxTigers]

Do you root for 14 teams at once?

Here is my order of rooting:- LSU- All SEC teams- Texas (my wife's alma mater)- all teams south of the mason dixon line and east of the Mississippi riverDon't care about the rest

How did you deal with last year's NC game? Half-sad, half-happy?

Pissed because LSU played like ####.

 

[GeauxTigers]

Do you root for 14 teams at once?

Here is my order of rooting:- LSU- All SEC teams- Texas (my wife's alma mater)- all teams south of the mason dixon line and east of the Mississippi riverDon't care about the rest

So you root for 1/4 of the country? Way to go out on a limb there, chief.

No, I root for "southern" teams...but in the order I described. It's boring to watch a game and not care who wins.

 

[Moe.]

Do we really have to do the conference stuff in every single thread? Holy crap people. There's nothing wrong with rooting from teams for your region/conference in games in which you don't have a rooting interest. It's actually pretty common. Please get over it. There's also nothing wrong with rooting for those same teams to lose. It's really not a big deal either way. I don't think anyone is living and dying with their non-favorite teams from their confer. I guess it's just a sore subject on this board because LHUCKS has been such a strong dbag about it for so long or something.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

You are the definition of obtuse. I mean you're turning into a complete in these threads, now I know why they hate you so much in those ACC threads.

They weren't calling him ACCHUCKS for nothing...

Yeah he's killing it in here also. Guess we are headed for four months of this stuff, I pity all of us.

 

[MAC_32]

Do we really have to do the conference stuff in every single thread? Holy crap people. There's nothing wrong with rooting from teams for your region/conference in games in which you don't have a rooting interest. It's actually pretty common. Please get over it. There's also nothing wrong with rooting for those same teams to lose. It's really not a big deal either way. I don't think anyone is living and dying with their non-favorite teams from their confer. I guess it's just a sore subject on this board because LHUCKS has been such a strong dbag about it for so long or something.

I love college football, so much that I have learned to gloss over the petty conference vs. conference BS. It's created by the system, glorified by the media, and turns fans into idiots. Sometimes ignoring the idiots is the best solution.

 

[roadkill1292]

It's boring to watch a game and not care who wins.

You don't like football enough.

 

[gump]

My initial thoughts on the week 2 AP poll...1. I think the voters are giving Alabama too much credit for the win. I just don't think Michigan is or was ever a top 10 team. The movement of them to #1 by the margin that they have is surprising given that notion but also not surprising seeing as the voters automatically want to play into the SEC superiority.

I agree with this statement. Bama looked very good against a poor passing team. Bama's secondary is very suspect. LSU will throw all over them and so will Arkansas. I think Bama loses to Ark and LSU and possibly Tenn. That Sunseri guy is a liability in coverage.

Arky wll be great test for the Pass D. i also expect a different, more aggressive scheme.

 

[GeauxTigers]

It's boring to watch a game and not care who wins.

You don't like football enough.

Oh, I bet to differ. I LOVE football. I have 3 fantasy NFL teams, play in 2 online NCAAFootball Dynasties and have a Madden Connected Careers.

 

[GeauxTigers]

LSU -23.5 vs. Washington

I think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

 

[MAC_32]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

 

[GeauxTigers]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

I hope you are right but I'm still worried. Lot of question marks for the Tigers. Zach is still inexperienced and so is our secondary and LBs.

 

[GDogg]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

Maybe. Washington's defense should be much improved. They brought in highly-regarded DC Justin Wilcox this year. They have some defensive talent, but the schemes were awful.On the flip side, Washington's offense did not look good at all against San Diego St.I don't think Washington puts up many points on LSU, but I also don't think LSU hangs 40 on the Huskies. I wouldn't be shocked if they did, but I don't think they'll "have no problem" putting up 40+. I could see a 30-10 type win for LSU.

 

[ATC1]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

Maybe. Washington's defense should be much improved. They brought in highly-regarded DC Justin Wilcox this year. They have some defensive talent, but the schemes were awful.On the flip side, Washington's offense did not look good at all against San Diego St.I don't think Washington puts up many points on LSU, but I also don't think LSU hangs 40 on the Huskies. I wouldn't be shocked if they did, but I don't think they'll "have no problem" putting up 40+. I could see a 30-10 type win for LSU.

While at TENN Wilcox put 8 in the box and dared LSU to throw the ball. Les being Les refused to stop running the ball. Now it was probably out of necessity since J. Lee was QB. By the 2nd half the TENN defense was gassed. Don't think Washington's front 7 is good enough not to put 8 in the box. Miles will either open up the passing offense up or be hell bent on running the ball. What he decides will say a lot in if he thinks Zach is ready to lead LSU in times where they have to rely on the passing game (Bama).

 

[MAC_32]

Looking forward to seeing Ray Graham in action tonight Interesting on a short week coming off a loss to a 1-AA team though...

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Looking forward to seeing Ray Graham in action tonight Interesting on a short week coming off a loss to a 1-AA team though...

usatoday preview:Surface: ArtificialCovers.com line: Cincinnati by 3½Sagarin difference: Cincinnati by 10.99The Paul Chryst era at Pittsburgh got off to a rocky start with a 31-17 home loss to Youngstown State in what was supposed to be a tuneup for this key Big East clash. The Bearcats, whose spread attack has similarities to Youngstown State's, hope to exploit the same holes in the Panthers' defensive front and keep LB Shane Gordon busy. But UC will have a lot of new faces in the backfield. QB Munchie Legaux has starting experience and retained the job in camp. His primary ballhandlers figure to be RB George Winn and WR Kenbrell Thompkins. Pitt will need RBs Ray Graham and Isaac Bennett to control the clock to help their defense. Bearcats DE Walter Stewart, moving up from linebacker, and CB Dominique Battle, returning from major knee surgery, hope to make Pitt QB Tino Sunseri's night difficult. Contributing: Compiled by Eddie Timanus. Jeff Sagarin's power ratings show relative strength of teams; 3 points were added to the home team's rating to calculate the difference.

 

[MAC_32]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

Maybe. Washington's defense should be much improved. They brought in highly-regarded DC Justin Wilcox this year. They have some defensive talent, but the schemes were awful.On the flip side, Washington's offense did not look good at all against San Diego St.I don't think Washington puts up many points on LSU, but I also don't think LSU hangs 40 on the Huskies. I wouldn't be shocked if they did, but I don't think they'll "have no problem" putting up 40+. I could see a 30-10 type win for LSU.

Not saying we're right, but Bruce Feldman's pick is just about exactly what I see happeninghttp://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/bruce-feldman/20077314/this-weekends-picks-and-notes-from-coast-to-coastLSU 42, Washington 21: Keith Price is really good, but his O-line will be overmatched against the Tigers' front, especially in Death Valley.

 

[shader]

Do we really have to do the conference stuff in every single thread? Holy crap people. There's nothing wrong with rooting from teams for your region/conference in games in which you don't have a rooting interest. It's actually pretty common. Please get over it. There's also nothing wrong with rooting for those same teams to lose. It's really not a big deal either way. I don't think anyone is living and dying with their non-favorite teams from their confer. I guess it's just a sore subject on this board because LHUCKS has been such a strong dbag about it for so long or something.

I agree.I am the rare SEC fan who loves it when conference foes get beat. I have some fellow SEC fans that get mad at me and say that it's bad for the SEC, but who cares. Seeing Auburn try to setup their own out of conference showdown in the Georgia Dome, (only to get upstaged by Bama-Michigan in Dallas) and then to lose that game was priceless.

 

[GDogg]

LSU -23.5 vs. WashingtonI think that spread is a little high. Washington has a great passing game and LSU's secondary is very young, starting 1 true freshman at CB and another freshman at the nickel. I'm a little nervous about this game.

In Baton Rouge at night? You'll be fine. Maybe Washington put up 20 or 24, but you'll have no problem putting up 40+

Maybe. Washington's defense should be much improved. They brought in highly-regarded DC Justin Wilcox this year. They have some defensive talent, but the schemes were awful.On the flip side, Washington's offense did not look good at all against San Diego St.I don't think Washington puts up many points on LSU, but I also don't think LSU hangs 40 on the Huskies. I wouldn't be shocked if they did, but I don't think they'll "have no problem" putting up 40+. I could see a 30-10 type win for LSU.

Not saying we're right, but Bruce Feldman's pick is just about exactly what I see happeninghttp://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/bruce-feldman/20077314/this-weekends-picks-and-notes-from-coast-to-coastLSU 42, Washington 21: Keith Price is really good, but his O-line will be overmatched against the Tigers' front, especially in Death Valley.

I never said that it wouldn't happen (in fact, I said I wouldn't be shocked if it did), but I don't think they "will have no problem" putting up 40+. A projected score of 42 doesn't seem like an automatic 40+ to me, but I admit that we may have different definitions of "no problem."I watched UW against San Diego St. (my guess is most fans of SEC schools did not). I think they'll have big problems scoring against LSU.

 

[GDogg]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

I didn't realize that I was a WVU blogger since you continue to use "you guys." See, in the non-conference honk world, we don't refer to everyone that covers or is a fan of any single team in the entire conference "you guys." I know that's tough to understand for a dim bulb such as yourself.Also, nobody said $30 million per team. Somewhere in the low $20s was mentioned. I realized you're detached from reality, but you're off by a factor of 50%.

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

You and Christo are spot on:Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN

Big 12, ABC/ESPN & Fox will announce 13-year media rights deal Friday worth $2.6B, worth $20M per school, sources told @ESPN.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

I didn't realize that I was a WVU blogger since you continue to use "you guys." See, in the non-conference honk world, we don't refer to everyone that covers or is a fan of any single team in the entire conference "you guys." I know that's tough to understand for a dim bulb such as yourself.Also, nobody said $30 million per team. Somewhere in the low $20s was mentioned. I realized you're detached from reality, but you're off by a factor of 50%.

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

You and Christo are spot on:Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN

Big 12, ABC/ESPN & Fox will announce 13-year media rights deal Friday worth $2.6B, worth $20M per school, sources told @ESPN.

Yes, $20M is about what was expected. The "bloggers" everyone was quoting all along was saying $25M or $30M a year and that FSU/Clemson would take the extra $10M/year. It's only $3M/year per school which isn't going to cause anyone to look because they would lose that $3M easily in travel costs for the entire athletic department.

 

[Glass Joe]

Do you root for 14 teams at once?

Here is my order of rooting:- LSU- All SEC teams- Texas (my wife's alma mater)- all teams south of the mason dixon line and east of the Mississippi riverDon't care about the rest

So you root for 1/4 of the country? Way to go out on a limb there, chief.

No, I root for "southern" teams...

Seriously - why? Is this a civil war inferiority-type thing?

 

[Christo]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

I didn't realize that I was a WVU blogger since you continue to use "you guys." See, in the non-conference honk world, we don't refer to everyone that covers or is a fan of any single team in the entire conference "you guys." I know that's tough to understand for a dim bulb such as yourself.Also, nobody said $30 million per team. Somewhere in the low $20s was mentioned. I realized you're detached from reality, but you're off by a factor of 50%.

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

You and Christo are spot on:Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN

Big 12, ABC/ESPN & Fox will announce 13-year media rights deal Friday worth $2.6B, worth $20M per school, sources told @ESPN.

Yes, $20M is about what was expected. The "bloggers" everyone was quoting all along was saying $25M or $30M a year and that FSU/Clemson would take the extra $10M/year. It's only $3M/year per school which isn't going to cause anyone to look because they would lose that $3M easily in travel costs for the entire athletic department.

I just hate to break it to you but you are arguing against the wind here. I'm not aware of anyone here who threw around the $30MM figure and said FSU or Clemson would come running. As a matter of fact, I'm on record saying I would like the Big 12 to add Louisville and Cincinnati to get back to 12.

 

[Raider Nation]

What an appalling lack of effort by PITT's "defense"...

 

[The Ref]

What an appalling lack of effort by PITT's "defense"...

Lets see how it goes here, but Pitt may be added to the fade list for the rest of the season. Fumble!

 

[JaxBill]

I think they should have switched up games this weekend.

FSU takes on Cincy

Savannah State runs roughshod over Pitt

 

[Raider Nation]

Just getting WAXED! Pitt never got off the bus.

 

[The Ref]

What an appalling lack of effort by PITT's "defense"...

Look at that. Pitt just stoped Winn for 4 yards. He is down to an average 30 yards everytime he touches the ball.

 

[bentley]

Christo - I thought FSU/Clemson would come and that it would be about $20m per team + the extra payout from the CCG. I still suspect that the Big 12 may have bungled that waiting for ND and/or trying to weasel out of the Louisville commitment.

Nobody said $30m and I'm pretty sure studies at the time showed that the additional travel costs would be less than any additional payout.

What we really need is for someone to quit creating false backstories and just let it go.

 

[bentley]

The RV tailgate lots here open at 7 pm on Thursdays. I think I'm going to take the bus down and start tailgating tonight. Is this Pitt mess the only game on tonight?

 

[JaxBill]

The RV tailgate lots here open at 7 pm on Thursdays. I think I'm going to take the bus down and start tailgating tonight. Is this Pitt mess the only game on tonight?

Bowie STate vs Benedict is on CBSSports. They're probably more evenly matched.

 

[Christo]

This is downright embarrassing. Pitt fans must be pining for Wanny.

 

[Osaurus]

Munchie.

 

[JaxBill]

Pitt's defense held the Bearcats to 58 yards that drive.

Jesse Palmer "That's a win for Pitt's defense".

 

[Raider Nation]

This game makes me miss the NHL even more.

 

[Ramblin Wreck]

Great job of going out of your way to prove my point, professor. Find me one instance of Christo or I saying anything about a 30 million dollar tv contract.

No ####. It's $2.6 billion.

30 million per team per year. You know the numbers all the WVU bloggers and Dr D-Bag here were posting that FSU would be begging to get.

I didn't realize that I was a WVU blogger since you continue to use "you guys." See, in the non-conference honk world, we don't refer to everyone that covers or is a fan of any single team in the entire conference "you guys." I know that's tough to understand for a dim bulb such as yourself.Also, nobody said $30 million per team. Somewhere in the low $20s was mentioned. I realized you're detached from reality, but you're off by a factor of 50%.

Further, you insist on ####ting all over any actual college football conversation in this thread.

You and Christo are spot on:Brett McMurphy ‏@McMurphyESPN

Big 12, ABC/ESPN & Fox will announce 13-year media rights deal Friday worth $2.6B, worth $20M per school, sources told @ESPN.

Yes, $20M is about what was expected. The "bloggers" everyone was quoting all along was saying $25M or $30M a year and that FSU/Clemson would take the extra $10M/year. It's only $3M/year per school which isn't going to cause anyone to look because they would lose that $3M easily in travel costs for the entire athletic department.

I just hate to break it to you but you are arguing against the wind here. I'm not aware of anyone here who threw around the $30MM figure and said FSU or Clemson would come running. As a matter of fact, I'm on record saying I would like the Big 12 to add Louisville and Cincinnati to get back to 12.

Not arguing with anyone and didn't quote you either. I even said the "bloggers". To be specific Chip Brown and the guy from WV that calls himself The Dude. They were throwing around those kind of numbers all spring to encite the FSU crowd. Cappy certainly took the bait, for example.

 

[Christo]

Munchie.

 

[JaxBill]

LOL

 

[Parrothead]

OOF.. I considered taking Pitt and the points..

SOOOOO glad I reconsidered! Pitt stinks :X